AIITONE Launches PoC Platform for Security Token Projects in South Korea

Financial regulators in Hong Kong are moving towards the presentation of stablecoin legislation following the completion of a consultation process. In February of this year, that consultation process, which received 108 submissions from professional bodies and industry stakeholders, was completed. It was run jointly by The Financial Services and the Treasury Bureau (FSTB) and the Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA), culminating in the publication of the results of the process.Photo by Pat Whelen on UnsplashLegislative proposal publishedOff the back of that prior body of work, the regulators have now published a legislative proposal, incorporating responses to issues that were brought to light via the consultation process. The regulators concluded that going forward, stablecoin regulation should be considered primarily in terms of those stablecoin assets which operate on a ledger which runs on a decentralized basis. Additionally, no individual or unilateral entity should have the ability to tamper with or control those assets or the network upon which they exist. On this basis, the regulators intend to submit a bill relative to fiat-referenced stablecoins for consideration to the Legislative Council at a later stage in 2024. Before submitting any legislative proposal, the regulators plan to once again consult with stakeholders prior to finalizing any such proposal. As part of what they have set out thus far, regulators are looking to include a requirement for any stablecoin issuer to obtain a license in Hong Kong.  Reserve asset requirementsThey remain open to the idea that reserve assets backing an issued stablecoin could be held in an overseas jurisdiction. However, if the issuer is an overseas entity, it will be required to establish a local corporate entity in Hong Kong, with relevant management personal based within the Chinese autonomous territory. In light of feedback received during the consultation process, the regulator is looking at reducing the attestation frequency that each stablecoin issuer will be required to provide via an independent auditor in order to verify that the stablecoins issued are backed by the requisite amount of liquid assets.  Such reserve assets must be segregated from the working capital of the stablecoin issuer’s business, with the HKMA expressing a preference for a trust-like structure following input via the consultation process. Furthermore, reserve assets must be deemed to be both high quality and highly liquid, which would include cash, bank deposits and government issued securities where counterparty risk is minimized. On the basis that the Hong Kong dollar is pegged to the U.S. dollar, the regulator is content to allow issuers to use USD-denominated reserve assets if they prefer to do so. The legislative proposal also stipulates the need for issuers to have a minimum share capital of HK$25 million or 1% of the value of stablecoin in circulation.  The HKMA foresees crypto exchanges, securities firms and regulated banks having the ability to offer stablecoins to customers, so such offerings won’t be confined to dedicated stablecoin issuers.Back in March the HKMA introduced a stablecoin sandbox with a view towards learning what works best from a regulatory standpoint. It’s understood that a list of participants will be announced in the near future. Participating entities will be able to issue stablecoins in Hong Kong within that controlled sandbox environment, prior to full scale implementation once stablecoin regulation has been fully legislated for.

