Hong Kong’s OSL crypto exchange receives $91M boost

Blockchain Mainnet FNCY to Collaborate with Web3 Community Platform GALXENetmarble F&C, a subsidiary of South Korean game developer Netmarble, announced on Tuesday that FNCY, the blockchain mainnet of its subsidiary Metaverse World, has established a strategic partnership with Web3 digital credential network GALXE.Photo by Shubham’s Web3 on UnsplashEmpowering the Web3 communityGALXE is a platform with over 11 million users dedicated to building the Web3 community. In collaboration with some 2,900 partners — including networks like Optimism, Polygon, and Arbitrum, among others — it offers rewards like non-fungible tokens (NFTs) and on-chain achievement tokens (OATs) to users when they contribute to their favorite Web3 community.Strengthening the FNCY chainThrough the new partnership, FNCY and GALXE plan to hold various events and campaigns to bolster the FNCY Chain. In addition, various decentralized applications (dApps) onboarding the FNCY Chain will be able to open channels and hold events themselves.“This partnership will play a significant role in adopting blockchain technology on a global scale and providing users with new experiences,” said Charles Wayn, CEO of GALXE.Seo Woo-won, CEO of Netmarble F&C, also described GALXE as the most suitable partner for forming and expanding the Web3 community and FNCY’s blockchain ecosystem.FNCY, previously called CUBE, is a Web3 entertainment platform where users can enjoy various content, including games, webtoons, and web novels. Users can also view transactions, blocks, wallet addresses, and other on-chain data.

India is strategically navigating the development of its digital rupee, with the Reserve Bank (RBI) actively addressing privacy concerns through technological solutions in its central bank digital currency (CBDC) pilot programs. According to a recent report by CoinDesk, a senior official with insights into these initiatives revealed that while progress is evident, the RBI is proactively exploring ways to ensure privacy in the use of the digital rupee.Photo by Julian Yu on UnsplashPursuing mechanisms to maintain anonymityThe RBI has introduced a new dimension to the discourse on privacy concerns associated with CBDC usage. The central bank official suggested that the RBI may seek legal backing from India’s finance ministry to enact legislation allowing customers to delete transactions for the purpose of maintaining anonymity. New-found urgencyPublic statements from the RBI suggested a lack of urgency in implementing a full-scale retail CBDC, coupled with a reluctance to provide a specific timeline. However, recent events indicate that an underlying sense of urgency may be emerging. In the past month, the retail CBDC achieved a notable milestone, processing one million transactions in a single day, with support from various banks. Several banks, including HDFC Bank, Kotak Mahindra Bank, Axis Bank, Canara Bank, IDFC First Bank and Union Bank of India, reportedly encouraged their employees to deposit funds in CBDC instead of fiat currency, contributing to this achievement. The official overseeing the CBDC development emphasized the necessity for experimentation and substantial efforts to ensure the security of the digital currency. While the settlement aspect is considered straightforward, addressing latency remains a priority for the RBI. No mandate on taxThe RBI, historically known for its opposition to crypto both domestically and globally, clarified that crypto taxation is not within its mandate. This clarification suggests that the RBI might not object if the Indian government decides to reduce the stringent taxes currently imposed on cryptocurrencies. The central bank clarified that it lacks the mandate to express a viewpoint on reducing a contentious tax that has stirred debate within the crypto industry. The RBI has been a driving force behind the adoption of wholesale and retail CBDC since late 2022 when it initiated pilot programs. The official emphasized that taxation matters fall under the government’s purview, reinforcing the RBI’s focus on its designated responsibilities. Similarly, the country’s judiciary recently turned down a plea to have it formulate a crypto regulatory framework, outlining that this too is up to the government to address. The central bank has a historical context of attempting to ban cryptocurrencies, with effective prohibitions in place between 2018 and 2020 until a Supreme Court order overturned the ban. Since then, the RBI has consistently expressed concerns about cryptocurrencies in various forums, including the Group of 20, where India played a leading role in coordinating global regulation in the crypto space. Recent utterances from the RBI governor, Shaktikanta Das, suggest that the regulator is disinterested in seeing the offering of spot crypto exchange-traded funds (ETFs) in India despite that eventuality coming to pass last month in the United States. Das also spoke positively recently about the tokenization of real-world assets using blockchain technology.

Dunamu Loses Lawsuit Seeking $19M in Corporate Tax Refunds After Venture Status RemovalDunamu, the operator of South Korea’s largest cryptocurrency exchange Upbit, lost a 24.8-billion-won (approximately $18.7 million) corporate tax lawsuit, according to local news outlet The Korea Economic Daily. This legal action emerged after Dunamu was removed from the list of registered venture firms in December 2018. The Seoul Administrative Court ruled that since Dunamu was no longer a venture, it was not eligible for the associated tax benefits.Photo by Tingey Injury Law Firm on UnsplashLosing venture statusIn September 2017, Dunamu obtained certification as a venture company from the Ministry of SMEs and Startups. However, this certification was revoked in December of the following year. This revocation was due to an amendment to the Enforcement Decree of the Venture Businesses Act in October 2018, which resulted in the exclusion of “blockchain-based crypto asset trading and brokerage” from the venture business classification. Consequently, the withdrawal of this certification rendered the company ineligible for government tax incentives.Tax refund request deniedIn August 2020, Dunamu took action by formally requesting a refund of KRW 24.8 billion in taxes previously paid to the tax office. The foundation of its claim rested on its entitlement to venture company tax benefits up until the corporate tax period of 2018. However, its request was turned down, leading Dunamu to escalate the matter by initiating an administrative case against the tax authorities, following an unfavorable decision by the Korean Tax Tribunal.Meanwhile, an amended version of the Act on Special Cases Concerning Taxation Restrictions, which excluded cryptocurrency-related industries from benefiting from tax reductions, went into effect in January 2019. Pointing to the effective date of this act, Dunamu argued that the company should be entitled to benefits applicable up until the corporate tax cycle of 2018. Furthermore, Dunamu highlighted its legal action, which had led the administrative court to suspend the effects of the venture company certification revocation from December 31, 2018, to January 18, 2019.Court’s stanceDespite these arguments, the court rejected Dunamu’s argument and upheld that tax relief could not be granted for the tax year encompassing the date of the removal of its venture status. Additionally, the court affirmed that the tax authorities’ decision was valid since the venture status had been revoked in 2018, regardless of the amended Taxation Act’s implementation.In disagreement with the court’s ruling, Dunamu has filed an appeal against the decision.