RaonSecure showcases blockchain-based SaaS to student ID card association

Hong Kong’s HashKey Adds AVAX TradingHashKey Hong Kong, the Chinese autonomous territory’s first licensed retail crypto exchange, has unveiled an addition to its platform with the launch of Avalanche (AVAX) trading.According to an announcement published to its website on Wednesday, HashKey has listed Avalanche on Thursday with the caveat that access to AVAX trading will be reserved for professional investors, as defined by Hong Kong’s Securities & Futures Commission (SFC).Photo by Wance Paleri on UnsplashAccessible to professional investorsTo meet the criteria as a professional investor in Hong Kong, individuals must possess an investment portfolio valued at a minimum of 8 million Hong Kong dollars, roughly equivalent to $1 million. This decision sets AVAX apart from other widely traded cryptocurrencies, such as Bitcoin and Ether, which remain accessible to retail investors in Hong Kong. While Tether (USDT) enjoys retail status, the majority of altcoins on HashKey will remain the preserve of professional investors.This move is a direct result of the SFC’s proactive stance on regulating the rapidly expanding crypto market in Hong Kong. Since the introduction of regulated retail crypto trading in the Chinese autonomous territory in August, the SFC has imposed rigorous requirements on exchanges. HashKey mandates users to deposit a minimum of 10,000 Hong Kong dollars or $1,500 into their exchange accounts as part of the Know Your Customer (KYC) verification process.Low trading volumeAmid these regulatory challenges, HashKey Hong Kong currently reports a 24-hour trading volume of approximately $5.3 million, significantly lower than its global peers. This lower trading volume suggests that stringent regulations may be affecting the exchange’s ability to attract retail investors effectively.The path to regulatory compliance in Hong Kong has been anything but smooth for crypto exchanges. Reports indicate that these platforms have collectively invested over $25 million in establishing the requisite infrastructure for obtaining a Hong Kong Virtual Asset Service Provider (VASP) license. It was reported earlier this year that crypto firms are forking out between $2.55 million and $25.5 million in order to secure a VASP trading license.Despite the challenges, HashKey is looking at various avenues in bringing its offering forward. Earlier this month the firm signed a memorandum of understanding (MOU) with insurer OneDegree. That collaboration could be significant as it should lead to the assets of HashKey users being protected and insured on the platform. That would solve a major issue for participants in the crypto space amid the backdrop of ongoing platform failures and hacks.JPEX collapseEven as regulatory efforts intensify, the crypto industry in Hong Kong has not been impervious to bad actors. The recent collapse of the JPEX crypto exchange earlier this month serves as a stark reminder of the ongoing risks associated with the industry. Described as the largest financial fraud in Hong Kong’s history, JPEX faced allegations of embezzling over $178 million of investors’ funds. Notably, JPEX was operating without SFC registration at the time of the alleged embezzlement.In response to such incidents, the SFC has taken proactive measures by publishing a warning list of crypto exchanges considered non-compliant within the Chinese autonomous territory.

BNP Paribas Partners With Chinese in Digital Yuan PushThe Chinese authorities continue with their sustained efforts to promote use of the digital yuan, on this occasion by hooking up with French international banking group, BNP Paribas.According to the South China Morning Post (SCMP) on Friday, the partnership will see BNP Paribas collaborating with the Bank of China (BOC) to promote the digital yuan to its corporate clients. The digital yuan or e-CNY is a digital representation of the Chinese sovereign currency, issued by the BOC.Photo by Eric Prouzet on Unsplashe-CNY system accessAs part of the arrangement, BNP Paribas China will connect into the BOCs system, accessing an e-CNY management system. The BOC has authorized ten banks in China including the four state-owned banks, all of which are domestic lenders, to deal with its digital currency business.The direct e-CNY system access enables straight-through processing, allowing BNP Paribas to offer digital wallet functionality to its corporate clients relative to the digital yuan. Essentially, the system will allow BNP Paribas China’s corporate clients to link their bank accounts with an accompanying digital wallet. Other functionality that will be enabled as a consequence includes access to smart contract applications through the m-CBDC bridge (central bank digital currency).BNP Paribas China CEO CG Lai commented on the partnership: “While this collaboration can supplement the Bank’s offline payment collection capabilities and further optimize our clients’ account structure, this also reinforced the Bank’s commitment to the China market.” Lai outlined that the bank intends to enhance customer service capabilities by pursuing digital innovation that, like in this instance, contributes to China’s economic development.Louise Zhang, Head of BNP Paribas China Transaction Banking claimed that the partnership will “provide innovative, efficient cash management and trade financing services to local and multinational clients.”CBDC developmentThere has been a lot of activity in recent years when it comes to the development of CBDCs. The central banks of most nations have carried out some level of preparatory or investigative work relative to a digital currency. However, China has been by far the leader in its development of a CBDC.The BOC first began research into a digital currency in 2014. The country’s State Council approved the development of the digital yuan in partnership with China’s commercial banks in 2017. Beyond initial development, a testing phase began in 2019 with the project known as the Digital Currency Electronic Payment (DCEP) system emerging as the first version of the digital yuan after a number of years of development.In 2020, the BOC began more extensive testing of the digital currency in four Chinese cities — Shenzhen, Suzhou, Chengdu and Xiong’an. To promote use of the currency at that time, they offered free digital yuan to residents of those cities to spend, in that way, stepping up efforts to popularize the digital currency.Last month, the administrators of the Chinese city of Xuzhou announced that it was in the process of publishing a pilot scheme which will set out a means for promoting China’s e-CNY digital currency. Also in April, the eastern city of Changshu clarified that it is gearing up to commence paying state employees in the city in e-CNY. According to an announcement made by the city’s finance bureau the civil servants will start to receive e-CNY as payment in May.

