Upbit opens staking quiz event with ETH prizes

Temasek Cuts Pay Following FTX AutopsySingaporean state-owned investment firm, Temasek Holdings, has announced a reduction in compensation for executives responsible for the company’s investment in the now-defunct cryptocurrency exchange FTX. Temasek, once the second-largest outside investor in FTX, faced scrutiny after the collapse of the exchange.Photo by Emilio Takas on UnsplashNo misconduct findingOn May 29, Temasek released a statement confirming the completion of its internal review of the $275 million investment loss incurred from FTX. The review determined that there was “no misconduct” within the company. However, both the investment team and senior management took “collective accountability” and experienced a reduction in their compensation.While acknowledging the inherent risks associated with any investment, Temasek emphasized the importance of continuing to invest in new sectors and emerging technologies to understand their potential impact on the business and financial models of existing portfolios. They recognized the need to adapt to an ever-changing world and explore avenues that could drive future value.It’s worth noting that the $275 million loss from the FTX investment constituted only 0.09% of Temasek’s portfolio value, which stood at over $293 billion at the time of the collapse.Temasek maintained that it conducted extensive due diligence before investing in FTX, emphasizing its commitment to a thorough review process. Chairman Lim Boon Heng stated in a May 29 interview with Bloomberg that there was fraudulent conduct intentionally hidden from investors, including Temasek. The negative outcome of the investment has been disappointing for the company and has had a significant impact on its reputation.Reputational damageSingapore Deputy Prime Minister Lawrence Wong echoed similar sentiments, highlighting the financial loss and reputational damage caused by the FTX collapse during a parliamentary meeting in November 2022.During the due diligence process, Temasek reviewed FTX’s financial statements, assessed regulatory risks related to financial service providers in the cryptocurrency market, and sought legal advice. The company also engaged with individuals who had firsthand knowledge of FTX, including employees, investors, and industry participants.In recent news, Temasek addressed and dismissed rumors about a $10 million investment in Array, a developer of algorithmic currency systems based on smart contracts and artificial intelligence. The company clarified that such reports were incorrect, refuting the circulating news articles and tweets.Temasek’s internal review process is certainly a move towards transparency and accountability. It indicates a willingness towards addressing the matter. That said, there are FTX creditor groups who fervently disagree with Temasek’s analysis.Class action lawsuitEarlier this year a number of FTX creditors filed a class action lawsuit against a number of venture capital (VC) firms, including Temasek. The FTX customers maintain that Temasek and others played a role in a conspiracy to defraud them. Venture capital firms have countered with the view that they themselves were victims as a consequence of the FTX collapse, suffering multi-million dollar losses.The fact remains that VCs get much further involved than merely handing over a check. They get involved with marketing, operations, and many other facets of the businesses of their portfolio companies. Meanwhile, other creditors suggest that Temasek has a responsibility to do right by the 1.4 million FTX creditors (a disproportionate number of them being Singapore-based) and to invest in a restructured FTX business, an option that represents the best opportunity for FTX customers to recover their funds.Temasek may have reached certain conclusions by way of their internal report on the matter but this is not likely to be the final analysis relative to its involvement in the fall of FTX.

