Chinese Court Recognizes Virtual Assets as Legal Property

Bitcoin miner Bitdeer Technologies Group’s stock had a rough debut on the Nasdaq exchange, losing almost 30% of its value shortly after market open on Friday. The Singapore-based firm, which is one of the largest bitcoin miners in the world, had delayed its listing several times and saw a lukewarm reception from investors. Bitdeer’s merger with a special-purpose acquisition vehicle called Blue Safari Group Acquisition Corp was approved on Tuesday, paving the way for the listing. Mining across six sitesBitdeer has six mining sites across Washington state, Texas, Tennessee, and Norway, with a total energy capacity of 775 megawatts as of the end of 2022. It has a hashrate or computing power of 16.2 exahash per second (EH/s), second only to bankrupt miner Core Scientific and higher than Riot Platforms and Marathon Digital Holdings. Around one-quarter of the hashrate is used for self-mining, while the rest is given out for cloud mining, which means that customers rent the machines and reap the rewards.Despite the company’s impressive size and scale, Bitdeer’s financial performance deteriorated in 2022, which was partly due to worsening market conditions. The company reported revenue of $330.3 million and a loss of $62.4 million for the year, compared with $394.7 million in revenue and a profit of $82.6 million in the previous year. The company’s listing comes at a better time than last year, as market conditions have improved, and bitcoin has passed the $30,000 mark. Mining equities have also outperformed the digital asset in percentage growth. Differentiation of mining operatorsHowever, Bitdeer’s listing was not received as positively as expected, and the stock was halted several times for volatility shortly after the market opened. Other crypto mining stocks saw single-digit upticks in their share value at the same time. The market is beginning to shift from operators with the biggest scale to operators with the best unit economics, said investment bank Stifel Nicolaus’s analyst Bill Papanastasiou.This shift may explain why investors were not too keen on Bitdeer’s debut, as the company’s financials are not as strong as those of its competitors. Despite Bitdeer being larger than Marathon and Riot, based on its current share price and valuation, it is priced at a third of the value of its two industry peers.Bitdeer was born out of the world’s largest rig manufacturer, Bitmain, following a spat between the two co-founders. The firm is not the only cloud mining firm affiliated with Bitmain that is going public via SPAC, as BitFuFu is also in the process of going public, but has delayed its listing. Bitdeer’s stock debut may have been lackluster, but the company remains one of the largest bitcoin miners in the world.Shares in the newly quoted public company opened at $9.70, sliding to $6.30, before ending the first day’s trading at $7.03.

Dispute Embroils Bitget in Legal Battle With Crypto InfluencerBitget, the crypto exchange registered in Seychelles, finds itself entangled in a legal dispute with prominent crypto influencer Evan Luthra.Photo by Tingey Injury Law Firm on UnsplashAccount freezing allegationsThe conflict stems from Luthra’s allegations of account freezing and loss of funds after a token listing incident in March. Luthra has filed a lawsuit against Bitget, accusing the exchange of withholding $200,000 in Tether (USDT) without adequate explanation, while also freezing his account.The legal drama follows Luthra’s involvement with the Reel Star project, where he served as an advisor for the platform which is aimed at creators. As compensation for his collaboration with the project, Luthra received Reel Token (REELT), the project’s utility token.Bitget alleged market manipulationUpon the listing of REELT tokens, Luthra reportedly sold 1.3 million tokens on Bitget. In response, Bitget claims it faced a manipulative attack orchestrated by a group of traders attempting to profit from market manipulation immediately after the token’s listing. This allegedly caused a significant drop in the token’s price, prompting Bitget’s decision to freeze Luthra’s account.Bitget states that it contacted Luthra seeking an explanation for the suspicious trading behavior. Luthra acknowledged the token sale but failed to provide satisfactory reasons for his actions, according to Bitget’s version of events. The exchange maintains that user protection is its foremost priority and that it takes swift action against illegal or fraudulent behaviors.$16 million damages claimLuthra refutes the allegations, asserting his innocence and citing alleged approval from Reel Star’s Co-Founder Navdeep Sharma for his token sale plans. He seeks a substantial $16 million in damages, in addition to the frozen funds. Luthra claims that Bitget unjustly deprived him of his tokens, asserting his status as a fully KYCed user entitled to access his holdings.In the aftermath of the incident, Bitget conducted an investigation and offered a compensation plan for affected clients. Gracy Chen, Bitget’s Managing Director, emphasized the exchange’s commitment to user protection and its actions against illicit activities on its platform. Addressing the matter on Twitter, Chen didn’t hold back in her commentary on Luthra, stating that he “has a history of fraudulent activities,” which she says were exposed by crypto journalist CoffeeZilla.The legal dispute has ignited debates within the crypto community. Supporters of Luthra contend that his case underscores broader issues faced by users of centralized exchanges, shedding light on the need for improved user rights and protection. On the other hand, some argue that Bitget acted appropriately to safeguard its users and the market integrity.CZ brought into the disputeThe legal battle has attracted attention from influential figures in the crypto industry. Against a backdrop of a very public airing of the dispute on Twitter, in a recent tweet Luthra invited Changpeng Zhao (CZ), the CEO of Binance, to respond to Luthra’s claim that Bitget spreads rumors about other exchanges. CZ was having none of it, writing: “You should talk to them, right? We are not a regulator for other exchanges.”The case highlights the intricate challenges surrounding market manipulation and token listings within the crypto space. As it unfolds, the outcome could potentially set a precedent for similar situations involving token listings, market manipulation, and user protection.

