Top

CarrieVerse joins Dubai’s DMCC as metaverse service provider

Web3 & Enterprise·November 09, 2023, 8:49 AM

Web3 metaverse platform CarrieVerse has joined the Dubai Multi Commodities Centre (DMCC), the UAE’s largest free-trade zone for a wide array of companies including those in the blockchain and crypto industry. Last month, CarrieVerse received final approval to establish a local subsidiary there, which will serve as a hub to expand its global Web3 ecosystem, particularly in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region.

Photo by ZQ Lee on Unsplash

 

An ever-growing business hub

“DMCC has recently risen as a hub for Web3 companies and investors that is actively supported by the Dubai government and the royal family. As the first Korean Web3 company to officially partner with DMCC, we expect that CarrieVerse will grow into a global company here,” said David Yoon, CEO of CarrieVerse.

DMCC is a UAE government agency located in the Jumeirah Lakes Towers district of Dubai and is currently led by Executive Chairman and CEO Ahmed Bin Sulayem. It is home to more than 23,000 companies ranging from startups to large corporations and has been named Global Free Zone of the Year by the Financial Times’ FDI Magazine for nine consecutive years since 2015.

Notably, the zone also has a Crypto Centre for blockchain and crypto businesses, including big names like Binance and Bybit. It has been supporting companies by providing funding, incubation, peer-to-peer matching and opportunities for collaboration.

According to Zaher El Orm, the Crypto Centre Executive at DMCC, the Crypto Centre also supports businesses in their pursuit of crypto licenses for business activities and regulated virtual assets activities. These include blockchain as a service, metaverse service provider, crypto proprietary trading and crypto mining activities. CarrieVerse revealed that it has officially obtained a license as a metaverse service provider.

 

Promising outlook for CVTX

DMCC is now an official partner of CVTX, the platform’s governance token, which is expected to boost the token’s momentum on global exchanges. It has recently been listed on the Singapore-based digital asset exchange BingX. This will further help the platform secure partnerships with more than 1,000 leading global Web3 companies at DMCC.

CarrieVerse and DMCC stated that they plan to reveal the roadmap of their partnership in the future.

More to Read
View All
Web3 & Enterprise·

Nov 11, 2023

Hodlnaut to proceed to liquidation

Hodlnaut to proceed to liquidationCryptocurrency lender Hodlnaut, based in Singapore, is set to undergo liquidation, according to former interim judicial managers, Aaron Lee and Angela Ee.The High Court of Singapore has lifted the protection order it had put in place in respect of the business and efforts to restructure it in August 2022. The decision, formalized with a winding-up order filed on Friday in the High Court, follows a period of trading in 2022 when the company incurred losses of approximately $189 million due to the collapse of the Terra ecosystem in May 2022.The liquidators, tasked with providing regular updates to the more than 17,000 creditors, will oversee the process. Hodlnaut’s crypto assets, amounting to $13.3 million, were locked on FTX before the exchange froze withdrawals and declared bankruptcy last November. Despite a rejected restructuring plan earlier this year, the creditors opted for liquidation, deeming it more favorable to their interests. Aaron Lee and Angela Ee will now act as the appointed liquidators, overseeing the winding-up process under the Insolvency, Restructuring and Dissolution Act of 2018.Photo by Hu Chen on UnsplashCreditors favored liquidationAt an early stage, Hodlnaut founders Simon Lee and Zhu Juntao were in favor of a business sale as a preferable alternative to liquidation. Back in February, there appeared to be some potential of a sale, with several buyers having indicated an interest in the business. The identity of these interested parties was never revealed and the interim judicial managers of the restructuring process later confirmed that no “white knight” had emerged to buy out the business.It became clear in April of this year that creditors preferred liquidation as opposed to attempting to restructure the business. The Algorand Foundation is a leading creditor, with a $35 million exposure to Hodlnaut. In a court filing in April, the Algorand Foundation, alongside other leading creditors Samtrade Custodian Limited and S.A.M. Fintech Pte Ltd., were noted as being opposed to a restructuring.OPNX bidIn August it emerged that controversial crypto claims trading platform OPNX, owned by Three Arrows Capital’s (3AC) Kyle Davies and Su Zhu alongside Mark and Leslie Lamb from CoinFLEX, was mounting a bid for Hodlnaut.OPNX had proposed to provide a capital injection of $30 million. The proposal outlined that this investment would be made in the form of FLEX tokens, the native token of the CoinFLEX platform.Following consideration by the interim judicial managers overseeing Hodlnaut’s restructuring process, it decided not to take up the offer. It was decided that the FLEX tokens had a speculative value and that they were highly illiquid.Additionally, no clear timeline had been provided by OPNX in respect of the repayment of creditors’ debts. Furthermore, the proposal was found to be scant on detail, particularly with regard to payments which were limited to 30% of liabilities. In August the FLEX token experienced a large drop, falling 90% in value.

