HSBC Expands Offering to Include Crypto ETFs in Hong Kong

China introduces identity verification through RealDID on blockchainThe Chinese government, in collaboration with the Blockchain-based Service Network (BSN), has unveiled plans for the introduction of RealDID, a new digital identity service.Integrating blockchain into public systemsThis platform is set to bring blockchain-based digital identity verification processes into broader use, verifying the digital identities of China’s 1.4 billion people. Such an eventuality would represent a pivotal moment in China’s ongoing efforts to integrate advanced technologies into governance and public administration.The platform is being geared to deliver a spectrum of services, encompassing personal real-name confirmation, encrypted personal data protection and certification. Notably, it will enable private logins, establish business identities and offer personal identification certificate services, coupled with information vouchers on personal identity.Photo by Tamara Gak on UnsplashAnonymous online identityA standout feature of RealDID is its provision for Chinese citizens to register and access online portals anonymously through a Decentralized Identity (DID) address. This feature ensures the privacy of transactions and personal data, addressing global concerns over data security. The introduction of RealDID underscores China’s commitment to harmonizing technological advancement while at the same time, preserving the privacy of the individual.Although the specific roll-out date for RealDID across China’s vast population remains undisclosed, the potential impact of this initiative is monumental. The platform is poised to significantly enhance the security and efficiency of identity verification processes, a critical element in the realm of digital transactions and interactions.RealDID is a strategic component of China’s broader technological vision, aimed at solidifying its position as a global leader in emerging technologies. The nation has been actively investing in and regulating emerging innovations such as artificial intelligence, central bank digital currencies (CBDCs) and cryptocurrencies. In tandem with these endeavors, China is actively working to reduce its reliance on foreign semiconductor chips by boosting domestic production.BSN FoundationBSN, operated by China’s National Information Center, has forged partnerships with major tech players like China Mobile and China UnionPay, illustrating the collaborative nature of this national initiative. The network was co-founded by Hong Kong’s Red Date Technology. With the network originating in China, last month, the BSN Foundation was established in Singapore, featuring five global members.These included Blockdaemon; Zeeve, a Los Angeles-based blockchain infrastructure automation platform; TOKO, a Hong Kong-headquartered digital asset creation platform; Germany’s GFT Technologies; and Red Date Technology. The five will act as a governing body for the BSN Spartan Network.The unveiling of RealDID by the Chinese government signifies a significant stride in integrating blockchain technology into everyday governance and public services. Leveraging blockchain’s inherent decentralization and security features, RealDID aims to provide a more secure and efficient method of identity verification while upholding user privacy.This move aligns with the global trend of governments exploring blockchain technology for diverse public services, highlighting China’s interest in spearheading technological innovation. As the global landscape evolves, China’s strides in the realm of blockchain-based identity verification serve as a testament to its ongoing interest in the future of digital governance.

