Chinese City Unveils Plan to Develop Metaverse

The Need to Distinguish Between Security and Non-Security Virtual AssetsWith the recent enactment of the Virtual Asset User Protection Bill in South Korea, there is a need to lay out criteria for determining whether virtual assets qualify as securities, says Kim Ja-bong, a senior research fellow at the Korea Institute of Finance, in his report titled “The Implications of Determining Which Virtual Assets Constitute Securities and Investor Protection” released on Saturday.Photo by Shubham Dhage on UnsplashThe implications of the Virtual Asset User Protection ActThe Virtual Asset User Protection Act — which will take effect in July of next year — aims to protect customer assets, establish regulations against unfair trading practices, and enforce penalties. Notably, it will target virtual assets that are not securities, deeming it necessary for regulators to determine if virtual assets qualify as securities or not in order to enforce the bill. Assets with characteristics of securities will fall under the jurisdiction of the Capital Markets Act.Therefore, if the Virtual Asset User Protection Act does not provide sufficient investor protection, issuers may be incentivized to issue non-security assets rather than security assets to avoid the regulations of the Capital Markets Act. This further necessitates the act of distinguishing between virtual assets that are securities versus those that are not.Determining if a virtual asset is a security or notThere are two approaches to do this, according to Kim: the passive approach, which avoids considering a virtual asset as a security whenever possible, and the active approach, which treats a virtual asset as a security whenever applicable.He argues that it is better to focus on whether an investment contract qualifies as a security if it is considered an investment contract, rather than simply selecting a specific approach.Furthermore, the nature of virtual assets renders them unbound by national borders, so it is necessary to establish assessment criteria that correspond with international standards, such as those used in the US and Europe.This is especially important because if the criteria differ from international standards, there is a risk of domestic investors suffering damages due to an issuer’s pursuit of regulatory arbitrage between countries.Equitable recognition and potential for security tokensAccording to Kim, the importance of determining whether virtual assets are securities lies in ensuring that security tokens receive the same recognition and trading treatment as traditional securities such as stocks. With such a measure, security token offerings can serve as an efficient and reliable method for raising funds. Although there may be concerns that such a regulation may hinder the development of virtual assets, it may well be an opportunity for security tokens to be qualified and trusted as high-quality financial instruments just like existing securities, Kim claims.Even for virtual assets that are not considered securities, there are many types of assets that are financial in nature, such as e-money tokens — therefore, it is necessary to actively protect investors in non-security virtual assets through financial regulations such as reinforcing disclosure obligations, which is being done in the EU through the Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation (MiCA).Empowering regulators for enhanced investor protection and market integrityKim underscored that investor protection and healthy growth of the virtual asset market are made possible mainly through expanding regulators’ authority to protect economic interests and prevent damages. The author also suggested institutional reforms that grant regulators substantial authority, which would enhance their ability to protect investors effectively and provide compensation for damages.He added that regulators should also have the authority to enforce liability for damages or impose civil penalties for unfair trading practices conducted using classified information.

Taiwan Aims to Propose Special Crypto Law by Late NovemberIn a bid to address growing concerns surrounding offshore crypto exchanges and prevent regulatory arbitrage, Taiwan is actively working towards proposing a draft special crypto law for its first reading by the end of November.Yung-Chang Chiang, a member of the Legislative Yuan, the Taiwanese parliament, emphasized the need for a dedicated crypto asset act to effectively regulate crypto businesses in discussion with The Block on Friday. Chiang believes that cryptocurrencies, as an asset class, significantly differ from traditional financial products and require oversight through a separate, specialized legal framework.Photo by Ian Chen on UnsplashPublic hearingThe Taiwanese politician recently organized a public hearing within the parliament to discuss the draft proposal with key stakeholders, including virtual asset service providers, legal experts, and academics. He argued that while Taiwan’s Financial Supervisory Commission (FSC) had released guidelines for the crypto sector to establish self-supervisory rules through a potential industry association, these measures lack legal enforceability.Chiang pointed out:“In this case, under the authority of this special law, regulatory authorities can impose administrative penalties on operators who violate these self-regulation rules. Without such a special law, the regulators would lack the ability to impose penalties.”Under the proposed special law, all crypto platforms operating in Taiwan would be required to obtain a permit. Failure to do so could result in regulatory orders to cease operations. Presently, Taiwan mandates that virtual asset service providers comply with anti-money laundering (AML) laws, which were introduced by the FSC in July 2021. However, the broader crypto industry in Taiwan remains largely unregulated.It is unlikely that the special law will pass through all three readings during the current legislative session, which is expected to conclude by the end of this year. Chiang noted: “An election is coming up, and the current legislative session focuses more on reviewing the government’s budget.”Chiang also mentioned the possibility of Taiwan’s FSC proposing its version of the special crypto law, but this is not anticipated until at least mid-2024. He explained: “It’s hard to say exactly when the special law will be enacted, but it should likely occur sometime after the middle of 2024.”Binance, the world’s largest crypto exchange, is understood to be in the process of registering in Taiwan for AML compliance, despite not currently being regulated in the country. The exchange has formed a local entity named “Binance International Limited Taiwan Branch (Seychelles),” as indicated in the Taiwanese Ministry of Economic Affairs’ database.Banking difficultiesDuring the public hearing, Damien Ho, Representative of Global Partnerships at Binance, raised concerns about the challenges faced by crypto platforms in Taiwan in securing suitable banking services. Despite the FSC’s efforts to discourage banks from treating crypto platforms as high-risk entities, crypto platforms still encounter difficulties in their interactions with banks. Ho suggested that the Taiwanese government should encourage private or public banks to become more crypto-friendly, facilitating the regulated and effective development of crypto businesses.At the public hearing, Winston Hsiao, Co-Founder and Group CRO of Taipei-based crypto exchange XREX, suggested a step-by-step approach to regulation, with smaller entities adhering to self-supervisory rules formulated by the industry association after registration. For larger entities, he proposed obtaining a permit under the special law and potentially applying for other relevant financial licenses.

