Hong Kong releases ‘LEAP’ framework for digital assets

Hong Kong's spot Bitcoin exchange-traded funds (ETFs) encountered their second day of net outflows since their launch on April 30. According to data published by crypto trading data platform SoSo Value, in excess of 90 BTC exited the Hong Kong ETFs on May 9. The data indicated that China Asset Management's spot Bitcoin ETF observed an outflow of 80.16 BTC, while the Bosera HashKey Bitcoin ETF recorded a lesser outflow of 10 BTC. Meanwhile, Hong Kong’s third spot Bitcoin ETF offered by Harvest Global registered zero flows.Photo by Dmytro Demidko on UnsplashThese daily net outflows follow a trend of net inflows that had developed in the preceding days, with the three ETFs collectively witnessing net inflows of 101.6 BTC on Wednesday and 99.99 BTC on Tuesday. As of Thursday, the three ETFs, managed by ChinaAMC, Harvest Global and Bosera with HashKey, held approximately 4,260 Bitcoin, with total net assets reaching $261.45 million, marking an increase from $247.7 million on the first day of trading. The total trading volume for the three ETFs amounted to $2.06 million on Thursday, a decline from $2.67 million the day prior and a significant drop from the $9.74 million recorded on April 30, according to SosoValue data. This recent outflow represents the second day of net outflows from these products since their launch on April 30.   The initial day of outflows occurred on May 6, with 75.36 BTC flowing out of the products. This marked the first setback for Hong Kong's Bitcoin ETFs following their launch on April 30.  The outflows on that occasion primarily stemmed from the China Asset Management Bitcoin ETF, while other Hong Kong-based products saw no flows. Potential Stock Connect additionMany commentators had expected these Hong Kong-based products to see inflows from mainland China. While that hasn’t materialized yet, Harvest Global CEO Han Tongli said that he doesn’t rule out the addition of its Bitcoin and Ether ETF products to Stock Connect.  Shanghai Hong Kong Stock Connect is a cross border investment channel that would open access to these products to investors that ordinarily invest in and trade products and equities listed within the Shanghai Stock Exchange (SSEC). Tongli made the suggestion to the South China Morning Post (SCMP)  while attending the Bitcoin Asia conference. He suggested that such an addition is a possibility if all goes smoothly over the course of the next two years. U.S. product outflowsIn the U.S., spot Bitcoin ETFs also saw net outflows on Thursday, amounting to $11.29 million. Farside data indicates that the Grayscale Bitcoin Trust (GBTC) witnessed a substantial $43.4 million redemption, marking its largest single-day outflow since May 2, totaling $17.5 billion in outflows overall. BlackRock’s IBIT has now accumulated $15.4 billion in total inflows. Additionally, other top-performing ETFs — Bitwise (BITB), Fidelity (FBTC) and ARK (ARKB) — also experienced inflows. In total, U.S. ETFs have witnessed $11.7 billion in cumulative net inflows.

