MUFG pushes into tokenized finance as Japan enters a new political chapter

Bitget withdraws from Hong Kong crypto marketSeychelles-incorporated cryptocurrency derivatives platform Bitget has made a decision to permanently exit the Hong Kong market, discontinuing its efforts to obtain a virtual asset trading platform (VATP) license.Photo by SHUJA OFFICIAL on UnsplashBitgetX platform shutdownThe decision comes only months after it had introduced its BitgetX platform to comply with local regulations. The company, which bases its operations out of Singapore, is a well-known entity in the crypto space, renowned as the operator of the 12th-largest cryptocurrency exchange globally in terms of 24-hour trading volume. It made this revelation on Monday, citing what it referred to as “business and market-related considerations.”In a published statement, the company said:”With a heavy heart, we regret to inform you that due to business and market related considerations, we have decided not to pursue a Virtual Asset Trading Platform (VATP) license in Hong Kong. As a result of this decision, the BitgetX website (www.BitgetX.hk) will cease its operations effective December 13, 2023. At the same time, Bitgetx.hk will permanently exit the Hong Kong market.”While outlining that BitgetX will close its doors, the firm urged users to withdraw their assets beforehand. Bitget is among a handful of exchanges that had publicly expressed their intent to secure a license following Hong Kong’s proactive push over the course of the past year to embrace the virtual asset sector.Broader challengesThe decision to abandon the pursuit of a VATP license echoes the broader challenges faced by the cryptocurrency industry in Hong Kong. Despite the city’s recent enthusiastic regulatory embrace of the virtual asset sector, a number of stumbling blocks remain.High compliance costs and the lingering aftermath of the JPEX financial scandal have hindered Hong Kong’s aspirations to establish itself as a leading crypto hub. A report back in June identified the major cost implications of acquiring a license in Hong Kong. At the time, it was estimated that the required spend to obtain a VATP license could range from $2.55 million to $25.5 million.Banking crypto companies has also become a major bottleneck. In June, the Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA) urged banks such as HSBC, Standard Chartered and the Bank of China to bank the crypto sector, having identified a reluctance amongst them to do so.Limited interestThe forthcoming closure of BitgetX adds to a growing trend of limited interest in Hong Kong’s new licensing scheme. Only five companies, all local, have submitted applications for virtual asset licenses to the Securities and Futures Commission (SFC). This list began publication in response to the JPEX scandal, which significantly damaged public trust in virtual assets.The challenges faced by the industry go beyond regulatory hurdles. The damaged public trust, coupled with the high-profile exit of JPEX, has contributed to the hesitancy of international crypto platforms in pursuing licenses in Hong Kong. The abrupt withdrawal of Bitget raises questions about the viability of Hong Kong as a central player in the cryptocurrency industry and underscores the complexities faced by exchanges navigating the evolving landscape of the digital asset sector.

Singapore Looks to Prohibit Crypto Lending and StakingIn a move to bolster investor protection and maintain financial stability, the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) is introducing new guidelines for cryptocurrency platforms operating in the country.Details of the measures were published by MAS on Monday. According to its statement, the measures “will mitigate the risk of loss or misuse of customers’ assets, and facilitate the recovery of customers’ assets in the event of a DPT [Digital Payment Token] service provider’s insolvency.”The proposed guidelines outline several key measures. One such measure is the daily reconciliation of customer assets, which will help prevent discrepancies and safeguard against potential losses.Photo by Hu Chen on UnsplashHolding assets in trustAdditionally, the custody function, responsible for holding and safeguarding client assets, will be operationally separated from other business divisions to minimize the risk of mismanagement or unauthorized use. By the end of this year, it’s understood that crypto platforms will be required to store client assets in trust accounts, ensuring enhanced security and accountability.DisclosuresFurthermore, licensed cryptocurrency service providers will be mandated to provide explicit disclosures to customers, clearly outlining the risks associated with holding and trading digital payment tokens (DPTs). Recognizing the speculative nature of digital token trading, the MAS acknowledges that regulations alone cannot fully protect consumers from potential losses.To further protect retail investors, the MAS intends to prohibit cryptocurrency service providers from facilitating lending or staking activities. Lending and staking, where digital tokens are loaned or pledged to earn profits, are considered unsuitable for the general public due to their complex and high-risk nature.These measures come as part of Singapore’s efforts to strengthen its regulatory environment for digital assets. The consultation process began last year, following the collapse of FTX, a cryptocurrency exchange.Singaporeans suffered disproportionately with the collapse of FTX as previously, MAS had banned global crypto exchange Binance from operating within the city-state. That led to Singapore having more FTX customers than many other world regions. To compound matters, state-owned global investment firm Temasek, was an investor in the fraudulent crypto exchange.MAS had called for feedback and proposals, with a focus on enhancing investor safeguards and promoting responsible trading practices. While the regulations aim to provide a safer environment for investors, the MAS also emphasizes the importance of individuals exercising caution when engaging in digital token trading.Contrasting approachesWhile Singapore is taking steps to tighten regulations, other cities like Hong Kong are adopting a more inclusive approach to the crypto industry. Hong Kong Legislative Council member Johnny Ng has voiced support for the local crypto business and has encouraged prominent exchanges like Coinbase to establish operations in the territory, aiming to foster greater engagement and growth within the sector.As the crypto industry continues to evolve, regulatory frameworks play a crucial role in ensuring investor protection and maintaining market integrity. Singapore’s proactive approach to strengthening its regulatory environment reflects its commitment to striking a balance between fostering innovation and safeguarding the interests of investors.