28 crypto service providers register with India’s FIUIn India, 28 entities providing services related to virtual digital assets (VDAs) have successfully registered with the Financial Intelligence Unit (FIU), the body responsible for combating money laundering in the world’s most populous country.Notable names in this list include Neblio Technologies, more commonly known as CoinDCX, Zanmai Labs, the company responsible for the WazirX crypto platform, Bitcipher Labs’ CoinSwitch, Nextgendev Solutions and Awlencan Innovations India’s Zebpay.Photo by Big G Media on UnsplashA need to register as ‘reporting entities’This information comes in response to a question posed in the Lok Sabha (India’s lower house of Parliament), where the government emphasized the significance of these entities complying with the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA). In March, the government had formally designated companies dealing in VDAs, crypto exchanges and related intermediaries as “reporting entities” under the PMLA.According to the notification, crypto exchanges and their intermediaries are obligated to conduct Know Your Customer (KYC) procedures for their clients and platform users. This includes maintaining KYC details, identity documents, account files and business correspondence records with clients.Offshore exchanges required to registerMinister of State for Finance Pankaj Chaudhary mentioned that the registration process for VDA service providers catering to the Indian market is underway. Non-compliance with these regulations may result in appropriate action under the PMLA. It has been clarified that offshore crypto exchanges operating in India are required to adhere to these guidelines. Despite that, none of the 28 entities who have registered so far appear to be offshore companies.Commenting on the development via the X social media platform, Sumit Gupta, Co-Founder of CoinDCX, wrote:”Emphasizing compliance to PMLA is vital for the safety and financial integrity of Indians, as dealing with non-registered platforms exposes citizens to nefarious actors, putting their finances at risk.” . . . “It’s encouraging to witness the Government initiating actions against non-compliant offshore entities.”While steps to provide guidelines for the industry are largely positive, the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) has been vocal in its criticism of cryptocurrencies and calls for potential bans have cast a shadow over the industry in India. The recent collapse of prominent platforms like FTX have not been helpful, only serving to exacerbate concerns relative to India’s crypto ecosystem.The negative sentiment, coupled with an ongoing funding winter, has resulted in the closure of operations for some crypto platforms, including Pillow and WeTrade, this year. Firms like CoinSwitch and Gupta’s CoinDCX have had to reduce headcount in 2023 amid challenging market conditions.Despite these challenges, there are also positive signs. A recent report by blockchain analytics firm Chainalysis found that India has been the frontrunner more recently in terms of crypto adoption in Asia.This latest development provides guidelines where anti-money laundering processes are concerned for crypto firms in India. However, the government needs to follow through with a complete regulatory framework for the industry. The Indian courts recently declined to act on such a petition on the basis that it falls within the remit of the country’s legislature and is outside the purview of the courts.

Taiwan to Restrict Offshore Non-Complaint ExchangesTaiwan’s Financial Supervisory Commission (FSC) has been working towards taking proactive steps to regulate the cryptocurrency industry within its borders recently. One key guiding principle it has developed is to impose strict regulation on offshore crypto exchanges operating in Taiwan.Photo by Vas on UnsplashTen guiding principlesTaiwan’s Central News Agency reported on Thursday that in an effort to ensure compliance and protect consumers, the FSC has developed ten guiding principles for virtual asset service providers (VASPs). These principles are set to be officially released by the end of this month, according to a government official.The guiding principles will encompass several important aspects of the crypto industry. They will emphasize the need for enhanced information disclosure, requiring businesses to establish clear review standards for the listing and delisting of virtual assets. Additionally, there will be a focus on ensuring the separation and proper custody of assets belonging to both companies and customers.Focusing on offshore complianceThe FSC intends to make it clear that offshore crypto exchanges must adhere to proper compliance registration if they want to conduct business onshore. The move is in line with what appears to be a commitment by the Taiwanese authorities to promote responsible and secure cryptocurrency operations.One particularly significant restriction is the prohibition of illegal solicitation of business by foreign crypto firms. The FSC is determined to enforce this rule strictly. Foreign VASPs that fail to register according to company law and declare their compliance with anti-money laundering regulations to the FSC will be barred from soliciting business in Taiwan or catering to domestic residents.It’s worth noting that Taiwan has been proactive in implementing anti-money laundering laws for VASPs since July 2021. Although this particular measure has been in place, the cryptocurrency industry in Taiwan has largely operated in a regulatory vacuum. However, recent developments suggest a shift towards greater oversight and accountability.One notable example is Binance, the world’s largest cryptocurrency exchange, which has initiated the process of registering for anti-money laundering compliance in Taiwan. Despite not being fully regulated in the country, Binance has established a local entity, “Binance International Limited Taiwan Branch (Seychelles),” and received government approval for company registration.Building a regulatory frameworkIn addition to these regulatory efforts, the Ministry of Economic Affairs has proposed the creation of a new business category within relevant regulations. This move aims to facilitate the formation of cryptocurrency-related industry associations, encouraging the development of self-regulatory guidelines.The forthcoming guiding principles for VASPs are expected to provide much-needed clarity and structure to the rapidly evolving world of cryptocurrencies within Taiwan’s borders.Many leading jurisdictions have been behind the curve in developing a clear, workable regulatory framework for crypto. That has led to many exchanges establishing themselves in offshore locations where light touch regulation is applied. It’s highly likely that the Taiwanese have examined the fallout from this development, best exemplified by the spectacular collapse of Bahamas-based FTX last November.