Dubai bars privacy coins from exchanges amid global AML push

Backpack Exchange, a crypto exchange that joined the Japan Virtual Currency Exchange Association (JVCEA) last December, has recently acquired FTX EU, the European arm of the failed crypto exchange business FTX. According to a press release, the business comes with a European MiFID II license, with the acquisition having been approved by the Cypriot regulator, the Cyprus Securities and Exchange Commission (CySEC). Furthermore, a Delaware bankruptcy court in the United States, which is dealing with the FTX bankruptcy, has also rubber-stamped the acquisition. Backpack Exchange was co-founded by CEO Armani Ferrante, alongside other former FTX executives. According to the firm’s LinkedIn page, it has established its headquarters in Japan. The company also has links to Dubai, having acquired a Virtual Asset Service Provider (VASP) license for its Backpack Wallet product from  Dubai’s Virtual Assets Regulatory Authority (VARA) in 2023.Photo by Christian Lue on UnsplashRebuilding trust As a consequence of having acquired FTX’s European arm, Backpack Exchange will now assume responsibility for the distribution of court-approved FTX bankruptcy claims to FTX EU users. In the company’s press release, Ferrante spoke of the importance of the distribution process in rebuilding trust. He stated: "Customer restitution is a crucial step to rebuild trust and confidence in the industry, and Backpack is committed to returning FTX EU customers’ funds as fast and as safely as possible." In response to a query from FTX creditor activist Sunil Kavuri on X, Ferrante outlined that FTX EU users “will only be able to claim their euro claims funds directly from Backpack EU.” Ferrante clarified that FTX EU customers who had pending crypto withdrawals at the time of the bankruptcy will have their crypto claims dealt with via the FTX bankruptcy estate. In a Series A financing round early last year, Backpack was valued at $120 million. Through FTX EU, it now acquires a MiFID II license, further facilitating the global expansion of the company. With FTX EU now forming Backpack’s EU arm, the company will offer crypto-derivative products, including perpetual futures. This product offering is scheduled to go live in Q1 2025. Bankruptcy process controversy The bankruptcy of FTX EU has been controversial, starting off with the European entity being illegally filed into a U.S. bankruptcy process. In early 2024, the FTX Debtors suggested that the entity was worthless. It later wanted to buy out the entity itself, outbidding a third-party bidder. A short time afterwards, the FTX Debtors reached a settlement with the former FTX EU team. It’s understood that Backpack has acquired FTX EU for $32 million.  The FTX Debtors’ attempt to buy the business itself has cast a cloud over the bankruptcy process. When it first emerged that the business had been sold, there was some speculation as to if this would mean a rebooted FTX within the European market, but Backpack’s acquisition confirms that this was not to be the outcome.  Japan could have offered another opportunity to reboot the business, but instead, FTX Japan was acquired by bitFlyer and absorbed into its existing business. With regard to the main FTX business entity, the FTX Debtors told the bankruptcy court that there was no interest in the business from buyers. 

South Korean financial regulators have decided, at least for the time being, to maintain the current policy requiring cryptocurrency exchanges to partner with only one bank, according to a report from the Seoul Economic Daily.Photo by POURIA 🦋 on UnsplashDominance and money laundering concernsA government official cited concerns that allowing multiple banking relationships could potentially strengthen market dominance by leading platforms and increase money laundering risks. Regulators plan to revisit the issue after monitoring new developments following upcoming regulations that will permit institutional participation in the crypto market. This decision runs counter to a recent proposal put forward by the People Power Party (PPP) ahead of the presidential election that seeks to eliminate the one-bank-per-exchange requirement. Bizwatch reported that while the crypto industry initially supported the removal of this restriction unanimously, opinions have recently diverged among market participants. Divided industryMajor exchanges offering Korean won-based trading are mostly against the potential policy change. Except for Upbit, the country's largest platform, competitors express concern that modifying the rules could weaken their existing banking relationships if more financial institutions choose to partner with the market leader. Conversely, crypto-only exchanges, which cannot offer Korean won trading services, generally favor eliminating banking restrictions. These platforms believe relaxed regulations could create more opportunities to establish banking partnerships. Under current rules, virtual asset service providers must secure real-name accounts from a local bank to offer Korean won trading, placing those without such accounts at a competitive disadvantage. Banks also want changeKorean commercial banks align with crypto-only exchanges in supporting the easing of banking regulations. Jung Jin-wan, CEO of key financial institution Woori Bank, recently called for allowing multiple banks to serve individual crypto exchanges. He argues that the current one-bank-per-exchange system not only undermines systemic stability but also limits customer choice. While an official from a crypto-to-fiat exchange acknowledged the need for eventual reform of the one-bank-per-exchange system to improve customer options and market development, they also pointed out that industry stakeholders hold different views depending on their position in the market. The official said that dominant platforms perceive minimal practical benefits from permitting multiple banking relationships. 

Global crypto exchange Binance has carried out a survey which reveals that the security habits of Asian platform users are evolving positively.Photo by Vadim Artyukhin on UnsplashUsers responding to more sophisticated scamsIn a blog post published by the crypto exchange platform on May 6, Binance revealed that it had carried out a survey of nearly 30,000 platform users across Asia. The company’s takeaway following analysis of the survey data is that “scams are evolving — and so are crypto users.” The firm suggested that users are “stepping up their security game,” with exchanges facing growing demand from their users for real-time protection and smarter security tools. Increasing use of 2FAThe exchange platform found that 80.5% of survey respondents now use Binance two-factor authentication (2FA). While the use of 2FA is definitely a move in the right direction, it doesn’t guarantee the safety of a user’s digital assets.  In an article published by Forbes last month Forbes Contributor Davey Winder warned that infostealer malware can compromise 2FA codes in as little as 10 seconds. In June of last year, an OKX user lost $2 million in crypto to a hacker who utilized AI despite the victim having used Google’s 2FA. Double-checking transfersThe survey found that 73.3% of users double-check transfers before sending digital assets. Due to the nature of decentralized cryptocurrency, crypto transactions are not easily reversed and are usually irreversible. That puts a greater responsibility on crypto users to ensure that they are sending funds to the appropriate wallet address. Double-checking transfer addresses is not only necessary due to human error. Malware is also used by hackers to spoof such addresses, tricking the sender into sending the digital assets to their address rather than the one that was originally intended. It emerged in May 2024 that a Bitcoin trader had lost more than $70 million in Bitcoin in an “address poisoning” scam. Binance itself had warned users last September that “clipper malware,” which intercepts clipboard data on a user’s phone or desktop, replacing copied wallet addresses with alternative addresses under the hacker’s control, is increasingly being employed in hacking attempts. While the survey has revealed a positive evolution in the security habits of Asian platform users, there’s still room for further improvement. Just 17.6% of survey respondents utilize address whitelisting, a measure that restricts account user access to a safe list of pre-defined trusted addresses. Only 21.5% of survey respondents use anti-phishing codes as a security mechanism. The objective of phishing is to steal data, install malware on a user’s device or otherwise gain account access. An anti-phishing code aids the user in verifying the authenticity of emails and texts from a specific service. Security remains a major issue within crypto. Last month, hackers employed social engineering tactics to steal $330 million in Bitcoin from an elderly American victim. Exchange platforms themselves continue to struggle to safeguard user funds. Earlier this year, Binance competitor, Dubai-headquartered Bybit, suffered a $1.5 billion hack believed to have been perpetrated by North Korea’s Lazarus Group. Lazarus is also thought to have been behind a $235 million crypto theft at Indian crypto exchange WazirX in July 2024.