Singapore High Court Recognizes Cryptocurrency as Personal PropertyIn a significant ruling on July 25, Judge Philip Jeyaretnam of the High Court of Singapore declared that cryptocurrency is capable of being held in trust and should be recognized as property.The judge’s decision came in response to a case brought by Dubai-headquartered crypto exchange Bybit against its former employee, Ho Kai Xin, who was accused of transferring approximately 4.2 million Tether (USDT) from the crypto exchange to her private accounts without authorization.Photo by Tingey Injury Law Firm on UnsplashNo fundamental differenceIn his ruling, Judge Jeyaretnam emphasized that there is no fundamental difference between cryptocurrencies, fiat money, or even physical objects like shells when it comes to their status as property. He argued that as long as these objects hold value and are based on mutual faith, they can be considered property. The judge’s verdict is seen as a crucial step in establishing the legal status of digital assets within the Singaporean jurisdiction.Addressing the argument that cryptocurrencies lack physical presence and therefore cannot be considered property, Judge Jeyaretnam drew an analogy, stating: “We identify what is going on as a particular digital token, somewhat like how we give a name to a river even though the water contained within its banks is constantly changing.” By equating cryptocurrencies to named entities, the judge made it clear that physical tangibility is not a prerequisite for something to be classified as property.Cryptocurrencies have valueFurthermore, the ruling challenges the perception that cryptocurrencies have no “real” value. Judge Jeyaretnam firmly refuted this notion, highlighting that the value of any asset, whether physical or digital, is ultimately determined by collective human belief and judgment.One critical classification made by the judge is grouping cryptocurrencies under the category of “things in action” within British common law. This categorization means that cryptocurrencies are considered a form of property, over which personal rights can be claimed and enforced through legal actions, rather than requiring physical possession.The judge’s decision also referenced the Monetary Authority of Singapore’s (MAS) consultation paper, which proposes implementing segregation and custody requirements for digital payment tokens. By taking cues from the MAS’s stance on digital assets, the court emphasized the legality of holding cryptocurrencies on trust, as long as practical methods for identification and segregation are in place.Cues taken from existing lawSingapore’s legal framework for property also played a crucial role in the ruling. Judge Jeyaretnam pointed to Order 22 of Singapore’s Rules of Court 2021, which defines “movable property” to include various assets, such as cash, debts, bonds, shares, and cryptocurrency or other digital currency. This inclusion reinforces the recognition of cryptocurrencies as a valid form of property within Singaporean law.In April of this year, a Hong Kong court reached a similar conclusion, recognizing cryptocurrency as property. In the High Court of Justice in London the following month, non-fungible tokens (NFTs) were recognized as “private property.”Overall, Judge Jeyaretnam’s ruling represents a significant milestone in the legal recognition of cryptocurrencies in Singapore. By acknowledging cryptocurrencies as property, the court provides greater clarity and certainty for crypto users and investors while affirming the importance of embracing digital assets within the nation’s legal framework.

Earlier this month, CoinNess reported on a flurry of Asian companies who had announced plans to add crypto to their balance sheets. That trend continued this week with two Chinese companies announcing similar plans. In a press release published on June 24, Aurora Mobile, a marketing technology firm based in Shenzhen, announced its intention to begin to invest in digital assets. The Nasdaq-listed company (JG) outlined that its Board of Directors had approved the investment of up to 20% of the firm’s cash and cash equivalents in various digital assets in a strategic initiative involving Aurora Mobile’s treasury management.Photo by Traxer on UnsplashGaining exposure to emerging asset classIt described the initiative as an example of the company’s “commitment to innovative treasury practices,” focusing on long-term value creation for Aurora Mobile’s shareholders. The firm’s CEO, Weidong Luo, said that the initiative will enable the company to diversify its portfolio, “gaining exposure to an emerging asset class with low correlation to traditional markets.” Luo also asserted that the move would demonstrate that the firm is “aligning with the technological advancements reshaping global finance.” Aurora Mobile indicated that it would look to purchase Bitcoin, Ethereum, Solana, Sui and other tokens. China’s crypto trading banA trading ban on crypto was introduced in mainland China in 2021. With that, it’s unclear how Aurora Mobile will establish its crypto treasury. It may opt to do so through Singapore-based subsidiary EngageLab or through an affiliated corporate entity in Hong Kong. No such ban applies in Hong Kong, where VMS Group, another company which has decided to invest in digital assets, is headquartered. VMS Group is a family office which provides investment solutions and advisory services, while specializing in alternative investments.  According to a report published by Bloomberg on June 23, the company, which has $4 billion worth of assets under management (AUM), intends to allocate up to $10 million to investment strategies run by a decentralized finance (DeFi)-focused hedge fund, Re7 Capital. VMS Group managing partner Elton Cheung told Bloomberg that the investment decision was taken as part of an effort to diversify into more liquid investments. Cheung added: “We thought this was the right time [to invest in digital assets] because of growing demand and because we see clearer legislative and government support from various jurisdictions, as well as large institutional support and endorsement.” Potential partnershipsVMS Group executive Zhi Li, who has been tasked with leading digital asset investments for the company, said that the firm is examining potential partnerships with blockchain payments and infrastructure projects. Li stated that “there is very strong institutional and family interest in getting regulated digital asset exposure,” adding that VMS has “seen the younger generation of families wanting to do something different.” Alongside these investments into cryptocurrencies, demand for crypto-related stocks in Hong Kong is also surging. Shares in publicly-listed licensed digital asset platforms in the Chinese autonomous territory surged by as much as 200% on June 25 as the market reacted positively to the city’s developing digital assets policy.