Backpack acquires FTX EU

Hong Kong Pressing Banks to Facilitate Crypto ClientsHong Kong’s banking regulator is urging banks, including HSBC and Standard Chartered, to onboard crypto exchanges as clients, despite increasing regulatory scrutiny of the industry in the United States.That’s according to a report published by the Financial Times (FT) on Wednesday. The FT cited three people who it claims are familiar with the matter, together with a letter seen by the publication as the basis for the assertion.Photo by Ansel Lee on PexelsChallenging crypto banking reticenceAt a recent meeting, the Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA) questioned these UK-based lenders, together with the Bank of China, about their reluctance to accept crypto exchanges as customers, according to sources familiar with the matter. The HKMA emphasized that due diligence on potential clients should not create unnecessary burdens, particularly for those seeking opportunities in Hong Kong. While banks do not have a ban on crypto clients, concerns over potential money laundering and illegal activities have made them cautious.The pressure faced by banks highlights the challenges Hong Kong is facing in establishing itself as a global hub for the crypto industry, especially in light of previous high-profile collapses, such as the implosion of FTX. However, the HKMA is encouraging banks to overcome their reservations, as the regulator believes there is resistance from senior executives who adhere to traditional banking mindsets.The enthusiasm of some Hong Kong officials for the sector is evident as pro-Beijing lawmaker Johnny Ng invited Coinbase and other crypto exchanges to set up operations in the city following the recent SEC lawsuit against Binance and Coinbase.Caught between opposing forcesBanks in Hong Kong find themselves walking a fine line between supporting the crypto industry as encouraged by the government and being cautious due to the US regulatory environment. They want to ensure the industry’s development aligns with government policies, but they are also concerned about potential anti-money laundering and know-your-customer issues.The HKMA and the Securities and Futures Commission (SFC) have been vocal about their expectations, setting them apart from regulators in other jurisdictions that may be more skeptical of cryptocurrencies. Last month it emerged that crypto startups are having difficulties in establishing banking facilities in the autonomous Chinese territory. At the time, the HKMA did convene a meeting to bring parties together in order to forge a path forward.While Hong Kong has a history as a crypto center, its position weakened after Beijing’s crackdown on the industry in 2017. However, the Hong Kong government aims to reestablish the city as a hub for digital assets, having expressed its desire to provide a supportive environment for crypto-related businesses. The introduction of a new licensing regime for crypto platforms in Hong Kong is part of the government’s efforts to attract more crypto groups to the city.HSBC, Standard Chartered, and the Bank of China hold influential positions in Hong Kong as issuers of the city’s currency and have key roles in the Hong Kong Association of Banks lobby group. Standard Chartered claims that it maintains regular dialogue with regulators on various subjects, while HSBC has claimed that it is actively engaging in policies and developments within the nascent industry.

Taiwan Advances Crypto Regulation with Initial Reading of Digital Asset BillTaiwan has furthered its efforts on the path of digital asset regulation, as the nation’s legislature introduced a cryptocurrency bill for its inaugural reading.The “Virtual Asset Management Ordinance Draft” bill represents a significant stride toward establishing a legal framework for digital assets in the country. The proposal passed its first reading at the Taiwanese state legislature, according to published parliamentary records.Photo by Ethan Lin on UnsplashBill objectivesThe primary objectives of the bill are to define virtual assets, establish operational standards for asset operators, enhance customer protection, and make it mandatory for industry players to join relevant associations and secure regulatory permissions.Up until now, Taiwan has maintained a relatively hands-off approach to the cryptocurrency sector. Its oversight was limited to existing know-your-customer (KYC) and anti-money laundering (AML) laws. However, this stance evolved following the collapse of the cryptocurrency exchange FTX in November. The platform’s popularity among Taiwanese users, owing to favorable US dollar interest rates compared to local banks, led to increased regulatory scrutiny.A member of Taiwan’s parliament, Yung-Chang Chiang, told The Block that “after the first reading of the bill, discussions on the regulatory framework for the virtual asset industry have progressed to the next stage.” Chiang added:“We hope that the Financial Supervisory Commission can also submit their version of a draft bill to the legislature, allowing various sectors of society to further consolidate consensus during the process.”In contrast to cryptocurrency regulations in neighboring Hong Kong, Taiwan’s bill does not adopt a strong stance on derivatives or stablecoins. Nevertheless, it recognizes that derivatives linked to virtual assets possess unique characteristics, with a specific mention of perpetual contracts. This recognition opens the door for the possibility of cryptocurrency derivative-specific regulation in future drafts.Importantly, the bill does not restrict the trading of virtual assets to professional investors, which allows broader participation in the digital asset market.Auditing and segregation of fundsUnlike Japan, which mandates the use of custodians for locally licensed exchanges, the draft bill in Taiwan only necessitates the segregation of customer assets from business funds. It does not explicitly require the involvement of third-party custodians.Under this legislation, exchange operators will be obliged to commission periodic reports from accountants regarding their operations and asset management. Additionally, regulators, such as the Financial Supervisory Commission (FSC), will have the authority to conduct regular inspections of exchange internal control and audit systems.Although this initial draft does not explicitly mention “Proof of Reserves,” it does indicate that the regulator will establish standards for asset ratios after consulting with industry stakeholders, with the expectation that licensed exchanges will adhere to these standards.Fostering self regulationTaiwan’s crypto industry stakeholders have expressed their support for formal regulatory oversight. Wayne Huang, co-founder and CEO of Taipei-based fintech company XREX, recently affirmed the industry’s willingness to collaborate with the FSC in defining regulatory operations.In tandem with the establishment of a regulatory framework, regulators have indicated that they want industry stakeholders to move towards some level of self-regulation. That led nine exchange businesses to form an industry association last month.The bill’s second reading is pending, and the FSC is anticipated to provide its input and recommendations before the next phase of the legislative process.

