Korean crypto exchange Upbit adds one-second interval charts

The Dubai Land Department (DLD), a government agency responsible for the registration of real estate in Dubai and the promotion of real estate investments, has signed an agreement with the Virtual Assets Regulatory Authority (VARA), a local regulator, to better integrate tokenized real estate within existing systems. In a statement published on the DLD website on April 6, the government agency set out further details on the collaboration. The purpose of the agreement is to better accommodate fractional ownership of Dubai real estate through tokenization. Photo by Precondo CA on UnsplashLinking fractional ownership to DLD registryTo that end, a governance system will be put in place in order to link the DLD’s land and property registry with tokenized, fractional ownership of property. The parties believe that this approach will lead to greater operational efficiency for stakeholders such as property management firms. Furthermore, greater accommodation of tokenized ownership will lead to enhanced liquidity within the Dubai real estate market.  As a consequence of this improved liquidity and facilitating a more seamless approach in terms of operational efficiency for property management firms, it’s believed that a greater share of global investment in local real estate can be achieved. Broadening the investor baseFractional ownership via tokenized real estate opens the market up to a broader range of potential investors. On this basis, the collaboration can play a role in contributing towards the objectives of Dubai’s Real Estate Strategy 2033, which sets out to boost the local property sector’s contribution towards gross domestic product (GDP). That initiative targets a real estate market value of AED 1 trillion ($272 billion). The DLD said that the initiative also feeds into the broader objectives of the Dubai Economic Agenda (D33), a ten-year plan that has been set out to double Dubai’s economy by 2033, through focusing on innovation, achieving competitiveness at a global level and sustainable growth. Helal Almari, the director general of Dubai’s Department of Economy and Tourism, commented on the partnership, stating that it reflects the future-focused innovation, which he claims Dubai has already become associated with. He added: “Real Estate and Virtual Assets are key pillars of the D33 Economic Agenda D33 and by joining forces DLD and VARA will be creating the blueprint for RE 2.0 in a Decentralised Future Economy.” Almari expressed the belief that putting legal safeguards in place to recognize fractional ownership rights where real estate is concerned will facilitate “more inclusive economic participation” in this market sector.  The DLD recently launched a real estate tokenization pilot project in collaboration with VARA and the Dubai Future Foundation (DFF). At that time, DLD Director General Marwan Ahmed Bin Ghalita recognized the potential that tokenization can bring to the real estate sector. He stated: “By converting real estate assets into digital tokens recorded on blockchain technology, tokenization simplifies and enhances buying, selling, and investment processes.”Last month, Scott Thiel, founder and CEO of Dubai-based real-world asset (RWA) token marketplace Tokinvest, outlined that RWA asset tokenization in the United Arab Emirates (UAE) is gaining momentum. Commenting on this latest development, Thiel said that it’s a demonstration that “the future of real estate investment is onchain.”

The recent 19b-4 approval of spot Ethereum exchange-traded funds (ETFs) by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) is putting pressure on South Korean financial regulators to revisit their policies on digital assets. The SEC's decision to allow ETFs for Ethereum, the world's second-largest cryptocurrency, on May 24, 2024, follows its earlier endorsement of Bitcoin ETFs in January 2024. This move is seen as a significant step in merging traditional finance with the digital asset sector.Photo by DrawKit Illustrations on UnsplashKorean regulatory cautionIn contrast to the progressive stance in the U.S., the Korean Financial Services Commission (FSC) and the Financial Supervisory Service (FSS) have maintained a cautious approach regarding the integration of crypto assets into traditional securities markets. According to current regulations under the Capital Markets Act, ETFs in Korea are limited to traditional underlying assets such as financial instruments, securities, international currencies and commodities. These foundations are crucial for the creation of financial derivatives, leaving little room for digital assets under current laws. Calls for regulatory reforms and market implicationsThe decision by the SEC is expected to influence the Korean regulators to update their views on digital assets, according to local media and industry experts. Jung Eui-jung, the head of the Korean Stockholders’ Alliance, has advocated for Korea to emulate the U.S. by approving Bitcoin and Ethereum ETFs. He expressed concerns that continued regulatory hesitance could lead to investor funds migrating to more progressive markets like the U.S., potentially positioning the U.S. to broaden its crypto market further. Xangle, a digital currency data provider in Seoul, has also criticized the current regulations as outdated, emphasizing the need for revisions to accommodate the increasing relevance of digital assets in global finance. 

Survey Reveals Over Half of Korean Financial Firms Eyeing Both Issuance and Distribution of Security TokensIn a recent survey conducted by fintech solution provider Koscom, it was found that more than half of South Korean financial companies interested in security token businesses are planning to undertake both the issuance and distribution of security tokens. This result reflects the belief of the financial firms that if they engage only in the secondary market, they will experience reduced profitability due to the necessity of lowering transaction fees amidst fierce competition, as per local business newspaper Hankyung.Photo by Shubham Dhage on Unsplash62% of financial firmsAt a seminar held today, Koscom revealed the result of this survey it conducted among a total of 95 entities interested in security tokens, consisting of 30 securities firms, three banks, one asset management company, and 61 token issuers. Among the financial firms that belong to the first three categories, 62% answered that they will conduct both the issuance and distribution of security tokens. 31% expressed a preference for conducting only issuance, while 7% were inclined towards distribution alone.The survey also highlighted that 38% of financial companies hold a positive outlook on the security token market, although they acknowledge insufficient understanding. Additionally, 34% of respondents anticipate that the security token market will rival the exchange-traded fund (ETF) market in terms of size, while only 10% believe it will eventually replace the initial public offering (IPO) market.Cultural contentWhen it comes to the underlying real-world assets (RWAs) for security tokens, cultural content emerged as the most preferred option, with 71% of respondents selecting it. Real estate followed closely at 66%, with energy (55%), artworks (41%), and agriculture and fisheries (21%) also garnering interest. Respondents were allowed to choose multiple options for this section.Similarly, cultural content remained the top choice among token issuers, favored by 21% of respondents. It was followed by real estate (16%), artworks (14%), intellectual property (14%), and agriculture and fisheries (9%).A Koscom official attributed the preference for cultural content and real estate as underlying assets to their accessibility and profitability.This seminar, organized by Koscom, aimed to create a supportive environment for issuers and distributors struggling to promote security token businesses. Hong Woo-sun, CEO of Koscom, said the company will leverage its expertise in the capital market and blockchain technology to collaborate with authorities and relevant organizations in lowering barriers to entry for market participants who need technical infrastructure.