Bitget withdraws from Hong Kong crypto marketSeychelles-incorporated cryptocurrency derivatives platform Bitget has made a decision to permanently exit the Hong Kong market, discontinuing its efforts to obtain a virtual asset trading platform (VATP) license.Photo by SHUJA OFFICIAL on UnsplashBitgetX platform shutdownThe decision comes only months after it had introduced its BitgetX platform to comply with local regulations. The company, which bases its operations out of Singapore, is a well-known entity in the crypto space, renowned as the operator of the 12th-largest cryptocurrency exchange globally in terms of 24-hour trading volume. It made this revelation on Monday, citing what it referred to as “business and market-related considerations.”In a published statement, the company said:”With a heavy heart, we regret to inform you that due to business and market related considerations, we have decided not to pursue a Virtual Asset Trading Platform (VATP) license in Hong Kong. As a result of this decision, the BitgetX website (www.BitgetX.hk) will cease its operations effective December 13, 2023. At the same time, Bitgetx.hk will permanently exit the Hong Kong market.”While outlining that BitgetX will close its doors, the firm urged users to withdraw their assets beforehand. Bitget is among a handful of exchanges that had publicly expressed their intent to secure a license following Hong Kong’s proactive push over the course of the past year to embrace the virtual asset sector.Broader challengesThe decision to abandon the pursuit of a VATP license echoes the broader challenges faced by the cryptocurrency industry in Hong Kong. Despite the city’s recent enthusiastic regulatory embrace of the virtual asset sector, a number of stumbling blocks remain.High compliance costs and the lingering aftermath of the JPEX financial scandal have hindered Hong Kong’s aspirations to establish itself as a leading crypto hub. A report back in June identified the major cost implications of acquiring a license in Hong Kong. At the time, it was estimated that the required spend to obtain a VATP license could range from $2.55 million to $25.5 million.Banking crypto companies has also become a major bottleneck. In June, the Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA) urged banks such as HSBC, Standard Chartered and the Bank of China to bank the crypto sector, having identified a reluctance amongst them to do so.Limited interestThe forthcoming closure of BitgetX adds to a growing trend of limited interest in Hong Kong’s new licensing scheme. Only five companies, all local, have submitted applications for virtual asset licenses to the Securities and Futures Commission (SFC). This list began publication in response to the JPEX scandal, which significantly damaged public trust in virtual assets.The challenges faced by the industry go beyond regulatory hurdles. The damaged public trust, coupled with the high-profile exit of JPEX, has contributed to the hesitancy of international crypto platforms in pursuing licenses in Hong Kong. The abrupt withdrawal of Bitget raises questions about the viability of Hong Kong as a central player in the cryptocurrency industry and underscores the complexities faced by exchanges navigating the evolving landscape of the digital asset sector.

Taiwan to review crypto ETFs amid developments overseasThe Financial Supervisory Commission (FSC) in Taiwan has disclosed its close examination of foreign cryptocurrency futures products and exchange-traded funds (ETFs), signaling a potential shift in its regulatory approach.According to a report in Chinese-language financial newspaper, Taiwan’s Commercial Times, the FSC aims to gradually ease restrictions, aligning its stance with global market conditions.Photo by bordercollie 1712 on UnsplashResponding to crypto ETF activity internationallyThe Taiwanese regulator is carrying out this exploration against the backdrop of significant global developments. The possibility of the Federal Reserve cutting interest rates and the upcoming review by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) of the spot bitcoin ETF in January next year are key factors influencing the FSC’s considerations.The anticipation surrounding the Bitcoin halving in April, combined with speculation that a spot bitcoin ETF approval is imminent in the U.S., have contributed to a 145% surge this year in Bitcoin’s unit price, adding momentum to that regulatory contemplation in Taiwan. There has been speculation that BlackRock, the world’s largest fund manager, is already preparing for the approval of its iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF.Recognizing the potential impact of a Bitcoin index stock fund, contingent on SEC approval and subsequent public investment permission, the FSC is closely monitoring global trends.Closer to home, it emerged last month that Hong Kong’s Securities and Futures Commission (SFC) is actively exploring the possibility of permitting retail participation in a spot crypto ETF. Domestic investment banks in Taiwan, attuned to these developments, have expressed longstanding interest in introducing similar crypto products.The FSC draws parallels with global counterparts, citing the proliferation of cryptocurrency futures products and ETFs in various markets.Cautious regulatory reviewAdopting a phased approach, the FSC emphasizes self-discipline and standards in relaxing regulations around crypto ETFs. This cautious strategy aligns with Taiwan’s historical prudence, previously observed in the delayed approval of cryptocurrency ETFs and blockchain ETFs due to concerns over volatility and speculative nature.As Taiwan contemplates a significant move into the cryptocurrency ETF domain, industry players remain cautiously optimistic. While some had considered private placements for overseas cryptocurrency ETFs, challenges such as tightened regulatory supervision and concerns over errors and price lags prompted a reevaluation.Earlier this month, ETF issuer ProShares launched its short Ether-linked ETF product on the New York Stock Exchange’s Arca, using the ticker symbol SETH. Spot bitcoin ETFs have been launched in Canada, Germany, Australia and Brazil. The products have also been made available via tax havens such as the Cayman Islands, Jersey, Liechtenstein and Guernsey.The regulator in Taiwan hints at a potential strategy involving “cryptocurrency concept ETFs.” These funds could invest in cryptocurrency-related software and hardware vendors, offering investors exposure to the industry without direct linkage to cryptocurrency price fluctuations.