e-CNY Payments Enabled for Hong Kong Visitors From Mainland China

Bitstamp, regarded as the longest-running cryptocurrency exchange in the business, declared on March 6 that it has obtained in-principle approval for a license to function as a Major Payment Institution (MPI) from the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS).Photo by Zhu Hongzhi on UnsplashFirst major Euro exchange in SingaporeThis preliminary approval, a precursor to a full-fledged license for operation in Singapore, marks a significant milestone for Bitstamp towards offering digital payment token services within the city-state. According to the exchange's press release, it's the first crypto trading platform with a substantial presence in the European Union (EU) to secure such approval from MAS. The nod from Singapore’s financial regulator arrives amidst notable regulatory strides in the crypto domain, including the European Union’s rollout of the Markets in Crypto-Assets (MiCA) framework and the green light given by the U.S. for Bitcoin ETFs. Focusing on AsiaBitstamp's strategic focus on the Asia Pacific region, with Singapore as its central hub, underscores its focus in delivering services to both institutional and retail clientele across the region. The firm’s intent in this regard became clear in August of last year when Bitstamp sought capital funding to enable it to extend the platform’s reach into various markets across Asia. Whilst the company’s origins can  be traced back to Slovenia, it has since developed further ties with Asia. In 2018, the company was acquired by NXMH, a subsidiary of South Korea’s NXC Corporation. The same holding company owns Korean crypto exchange Korbit. Compliance strategyWhile the licensing is quite the achievement, the company already boasts a robust regulatory track record, surpassing the 50-license mark across key markets such as Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Italy, Spain, France the United States (with coverage in 40 states including New York, Washington, Texas and Florida) and the United Kingdom. In its press release the company referred to its ever-growing licensing collection, outlining that “compliance and regulation [are] at the heart of all operations.” Leonard Hoh, Bitstamp's APAC General Manager, lauded Singapore's proactive stance in establishing a regulatory framework for crypto exchanges, positioning the city-state as a pivotal player in the digital assets landscape. Singapore has already granted full licenses to several crypto service providers, including Blockchain.com, Circle, Coinbase and Ripple. In late 2023, Bitstamp initiated talks with three major European banks regarding the potential introduction of cryptocurrency services in 2024. This signals a broader trend within the EU, where the crypto regulatory initiative, MiCA, is smoothing the path for traditional financial institutions to venture into the digital assets realm. Robert Zagotta, Bitstamp’s Chief Commercial Officer, highlighted the surge in interest surrounding its “Bitstamp-as-a-Service” offering, especially within European circles. This service furnishes a white-label licensing framework, coupled with requisite technology, to aid banks and fintech entities in facilitating cryptocurrency transactions for their clientele. However, the regulatory landscape isn't as welcoming in India, where the country’s Financial Intelligence Unit (FIU) urged the Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology to block the URLs of nine major global crypto exchanges, including Bitstamp, in late 2023. 