Terraform Labs civil trial proceeds with confidential filingsSingaporean blockchain development firm Terraform Labs, the creator of the failed Terra blockchain protocol, has reached an agreement on a protective order in their ongoing civil case with the United States’ Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).Photo by Thomas Habr on UnsplashData shielded from public disclosureThe decision, sanctioned by the U.S. District Court Judge Jed Rakoff in the Southern District of New York on Wednesday, ensures that materials marked as confidential by the involved parties will remain shielded from public disclosure. The court is obligated to seal any discovery filings labeled confidential ahead of the trial.Judge Rakoff conveyed his likelihood of denying requests to unseal these confidential documents, although the order did not delve into the specific rationale for maintaining their confidential status beyond citing “good cause.” The finalized agreement on this protective order took place on Dec. 18, with legal representatives from both the SEC and Terraform Labs, including co-founder Do Kwon, giving their consent. Kwon, presently detained in Montenegro, faces potential extradition to the United States or South Korea.Pivotal momentThe depegging of Terraform’s stablecoin TerraUSD (UST) from the U.S. dollar marked a turning point in the cryptocurrency sector. This event is believed to have significantly contributed to the crypto market downturn in 2022, as it had a knock-on effect on countless other crypto businesses and platforms that were over-exposed to the flawed algorithmic currency.That chain of events led to the SEC taking action after the fact. However, it has subsequently also pursued a much criticized “regulation by enforcement” policy relative to the crypto sector. To that end, the Commission has pending cases against Coinbase, Ripple, Kraken and Binance, among others.In February, the SEC accused Terraform Labs and Do Kwon of conducting a multi-billion dollar crypto asset securities fraud by offering and selling unregistered securities. As proceedings have unfolded, both Terraform and the SEC have traded unsuccessful attempts to obtain summary judgment.Far-reaching consequencesThe ongoing SEC vs. Terraform civil case carries potential far-reaching consequences in terms of legal precedents within the cryptocurrency sector. In a separate ruling in August, the court allowed Terra to issue subpoenas to FTX entities as part of FTX’s bankruptcy proceedings. Judge Rakoff, in November, accepted confidential materials from Jump Crypto Holdings for discovery in this case.Troubled crypto lender Genesis Trading has also been tangled up in the proceedings with the courts directing it to comply with a subpoena initiated by Terraform Labs. The outcome of this case is poised to offer essential legal guidance for numerous companies operating in the crypto space.The SEC’s regulatory approach toward cryptocurrency firms in the United States has been subject to considerable debate and criticism. The commission’s alleged “regulation by enforcement” strategy, especially in dealings with major players in the crypto industry, has drawn accusations.While many in the U.S. have been unhappy with “regulation by enforcement,” the upside is that over the longer haul, the courts will be able to eventually furnish the regulatory clarity that the SEC refuses to provide. The ongoing scrutiny of regulatory approaches and the outcomes of cases like Terraform Labs vs. SEC will undoubtedly shape the future legal landscape of the cryptocurrency industry.