MARBLEX Partners with Aptos to Expand Its Multichain Endeavors

Regulatory breach sees Philippines initiate blockade on BinanceIt’s been a very challenging year for global crypto platform Binance — one that doesn’t appear to be improving with the latest move to block access to the platform in the Philippines.Photo by Alexes Gerard on UnsplashUnlicensed to tradeIn a noteworthy development, the Philippines Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) declared on Tuesday its intention to block access to the Binance platform due to regulatory irregularities.The SEC asserted in a statement that Binance lacks the necessary license to operate in the Philippines, cautioning the public against engaging in investment products on the platform. The regulator stated:”BINANCE is NOT REGISTERED as a corporation in the Philippines and OPERATES WITHOUT THE NECESSARY LICENSE AND/OR AUTHORITY.”The regulatory body is actively working to have Binance blocked in the country, citing concerns about unregistered investment products. The impending ban is set to take effect within three months, allowing investors a window to exit their positions held through Binance.Pushback on advertisingIn addition to its attempts to block access to the platform, the SEC has also approached tech giants Google and Meta (Facebook’s parent company), requesting the blocking of Binance advertisements on their platforms within the country. This is a response to social media campaigns designed to attract Filipino investors to the embattled cryptocurrency exchange. While users can still download the Binance app from Google and Apple app stores in the Philippines, the extent of investor activity in the country remains uncertain.Follows U.S. regulatory actionThese actions in the Philippines come hot on the heels of Binance’s CEO Changpeng Zhao (CZ) stepping down and pleading guilty in a U.S. money-laundering case. The Philippines’ ban adds to Binance’s challenges as it aims to expand in Southeast Asia amid legal troubles in the U.S. and restrictions on operations in China.Over the course of a three-month period earlier this year, the world’s largest crypto exchange platform lost its ability to trade in Germany, Canada, Belgium, the Netherlands and Cyprus. Additionally, French authorities have been investigating the platform for alleged illegal provision of digital asset services and aggravated money laundering.Facing regulatory pushback in the U.S. and Europe, Binance appeared to be concentrating on making further in-roads in Asian markets over the course of this past year. It had recently pursued a joint venture with Gulf Energy in Thailand to launch a new digital assets exchange.Media reports previously suggested that Binance was considering acquiring a Philippine company to obtain operating licenses in the country. The SEC’s move to ban the platform follows a warning issued last year against using Binance, and it represents a broader effort to regulate the cryptocurrency sector and protect the public interest.The recent guilty plea by CZ for violating U.S. money laundering laws has added to the legal woes of the cryptocurrency giant. CZ agreed to personally pay $50 million in penalties as part of a $4.3 billion settlement to resolve investigations into Binance’s practices. He may also still face prison time in the U.S. In the Philippines, the SEC warns that Section 28 of the Securities Regulation Code (SRC) allows the application of a fine of up to five million pesos ($90,000) and a maximum prison term of 21 years.

Vietnam has moved to take a positive approach to crypto assets by passing legislation to legalize them. Last week, the Southeast Asian nation’s National Assembly passed the Digital Technology Industry Law, which takes effect on Jan. 1, 2026, according to a report published in the official online newspaper of the Vietnamese government. Photo by Daniel Bernard on UnsplashCategorizing digital assetsThe law sets out two categories of digital assets, virtual assets and crypto assets. The legislation frames virtual assets as digital assets used for exchange or investments. Meanwhile, crypto assets are to be regarded as digital assets utilized to validate transactions and confirm ownership while relying on the use of encryption technology. Neither category includes securities or digital versions of fiat currencies such as central bank digital currencies (CBDCs) or other financial instruments. The legislation gives the Vietnamese government the authority to define and apply specific regulatory conditions when it comes to items such as anti-money laundering (AML) measures and the inclusion of international cybersecurity standards. It is hoped that the law will pave the way for the development of home-grown technological enterprises within Vietnam, while also promoting a nationwide digital transformation process. Regulatory clarityThe legislation is significant as it clearly sets out the legal status of digital assets in Vietnam after years of uncertainty and regulatory ambiguity. Singapore-based blockchain-focused Business Strategist, Anndy Lian, said that such legal clarity could result in Vietnam becoming a regional hub for the crypto sector.  Anh Tran, who belongs to Superteam Vietnam, a community for Solana builders in Vietnam, said that the development was huge for founders, developers and investors in the crypto space in Vietnam. He stated: “For a country who has always been at the forefront of crypto adoption, [Vietnam] is now a 'green-lighted zone' in principle, but we're still waiting at the red light for operational rules.” He refers to the fact that Vietnamese regulators still have until Jan. 1, 2026, to flesh out the details in terms of defining who can issue, trade, custody or manage crypto, and how AML, cybersecurity and taxation are handled. Vietnamese officials are likely to give strong consideration to AML measures relative to crypto given that the Southeast Asian nation has been on the grey list of the Financial Action Task Force since 2023. Countries who appear on the grey list are under considerably more scrutiny with regard to AML matters. While another community member claimed that anywhere crypto regulation has been implemented, actual usage has declined, Tran maintained that regulation is inevitable and that “crypto doesn’t need to be lawless to be free.” Last October, Vietnam set out its blockchain strategy, aspiring to the goal of achieving regional leadership in the sector by 2030. In March, the country’s Prime Minister, Pham Minh Chinh, requested that a legal framework for cryptocurrencies be established.  According to Chainalysis’ 2024 Global Crypto Adoption Index, Vietnam ranks fifth in the world.

