Singapore’s MAS gears up for live CBDC pilot

BitGo, an American regulated digital asset custody firm, has achieved in-principle approval from the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) for a Major Payment Institution (MPI) license, marking a significant milestone in its global expansion efforts.Photo by Sergio Sala on UnsplashExtending global footprintIn a recent social media post, BitGo expressed its enthusiasm for the approval, positioning itself closer to providing specialized trading services for non-retail investors. The company sees this as an opportunity to extend its global footprint and offer regulated, secure and trusted solutions in the Asia-Pacific (APAC) region. Lim Ho Beng, BitGo's Asia-Pacific managing director, emphasized Singapore's regulatory clarity regarding digital assets and its status as a leading innovation hub and gateway to the Asia-Pacific as key factors driving BitGo's expansion into the Republic. In a statement provided to The Block, the company outlined that in operating as a crypto brokerage in Singapore, that would position BitGo “as a leading provider of digital asset services for institutional finance throughout APAC.” Expanding service offeringWith the full license on the horizon, BitGo Singapore Pte. Ltd. is aiming to broaden its services in the city-state, facilitating institutional clients in purchasing and selling cryptocurrencies directly from its cold storage custody solution. BitGo CEO Mike Belshe acknowledged the significance of the MAS in-principle approval, particularly following the recent acquisition of the company's German license. Belshe emphasized the company's commitment to providing clients with regulated, secure and trusted solutions as it expands its global presence. Additional licensing successBefore this achievement in Singapore, BitGo had already made notable strides in the global digital asset custody arena. The company secured a crypto custody license from Germany’s Federal Financial Supervisory Authority (BaFin), a crucial step in its European expansion strategy. BitGo Deutschland GmbH, established in 2020, initially operated under a transitional regime in Germany before obtaining the full license, aligning with the company's dedication to operating in regulatory-compliant markets. Dejan Maljevic, BitGo’s Managing European Director, commended BaFin's role as a global trendsetter in crypto regulation, providing a secure regulatory framework that facilitates progress in digital currencies. In addition to its presence in Germany, BitGo obtained approval from the New York Department of Financial Services (NYDFS) for the New York Trust Charter. This authorization allows BitGo to extend its custody services to a broader range of institutional clients in New York, further solidifying its position as a trusted player in the digital asset custody space. BitGo was one of the first crypto custodians to emerge in catering to institutional clients. It will compete with firms like Zodia Custody, a digital asset custodian backed by Japan’s SBI Holdings and British bank Standard Chartered, which launched its services in Singapore last September. In August, BitGo raised $100 million in Series C funding, based on a company valuation of $1.75 billion. The crypto custodian continues to navigate regulatory landscapes globally, emphasizing its commitment to offering secure and compliant solutions to institutional clients across various jurisdictions.