Newly founded bankruptcy claim trading platform OPNX has provided further details about the entities backing the fledgling startup. Taking to Twitter on Friday, Open Exchange CEO Leslie Lamb outlined a number of venture capital backers, with a mixture of international and Asia-centric firms among them. Global backersLamb’s tweet via the firm’s official Twitter account, together with a similar announcement published to the firm’s website, outlined AppWorks, a leading Taiwanese venture capital firm and startup accelerator, as an investor in the company. Other Asian backers include Hong Kong-based crypto fund, Token Bay Capital and the Hong Kong-based arm of one of China’s largest banks, China Merchant Bank International.With the firm based in Dubai, Middle-Eastern interest is represented through the involvement of Saudi digital asset fund, Tuwaiq Limited. Otherwise, the company lists a number of other international backers, including US equity options exchange MIAX Group, DeFi-focused venture and trading firm Nascent, top tier global venture capital firm Susquehanna and the investment arm of market maker and early stage investor, DRW. Questionable founding teamOnly hours after the disclosure by Open Exchange, DRW reached out to CoinDesk to confirm that it is not an investor in the bankruptcy claims exchange. Nascent and Susquehanna also denied that they are involved. The companies are still being listed by OPNX as backers of the project on its website.The launch of OPNX has been mired in controversy from the outset as its founding team includes the founders of the former crypto hedge fund Three Arrows Capital (3AC) which failed spectacularly in 2022. Su Zhu and Kyle Davies, the founders of 3AC are now the founders behind OPNX. Before their involvement, OPNX was preceded by Seychelles-based crypto yield platform CoinFLEX. That business also failed during the 2022 crypto bear market. It entered into a restructuring process with the consent of the courts in the Seychelles. Emerging from it is OPNX with the 3AC duo of Zhu and Davies having gotten involved at that point. Industry push-backMany in the crypto space have been highly critical of the development of OPNX on the basis of the involvement of both Zhu and Davies. The duo are being blamed for the collapse of the crypto hedge fund due to mismanagement and the knock on effects the firm’s demise had on other entities within crypto. Many of the series of crypto lenders who failed at a later stage in 2022 had major exposure to the wayward hedge fund.There had been some speculation as to who was backing the new project. Earlier this month, BitMEX co-founder and former CEO Arthur Hayes claimed that the 3AC duo had received substantial funding from Bahrain’s sovereign wealth fund to establish the project. In February, Hayes suggested that the crypto bull market must be starting based on news of Zhu and Davies wanting to launch the OPNX platform.Crypto-focused venture capitalist Michael Arrington also spoke out around that time, stating on Twitter, that 3AC founders successfully raising capital for their latest venture was “the saddest bulls**t I’ve heard in a long time.”Upon its launch earlier this month, industry commentators quickly declared the project a flop citing a trading volume of $13.64 on its first day of trading. Five days in, OPNX made light of the situation, declaring a win on the basis that it had progressed to $12,398 in trading volume, representing a 90,000% increase in trading.Dubai’s Virtual Assets Regulatory Authority (VARA) issued an investor and marketplace alert on April 12 stating that while OPNX may be Dubai-based, it is not regulated by VARA and instead operates on an unregulated basis. It warned investors against using any unregulated crypto entity.