Upbit D Conference participants share insights on Web3 and blockchainBlockchain specialists from 29 countries gathered on Monday (local time) at Upbit D Conference (UDC) 2023 in Seoul to explore capital markets in the forthcoming Web3 era. This era is characterized by user-controlled, communal data management, a notable shift from the Web2 space where major tech corporations held dominant control over data.Organized by Dunamu, the operator of South Korea’s Upbit cryptocurrency exchange, the conference featured 39 experts, focusing on the transformative potential of blockchain technology in this new internet phase.Photo by Shubham Dhage on UnsplashAsset tokenization and investment opportunitiesAccording to a report by the Asia Business Daily, one of the key speakers at the conference, Wally Yu, a Solutions Architect at San Francisco-based Chainlink Labs, delved into how cross-chain solutions and asset tokenization could add to the financial industry. He explained that Chainlink’s Cross-Chain Interoperability Protocol (CCIP), designed to connect various blockchains, is only beginning to reveal its capabilities in integrating with traditional financial markets. Yu pointed out the growing interest from banks in tokenizing their conventional assets and transferring them to the blockchain. This move, he suggested, could lead to increased liquidity and open up new investment opportunities.Yu also compared the current DeFi market to traditional sectors like stock, real estate, and derivatives, noting DeFi’s relatively smaller scale. However, he underlined blockchain’s transparency as a key advantage over traditional markets, where transparency is often lacking. According to Yu, the adoption of blockchain by traditional financial firms could address longstanding issues more effectively.Looking ahead to the Web3 era, Yu envisioned a scenario where different tokens are interconnected, potentially bringing an estimated $900 trillion worth of assets onto the blockchain. This, he believes, would significantly enhance liquidity in the financial markets.From Web2 to Web3During the conference, Korean mobile network provider SK Telecom’s (SKT) Vice President, Oh Se-hyun, outlined the company’s forward-looking strategy to transition its 30 million subscribers from Web2 to Web3. She highlighted SKT’s search for high-value markets to expand its business scope, underscoring the company’s active efforts in constructing Web3 infrastructure. This strategic pivot aligns with their vision for the upcoming Web3 era.SKT, which established its Web3 division in 2017, initially engaged in developing a private mainnet. However, the company has since shifted its focus towards services aimed at boosting customer engagement, such as custody, web and app services. Oh emphasized the need for Web3 wallets to support a diverse range of assets and decentralized applications (dApps), but she stressed that ease of use is paramount. She views that these wallets will serve as gateways for customers entering the blockchain space.SKT has developed and is improving its own Web3 wallet, dubbed Wallet T. Oh shared her belief that the future of financial business models will pivot from traditional and big-tech banks to those based on public chains. In preparation for this shift, SKT is contemplating strategies to embrace blockchain-based Web3 services.Crypto regulationThe conference also touched on the potential integration of virtual assets within regulatory frameworks. There’s growing anticipation in the market for the approval of spot bitcoin exchange-traded funds (ETFs) by the United States Securities and Exchange Commission, especially following the inclusion of asset manager BlackRock’s proposed spot bitcoin ETF in the Depository Trust and Clearing Corporation’s (DTCC) clearing-house eligibility file.Emily Parker, Executive Director at CoinDesk, mentioned that a spot bitcoin ETF is on the horizon in the U.S. She anticipated that such a development would not only boost cryptocurrency prices but also positively impact the market for non-fungible tokens (NFTs). Echoing this sentiment, Oh Se-hyun from SKT predicted that the approval of a spot bitcoin ETF could unlock access to a $30 trillion market.SKT’s Oh also addressed the complexities surrounding the regulatory landscape for cryptocurrencies. She acknowledged the challenge facing authorities in developing these regulations all at once, highlighting the gradual progress in this area. She cited the outcome of Ripple’s lawsuit in the U.S., which resulted in Ripple’s XRP tokens being classified differently for different investors: as a security for institutional investors but not for retail investors. Additionally, Oh pointed to the upcoming Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation (MiCA) in the European Union, slated for implementation in December 2024. She emphasized that the establishment of such regulatory guidelines brings clarity and reduces uncertainty, which can be reassuring for businesses operating in the crypto space.Providing further insights into this matter, Kim Gap-rae, a senior researcher at the Korea Capital Market Institute (KCMI), spoke about the importance of regulatory clarity in the cryptocurrency sector. He pointed out that it’s more crucial for governments to have clear regulations rather than focusing on the extent of regulation. Understanding new regulatory or legislative trends is essential for governments as they look to develop new infrastructures.According to Kim, a potential spot bitcoin ETF approval in the U.S. could prompt South Korea to consider a similar approval. However, he noted that Korea currently lacks a regulatory framework for Bitcoin custody, which could lead to a competitive environment among crypto companies in the country. Kim believes that a deeper understanding of custodian regulations will enable better adaptation to new types of ETFs and foster their growth in Korea.

At the end of last month, social derivatives trading platform ZKX, a protocol that runs on the Ethereum-centric Starknet layer-2 network, shut down blindsiding the project’s stakeholders. That event has led to Singapore-headquartered digital assets firm Amber Group speaking out, calling for cryptocurrency projects to be more accountable and transparent going forward. Not economically viableNews of the project shutdown emerged when ZKX founder Eduard Jubany Tur took to X on July 30 to outline the discontinuation of the protocol. Tur claimed that the project was “unable to find an economically viable path for the protocol.” In a long-form post, the ZKX founder outlined that user engagement had been minimal, resulting in disappointing trading volumes. By extension, Tur claimed that revenues didn’t come anywhere close to covering cloud server expenses. “The market is undervaluing the work done and infrastructure built by appchains and dApps coming from ecosystems like ours,” Tur added. Pseudonymous blockchain sleuth ZachXBT had a different take on the matter, claiming that the shutdown represented a rug pull. Amber Group chimed in on the subject on X on Aug. 3. Amber suggested that it wouldn’t break any contractual non-disclosure obligations it had with regard to ZKX but that aside, the firm took the opportunity to share its perspective more broadly in an effort to promote transparency.Photo by Markus Spiske on PexelsAmber Group criticismAmber Group criticized the ZKX team on the basis of a lack of transparency. It stated: “The last update we received was on July 30, when the project announced the cessation of operations. This decision was made without prior communication, highlighting the importance of transparency in our industry.” Staying with that theme, it claimed that clear communication and transparency are essential for fostering trust and collaboration within the crypto community, and that such principles would guide future projects. Amber Group had acted as a market maker relative to the ZKX project. It borrowed and purchased ZKX tokens in support of the launch of the token and in an effort to support token liquidity post-launch. It had secured two million ZKX tokens from the open market, with its overall holding totaling three million ZKX tokens. Project investor HashKey Capital also took to the X social media platform on the subject. Like Amber Group it too criticized the ZKX project for its lack of accountability and transparency. It described the project’s reluctance to communicate as “disappointing,” while it asserted that Tur’s handling of the situation had been “regrettable.” Ye Su, founding partner at ArkStream Capital, expressed a similar complaint, stating on X that “when ZKX shut down, as investors, we got zero heads-up.” He also singled out Tur, claiming that “Edward took the money from early supporters without any communication, showing no moral standards and losing his right to future entrepreneurship in the industry.”