Litigation set to fuel Bitcoin accumulation at Genius Group

Flybit Achieves Top Score in FIU’s Anti-Money Laundering AssessmentSouth Korean virtual asset exchange Flybit said Monday that it has received the highest rating in the comprehensive anti-money laundering (AML) evaluation conducted annually by the Financial Intelligence Unit (FIU) under the Financial Services Commission for all financial companies in Korea.Photo by REDioACTIVE on PixabayRanking among top-performing financial institutionsThe comprehensive AML evaluation is aimed at facilitating the optimal establishment and implementation of strong AML systems. It is operated under a control system where financial authorities assess and oversee a given company’s AML risk management, and the company receives verification on the adequacy of its risk management levels.In this year’s evaluation, Flybit achieved a score of 89.70, scoring in the highest ranks among all financial institutions, including virtual asset service providers (VASPs). This places Flybit among the upper echelons of financial companies that received an “Excellent” rating, which make up only 15% of all evaluated firms.Robust and varied effortsThe exchange explained that it has taken a risk-based approach (RBA) to control and manage its AML risk factors that were found in the results from the FLYBIT Enterprise-Wide AML Risk Assessment (FARA) — an AML risk assessment model developed in-house — and the FIU’s semi-annual AML system compliance evaluation, where FLYBIT was deemed as a “self-monitoring” company.Notably, Flybit operates customized AML education programs for different ranks and job roles within its corporation, which leverages both external and internal resources, including the Korea Banking Institute. It also conducts over 40 hours of advanced-level training — three times longer than the FIU recommendation — for employees directly involved in AML-related tasks.“The basis for this [evaluation] result was the active interest and support of the management, as well as the operation of a specialized AML control system for VASPs,” said Seol Ki-hwan, a compliance officer in charge of AML reporting at Flybit. “In the future, we will continue our efforts, not only in AML compliance but also in fulfilling our responsibilities and roles as a model VASP.”

Cryptocurrency exchanges operating in the Dubai International Financial Centre (DIFC), a financial hub in the United Arab Emirates (UAE), entered a new compliance environment on Jan. 12 as updated Crypto Token rules issued by the Dubai Financial Services Authority (DFSA) came into force. The revised framework bars exchanges from offering certain digital assets.Photo by Christoph Schulz on UnsplashPrivacy tokens restricted to private walletsThe affected assets are privacy tokens like Zcash (ZEC) and Monero (XMR), although the restriction does not prevent Dubai residents from holding those coins in private wallets. The move is aimed at addressing anti-money laundering (AML) and sanctions compliance risks. The exclusion of privacy tokens reflects alignment with global compliance standards, according to Elisabeth Wallace, Associate Director of Policy & Legal at the DFSA. She told CoinDesk that bans of this kind are effectively inevitable if crypto businesses want to align with standards set by the Financial Action Task Force (FATF), given that privacy tokens are designed to obscure transaction histories and the identities of holders. The revised rules extend beyond token classifications, preventing regulated firms from deploying or providing tools designed to mask blockchain activity. These include mixers, tumblers, and other technologies that obscure transaction information. At the same time, the DFSA refined its classification of what it terms “Fiat Crypto Tokens,” limiting the category to tokens pegged to fiat currencies and backed by high-quality, liquid assets capable of meeting redemption requests under market stress. Under this definition, algorithmic stablecoins such as Ethena (ENA) would not qualify as stablecoins, though they would still be treated as cryptocurrencies. The update also alters how token eligibility is determined. Rather than maintaining a centralized list of approved assets, the DFSA now requires licensed firms to carry out their own assessments of the crypto assets they offer, document those judgments, and keep them under ongoing review. Thailand enforces crypto travel ruleComparable regulatory tightening is unfolding elsewhere in Asia. In Thailand, during a high-level meeting on Jan. 9, Prime Minister Anutin Charnvirakul said the Securities and Exchange Commission had been instructed to strictly enforce the travel rule, according to The Nation Thailand. The international standard requires crypto service providers to verify both senders and recipients in wallet-to-wallet transfers. The directive forms part of a broader government initiative to establish a national data bureau, envisioned as a centralized platform for real-time monitoring of suspicious transactions and the development of detailed financial risk profiles. In South Korea, enforcement actions have similarly intensified. According to Dailian, Korbit, the country’s fourth-largest crypto exchange, paid a 2.73 billion won ($1.9 million) fine imposed by the Financial Information Unit (FIU) under the Financial Services Commission (FSC) for violations of anti-money laundering (AML) rules. The payment followed a board decision and was made within a reduced-penalty period, allowing Korbit to receive a 20% discount. Crypto firms comprise 77% of Korean finesA broader review of penalties issued by the FIU since the disclosure of its sanctions guidelines shows that 77% of total fines were levied against virtual asset service providers (VASPs). While an analysis by Digital Asset found that only four of 95 fine cases issued since August 2023 involved VASPs, those cases accounted for a disproportionately large total of 41.8 billion won ($28.4 million). Exchanges fined to date include Delio, Hanbitco Korea, Dunamu—the operator of Upbit—and Korbit, with Dunamu receiving the largest penalty imposed by the FIU to date. The sanctions were linked to alleged know-your-customer (KYC) failures, unreported transactions involving individuals subject to warrants, and shortcomings in systems designed to detect suspicious activity. Separately, the FIU had issued disciplinary measures against Dunamu, including a warning to its chief executive and a three-month partial suspension of operations, which the company is contesting in court. The next hearing is scheduled for February. In overall fine totals, casinos ranked behind crypto firms, underscoring how enforcement against crypto intermediaries has been particularly robust, as oversight patterns continue to evolve. 