Genesis Ordered to Comply with Subpoena in Terraform Labs CaseGenesis, the troubled crypto lender and trading company, has been issued a compelling directive by a New York court. The court has mandated Genesis to comply with a subpoena within five days, following a failure to respond to previous requests by the October 9 deadline, relative to a case involving Singapore’s Terraform Labs.Photo by Michael Discenza on UnsplashTerraUSD collapse falloutThese requests are related to the 2022 collapse of the TerraUSD stablecoin, a cryptocurrency which was supposed to maintain a peg to the US dollar’s value until it lost that peg and collapsed. At the time, the demise of TerraUSD reverberated throughout the cryptocurrency markets.In response to this collapse, the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) initiated a legal action against Terraform Labs, the company responsible for the token, and its co-founder Do Kwon, alleging that investors had been misled. Both Do Kwon and Terraform subsequently tried unsuccessfully to have the case dismissed.As part of the progression of this case, the SEC sought to question Do Kwon and gain access to company records held by the Singapore-headquartered firm. The defendants were ultimately unsuccessful in arguing their case in that instance on jurisdictional grounds.Failure to respondJudge Jed Rakoff, in a court order filed on Friday, highlighted Genesis’s non-compliance with the subpoenas, stating:“As of today, the Genesis Entities have failed to produce any documents in response to the Subpoenas.”These subpoenas were issued by the defendants to seek specific information from Genesis Global Capital, Genesis Global Holdco, and Genesis Global Trading on September 12.The court order does not specify the nature of the information sought. It is worth noting that Genesis extended substantial loans to the now-defunct hedge fund Three Arrows Capital (3AC), which was heavily exposed to the TerraUSD stablecoin. In January 2023, three Genesis entities filed for bankruptcy, and its trading arm ceased its US spot market operations in September.In addition to the challenge posed by Genesis’ non-compliance, Judge Rakoff is also wrestling with obtaining information from Do Kwon in connection with the legal proceedings. Kwon’s legal representatives have argued that he cannot physically come to the US as he is serving a jail sentence in Montenegro for possession of a counterfeit passport.However, Judge Rakoff has expressed his determination to ensure Kwon’s availability for cross-questioning and stated that Kwon will not be allowed to provide any declarations in the case without being subject to cross-examination.Citadel under scrutinyIn a related development, it emerged last week that Terraform Labs is accusing American market maker Citadel Securities of having sabotaged its TerraUSD stablecoin. As part of the Singaporean company’s pursuit of justice, it has called upon the United States District Court in the Southern District of Florida to force Citadel to furnish specific documents that relate to their trading activities during the period within which TerraUSD collapsed.Should it fail in that endeavor, Terraform has said that it will look to have the matter heard in Judge Rakoff’s court in New York.This legal development concerning Genesis marks a crucial juncture in the ongoing investigation into the TerraUSD stablecoin’s collapse and the actions of the entities involved, with Genesis now facing increased pressure to cooperate fully with the legal process.