Ministry of Science and ICT to hold conference to explore future of Web3

As cryptocurrencies increasingly position themselves as a recognized asset class and potential hedge against fiat inflation, illicit activity tied to digital tokens is becoming more visible. A recent high-profile case in the UK has brought this issue into sharp focus, centering on a fraud scheme originating in China. According to BBC News, the case involves Qian Zhimin, a woman who raised funds from more than 100,000 investors in China by claiming to operate a crypto mining company that also develops health products. Instead, she laundered the proceeds and fled the country. On Nov. 11, Qian was sentenced to 11 years and eight months in prison by a UK court.Photo by Vasilis Chatzopoulos on Unsplash$6B fraud and lavish lifestyle​Qian entered Britain on a forged passport in September 2017 and proceeded to live an extravagant lifestyle, renting a mansion in Hampstead for over £17,000 ($22,700) per month. She was arrested in northern England in April 2024, and it was found that she held roughly 61,000 Bitcoin, valued at roughly £5 billion ($6.6 billion), having converted portions of her holdings to cover her substantial living expenses. ​The sheer scale of her wealth was revealed after police searched her rented residence, discovering the Bitcoin reserves on hard drives and laptops. It marks the largest crypto seizure ever recorded in the UK. During the raid, officers also found four other individuals at the property illegally employed to handle household tasks such as shopping, cleaning, and security. ​Since Qian’s arrival in the UK, the value of her Bitcoin holdings has appreciated more than 20-fold. With the fraudster now sentenced, victims are seeing a glimmer of hope for restitution. A civil case scheduled for early next year will determine the fate of the seized assets. However, while many defrauded Chinese investors are reportedly preparing to file claims, establishing a clear paper trail may prove difficult. Many victims routed funds through local intermediaries rather than transferring them directly to Qian’s firm. ​U.S. Bitcoin forfeiture and Beijing’s allegationsWhile the UK courts grapple with the aftermath of Qian’s fraud, a separate crypto controversy is brewing between the U.S. and China, highlighting Beijing's continued vigilance over the sector despite its 2021 ban on trading and mining. According to Cointelegraph, the state-supported National Computer Virus Emergency Response Center (CVERC) has alleged that American authorities are connected to the disappearance of roughly 127,000 Bitcoin, valued at around $14.5 billion, from the LuBian mining pool. ​These allegations surfaced after the U.S. filed a civil forfeiture claim in October against Chen Zhi, the Cambodia-based founder of the Prince Group, who is believed to have owned the assets prior to the breach. At the time of the filing, the U.S. Treasury Department noted that the funds were already under its control. ​CVERC contends that Washington hasn't explained how it accessed the assets. Citing data from analytics firm Arkham, the Chinese agency suggested the funds had been under U.S. control for over a year. They argued that the prolonged inactivity of the Bitcoin before the formal seizure is inconsistent with the typical behavior of hackers seeking quick profit, implying state-level involvement. Economic chess between Washington and BeijingThis matter of Bitcoin control adds a new layer of complexity to U.S.–China relations, even as a trade truce between the two countries took effect on Nov. 10. In a report by CNBC, Washington cut tariffs on China’s fentanyl-linked imports to 10% and extended a reciprocal rate reduction under that agreement. In exchange, Beijing is said to have eased certain restrictions on rare earth exports. Analysts at Morgan Stanley suggest that China is maintaining its export-control regime, implemented in April, to retain strategic leverage. They caution that recurring negotiations and strategic divergence will remain defining features of the evolving bilateral relationship. 