Hong Kong to Issue Digital Asset Licensing Guidelines in MayAccording to Hong Kong’s Securities and Futures Commission (SFC), the Commission will issue new guidelines for virtual asset exchanges within the Chinese autonomous special administrative region (SAR).© Pexels/Jimmy ChanSFC CEO Julia Leung made that announcement while speaking at an event in the city on Thursday, indicating that the guidelines are due to be released next month. Additionally the autonomous region intends to introduce a new licensing system from June 1 onwards, enabling the retail investors among Hong Kong’s populace to trade leading cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin and Ethereum.Hong Kong authorities had provided an insight into this approach back in February, when plans to provide retail access to digital assets were first set out. At the time, they outlined the need for retail customers to pass a knowledge test relative to digital assets or otherwise only being allowed to trade such assets once the customer had completed a certain level of training relative to digital assets, provided by a regulated crypto service provider.This latest announcement has arrived amid a backdrop of a series of recent indications that signify the intent of authorities in Hong Kong to make the autonomous region a major financial hub centered around digital assets.Leung articulated that the further development of this digital assets framework follows a consultation process that attracted more than 150 responses. Although virtual asset service providers (VASPs) will need to await the complete rollout of the licensing system, a handful of crypto businesses such as OSL and Hashkey, under the supervision of the Hong Kong regulator, have already started to offer their services.Crypto as propertyA Hong Kong court recently recognized cryptocurrency as property. The ruling emerged in a bankruptcy hearing pertaining to failed cryptocurrency exchange Gatecoin. In presiding over the case, Justice Linda Chan outlined that the autonomous region takes a broad view of what constitutes property. In finding crypto to meet the definition of property, she went on to clarify that it therefore has the capability of being held in trust.The finding has particular relevance in the crypto world right now given the consequences of an “in trust” custodianship of customer’s digital assets relative to numerous ongoing bankruptcy processes involving failed crypto businesses, and the pecking order of creditors in those instances, in their efforts to recover their digital assets.Positive approachWhile mainland China remains an adverse territory relative to digital assets, Hong Kong has taken to welcoming the sector and with that, enticing crypto firms to relocate to the autonomous region from the mainland. Leadership in the city has been making all the right soundings to demonstrate that it is actively trying to nurture the nascent sector.While recent months have seen the Biden administration in the United States attempt to close off banking from the crypto sector, in contrast, Hong Kong’s largest virtual bank, ZA Bank, was recently given permission to act as a settlement bank for regulated Web3 businesses located within Hong Kong.