Chinese City Unveils Plan to Develop Metaverse

Krafton and Naver Z Unveil a Metaverse Joint Venture ‘Overdare’Krafton, the developer behind the popular shooter game PlayerUnknown’s Battlegrounds (PUBG), made an announcement on Thursday regarding its collaboration with augmented reality company Naver Z for a metaverse platform project. The official name of their joint venture has been revealed as “Overdare.” Furthermore, its forthcoming metaverse service, previously referred to as Migaloo, will also be rebranded under the name Overdare.Photo by Tima Miroshnichenko on PexelsInvestment breakdownThe total investment in the joint venture amounts to KRW 48 billion (approximately $36 million), with Krafton’s anticipated purchase price standing at KRW 40.8 billion and Naver Z’s expected purchase price at KRW 7.2 billion. Following the acquisition, Krafton will hold an 85% stake in the joint venture, while Naver Z will possess the remaining 15%.Meaning behind ‘Overdare’The company has chosen the English word Overdare to convey two meanings–“dare too much” and “over there,” which has a phonetic resemblance. Through this name, the joint venture aspires to establish itself as a pioneer in the realm of interactive user-generated content (UGC) platforms. Simultaneously, its service aims to provide a place where users can freely and fearlessly express themselves.As a mobile UGC platform, Overdare offers users the ability to craft games of diverse genres, including action RPGs, sports games, and shooting games. Leveraging the power of generative artificial intelligence and the advanced capabilities of Unreal Engine 5, a renowned video game engine, the platform facilitates the streamlined creation of top-notch content. Beyond game development, users can immerse themselves in a wide array of social activities, ranging from personalizing their avatars to engaging in lively conversations.C2E systemOverdare has adopted a create-to-earn (C2E) system within the metaverse, empowering creators to produce their own content, which users can then purchase and own. The trading of these creations is facilitated through non-fungible tokens (NFTs) and blockchain technology. Every transaction that takes place within the metaverse is recorded on the blockchain, and creators are duly compensated based on these transaction records. This system enhances the transparency of transactions and settlements.Compensation in USDCIn pursuit of this vision, Overdare has selected Settlus, a Cosmos-based blockchain developed by Krafton’s subsidiary of the same name, as its mainnet. Settlus has been dedicated to licensing creators’ intellectual property through NFTs on Web2 platforms. As part of this ecosystem, creators have the flexibility to receive compensation in USDC, the US dollar-pegged stablecoin issued by crypto company Circle.Overdare has its sights set on a soft launch of its service in December, followed by the official global release planned for the first half of next year.

Singaporean Regulator Proposes Framework for Digital Money UseThe Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) has released a White Paper that outlines proposed standards for the use of digital assets. The aim is to establish a common protocol and conditions for the utilization of these assets.While the paper identifies the potential digital assets bring in streamlining transactions and promoting financial inclusion, it also outlines challenges that need to be addressed before digital money can be successfully implemented.Photo by Pixabay on PexelsPurpose Bound Money (PBM)MAS’s White Paper, which was published on Wednesday, provides requirements to protect the use of digital assets as a medium of exchange and offers a technical overview of Purpose Bound Money (PBM). PBM allows the sender of digital money to specify certain conditions such as validity periods or how the money can be spent.The covered digital monies include central bank digital currencies (CBDCs), tokenized bank deposits, and potentially well-regulated stablecoins, excluding digital assets that it considers volatile such as Bitcoin. These digital monies are generally pegged to real-world currencies, commodities, or financial institutions, making them more stable.MAS highlights that PBMs utilize a common protocol compatible with different ledger technologies and forms of money. This protocol enables money to be directed toward a specific purpose without requiring the money itself to be programmed. It functions as a secure two-layered delivery vehicle, with funds held as collateral in a “wrapper” until specific conditions are met for its release.Standardized formatThe standardized format outlined in the White Paper will allow users to access digital money using their preferred wallet provider. By establishing these standards, the prospects for digital money to become a significant component of the future financial and payments landscape are enhanced. Standardization and regulated use of PBMs can unlock economic value, facilitate efficient and inclusive digital transactions, and provide additional consumer protection.One notable application of PBMs is in protecting online payments, such as e-commerce transactions and prepaid packages. With PBMs, advance payments can be securely held until the service is fulfilled, ensuring that the product or service is delivered before funds are released. This benefits both consumers and merchants, assuring consumers of product delivery and allowing merchants to verify payment before delivering.PBMs can also aid businesses in mitigating risks associated with international trade transactions, ensuring secure and efficient payments while reducing the potential for fraud or non-payment.InteroperabilityTo ensure the safety and usability of digital monies, MAS highlights considerations that will impact PBM implementation. Interoperability across different platforms is crucial to avoid fragmentation and excessive fees. The choice of underlying digital currencies also affects usability and value, with CBDCs, tokenized bank liabilities, and stablecoins offering varying levels of guarantees and regulatory oversight. Additionally, privacy, digital readiness, and the impact on users need to be carefully assessed.MAS acknowledges that the regulatory landscape for digital monies is still evolving globally, which may lead to varying regulatory treatment of PBMs across jurisdictions. It believes that policy considerations should be thought through when designing PBM-based solutions, including decisions regarding issuance, distribution, and conditions for use.

