Malaysian exchange Hata raises $4.2M

Blockchain Deposit Insurance Corporation (BDIC), an emerging crypto insurer based in Florida in the United States, with corporate headquarters in Bermuda, has disclosed that it is preparing to launch its cryptocurrency insurance platform.Photo by Kindel Media on PexelsStarting point in AsiaIn a press release published on Feb. 11, BDIC outlined that the launch would take place in Q2 2025, with its crypto insurance underwriting service commencing in key Asian markets to begin with.  The company has chosen Asia as its starting point, where it feels crypto adoption continues to build momentum. With that, it specified Hong Kong, Singapore, Japan, Taiwan and South Korea as target markets.  While the initial launch will take place in Q2, the company foresees having expanded into Southeast Asia by Q4 2025. Broader service coverage will follow across the greater Asia-Pacific (APAC) region by 2026, with particular emphasis on entering the Hong Kong market. Company CEO Jeffrey Glusman cited a growing demand for crypto wallet security across Asia. He underlined the growing crypto adoption rate in the region, suggesting that this will encompass 300 million users by 2028. Insurance essential for mainstream adoption Speaking about the product offering more generally, Glusman said that the crypto sector has reached a critical inflection point. With that, he believes that “institutional-grade insurance solutions are essential for mainstream adoption.” He added: “BDIC introduces a new paradigm in digital asset protection, using advanced risk assessment algorithms and real-time monitoring to safeguard users’ holdings.” Token launch The company is also planning to launch a native token for its platform, “BDIC Coin,” in Q2 2025. The purpose of the token launch will be to power the BDIC Foundation Reserve Fund, a reserve which will be used for the purposes of premium payments and claim settlements. Furthermore, the token will enable holders to participate in governance voting relative to the project. BDIC claims that it has established compliance protocols and a whitelist in order to provide for a robust and equitable tokenomics structure. Glusman believes that the timing of BDIC’s launch couldn’t be better. A recent report by information services company GlobalData corroborates his view. The report, published on the back of a GlobalData survey, outlined that only 10.8% of crypto holders worldwide have insurance in place for their digital assets.  The survey data suggests that 41.9% of non-policy holding respondents would purchase such insurance given the opportunity, while a further 26.2% were open to the idea. Theft or hacking of digital assets was perceived to be the most important risk to cover in a digital asset insurance policy in the case of a quarter of respondents. The number of insurers offering crypto-related insurance remains limited. However, it would appear that there’s a significant growth opportunity for firms like BDIC, based on the survey data. While there might be a growth opportunity, there are also challenges. Nischal Shetty, founder and CEO of WazirX, an Indian crypto exchange platform that suffered a $230 million hack in 2024, described the difficulties encountered by the company in trying to get insurance when interviewed last August. He stated: “We tried to get insurance in the past, but we did not get any provider who would be willing to insure these assets. It's not an easy process.”

In an effort to fortify the cryptocurrency market and safeguard investors' funds, the Hong Kong Securities and Futures Commission (SFC) has introduced a minimum insurance requirement of 50% for licensed cryptocurrency exchanges handling customers' assets.Photo by Simon Zhu on UnsplashGuarding against insolvency riskThe move came to light through a statement published recently by OSL, one of Hong Kong’s licensed virtual asset trading platforms. It’s aimed at enhancing security measures, protecting users from potential security breaches or insolvency. As part of that disclosure, OSL announced a two-year partnership with Canopius, an underwriter syndicate associated with Lloyd's of London. Under this collaboration, OSL will provide insurance coverage for an impressive 95% of its users' assets, surpassing the mandated 50%. OSL emphasized its commitment to safeguarding regulated assets under custody, irrespective of the regulatory guidelines permitting virtual asset service providers (VASPs) to reduce insurance coverage to 50%. Response to recent failuresThis decision is grounded in the acknowledgment of the volatile market conditions and the series of cryptocurrency firm collapses witnessed in recent years. 2022 saw a number of high-profile crypto platform collapses, such as the demise of FTX. HashKey Exchange, another licensed crypto exchange in Hong Kong, has also proactively secured its users' assets by entering into a crypto insurance agreement with Hong Kong headquartered fintech firm OneDegree back in September. The insurer entered the digital assets space last July, expanding into the Middle East last month. OneDegree’s arrangement with HashKey offers coverage ranging from $50 million to $400 million, extending beyond standard security breaches and insolvency to include server downtime, data back-up and load management incidents, ensuring comprehensive protection. Broader regulatory effortsThe minimum insurance requirement is part of the SFC's larger strategy to regulate the cryptocurrency industry in Hong Kong. While the Chinese autonomous territory enabled cryptocurrency trading for retail investors in August, only OSL and HashKey have obtained virtual asset trading licenses. Thirteen other entities are currently in the application process, undergoing rigorous due diligence checks, including comprehensive financial audits exceeding the scope beyond proof-of-reserve systems. This insurance mandate represents a significant step toward enhancing investor confidence in the cryptocurrency market. As digital assets gain popularity, ensuring the security of customers' funds has become paramount. The SFC's proactive approach seeks to strike a balance between fostering innovation and safeguarding investors. Products are also emerging that crypto users themselves can access. UK-based CryptoShield offers insurance protection directly to users that covers potential loss of funds on crypto platforms. The cryptocurrency landscape in Hong Kong is evolving rapidly, with the SFC playing a pivotal role in shaping the regulatory environment. Regulators aim to establish a robust framework addressing potential risks and protecting market participants while embracing digital innovation. As the regulatory landscape matures, more licensed crypto exchanges in Hong Kong may be required to meet the 50% minimum insurance requirement, further strengthening security measures and making the market a safer place for investors.  

