Binance collaborates with Indian authorities to dismantle scam app

Korea’s Most Populated Province to Conduct Survey on Unfair Crypto TradingGyeonggi-do, the most populated South Korean province that encircles the nation’s capital of Seoul, announced today a plan to conduct a survey among its residents later this year to assess their experiences with unfair cryptocurrency trading practices.Photo by mockupbee on UnsplashRising crypto-related complaintsThe decision to conduct this survey was prompted by the increasing number of residents experiencing unfair losses from cryptocurrency investments amid an economic slowdown. Last year, the consumer counseling center in Gyeonggi-do received 448 complaints related to crypto assets, which was more than triple the number in 2020.The objective of the survey, which will run from August to November, is to gather data on residents’ perceptions of crypto assets, their methods of accessing them, the types of investment victims, and the extent of investment losses. To obtain a comprehensive understanding of the current situation, Gyeonggi-do will also analyze complaints from the past three years and establish appropriate response measures.In-depth interviewsIn addition to the survey, Gyeonggi-do plans to conduct in-depth interviews with victims by making visits and phone calls. The provincial government aims to categorize each case into major groups such as illicit pyramid schemes, suspicious investment advice channels, illegitimate fund-raising activities, market manipulations, and fake crypto sales.Legislation in progressMeanwhile, the Virtual Asset User Protection Bill is currently undergoing the legislative process in the National Assembly. Gyeonggi-do is committed to devising appropriate consumer protection policies within its jurisdiction to safeguard residents and prevent further damages until the act becomes effective. Cases of unfair trading practices uncovered during the survey will undergo legal reviews and may result in fines or lawsuits.Heo Seong-cheol, the head of the Fair Economy Division at the Gyeonggi-do government, expressed the province’s dedication to minimizing financial losses incurred by consumers due to criminal activities in the crypto industry. He said the survey will provide valuable insights to the local government, enabling them to gain a comprehensive understanding of the current situation regarding unfair crypto trading practices and take necessary actions.

Chinese Prosecutors Issue Warning on NFTsIn recent days, China’s top procuratorial agency, the Supreme People’s Procuratorate of China, issued a warning alongside some guidelines on non-fungible tokens (NFTs).The Supreme People’s Procuratorate is the highest office in China charged with the mandate of upholding legal integrity, safeguarding citizens’ rights, and where necessary, conducting criminal investigations. In a statement published on Monday, the agency set out an advisory, together with additional recommendations, pertaining to NFTs.Photo by Markus Winkler on PexelsNFT status in ChinaWhile all and sundry are aware of a multi-year crack-down by the Chinese authorities on crypto in recent times, exemplified by a ban on crypto trading and the operation of crypto mining facilities within the country’s borders, the status of NFTs has been discussed to a much lesser degree.NFTs remain legal within the country. When the crypto trading ban came into play in 2021, much of the local industry connected with that trading activity disappeared. However, in its place, a newly emergent trend came to the fore in the form of NFTs. With cryptocurrencies perceived as being high risk and sanctioned by the authorities, attention turned to NFTs and there has been a surge of adoption of the digital collectibles within China as a consequence.NFT risksThe procuratorial agency highlighted a number of attributes as well as risks in relation to NFTs in the report that it published. The agency finds the issue of ownership of NFTs as a troublesome one. It cites the fact that NFTs can be replicated and distributed at will on this basis as being particularly problematic. The legitimacy of the right source of the work itself is the decisive factor for the healthy and orderly development of digital works NFT transactions,” it states.It appears that the agency, like many in traditional professional circles before them, have a difficulty recognizing the model of asset ownership that NFTs incorporate. That ownership is not defined by civil law or in accordance with centralized systems but by simply the possession of the requisite private key pertaining to a given NFT within a decentralized system.Blockchain, not cryptoThe agency acknowledged that NFTs do present a novel application of blockchain technology. This is not surprising as while there might be an ongoing clampdown on decentralized cryptocurrencies in China, officials at a national level and in numerous instances within regional administrations, are demonstrating a strategy of leveraging blockchain technology for the betterment of the Chinese economy in the future.Public prosecutor Wang Xia-fen, one of the authors of the report, stated: “It’s widely recognized that digital collectibles have the potential to protect intellectual property rights, boost content creation and enrich the digital economy.” Wang encouraged public prosecutors to “find the distinction between real innovation and criminal activities” where NFTs are concerned.The upshot of its report though, is that the procuratorial agency is uncomfortable with the similarity of many of the attributes of NFTs when compared with decentralized cryptocurrencies. It issued a warning on that basis, emphasizing a need for risk assessment to be carried out and further consideration of the legal risks that are implicated.

Singapore High Court Embraces NFTs for Financial InvestigationsA recent decision by the Singapore High Court has seen it embrace non-fungible tokens (NFTs) in financial investigations. Financial investigation firm Intelligent Sanctuary, also known as iSanctuary, has been granted permission to attach NFTs containing legal documents to cold wallets linked to a hacking incident.This innovative approach, similar to the one used in Italy and the United States to deliver court summonses recently, signals a new departure in the application of NFT technology in the legal and financial world.Photo by Choong Deng Xiang on UnsplashMoving towards tokenized legal ordersLondon-based iSanctuary set out details of the court decision in a blog post published to its website recently. A pivotal moment in this scenario was the court’s issuance of a global freezing order encapsulated within soulbound NFTs, securely linked to the specified wallets. Soulbound NFTs are special types of NFTs which are tied to a user’s account. They cannot be transferred or traded.Although these NFTs do not halt transactions, they serve as powerful deterrents, notifying counterparties and exchanges about the wallets’ dubious past involvement in a hacking event.Monitoring fund movementsFurthermore, iSanctuary has unveiled an ingenious strategy to actively monitor funds leaving these wallets through the NFTs. This innovative method ensures a permanent and unbreakable connection between the NFTs and the wallets.iSanctuary recounted on its website that it was employed by a businessperson who had lost $3 million in crypto assets and was able to track the stolen funds successfully. Their method, which combines both on-chain and off-chain evidence, was presented by an iSanctuary senior investigator to the Singapore High Court. This led to the issuance of a worldwide injunction.iSanctuary’s financial and crypto investigators identified a series of cold wallets holding the proceeds of the crime, and the court approved their use of NFTs for service delivery.Mintable collaborationiSanctuary accredited Singaporean NFT marketplace Mintable as the creator of the NFTs. As reported by local news media outlet The Straits Times last week, this case revolved around a stolen private key and the alleged involvement of Singapore-based crypto exchanges in laundering the stolen assets. The fraudsters, purportedly from Singapore, are alleged to have orchestrated this saga that spans countries from Singapore to Spain, Ireland, Britain, and other European territories.Taking to X (formerly Twitter) to comment on the saga, Mintable founder Zach Burks stated:”Happy to help clean up the crypto space and move the NFT ecosystem into a realm of utility and away from the speculation of jpegs!”In a subsequent post, Burks highlighted further NFT-related innovation when pointing to a central bank digital currency (CBDC) pilot program led by Mastercard that implicated the use of NFTs to stamp out fraud. Mintable supported that particular use of the technology within that project.iSanctuary’s founder, Jonathan Benton, emphasized the impact of the recent initiative, calling it a “game changer.” The approach enables swift action, allowing for the identification of illicit asset holders and expediting the issuance of civil or criminal orders, even red flags, within hours if necessary. It also demonstrates that NFTs can be put to good use, above and beyond speculative trading.