Top

Backpack acquires FTX EU

Web3 & Enterprise·January 10, 2025, 6:44 AM

Backpack Exchange, a crypto exchange that joined the Japan Virtual Currency Exchange Association (JVCEA) last December, has recently acquired FTX EU, the European arm of the failed crypto exchange business FTX.

 

According to a press release, the business comes with a European MiFID II license, with the acquisition having been approved by the Cypriot regulator, the Cyprus Securities and Exchange Commission (CySEC). Furthermore, a Delaware bankruptcy court in the United States, which is dealing with the FTX bankruptcy, has also rubber-stamped the acquisition.

 

Backpack Exchange was co-founded by CEO Armani Ferrante, alongside other former FTX executives. According to the firm’s LinkedIn page, it has established its headquarters in Japan. The company also has links to Dubai, having acquired a Virtual Asset Service Provider (VASP) license for its Backpack Wallet product from  Dubai’s Virtual Assets Regulatory Authority (VARA) in 2023.

https://asset.coinness.com/en/news/e52208b2b388ac5787c108956621928f.webp
Photo by Christian Lue on Unsplash

Rebuilding trust 

As a consequence of having acquired FTX’s European arm, Backpack Exchange will now assume responsibility for the distribution of court-approved FTX bankruptcy claims to FTX EU users. In the company’s press release, Ferrante spoke of the importance of the distribution process in rebuilding trust. He stated:

 

"Customer restitution is a crucial step to rebuild trust and confidence in the industry, and Backpack is committed to returning FTX EU customers’ funds as fast and as safely as possible."

 

In response to a query from FTX creditor activist Sunil Kavuri on X, Ferrante outlined that FTX EU users “will only be able to claim their euro claims funds directly from Backpack EU.”

 

Ferrante clarified that FTX EU customers who had pending crypto withdrawals at the time of the bankruptcy will have their crypto claims dealt with via the FTX bankruptcy estate.

 

In a Series A financing round early last year, Backpack was valued at $120 million. Through FTX EU, it now acquires a MiFID II license, further facilitating the global expansion of the company.

 

With FTX EU now forming Backpack’s EU arm, the company will offer crypto-derivative products, including perpetual futures. This product offering is scheduled to go live in Q1 2025.

 

Bankruptcy process controversy 

The bankruptcy of FTX EU has been controversial, starting off with the European entity being illegally filed into a U.S. bankruptcy process. In early 2024, the FTX Debtors suggested that the entity was worthless. It later wanted to buy out the entity itself, outbidding a third-party bidder. A short time afterwards, the FTX Debtors reached a settlement with the former FTX EU team. It’s understood that Backpack has acquired FTX EU for $32 million. 

 

The FTX Debtors’ attempt to buy the business itself has cast a cloud over the bankruptcy process. When it first emerged that the business had been sold, there was some speculation as to if this would mean a rebooted FTX within the European market, but Backpack’s acquisition confirms that this was not to be the outcome. 

 

Japan could have offered another opportunity to reboot the business, but instead, FTX Japan was acquired by bitFlyer and absorbed into its existing business. With regard to the main FTX business entity, the FTX Debtors told the bankruptcy court that there was no interest in the business from buyers. 

More to Read
View All
Policy & Regulation·

May 29, 2024

Korean regulators pressured to approve crypto ETFs following ETH ETF approval in the U.S.

The recent 19b-4 approval of spot Ethereum exchange-traded funds (ETFs) by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) is putting pressure on South Korean financial regulators to revisit their policies on digital assets. The SEC's decision to allow ETFs for Ethereum, the world's second-largest cryptocurrency, on May 24, 2024, follows its earlier endorsement of Bitcoin ETFs in January 2024. This move is seen as a significant step in merging traditional finance with the digital asset sector.Photo by DrawKit Illustrations on UnsplashKorean regulatory cautionIn contrast to the progressive stance in the U.S., the Korean Financial Services Commission (FSC) and the Financial Supervisory Service (FSS) have maintained a cautious approach regarding the integration of crypto assets into traditional securities markets. According to current regulations under the Capital Markets Act, ETFs in Korea are limited to traditional underlying assets such as financial instruments, securities, international currencies and commodities. These foundations are crucial for the creation of financial derivatives, leaving little room for digital assets under current laws. Calls for regulatory reforms and market implicationsThe decision by the SEC is expected to influence the Korean regulators to update their views on digital assets, according to local media and industry experts. Jung Eui-jung, the head of the Korean Stockholders’ Alliance, has advocated for Korea to emulate the U.S. by approving Bitcoin and Ethereum ETFs. He expressed concerns that continued regulatory hesitance could lead to investor funds migrating to more progressive markets like the U.S., potentially positioning the U.S. to broaden its crypto market further. Xangle, a digital currency data provider in Seoul, has also criticized the current regulations as outdated, emphasizing the need for revisions to accommodate the increasing relevance of digital assets in global finance. 