Hong Kong Pressing Banks to Facilitate Crypto ClientsHong Kong’s banking regulator is urging banks, including HSBC and Standard Chartered, to onboard crypto exchanges as clients, despite increasing regulatory scrutiny of the industry in the United States.That’s according to a report published by the Financial Times (FT) on Wednesday. The FT cited three people who it claims are familiar with the matter, together with a letter seen by the publication as the basis for the assertion.Photo by Ansel Lee on PexelsChallenging crypto banking reticenceAt a recent meeting, the Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA) questioned these UK-based lenders, together with the Bank of China, about their reluctance to accept crypto exchanges as customers, according to sources familiar with the matter. The HKMA emphasized that due diligence on potential clients should not create unnecessary burdens, particularly for those seeking opportunities in Hong Kong. While banks do not have a ban on crypto clients, concerns over potential money laundering and illegal activities have made them cautious.The pressure faced by banks highlights the challenges Hong Kong is facing in establishing itself as a global hub for the crypto industry, especially in light of previous high-profile collapses, such as the implosion of FTX. However, the HKMA is encouraging banks to overcome their reservations, as the regulator believes there is resistance from senior executives who adhere to traditional banking mindsets.The enthusiasm of some Hong Kong officials for the sector is evident as pro-Beijing lawmaker Johnny Ng invited Coinbase and other crypto exchanges to set up operations in the city following the recent SEC lawsuit against Binance and Coinbase.Caught between opposing forcesBanks in Hong Kong find themselves walking a fine line between supporting the crypto industry as encouraged by the government and being cautious due to the US regulatory environment. They want to ensure the industry’s development aligns with government policies, but they are also concerned about potential anti-money laundering and know-your-customer issues.The HKMA and the Securities and Futures Commission (SFC) have been vocal about their expectations, setting them apart from regulators in other jurisdictions that may be more skeptical of cryptocurrencies. Last month it emerged that crypto startups are having difficulties in establishing banking facilities in the autonomous Chinese territory. At the time, the HKMA did convene a meeting to bring parties together in order to forge a path forward.While Hong Kong has a history as a crypto center, its position weakened after Beijing’s crackdown on the industry in 2017. However, the Hong Kong government aims to reestablish the city as a hub for digital assets, having expressed its desire to provide a supportive environment for crypto-related businesses. The introduction of a new licensing regime for crypto platforms in Hong Kong is part of the government’s efforts to attract more crypto groups to the city.HSBC, Standard Chartered, and the Bank of China hold influential positions in Hong Kong as issuers of the city’s currency and have key roles in the Hong Kong Association of Banks lobby group. Standard Chartered claims that it maintains regular dialogue with regulators on various subjects, while HSBC has claimed that it is actively engaging in policies and developments within the nascent industry.