Korbit Joins Hands with Shinhan Card and Good Neighbors for NFT Campaign

Korea’s Busan City to Develop Blockchain-Based Carbon Neutrality PlatformBusan Metropolitan City, known for being home to South Korea’s largest port, announced today that its consortium won the bid for the 2023 new local energy facilitation project offered by the Korea Energy Agency, an organization under the Ministry of Trade, Industry, and Energy (MOTIE). The consortium consists of five entities, including Busan City, tech solution provider Nuri Flex, and gas distributor Busan City Gas. As the winning bidder, Busan City and its collaborators will proceed with the development of a blockchain-based platform that promotes carbon neutrality.Photo by BERK OZDEMIR on PexelsCarbon neutralityThe primary aim of this project is to create a system that leverages surplus renewable energy to achieve carbon neutrality in the city’s port and industrial infrastructure. The initiative includes providing eco-friendly renewable energy to port and industrial facilities, establishing a blockchain-based carbon credit system to support businesses in joining the global corporate renewable energy initiative RE100, and facilitating the trading of surplus electricity. These measures are intended to save energy, enhance power system stability, and create greater value.Boosting green energy proportionThe project is set to take place from June 2023 to December 2024, with an estimated cost of 3 billion KRW ($2.3 million). The national and local governments will each finance 25% of the project, while the private sector will cover the remaining 50%. Upon completion of the project, Busan aims to increase the proportion of renewable energy within the city. Leveraging surplus energy and engaging in carbon credit trading, Busan expects to gain a competitive edge in the carbon-neutral sector.

The Legal Future of South Korea’s Crypto Industry: Necessary Legislation and SystemsA recent National Assembly symposium organized by South Korea’s Digital Asset Policy Forum brought experts together to discuss the challenges and prospects of the implementation of the Virtual Asset User Protection Act at the National Assembly Members’ Office Building in Seoul on Tuesday.Photo by Tingey Injury Law Firm on UnsplashInternational modelsReferences were made to global examples, such as the Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation (MiCA) — the world’s first standalone virtual asset legislation enacted in the EU — which ensures transparency, disclosure, authorization, and supervision of crypto-asset transactions. However, unlike the capital market, MiCA does not impose regular disclosure reporting requirements or corrections on them. Firms in Japan, on the other hand, are asked to provide disclosure under autonomous regulation through the Japan Virtual and Crypto Assets Exchange Association (JVCEA).Notably, in its recent Policy Recommendations for Crypto and Digital Asset Markets Consultation Report, the International Organization of Securities Commissions (IOSCO) states that it is “seeking to encourage optimal consistency in the way crypto-asset markets and securities markets are regulated within individual IOSCO jurisdictions, in accordance with the principle of ‘same activities, same risks, same regulatory outcomes’.” This principle refers to the concept that any crypto-asset activity that has a similar function and poses similar risks to those in the traditional financial system — such as operating a trading platform or providing custody services — is subject to regulation that ensures equivalent outcomes, as defined by the UK Parliament.The IOSCO report also suggests that crypto-asset service providers (CASPs) should disclose information regarding ownership and control of crypto-assets, issuer and business-related information, issuer management teams, transaction history and operational description of crypto-assets, token ownership concentration, transfer protocols, and a given CASP’s treatment of the client crypto-assets and their respective rights and entitlements during events like hard forks and airdrops.Hurdles to overcomeExperts at the forum reflected these considerations in their sentiments. Han Suh-hee, a lawyer at Barun Law Firm, emphasized that it is important to determine what kind of information should be disclosed. She argued that it is necessary to discuss to what extent information about virtual asset issuers should be disclosed and whether mandating firms to disclose their financial and business conditions is efficient.In particular, Han underlined the need to consider the differences between virtual assets and stocks when establishing a framework for the disclosure of virtual assets holdings. Unlike stocks, virtual assets possess distinctive characteristics like their borderless and decentralized nature, unclear issuer backgrounds, and the ability to conduct peer-to-peer (P2P) transactions.Lee Han-jin, a lawyer at Kim & Chang Law Firm, added that the enactment of Korea’s Virtual Asset User Protection Act was aimed at establishing a system directly targeted at regulating virtual assets and virtual asset service operators (VASPs) — a significant development from the Financial Transaction Reporting Act, which had until now been the only legal framework responsible for regulating VASPs along with other entities like casino business operators. Virtual assets are now subject to a more systematized regulatory approach.However, he said that the Virtual Asset User Protection Act still has its setbacks because it is undergoing a two-stage legislative process. Lee criticized the fact that the same definition of VASPs outlined in the Financial Transaction Reporting Act had been brought over, which limits their identity to transaction intermediaries, wallet operators, and custodians while overlooking their other roles like crypto management, crypto deposits, and crypto collective investments.Lee also pointed out another weakness: the scope of prohibition on using undisclosed information and market manipulation is broader in the Virtual Asset User Protection Act than in the Capital Markets Act. He argued that enforcement decrees should stipulate the definition of insiders and exceptional cases when deliberating on the prohibition of insider virtual asset trading.Lee thus emphasized the need for a clear definition of virtual assets in the Virtual Asset User Protection Act, as it is yet unclear whether they are objects or assets. All things considered, he believes there must be a law that can encompass blockchain-based decentralization, outline the similarities and differences between digital assets and financial products, and accommodate new services that utilize smart contracts.“We are in the process of creating a regulatory system similar to those being adopted in other countries based on their respective markets,” said Lee Seok-ran, head of the Financial Innovation Bureau at the Financial Services Commission (FSC). “Unlike the stock market, which is equipped with regulations to prevent fraudulent transactions and misconduct, virtual assets are traded on multiple exchanges, so we are considering how to interpret unfair trading activities and conduct market surveillance.”She explained that the commission is prioritizing user protection measures and subordinate regulations. “I believe we will be able to create a system for subordinate regulations on disclosure once an overall global trajectory is established. But before that happens, we are working on guidelines for defining unfair trading activities with regulators and the Digital Asset eXchange Alliance (DAXA).” Unfair trading activities associated with virtual assets include not only those conducted on exchanges but also under other circumstances.The FSC officer said that the financial authority is set to establish legal criteria to distinguish cases such as false statements in white papers of crypto projects. She added that enforcement decrees will define both the conditions for restricting deposits and withdrawals on crypto exchanges and the corresponding limits.

RaonSecure showcases blockchain-based SaaS to student ID card associationRaonSecure, a South Korean tech security company, recently showcased their blockchain-based Software as a Service (SaaS) solution, OmniOne Digital ID, to executives from the International Student Identity Card (ISIC) Association during their visit to RaonSecure’s headquarters in Seoul, as per a report by news outlet Digital Today. The tech firm also proposed a mobile ID project catered to ISIC.Photo by Matese Fields on Unsplash2.5 million student ID cards per yearThe ISIC Association, a non-profit organization registered in Denmark, is renowned for issuing approximately 2.5 million student identity cards each year. These cards are recognized and accepted in 108 countries globally.Various discount programsISIC card holders have access to an extensive range of discount programs at ISIC’s partner merchants. These discounts span a wide variety of industries, offering savings in areas such as accommodation, cultural attractions and travel. This feature of the ISIC card makes it a beneficial resource for students worldwide who are looking to save money while accessing various services and experiences.In October, RaonSecure signed a business partnership with two organizations to develop digital ID-based ISIC on mobile platforms. One of them is KISES Corporation, the Korean branch of ISIC, and the other is smart card service provider Future & More.