news
Web3 & Enterprise·

May 13, 2024

Harvest Global CEO considers offering BTC and ETH ETFs to mainland Chinese investors

Tongli Han, the CEO and CIO of Harvest Global, has expressed openness to the possibility of applying to offer Bitcoin and Ether exchange-traded funds (ETFs) to mainland Chinese investors through the Stock Connect program. This consideration is contingent on favorable developments in the next two years. Harvest Global, along with China Asset Management (ChinaAMC) and Bosera HashKey, recently launched Asia's first spot Bitcoin and Ether ETFs on the Hong Kong Stock Exchange, aligning with Hong Kong's ambition to establish itself as a global cryptocurrency hub. Han's remarks were delivered during the Bitcoin Asia conference in Hong Kong, underscoring the potential for expansion into the mainland Chinese market.Photo by Jimmy Chan on PexelsUncertain regulatory landscape and growth prospectsDespite the introduction of spot crypto ETFs in Hong Kong, uncertainty looms over mainland Chinese investors' access to such products through the Stock Connect program. China's regulatory stance towards the cryptocurrency industry remains stringent, with most commercial crypto activities prohibited on the mainland. While there is speculation regarding the potential inclusion of crypto ETFs in the eligible securities list of the Stock Connect program, approval remains uncertain. The debut of Hong Kong's spot crypto ETFs recorded modest trading volumes compared to their U.S. counterparts, signaling a cautious start. However, Han anticipates the potential for growth in the Asia region, envisioning the Hong Kong ETFs to potentially double the size of their U.S. counterparts. Despite differing opinions on growth prospects, market observers highlight challenges such as the relatively small size of the Hong Kong ETF market and restrictions on mainland Chinese investors' participation, underscoring the complexities facing the expansion of crypto ETFs in the region. 

news
Web3 & Enterprise·

Oct 27, 2023

Bithumb and Korbit Struggle to Gain Traction Despite Zero Trading Fees

Bithumb and Korbit Struggle to Gain Traction Despite Zero Trading FeesSouth Korean cryptocurrency exchanges Bithumb and Korbit have recently eliminated trading fees, but their bold decision hasn’t yielded much results. Bithumb was the first to implement this change and attracted users for about a week, but it is now seeing a loss in market share. Korbit, following Bithumb’s example, is also struggling to achieve meaningful outcomes.Photo by Alexander Grey on UnsplashLimited impactLocal media outlet Chosun Biz used data from crypto data platform CoinGecko to draw this conclusion. On October 26, Korbit’s daily trading volume represented 0.19% of the total trading volume among South Korea’s top five crypto exchanges (Upbit, Bithumb, Coinone, Korbit, and Gopax). This figure marked a 0.14 percentage point increase compared to the 0.05% recorded on October 19. Korbit had implemented a zero trading fee policy at 9 a.m. (KST) on October 20. Additionally, they launched a promotion offering KRW 5,000 ($3.69) worth of bitcoin to users who transferred virtual assets totaling KRW 1 million or more from Travel Rule-compliant exchanges to Korbit. While the promotion did contribute to Korbit’s market share, it still remains below 1%.Bithumb’s performance showed some improvement, albeit briefly. As of October 26, Bithumb’s market share stood at 18%, marking a 4.7 percentage point increase from its 13.3% share on October 3, the day before it eliminated trading fees. However, it’s worth noting that its market share had reached almost 30% shortly after the promotion’s launch. This indicates that its strategy is losing efficacy over time.The less-than-enthusiastic results from their daring marketing endeavors can be attributed to their inability to draw in retail investors. To begin with, Upbit, the leading player in the market, had already been providing a relatively low fee of 0.05%. Furthermore, adapting to new user interfaces on these exchanges posed a challenge. Zero trading fees weren’t attractive enough for crypto investors to leave their current platforms.Trading volume mattersIn the case of Korbit, its lower trading volume was a disadvantage when it came to attracting users. On crypto exchanges, a higher trading volume typically translates to faster trade executions. As a result, users of Korbit might experience delays in executing trades at their preferred price.Jeong Hye-won, a research associate at crypto data analytics platform Xangle, told Chosun Biz that users on exchanges with lower trading volumes tend to experience slippages due to slower transaction speeds and sparsely populated order books. A slippage means the difference between the initially placed order price and the executed order price. Jeong further explained that Korbit’s zero trading fee policy didn’t have a significant impact because it offers fewer listed tokens compared to Upbit and Bithumb.There is speculation that the free-trading fee promotions introduced by Bithumb and Korbit, despite their revenue sacrifices, might conclude sooner than initially anticipated due to their perceived ineffectiveness. Bithumb derives 99.95% of its revenue from trading fees, while Korbit relies on trading fees for 99.79% of its income. An industry insider has commented that trading fees play a vital role in an exchange’s revenue, and given Bithumb’s reported loss in earnings during the second quarter, there are concerns about their capacity to sustain this strategy.

news
Loading