news
Policy & Regulation·

Oct 26, 2023

The Legal Future of South Korea’s Crypto Industry: Necessary Legislation and Systems

The Legal Future of South Korea’s Crypto Industry: Necessary Legislation and SystemsA recent National Assembly symposium organized by South Korea’s Digital Asset Policy Forum brought experts together to discuss the challenges and prospects of the implementation of the Virtual Asset User Protection Act at the National Assembly Members’ Office Building in Seoul on Tuesday.Photo by Tingey Injury Law Firm on UnsplashInternational modelsReferences were made to global examples, such as the Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation (MiCA) — the world’s first standalone virtual asset legislation enacted in the EU — which ensures transparency, disclosure, authorization, and supervision of crypto-asset transactions. However, unlike the capital market, MiCA does not impose regular disclosure reporting requirements or corrections on them. Firms in Japan, on the other hand, are asked to provide disclosure under autonomous regulation through the Japan Virtual and Crypto Assets Exchange Association (JVCEA).Notably, in its recent Policy Recommendations for Crypto and Digital Asset Markets Consultation Report, the International Organization of Securities Commissions (IOSCO) states that it is “seeking to encourage optimal consistency in the way crypto-asset markets and securities markets are regulated within individual IOSCO jurisdictions, in accordance with the principle of ‘same activities, same risks, same regulatory outcomes’.” This principle refers to the concept that any crypto-asset activity that has a similar function and poses similar risks to those in the traditional financial system — such as operating a trading platform or providing custody services — is subject to regulation that ensures equivalent outcomes, as defined by the UK Parliament.The IOSCO report also suggests that crypto-asset service providers (CASPs) should disclose information regarding ownership and control of crypto-assets, issuer and business-related information, issuer management teams, transaction history and operational description of crypto-assets, token ownership concentration, transfer protocols, and a given CASP’s treatment of the client crypto-assets and their respective rights and entitlements during events like hard forks and airdrops.Hurdles to overcomeExperts at the forum reflected these considerations in their sentiments. Han Suh-hee, a lawyer at Barun Law Firm, emphasized that it is important to determine what kind of information should be disclosed. She argued that it is necessary to discuss to what extent information about virtual asset issuers should be disclosed and whether mandating firms to disclose their financial and business conditions is efficient.In particular, Han underlined the need to consider the differences between virtual assets and stocks when establishing a framework for the disclosure of virtual assets holdings. Unlike stocks, virtual assets possess distinctive characteristics like their borderless and decentralized nature, unclear issuer backgrounds, and the ability to conduct peer-to-peer (P2P) transactions.Lee Han-jin, a lawyer at Kim & Chang Law Firm, added that the enactment of Korea’s Virtual Asset User Protection Act was aimed at establishing a system directly targeted at regulating virtual assets and virtual asset service operators (VASPs) — a significant development from the Financial Transaction Reporting Act, which had until now been the only legal framework responsible for regulating VASPs along with other entities like casino business operators. Virtual assets are now subject to a more systematized regulatory approach.However, he said that the Virtual Asset User Protection Act still has its setbacks because it is undergoing a two-stage legislative process. Lee criticized the fact that the same definition of VASPs outlined in the Financial Transaction Reporting Act had been brought over, which limits their identity to transaction intermediaries, wallet operators, and custodians while overlooking their other roles like crypto management, crypto deposits, and crypto collective investments.Lee also pointed out another weakness: the scope of prohibition on using undisclosed information and market manipulation is broader in the Virtual Asset User Protection Act than in the Capital Markets Act. He argued that enforcement decrees should stipulate the definition of insiders and exceptional cases when deliberating on the prohibition of insider virtual asset trading.Lee thus emphasized the need for a clear definition of virtual assets in the Virtual Asset User Protection Act, as it is yet unclear whether they are objects or assets. All things considered, he believes there must be a law that can encompass blockchain-based decentralization, outline the similarities and differences between digital assets and financial products, and accommodate new services that utilize smart contracts.“We are in the process of creating a regulatory system similar to those being adopted in other countries based on their respective markets,” said Lee Seok-ran, head of the Financial Innovation Bureau at the Financial Services Commission (FSC). “Unlike the stock market, which is equipped with regulations to prevent fraudulent transactions and misconduct, virtual assets are traded on multiple exchanges, so we are considering how to interpret unfair trading activities and conduct market surveillance.”She explained that the commission is prioritizing user protection measures and subordinate regulations. “I believe we will be able to create a system for subordinate regulations on disclosure once an overall global trajectory is established. But before that happens, we are working on guidelines for defining unfair trading activities with regulators and the Digital Asset eXchange Alliance (DAXA).” Unfair trading activities associated with virtual assets include not only those conducted on exchanges but also under other circumstances.The FSC officer said that the financial authority is set to establish legal criteria to distinguish cases such as false statements in white papers of crypto projects. She added that enforcement decrees will define both the conditions for restricting deposits and withdrawals on crypto exchanges and the corresponding limits.