Suspected Malicious Activity Drains AnySwap Tokens via Multichain ExecutorAccording to an on-chain sleuth known as Spreek, a person is using the Multichain Executor to drain tokens associated with the AnySwap bridging protocol.Multichain is a cross-chain routing network, established and maintained by a Chinese developer team. It supports in excess of 25 blockchains and more than 1,100 tokens.Photo by Marek Piwnicki on Unsplash$100 million outflowThis revelation comes after abnormal outflows of over $100 million from Multichain bridges on July 7, which were flagged by the Multichain team. Spreek’s report via Twitter on July 10 states that the Multichain Executor address has been draining anyToken addresses across multiple chains and transferring them to a new externally owned account (EOA).Evidence provided in the report includes an Ethereum transaction, 0x53ede4462d90978b992b0a88727de19afe4e96f0374aa1a221b8ff65fda5a6fe, which called the “anySwapFeeTo” method on the Multichain Router: V4 contract. This transaction resulted in approximately $15,275.90 worth of anyDAI being minted on Ethereum, sent to the Multichain Executor, burned, and exchanged for the underlying DAI backing the asset.The funds from these transactions were sent to the following address:0x1eed63efba5f81d95bfe37d82c8e736b974f477b. Similarly, on the BNB Smart Chain (BSC), the Multichain Executor used the anySwapFeeTo function to convert $208,997 worth of anyUSDC into Binance-pegged USDC and sent them to the same address. Additionally, 50.80 anyBTC, equivalent to $39,251.43 at the time, was converted into Binance-pegged Bitcoin and sent to the address.In total, approximately $263,524.33 worth of tokens were sent to this address through the anySwapFeeTo method. Spreek suggests that this behavior could be part of the protocol’s normal functioning. However, a different account engaged in similar activity the day before and ultimately sold the drained tokens, indicating malicious intent.Potential exploitSpreek theorizes that the attacker may be exploiting the anySwapFeeTo function by setting fees to an arbitrarily large amount, allowing them to drain users’ funds. The function apparently permits setting any value, enabling the address to choose the total value of the token held in that anyToken.The Multichain incident has puzzled blockchain analysts, as it remains unclear whether it resulted from an exploit or if it was simply large token-holders moving their funds between networks. The mystery began on July 7 when over $100 million worth of tokens were withdrawn from the Ethereum side of Multichain’s bridges and transferred to wallet addresses with no prior transactions. This represented the majority of funds held on each bridge.Hack or rug pullThe Multichain team labeled these withdrawals as “abnormal” and advised users to stop using the protocol. However, they have not disclosed the source or nature of the anomaly. In response to the incident, stablecoin issuers Circle and Tether froze some of the addresses involved in the suspicious transactions. Chainanalysis, a blockchain analytics firm, has commented that the incident appears more like a hack or rug pull rather than a migration.Adding to the complexity, the Multichain team has reported that their CEO is missing, and they have shut down certain bridges due to losing access to some of the network’s multi-party computation network servers. There have been various concerns relative to Multichain since May. The situation continues to evolve, with ongoing investigations and efforts to mitigate any potential damage caused by the suspected malicious activity.