Korean Financial Watchdog to Penalize Bankers Involved in Illegal Foreign RemittancesThe Korean Financial Supervisory Service (FSS) recently completed an investigation into illegal foreign remittances of approximately 16 trillion KRW (~$12,137,718,400) that involved numerous bankers.©Unsplash/Paul FiedlerExploiting the kimchi premiumThe investigation, launched by the Korean financial watchdog last June, found that these lawbreakers sent funds to China, Hong Kong, and other overseas destinations through Korean crypto exchanges, trading firms, and bank branches with an aim of making money through arbitrage by taking the advantage of the kimchi premium, a term used to describe that the higher prices of crypto assets in Korean exchanges compared to their foreign counterparts.Bankers neglecting the KYC ruleSome of these bankers participated in the crime by raising the remittance cap and applying favorable exchange rates to trading companies that had no previous transaction records with banks. By law, bankers in Korea are obligated to follow the “know your customer” rule. It was found that 12 domestic banks and one futures firm were involved in this incident.The FSS has decided to impose strict penalties on these financial institutions, considering they were exploited for money laundering purposes. These entities are likely to have some of their services suspended, with the employees involved being fired.Accountability of top bankersOne key point to watch out for is whether the FSS would be able to hold executives accountable. Some say penalizing top bankers is not easy, given that it has to be proven that the employees’ criminal activities were due to a lack of executives’ internal control.The financial regulator recently announced plans to revise the law governing banks’ governance, but it is expected that such a bill would take some time to pass through the National Assembly.Through a revision of the law, the financial authority aims to hold top executives at financial institutions more responsible for serious financial accidents. It looks forward to bestowing top bankers with the obligation of comprehensive internal control management and making them accountable as an overall manager only in case of critical financial accidents. The term “top executives” in the bill will encompass not only bank presidents but also chairpersons of financial holding companies. More specific revision plans are expected to be revealed by the end of this month.

Taiwan Proposes New Crypto Business CategoryWith regulation having trailed the crypto innovation, more recently it seems like every day brings further developments, with the latest installment seeing Taiwan take a significant step forward. Officials in Taipei are proposing the classification of crypto regulations within their own novel business category.Photo by Jack Brind on UnsplashFostering self-regulationThe move aims to potentially allow cryptocurrency-related companies to establish industry associations, ultimately fostering the creation of self-regulatory guidelines. The Ministry of Economic Affairs, in a recent announcement, unveiled its draft amendment to the Standards of Classification of Commercial Group regulations. This proposed amendment centers on the inclusion of a distinct category for digital asset services.An official from the economic ministry informed The Block that the freshly introduced business category outlines the scope of operations within the cryptocurrency sector. This encompasses various activities, such as cryptocurrency to fiat or digital token exchanges, facilitating cryptocurrency transfers, offering services for crypto storage and management, and providing assistance related to cryptocurrency issuance or sales.The official further elaborated that cryptocurrency firms will be permitted to form industry associations once the proposed business category is successfully incorporated into the relevant regulations. Seeking public input, the ministry anticipates finalizing the amendment in collaboration with the Ministry of the Interior in either mid- or late-October.Encouraging trade associationsBy allowing the establishment of industry associations, cryptocurrency companies can proactively devise self-supervisory rules that address industry-specific challenges and concerns. This move is anticipated to bolster transparency, security, and responsible conduct within the cryptocurrency ecosystem.Taiwan’s approach to virtual asset services providers (VASPs) has mandated compliance with anti-money laundering laws since the implementation of anti-money laundering regulations by the Financial Supervisory Commission in July 2021. However, the overall industry remains relatively unregulated within the country.Binance, the world’s largest cryptocurrency exchange, has recently embarked on the process of obtaining registration for anti-money laundering compliance under the FSC.Regulatory guidelines being draftedAs the regulatory landscape evolves, Taiwan’s FSC, which assumed its role as the principal regulator overseeing the crypto industry in March, is actively formulating comprehensive guidelines. These guidelines will cover trading and payment aspects associated with cryptocurrencies for VASPs.An FSC official revealed that the agency plans to unveil the VASP guidelines by the end of September. It’s understood that the guidelines will comprise thirteen regulatory principles. It’s believed that the issuance of crypto assets will be permitted but that stablecoin issuance will be prohibited. One prerequisite for the issuance of digital assets will be a requirement to accompany that issuance with a comprehensive whitepaper, detailing fundamental and necessary information that investors can review, relative to the token offering.Taiwan’s proposition of a novel business category signifies a pivotal move towards enhanced self-regulation and industry cohesion within the cryptocurrency sector. As the regulatory framework takes shape, the introduction of self-regulatory guidelines is poised to contribute to the responsible growth of the cryptocurrency industry in Taiwan.