In a contrasting move to the recent approval of several spot bitcoin exchange-traded funds (ETFs) by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), regulators in both Singapore and Thailand have turned down permission to list spot bitcoin ETFs.Photo by Dmytro Demidko on UnsplashBitcoin not a qualified assetAccording to local news media on Wednesday, Singapore's Monetary Authority (MAS) has announced its decision not to permit the listing of spot ETFs in the country. The MAS argues that cryptocurrencies, including bitcoin, do not meet the criteria for qualified assets within the context of ETFs. This regulatory divergence means that retail investors in Singapore won't see the introduction of spot bitcoin ETFs domestically. However, they still have an avenue to trade such ETFs as they can turn to local brokerages for access to overseas markets. Despite this allowance, the MAS emphasizes the need for these retail investors to exercise caution due to the inherent high volatility and speculative nature of cryptocurrency trading. A spokesperson from the regulatory authority clarified that while collected investment schemes (CIS), falling under the Securities and Futures Act regulation, include ETFs, they do not encompass bitcoin or any other cryptocurrency. Future potentialWhile MAS may be turning down spot bitcoin ETFs at this point, there’s potential for a change of heart in the future. The FIMA Bill is currently working its way through the city-state’s legislative process. If enacted, it would give broader regulatory oversight of crypto to MAS. Lasanka Perera, CEO of Independent Reserve Singapore, recently suggested that the bill could make an ETF more likely. Thailand says noMeanwhile, Thailand’s Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has stated that it currently does not plan to allow asset management firms to launch spot bitcoin ETFs in the country. Thai securities brokerage firms have been encouraging investors to consider investing directly in U.S. spot bitcoin ETFs. The Thai SEC clarified that while it closely monitors these developments, there is no immediate policy to allow spot bitcoin ETFs in Thailand. The regulator emphasizes that Thai investors can still engage in digital asset investments through domestic exchanges licensed by the SEC under the Digital Assets Decree. India, too, doesn’t appear to have been looking favorably on the potential for such products. The governor of the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) said last week that “the way we look at crypto remains unchanged, irrespective of who does what.” Asian optimismIn the wake of ETF approval in the U.S., many industry commentators had suggested that Asia would respond positively. Australian venture capitalist Mark Carnegie has suggested that the developing bull market would be “an Asian story.” Yat Siu, co-founder of Hong Kong’s Animoca Brands, expressed the view that U.S. ETF approval would have a substantially positive impact within the Asian region. Hong Kong appears to be the most positive in the region in its outlook with regard to embracing spot bitcoin ETFs. Immediately following approval in the U.S., a Hong Kong legislator spoke out to encourage a proactive response relative to launch of similar products within the Chinese autonomous territory. Meanwhile, recent news reports indicate that spot bitcoin ETFs experienced substantial trading volume, accumulating $10 billion just three days after their approval in the U.S.