news
Policy & Regulation·

Aug 23, 2023

Oman’s Crypto Mining Expansion Signals Further Economic Diversification

Oman’s Crypto Mining Expansion Signals Further Economic DiversificationOman has recently unveiled a state-of-the-art digital asset mining facility, as it continues in its quest to diversify its economy beyond oil exports.$150 million facilityThis cutting-edge mining facility was recently inaugurated, valued at around 135 million Omani rials, approximately $150 million, as a result of collaboration between Exahertz, an Omani company, and Moonwalk Systems, a Dubai-based blockchain solutions firm.Situated within the Salalah Free Zone, a hub that offers tax benefits to corporate entities, the facility is powered by mining hardware provided by leading Chinese mining equipment manufacturer Bitmain Technologies and is primed to house 2,000 machines, making for an 11-megawatt facility.Photo by Anusree Mohan on UnsplashExpansion plansSam Ferdows, the CEO of Moonwalk Systems, hailed the project, emphasizing the company’s dedication to expanding the facility’s capacity. Ferdows shared that plans are already in motion to increase the mining operation’s capacity to accommodate 15,000 miner units by October, with aspirations to expand to multiple cities. Recognizing the importance of corporate social responsibility relative to sustainability, Moonwalk Systems aims to train citizens through dedicated programs, further promoting the growth of the digital asset sector.Engineer Said Hamoud, Oman’s Minister of Transport, Communications, and Information Technology, who led the inauguration of the project, underscored its significance as a pivotal step in the nation’s digital transformation. He expressed confidence that the new mining facility would contribute to Oman’s growing digital economy.Second mining projectThis marks Oman’s second major move into the cryptocurrency mining space within nine months. Back in November 2022, the country inaugurated its first mining facility with a price tag of approximately $389 million. The combined investment in these ventures totals $740 million, which aligns with the broader regional push toward embracing the opportunities presented by blockchain and Web3 technologies.In the Middle East, several governments are actively investing in blockchain-related infrastructure. The United Arab Emirates, a neighbor to Oman, has notably begun to accept applications from Web3-related companies. The Virtual Assets Regulatory Authority (VARA), the local regulator in Dubai, has rolled out comprehensive regulatory directives that govern licensing requirements, company operations, and compliance.Oman, for its part, is not just focusing on infrastructure. It is also addressing regulatory aspects by requiring registered digital asset firms to establish a presence within the country. Evidence of those efforts emerged earlier this month when the Omani regulator, the Capital Market Authority (CMA), invited public feedback on a consultation paper that feeds into the development of a virtual asset regulatory framework in Oman. This versatile approach suggests that the Sultanate is making a conscious commitment to fostering a thriving blockchain ecosystem within the country.As Oman attempts to position itself as a regional blockchain hub, it recognizes the transformative power of cryptocurrencies and blockchain technology in propelling its economy forward. On that basis, the Middle Eastern country is making a resolute pivot from its oil-based past to a blockchain-enabled future.

news
Loading