Hong Kong Authorities Block Access to JPEX Amid Ongoing InvestigationDubai-headquartered crypto exchange JPEX has been under intense scrutiny in Hong Kong over the course of the past week due to issues experienced by Hong Kong users in withdrawing funds from the platform. In the most recent twist to the saga, authorities in the Chinese autonomous territory have now blocked access to the JPEX website and mobile application.Photo by Tao Yuan on UnsplashCutting off service accessThe firm published a statement on Wednesday, outlining this latest sanction, while protesting that the move had been unreasonable. It appears that the authorities requested local telecommunications providers to block access to the company’s online platform.The measure follows ongoing enforcement actions initiated by local law enforcement agencies, which have led to the detention of at least 11 individuals and the seizure of assets related to the case. The scandal has also had implications for the crypto sector as a whole, as local regulators are now looking once more at regulation and determining if there’s a need to tighten regulatory measures as a consequence of JPEX’s failings in Hong Kong.VPN recommendationIn its statement, JPEX stated:“Since September 13, 2023, the SFC [Securities and Futures Commission] has suddenly made a series of accusations against our platform’s operating model and promotional methods, which we vehemently resent as they were made without investigation or review.”In response to the blocking of their platform, JPEX has encouraged users to utilize virtual private network (VPN) services to access their services. The exchange sought to reassure its user base, stating: “Here, we strongly reiterate that, even in the face of such oppression and unfair treatment, our platform will continue to operate as usual. Users can log into our mobile application or operate on our web version using VPN applications like Surfshark.”The investigation into JPEX was initiated following warnings from the SFC regarding false or misleading statements made on social media by crypto influencers and the trading platform relative to a trading license application.On Sunday, JPEX announced that it had suspended certain operations and increased withdrawal fees due to an ongoing liquidity crisis, triggering an influx of complaints from users. As of Monday night, the police had received a total of 1,641 complaints, with claims amounting to approximately HK$1.19 billion ($152 million) in assets involved, as revealed during a police briefing on Tuesday.DAO Stakeholders Dividend PlanIn response to these developments, JPEX unveiled plans for a “DAO Stakeholders Dividend Plan.” Under this initiative, JPEX users will have the opportunity to convert their assets on the platform into DAO stakeholder dividends at a 1:1 ratio.The exchange intends to distribute 49% of the DAO Stakeholder dividends, with an estimated total value of approximately 400,000,000 USDT available for subscription and conversion. Additionally, JPEX plans to offer repurchase options one year and two years after the program’s launch.New users who subscribe to the DAO stakeholder dividends will enjoy double payouts, and they will not be required to bear all the operational responsibilities of the platform. This move is seen as an attempt by JPEX to address the concerns of its user base and navigate the challenges it currently faces.The situation surrounding JPEX remains fluid, with ongoing investigations and regulatory actions continuing to unfold.

The cryptocurrency market has come under renewed pressure as escalating global tariff tensions converge with growing stress in the private credit sector, though a South Korean analyst suggests that prospects for a rebound remain intact. According to Etoday, Yang Hyun-kyung, a researcher at iM Securities, noted that risk assets staged a brief rally after the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that President Donald Trump’s reciprocal tariffs, imposed under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA), were unlawful. However, the relief proved short-lived as tariff fears reignited following the announcement of a 10% levy and a subsequent proposal to increase it to 15%.Photo by Markus Winkler on UnsplashLiquidations surge amid private credit jittersYang observed that market volatility intensified as concerns in the private credit market resurfaced after Blue Owl Capital halted redemptions for its Blue Owl Capital Corporation II (OBDC II) fund and initiated a $1.4 billion asset sale. Yang highlighted that $420 million in liquidations hit the crypto market as Asian trading opened on Feb. 23. This included $386 million in long positions and $34 million in shorts, signaling a swift deleveraging. These pressures are reflected in current price levels. According to CoinMarketCap, Bitcoin, the world’s largest cryptocurrency, is trading just below $65,000, down 1.13% over the past 24 hours. The token remains approximately 49% below the all-time high recorded in October. Bitcoin’s decline has widened valuation losses among digital asset treasury (DAT) firms. Yang estimated that Strategy, which holds 717,131 BTC, is sitting on roughly $7.89 billion in unrealized losses. Yang added that a potential shift toward monetary easing ahead of the U.S. midterm elections, combined with reduced regulatory uncertainty from the crypto market structure bill known as the Clarity Act, could serve as short-term catalysts for a rebound. Binance focuses on regulatory alignment in KoreaDespite the market slump, crypto firms are deepening their presence in South Korea. In an interview with ZDNet Korea, Binance Head of APAC SB Seker stated that the company’s focus is not on increasing its ownership stake, but on establishing a compliant, trusted, and sustainable operation in the country. Binance currently holds a 67.45% stake in Gopax, operated by Streami, after securing regulatory approval to become its largest shareholder. Addressing the issue regarding GoFi—Gopax’s DeFi product designed to generate returns for users—Seker said any repayments of unpaid customer funds must comply with Korean commercial law and satisfy relevant legal and administrative procedures. He added that discussions with regulators are ongoing and the company cannot unilaterally set a repayment schedule. Seker also noted that Binance plans to work closely with authorities to advance its business in areas such as institutional investment and stablecoins. Regulators reiterate exchange ownership capsAs the digital asset sector evolves, South Korea is moving to tighten oversight. MoneyToday reported that financial authorities have notified the heads of the country’s five largest crypto exchanges—Upbit, Bithumb, Korbit, Coinone, and Gopax—of their intention to introduce caps on the ownership stakes of controlling shareholders. The notification is widely viewed as a precursor to the government’s release of the Digital Asset Basic Act, often described as the second phase of the country’s crypto regulatory framework. The Financial Services Commission has maintained that a single largest shareholder’s stake in a crypto exchange should be limited to between 15% and 20%. At the meeting, officials outlined key elements of the forthcoming bill and reaffirmed their intention to enshrine the ownership cap in law. Representatives from the five exchanges and the Digital Asset eXchange Alliance (DAXA), the industry body to which the platforms belong, reportedly raised concerns about the proposal.