Regulator pulls plug on Bybit in Malaysia

BitMEX CEO Calls for an End to Internal Market MakersIn a recent interview, Stephan Lutz, the acting CEO and group CFO of 100x Group, the parent company of Seychelles-headquartered global crypto exchange BitMEX, expressed his belief that crypto exchanges should phase out their internal market-making teams.Photo by Joe Roberts on UnsplashProp trading desks unnecessarySpeaking with The Block, Lutz argued that with the growth of institutional liquidity providers and high-frequency traders (HFTs) in the market, proprietary trading desks are becoming unnecessary.Lutz stated: “You have enough HFTs out there and prop shops that can perform that function.” He was referring to the role of liquidity providers in filling gaps in the market. He made these comments in response to the emergence of information earlier this week that raised questions about internal trading practices at Crypto.com, a Singapore-based exchange.BitMEX, once the world’s largest crypto derivatives exchange, also used to employ internal traders who acted as market makers. However, Lutz explained that BitMEX’s internal trading team, named Arrakis Capital, now functions primarily as a “treasury desk.” He sees this transition as a natural evolution for crypto exchanges in a market that has matured and attracted more institutional liquidity providers.Arrakis Capital currently performs limited functions, including converting commission fees earned in Bitcoin into fiat currency for operational purposes, hedging BitMEX’s exposure to tokens held as inventory, and making markets for BitMEX’s token $BMEX. Lutz clarified that Arrakis’s market-making activities are limited because external market makers find the token’s liquidity insufficient.Regarding profitability, Lutz stated that Arrakis earns “very minor returns” of up to $100,000 per month from holding T-Bills, but it incurred losses last year. He noted that Arrakis used to play a more significant market-making role when BitMEX dominated the crypto futures market. However, he assured that the trading desk was always segregated, despite accusations in the past.Fee structuresLutz acknowledged that exchanges with internal trading teams have faced increased scrutiny since the controversies surrounding Alameda Research and FTX. To differentiate between benign internal trading teams and hedge fund-like operations, Lutz highlighted several factors, including the separation of client funds and house funds, access to sensitive data, and the ability to move markets on their own exchange. Fee structures also play a role, with low or no transaction fees potentially signaling a market-making motive rather than serving as a counterparty.Lutz’s perspective suggests that crypto exchanges should rely on external liquidity providers and HFTs rather than maintaining internal market-making teams. He argues that the market has evolved. At this point he feels that these teams are no longer necessary, due to the presence of established players within the digital assets space.As regulatory scrutiny grows, ensuring transparency and avoiding conflicts of interest become crucial for maintaining trust within the crypto exchange ecosystem. The digital assets industry is far from arriving at a mature stage in its development. While many in the industry have found the stance taken by regulators to be unhelpful, the industry itself must also demonstrate its ability to iteratively move towards best practice, without that being a knee-jerk response to regulatory enforcement.

South Korea’s largest cryptocurrency exchange Upbit has opened a special event in celebration of its staking service surpassing a total value of KRW 1.5 trillion ($1.2 billion), where users can participate in a staking quiz to receive 0.002 ETH (approximately $4.60) each. Staking refers to the process of entrusting crypto assets to be utilized for a blockchain’s operations and receiving rewards in return.Photo by Nenad Novaković on UnsplashEvent detailsParticipants in the quiz event will have 30 minutes to complete five quizzes related to Upbit’s staking service. The total reward pool is 210 ETH, which will be allocated to 100,000 participants on a first-come, first-served basis the day after answers are submitted. After completing the quiz mission, ten users who also stake their Ethereum assets will get the opportunity to be selected to receive 1 ETH each. "We organized the event to make more users aware of staking on Upbit and to express our gratitude,” Dunamu, the operator of Upbit, said. Upbit’s growing staking platformUpbit’s staking service was officially launched in January last year. Currently, there are five cryptocurrencies that can be staked on Upbit – Ethereum, Cosmos, Cardano, Solana and Polygon. In particular, the exchange does not manage user assets or entrust them to external parties but stakes them through self-operated validators. All staked assets are stored in a cold wallet. 

Matrixport, a Singapore-headquartered digital assets financial services firm, announced the acquisition of Switzerland-based Crypto Finance Asset Management (CFAM), a regulated crypto fund management firm. The acquisition, completed by way of an all-cash deal, signifies Matrixport’s expansion into the European market. The company announced the deal via a blog post published on the Matrixport website on Sept. 30. Photo by Lin Mei on UnsplashCFAM rebrandAs part of the acquisition, CFAM will be rebranded to Matrixport Asset Management AG (MAM), providing institutional-grade crypto investment solutions, while continuing to act as a crypto market infrastructure provider.  CFAM CEO Stijn Vander Straeten stated that the company’s strategy focused on “trading, custody and staking as well as other post-trade services.” He added, “This move allows us to put all our focus on expanding our core services within the digital asset ecosystem in Switzerland, Germany and across the European markets.” CFAM had formed part of the Crypto Finance Group, an entity part-owned by the Deutsche Börse Group. Regulatory complaint acquisitionIn its press release, Matrixport outlined that the acquisition has been completed with regulatory approval having been granted by the Swiss Financial Market Supervisory Authority (FINMA), the Swiss independent financial markets regulator, which supervises banks, insurance companies and financial institutions in Switzerland. CFAM became the first FINMA-approved manager of a crypto fund in Switzerland. Commenting on the acquisition, Matrixport Co-Founder and CEO John Ge, stated: “We are delighted with the establishment of MAM and warmly welcome the team to the Matrixport family. The acquisition enables clients access to the most innovative, compliant crypto asset management products, and aligns with our strategy to further expand services in Europe.” Personnel changesA number of personnel changes have been made as part of the acquisition. Stefan Schwitter has been appointed as CEO of MAM. Schwitter previously held the role of head of asset management at CFAM. The executive claimed that the complementary strengths of Matrixport and CFAM “will add value to the existing and future client base of Matrixport Group on a global level.” Matrixport was established in 2019 and currently holds over $6 billion in assets under management (AUM). Its founders include Jihan Wu, the co-founder of Chinese crypto miner manufacturer Bitmain and Singapore-based crypto cloud mining company Bitdeer. The firm is licensed as a money services business (MSB) in the United States, while also being licensed to trade in Hong Kong as a trust or company service provider (TCSP) and as a money lender. Matrixport offers its accredited investor and institutional clients over-the-counter (OTC) services, prime brokerage services, digital asset custody through qualified custodian Cactus Custody, asset management and access to real-world asset (RWA) tokenization. In September, the company offered tokenized RWA access in the form of XAUm, a gold-backed token, via its subsidiary company, Matrixdock. It emerged earlier this year that Matrixport had been listed on the Global Unicorn Index, a list of companies compiled by the Huron Research Institute, believed to have a valuation in excess of $1 billion while not yet listed on a public exchange.