The South Korean government and the ruling party may postpone agreement on a unified proposal for the Digital Asset Basic Act, legislation that would include regulations on stablecoins. The bill represents the second phase of the country’s cryptocurrency regulatory framework, following the first phase that took effect in 2024 to strengthen investor protection.Photo by KS KYUNG on UnsplashAccording to Edaily, the two sides had planned a policy consultation on March 5 to finalize the draft. The meeting was later pushed back to this week but is now unlikely to take place, potentially delaying the government’s plan to complete stablecoin legislation by this month. The Digital Asset Basic Act is a comprehensive bill to regulate the crypto market, including issuance, distribution, disclosure, and listing of virtual assets. South Korea has more than 13 million crypto investors, and market participants see the legislation as a step toward reducing regulatory uncertainty. Meanwhile, the rapid rise of dollar-denominated stablecoins such as USDT and USDC has raised concerns that a slow regulatory response could undermine the country’s monetary sovereignty. Toss eyes dual role in KRW stablecoinsAmid ongoing debate over stablecoin regulation, Viva Republica, the operator of the payments app Toss, is preparing to move into the issuance and distribution of won-denominated stablecoins. At the 2026 Blockchain Meetup Conference last week, Seo Chang-whoon, corporate development director at Viva Republica, said Toss hopes to take on both roles in the stablecoin ecosystem, according to ZDNet Korea. “Toss would like to try serving both as a stablecoin issuer and as a distribution platform,” Seo said. The company is considering joining a consortium to issue a won-based stablecoin, which could include Toss, its financial affiliates, and traditional banks. Toss also plans to expand the token’s use through a dApp store, and indicated it may work with blockchain firms as it develops the business. Global firms are also studying the market potential for Korean won-backed stablecoins. DWF Ventures said in a report last week titled “South Korea’s KRW Stablecoin Opportunity” that a won-denominated stablecoin could offer meaningful benefits to domestic markets. The report argued that such a token could help reduce reliance on the U.S. dollar and curb capital outflows, while improving capital efficiency by allowing reserves to generate yield. With about 98% of South Koreans using digital payments, adoption could come quickly, the report said, adding that the system could also strengthen authorities’ ability to monitor and curb illegal activity. Survey finds modest optimism around BitcoinAmid growing expectations around stablecoin policy, a recent survey of South Korean crypto investors showed cautious optimism about Bitcoin’s price outlook this week. According to a weekly poll conducted last week by CoinNess and Cratos, 27.3% of respondents said they expect Bitcoin to rise or surge this week, up from 24% a week earlier. 32.2% predicted the price would move sideways, up from 28.1% the previous week, while 30.5% expected a decline or sharp drop, down from 47.9% a week earlier. When asked about market sentiment, 37% of respondents said they felt fear or extreme fear, while 32.2% described sentiment as neutral, and 30.8% said they were optimistic or extremely optimistic. Asked why they invest in cryptocurrencies, 33.9% of respondents said they see crypto as the only path to upward mobility. Another 32.5% cited confidence in the long-term value of Bitcoin and blockchain technology, while 25.5% pointed to its role as a hedge against instability in traditional finance. The remaining 8.1% cited volatility and 24/7 trading. According to CoinMarketCap data, Bitcoin was trading at $72,634.39 at the time of writing, up 9.34% over the past week.