While cryptocurrencies may be banned in China, crypto trading activity continues in some corners, nonetheless, sometimes through accessing overseas exchanges. With that, authorities recently uncovered a massive underground banking operation that exploited crypto trading platforms to evade local forex regulations.Photo by Manuel Joseph on Pexels$2.2 billion laundering operationOn Sunday, an account on popular Chinese social media platform WeChat run by China’s State Administration of Foreign Exchange (SAFE) published details of the $2.2 billion laundering operation bust. Xu Xiao, the Inspector at the Qingdao Branch of the State Administration of Foreign Exchange, revealed that the scheme involved underground banks who purchased virtual currencies and then sold the virtual currencies through overseas trading platforms to obtain the foreign currency they needed. This process, he explained, completes the conversion of yuan and foreign currencies, constituting the illegal act of buying and selling foreign exchange. Stringent capital controlsChina enforces stringent rules on money transfers outside the country. Citizens are limited to exchanging up to $50,000 in foreign currency and require a permit for transactions beyond that limit. Any transaction exceeding the limit without a permit is considered money laundering. During a recent investigation, authorities seized cryptocurrencies valued at approximately $28,000 in Tether, Litecoin and other digital currencies. However, the operation is estimated to have facilitated the movement of over $2.2 billion, involving more than a thousand bank accounts across 17 provinces and municipalities. Monetary control loopholesChina, once the largest cryptocurrency market, imposed a comprehensive ban on crypto exchanges in September 2017 and subsequently expanded its restrictions to include crypto mining and trading. Despite these measures, reports have surfaced about underground crypto exchange operations. Earlier this year, an investigative report by the Wall Street Journal found that global exchange Binance continues to do thriving business with Chinese customers. Global crypto exchanges are reportedly still onboarding Chinese clients indirectly. The South China Morning Post (SCMP) recently accused Binance of facilitating Chinese crypto trading accounts by falsely claiming they are from Taiwan. While mainland China adopts a hostile stance towards cryptocurrencies, the special administrative region of Hong Kong remains progressive in the sector. Hong Kong’s regulatory authorities have introduced specific rules for cryptocurrencies and are licensing crypto exchanges operating within the jurisdiction. Arthur Hayes, the co-founder of the BitMEX crypto derivatives platform, recently described Hong Kong as the gateway for mainland China to global capital markets. Hayes asserted that wealthy Chinese individuals all bank in Hong Kong and with that, they all have access to crypto exchanges and brokers. In Cambodia, it is understood that illicit Chinese-linked activities oftentimes implicate the use of U.S. dollar stablecoin Tether (USDT) to move funds in and out of China even though Tether is banned in Cambodia. The latest crackdown in China underscores the ongoing challenges faced by authorities in controlling crypto-related activities, highlighting the dynamic nature of such activity within and adjacent to mainland China. As regulatory scrutiny intensifies, the contrast between mainland China’s approach and Hong Kong’s more open stance toward cryptocurrencies becomes increasingly evident.