Galaxia Moneytree partners with Charzin to integrate security tokens into EV charging systems

In Malaysia local regulator the Securities Commission has ordered global crypto exchange platform Bybit to shut down its operations within Malaysia as part of enforcement actions being taken by the regulator against the company.Photo by Esmonde Yong on UnsplashOperating without registration The Securities Commission published a statement to its website late last week outlining that both Bybit and its CEO Ben Zhou had been reprimanded for carrying out digital asset trading activities in Malaysia without having completed the necessary registration. The regulator also pointed out that both Zhou and his company have been listed on its Investor Alert List since July 2021. The Securities Commission took the opportunity to remind investors that they should only deal with what it termed “Recognized Market Operators” (RMOs), a designation it applies to entities that have completed registration with the regulator. Investors who utilize unregistered platforms are not extended any form of protection under Malaysian securities law, the Securities Commission warned, adding that such platforms could put them at risk of fraud and implicate them in money laundering activity potentially. Enforcement actions Bybit has been directed by the regulator to disable its website and mobile applications that are currently targeting Malaysian investors within 14 business days from Dec. 11.  The regulator also wants the company to curb other forms of promotion aimed at Malaysian investors. With that, it has requested that the company take down its Telegram-based support channel for Malaysian customers. Advertising activity, including social media posts, must also cease in cases where such activity is aimed at Malaysian investors. The Securities Commission acknowledged that thus far, Bybit has been compliant with its latest enforcement requests. Intentions to secure licensing Bybit has responded to these developments on its Bybit Malaysia Telegram channel, stating that the company understands that these actions “may cause some inconvenience” to Malaysian customers. “Once we have secured the appropriate licenses, we look forward to reconnecting with you again in the future,” it added. The enforcement action is likely to be a setback for Bybit given that the firm appeared to be focusing on the Malaysian market of late. In June it emerged that the company was moving to relocate Chinese employees to both Malaysia and Dubai.  This is not the first occasion in which Malaysia’s Securities Commission has taken action against a crypto platform. In 2023 the commission ordered the closure of the Malaysian operations of global exchange Huobi (subsequently rebranded as HTX). The circumstances in that instance were similar in that it acted against the exchange and its CEO for operating illegally within the Malaysian market. Within the Malaysian market, only six trading platforms have been registered. These include Hata Digital, Luno, MX Global, Sinegy, Tokenize Technology and Torum International. Earlier the Securities Commission acted similarly in prohibiting Atomic Wallet from operating within Malaysia given its failure to register its digital asset exchange activities. 

Non-Fiat Crypto Exchanges in Korea Urge Banks for Real-Name AccountsThe Virtual Asset Exchange Association (VXA) made an announcement today regarding its recent due diligence request sent to 12 South Korean banks, as reported by local news outlet Digital Today. These banks have not yet entered into contracts to provide real-name deposit and withdrawal accounts to cryptocurrency exchanges.VXA is a group comprised of representatives from ten non-fiat crypto trading platforms in the country. Among its members, eight exchanges–Aprobit, Probit, BTX, Foblgate, GDAC, Flata Exchange, Flybit, and High Block (previously known as Huobi Korea)–participated in the request.Photo by Eduardo Soares on UnsplashPartnerships with banksThe objective of the request is to urge the banks to consider establishing partnerships with competent non-fiat exchanges. The requesters argued that such collaborations would promote fair trading in the market and provide customers with more options. They highlighted the growing presence of the virtual asset trading sector in the capital market.Uneven crypto marketAn official from VXA emphasized the key role played by real-name bank account issuers in creating a healthy environment that addresses the existing monopoly in the Korean crypto market. According to a March report published by the Financial Services Commission, non-fiat crypto trading platforms accounted for only 3 percent of the total Korean crypto market capitalization during the second half of 2022. The remaining 97 percent was attributed to fiat-supporting crypto exchanges.The official further explained that allowing more exchanges to support the trading of the Korean won currency would contribute to shaping a free market while bolstering transparency and investor protection.Legal requirementsEarlier this month, VXA also sought fair due diligence from five Korean banks that have already formed partnerships with fiat-supporting crypto exchanges. In Korea, crypto trading platforms are required by law to obtain real-name accounts from banks in order to provide cash deposit and withdrawal services.

Regulatory Caution Among Asian Nations Amid Reports of Illicit FinancingWith a plethora of reports of crypto-related terrorist financing having been published in recent weeks, it’s understood that Asian nations may be looking to exercise caution when it comes to the current ongoing process of establishing regulatory guidelines for crypto.That’s according to a report published by the South China Morning Post (SCMP) on Thursday. The use of cryptocurrency by Hamas to fund its attack on Israel is being seen as the catalyst that may drive authorities in various Asian nations to take a more cautious approach to regulating digital currencies, according to analysts cited by the publication.Raj Kapoor, the founder of India Blockchain Alliance (IBA), commented on these recent developments, stating:”It is a kick on the backside for most governments. All regulatory bodies will take a closer look at crypto regulation. Governments will need to start implementing new rules and regulations.”At the recent G20 summit held in New Delhi, a joint declaration called for the regulation, supervision, and oversight of crypto assets, among other measures. The declaration emphasized the importance of supporting “a coordinated and comprehensive policy and regulatory framework.”Kapoor stressed the importance of revisiting the declaration and developing solutions to implement its objectives.Photo by Adolfo Félix on UnsplashRenewed scrutinyEvents in Palestine in recent weeks have led to renewed scrutiny when it comes to monitoring illicit financing activity via cryptocurrency. Only days following the recent Hamas attack, Israeli authorities moved to freeze specified crypto accounts.That scrutiny has continued in recent days, with more accounts having been frozen on crypto platforms such as Binance, while more still have been identified as suspicious, with requests for further information having been submitted in respect of over 200 additional accounts.On Wednesday it emerged that the United States Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) had sanctioned a Gaza-based crypto platform.Potential over-reactionWhile crypto-related terrorist financing has been widely publicized, blockchain analytics firm Chainalysis warned on Wednesday that crypto’s role in this illicit activity has likely been overstated. In its blog post on the subject, the firm stated:“Although terrorism financing is a very small portion of the already very small portion of cryptocurrency transaction volume that is illicit, some terrorist organizations raise, store, and transfer funds using cryptocurrency.”Additionally, Chainalysis stated that it had seen “overstated metrics and flawed analyses of these terrorist groups’ use of cryptocurrency.” Peter Van Valkenburgh, Director of Research at non-profit crypto advocacy group Coin Center, also believes that reporting on the matter is not balanced. Taking to X, he stated:“Sensational early reporting on the scale of Hamas crypto fundraising significantly misstated the amounts involved.”Coin Center’s Director of Communications, Neeraj Agrawal, highlighted an article which claimed that crypto “fueled Hamas’ terror attack on Israel” in its title, only to reveal within the body of the article that “cryptocurrency is still far from the largest funding source for terrorism.”Anndy Lian, a Singapore-based author and inter-governmental blockchain adviser, noted that while some countries may consider banning cryptocurrencies as a solution, this could merely drive illicit financing underground and make it more challenging to trace and halt. Lian argued that cryptocurrencies are traceable and trackable, unlike traditional fiat currencies like US dollars.