Korea’s security token group KSTO signs MOU with blockchain developer Metalab

Singaporean Researchers Devise More Effective DAO VotingResearchers at the Singapore University of Social Sciences have come up with a more efficient governance model for decentralized autonomous organizations (DAOs).Photo by Shubham Dhage on UnsplashDAO governance reviewThe scientists presented their work via a paper titled “Voting Schemes in DAO Governance,” which was published earlier this week. The paper is due to appear in the Annual Review of Fintech in due course.The research paper initially sets out with a review of the different forms of voting currently used to affect DAO governance in the various early stage projects that are already up and running. Having taken a deep dive into existing approaches, the research team of Qinxu Ding, Weibiao Xu, Zhiguo Wang and David Kuo Chuen Lee decided that they could go one better themselves.Their review encompassed eight current approaches including the following: token-based quorum voting, knowledge-extractable voting, conviction voting and reputation-based voting. Each voting scheme was then evaluated based on the following factors:Efficiency: An assessment of the speed at which proposals are selected and approved.Fairness: Each voter should have equal rights to vote.Scalability: The degree to which storage, computation and communication needs can be adjusted relative to the number of voters.Robustness: An assessment of the relative resistance of the voting scheme to attacks and collusion.Incentive Schemes: The extent to which DAO members are motivated to vote.Following on from that analysis, the scientists put forward a hypothetical voting mechanism with design considerations relative to fully decentralized and permissionless DAO governance. When it came to ratings, the holographic consensus approach scored highest, with a “high” rating in the categories of efficiency, fairness and robustness, dropping down to medium when it came to scalability. None of the other approaches came close.In trying to go one better, the team took the holographic consensus approach and set out to create their own hypothetical voting mechanism based on this model. As evidenced from the paper, they tried to effect improvements to this approach:“We know that the downside of the conviction voting mechanism is that it takes time to approve an urgent proposal. To address this concern, we introduce a blind betting mechanism: each member could choose whether to bet on any proposals with a certain number of their tokens.”The researcher’s hypothetical model allows stakeholders to gamble their tokens on the likelihood of a proposal passing or failing. The logic with this approach, they claim, is that it would speed up the governance process, while making it more robust at the same time.In concluding remarks, the researchers acknowledged that all approaches were not without their pros and cons. They point out that the further development of DAOs shouldn’t be confined to a static organizational future. While they believe that their own hypothetical scheme is in theory superior, they acknowledge that it too has flaws. With that, the realities of implementing it in the real world may be a challenge.

Korbit and Shinhan Bank hold seminar to strengthen suspicious crypto transaction reportingKorbit, one of the top five cryptocurrency exchanges in South Korea, revealed on Monday (local time) that it conducted a seminar in collaboration with Shinhan Bank last month aimed at enhancing the effectiveness of suspicious transaction report (STR) filings.Photo by Nick Fewings on UnsplashEnhancing suspicious transaction reportingThe seminar held at Korbit’s premises was a collaborative forum where experts from both the exchange and Shinhan Bank exchanged insights and engaged in a question-and-answer session. The agenda covered areas such as the writing of STR reports, monitoring based on particular themes and the education of staff members. The gathering featured key participants, including Jin Chang-hwan, Compliance Officer of Korbit, and Yoo Jung-yeol, Head of the Digital Assets Team at Shinhan Bank as well as personnel from both organizations involved in anti-money laundering (AML) initiatives.Focus on complianceEarlier this year, Korbit and Shinhan Bank held a meeting to go over the Financial Intelligence Unit’s (FIU) comprehensive evaluation of virtual asset service providers (VASPs). This evaluation examined how well VASPs complied with the Travel Rule. Additionally, the meeting allowed both organizations to exchange ideas on how to enhance their compliance processes. In a move ahead of the industry, Korbit in September became the first Korean crypto exchange to adopt new rules for real-name bank accounts, a policy that will become mandatory in January of the following year.Oh Se-jin, Korbit’s CEO, highlighted the increasing significance of filing STRs, citing recent FIU data that showed VASPs submitted more STRs in the first three quarters of this year than in the entirety of last year. He affirmed Korbit’s dedication to establishing itself as a secure and reliable cryptocurrency exchange through ongoing collaborations with Shinhan Bank.Meanwhile, Korbit has managed to cut down the review period for STRs to a third of its previous duration. Additionally, the exchange verifies the effectiveness of its STR rules by performing monthly evaluations and seeking advice from external consultants.

A recent survey in South Korea found that 20.3% of crypto investors have fallen victim to financial losses. Conducted by the Korea Financial Consumers Protection Foundation in late December, the survey polled 2,500 adults aged 19-69, with respondents able to select multiple loss categories. Investors in their 60s were most vulnerable, reporting a 25.3% loss rate. Exchange-related problems constituted the majority of incidents (72.8%), followed by online chat room scams (44.7%) and investment fraud (35.5%).Photo by Growtika on UnsplashExchange failures lead lossesAmong exchange-related losses, 40.6% of users couldn't sell assets due to system failures, while 11.5% lost digital assets through exchange hacking. Overall, exchange technical issues accounted for 52.1% of reported losses, with another 20.7% losing assets when exchanges closed completely. Chat group scam victims experienced various forms of fraud: 23.2% paid for worthless or false information, while 21.5% suffered financial losses through market manipulation or proxy trading schemes. Investment scams included fake crypto projects or fraudulent firms (18.0%), deceptive exchanges (10.3%), and other scams (7.2%). Most victims (75.1%) reported losses under 10 million won (approximately $6,945), with 34.6% losing less than 1 million won. Due to these relatively small amounts, 67.7% took no action following their losses. Of the 32.3% who sought help through various channels, 73.9% were unable to fully recover their funds. Problem worsening across Asia and beyondThis problem extends beyond South Korea. In neighboring Japan, police reported 19,038 crypto fraud cases in 2023, with damages totaling 45.26 billion yen (about $300 million), according to Chainalysis, citing Japanese National Police Agency data. These figures surpass 2022 numbers, indicating continued growth in fraudulent activities. A recent case highlighted by the Fukushima Minyu Shimbun involved a Soma City woman in her 50s who lost approximately 116.6 million yen ($780,000) to scammers impersonating police officers. The fraud began with a fake customer service call, followed by deceptive claims about fraudulent accounts and threats of arrest, which led her to create cryptocurrency accounts and transfer funds before eventually reporting the scam. Elderly at highest risk as fraud surgesThe FBI's Internet Crime Complaint Center's 2024 report further confirms this trend, documenting 149,686 crypto fraud complaints in the U.S. with $9.3 billion in reported losses—66% higher than in 2023. Notably, people over 60 were the most affected demographic, consistent with the Korean study's findings.