Singapore High Court Recognizes Cryptocurrency as Personal PropertyIn a significant ruling on July 25, Judge Philip Jeyaretnam of the High Court of Singapore declared that cryptocurrency is capable of being held in trust and should be recognized as property.The judge’s decision came in response to a case brought by Dubai-headquartered crypto exchange Bybit against its former employee, Ho Kai Xin, who was accused of transferring approximately 4.2 million Tether (USDT) from the crypto exchange to her private accounts without authorization.Photo by Tingey Injury Law Firm on UnsplashNo fundamental differenceIn his ruling, Judge Jeyaretnam emphasized that there is no fundamental difference between cryptocurrencies, fiat money, or even physical objects like shells when it comes to their status as property. He argued that as long as these objects hold value and are based on mutual faith, they can be considered property. The judge’s verdict is seen as a crucial step in establishing the legal status of digital assets within the Singaporean jurisdiction.Addressing the argument that cryptocurrencies lack physical presence and therefore cannot be considered property, Judge Jeyaretnam drew an analogy, stating: “We identify what is going on as a particular digital token, somewhat like how we give a name to a river even though the water contained within its banks is constantly changing.” By equating cryptocurrencies to named entities, the judge made it clear that physical tangibility is not a prerequisite for something to be classified as property.Cryptocurrencies have valueFurthermore, the ruling challenges the perception that cryptocurrencies have no “real” value. Judge Jeyaretnam firmly refuted this notion, highlighting that the value of any asset, whether physical or digital, is ultimately determined by collective human belief and judgment.One critical classification made by the judge is grouping cryptocurrencies under the category of “things in action” within British common law. This categorization means that cryptocurrencies are considered a form of property, over which personal rights can be claimed and enforced through legal actions, rather than requiring physical possession.The judge’s decision also referenced the Monetary Authority of Singapore’s (MAS) consultation paper, which proposes implementing segregation and custody requirements for digital payment tokens. By taking cues from the MAS’s stance on digital assets, the court emphasized the legality of holding cryptocurrencies on trust, as long as practical methods for identification and segregation are in place.Cues taken from existing lawSingapore’s legal framework for property also played a crucial role in the ruling. Judge Jeyaretnam pointed to Order 22 of Singapore’s Rules of Court 2021, which defines “movable property” to include various assets, such as cash, debts, bonds, shares, and cryptocurrency or other digital currency. This inclusion reinforces the recognition of cryptocurrencies as a valid form of property within Singaporean law.In April of this year, a Hong Kong court reached a similar conclusion, recognizing cryptocurrency as property. In the High Court of Justice in London the following month, non-fungible tokens (NFTs) were recognized as “private property.”Overall, Judge Jeyaretnam’s ruling represents a significant milestone in the legal recognition of cryptocurrencies in Singapore. By acknowledging cryptocurrencies as property, the court provides greater clarity and certainty for crypto users and investors while affirming the importance of embracing digital assets within the nation’s legal framework.

Shanghai Embraces Blockchain, AI, and Digital Yuan with New GuidelinesIn a bid to stay at the forefront of technological advancements, the government of China’s largest and most populous city, Shanghai, has issued a set of guidelines aimed at promoting the widespread adoption of blockchain, the metaverse, and the digital yuan.Photo by Edward He on UnsplashIntegrating blockchain technologyThe objective of the measure is to further the use of these technologies across various industries within the city. Leading enterprises across a range of industry sectors, such as automotive, commodity trading, and e-commerce, are now required to look to incorporate these technologies into their operations.The guidelines, which were published last Tuesday, outline the government’s commitment to providing support for platforms that seek to enhance digitalization in production, operations, and management processes. Additionally, they emphasize the development of information technology services centered around big data, blockchain, the Internet of Things, artificial intelligence, and the mobile Internet.Bolstering commodity tradingA key focus for the government is the establishment of a robust internet system to bolster its local commodity trading service. This move is driven by a reliance on “the national financial factor market,” which aims to upgrade the over-the-counter derivatives platform for bulk commodities and strengthen the linkages between futures and cash.Furthermore, the guidelines pave the way for expanding e-commerce service platforms for industrial products, setting up a digital transformation service platform, and fostering the development and application of data resources.Shanghai’s status as China’s financial hub makes it an ideal testing ground for innovative technologies like blockchain and AI. However, China’s approach to cryptocurrency is more complex. It involves support for blockchain technology while at the same time applying strict measures against crypto trading and mining.Aligning with central government policyThe Chinese government’s support for blockchain technology stems from its recognition of blockchain as the underlying foundation of cryptocurrencies. Judging by the blockchain initiatives forwarded by the central government and regional Chinese administrations in recent months, it’s clear that China is keen to develop leadership in the use of blockchain across various sectors. It takes a different view, however, when it comes to projects related to decentralized cryptocurrencies and crypto trading.In recent years, China has cracked down on cryptocurrency activities. In 2013, the government banned initial coin offerings (ICOs), a fundraising method used for cryptocurrency projects. Subsequently, cryptocurrency exchanges were banned in 2017, followed by a prohibition on cryptocurrency mining in 2021.Several factors contribute to the Chinese government’s cautious approach to cryptocurrency. One major concern is financial stability, as crypto can be exploited for illicit activities like money laundering. According to a recent report, Chinese authorities are redoubling their efforts in pushing back against the use of crypto as they’re finding that it is being used to exploit capital control loopholes.These recent guidelines from Shanghai’s administrators aim to capitalize on the transformative potential of emerging technologies while ensuring prudent regulation and control over cryptocurrency-related activities in line with current central government policy emanating from Beijing.