Silicon Valley blockchain firm Gluwa becomes partner in Nigeria’s CBDC project

Hong Kong to Issue Digital Asset Licensing Guidelines in MayAccording to Hong Kong’s Securities and Futures Commission (SFC), the Commission will issue new guidelines for virtual asset exchanges within the Chinese autonomous special administrative region (SAR).© Pexels/Jimmy ChanSFC CEO Julia Leung made that announcement while speaking at an event in the city on Thursday, indicating that the guidelines are due to be released next month. Additionally the autonomous region intends to introduce a new licensing system from June 1 onwards, enabling the retail investors among Hong Kong’s populace to trade leading cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin and Ethereum.Hong Kong authorities had provided an insight into this approach back in February, when plans to provide retail access to digital assets were first set out. At the time, they outlined the need for retail customers to pass a knowledge test relative to digital assets or otherwise only being allowed to trade such assets once the customer had completed a certain level of training relative to digital assets, provided by a regulated crypto service provider.This latest announcement has arrived amid a backdrop of a series of recent indications that signify the intent of authorities in Hong Kong to make the autonomous region a major financial hub centered around digital assets.Leung articulated that the further development of this digital assets framework follows a consultation process that attracted more than 150 responses. Although virtual asset service providers (VASPs) will need to await the complete rollout of the licensing system, a handful of crypto businesses such as OSL and Hashkey, under the supervision of the Hong Kong regulator, have already started to offer their services.Crypto as propertyA Hong Kong court recently recognized cryptocurrency as property. The ruling emerged in a bankruptcy hearing pertaining to failed cryptocurrency exchange Gatecoin. In presiding over the case, Justice Linda Chan outlined that the autonomous region takes a broad view of what constitutes property. In finding crypto to meet the definition of property, she went on to clarify that it therefore has the capability of being held in trust.The finding has particular relevance in the crypto world right now given the consequences of an “in trust” custodianship of customer’s digital assets relative to numerous ongoing bankruptcy processes involving failed crypto businesses, and the pecking order of creditors in those instances, in their efforts to recover their digital assets.Positive approachWhile mainland China remains an adverse territory relative to digital assets, Hong Kong has taken to welcoming the sector and with that, enticing crypto firms to relocate to the autonomous region from the mainland. Leadership in the city has been making all the right soundings to demonstrate that it is actively trying to nurture the nascent sector.While recent months have seen the Biden administration in the United States attempt to close off banking from the crypto sector, in contrast, Hong Kong’s largest virtual bank, ZA Bank, was recently given permission to act as a settlement bank for regulated Web3 businesses located within Hong Kong.

Ripple Expands in Asia-Pacific with Full License to Operate in SingaporeEnterprise blockchain firm Ripple announced on Wednesday (UTC) that it has secured a full license to operate in Singapore, where it has established its Asia-Pacific headquarters since 2017.Photo by Sergio Sala on UnsplashFrom outline to full approval in 4 monthsThis development marks another step in Ripple’s strategic expansion within the Asia-Pacific region, known for its rapidly growing cryptocurrency market. Ripple’s journey to obtaining this full license began less than four months ago when the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) granted it an initial in-principle approval in June. With the newly acquired full license, Ripple is now authorized to offer regulated cryptocurrency payment services in Singapore, a key financial hub in the region.Brad Garlinghouse, the CEO of Ripple, expressed his enthusiasm for the company’s continued growth in Singapore, stating:“We have hired exceptional talent and local leadership, doubling headcount over the past year and plan to continue growing our presence in a progressive jurisdiction like Singapore.”Global expansion strategyThe company also highlighted the fact that over 90% of Ripple’s business occurs outside the United States, making the Asia-Pacific region, and Singapore in particular, a vital part of its global expansion strategy.Monica Long, President of Ripple, explained in a recent interview with CNBC that the Singapore office has seen substantial growth in the past year due to the booming business opportunities in the Asia-Pacific region. This expansion aligns with Singapore’s leadership in crypto regulation in the region. The introduction of the Payment Services Act, which has been in effect since January 2020, has played a large part in that, regulating payment services and crypto services to the public.Singapore’s regulatory framework also includes requirements for crypto service providers to safeguard customer assets in statutory trusts by the end of 2023 and restrictions on facilitating lending or staking of retail customers’ assets. These measures ensure consumer protection and responsible growth in the crypto industry.Praising SingaporeGarlinghouse commended Singapore’s regulatory approach, stating, “Under MAS’ leadership, Singapore has developed into one of the leading fintech and digital asset hubs, striking the balance between innovation, consumer protection and responsible growth.” Ripple’s experience in Singapore differs entirely from the ongoing legal battle it has found itself in in the United States with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).Both Ripple and Coinbase have found themselves embroiled in lawsuits with the regulator in the US. In Ripple’s case, the firm and its founders have been accused of unlawfully selling their native cryptocurrency XRP without registering it with the SEC. However, a landmark ruling in July determined that XRP, as a token, may not necessarily be classified as a security.Long spoke to the contrasting experiences the firm has encountered between the United States and Singapore. Long stated:”Being in Singapore a couple weeks ago felt like night and day compared to the US in terms of open dialogue with regulators, and thus being able to build innovative *and* compliant products.”Ripple, along with Coinbase and several other crypto firms, has criticized the lack of regulatory clarity in the US and has even considered relocating operations due to the SEC’s stringent regulatory stance. Notably, Coinbase also recently announced its successful acquisition of a major payment institution license in Singapore, following its in-principle approval obtained about a year ago.

In an effort to safeguard crypto investors from falling prey to misleading advertisements, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) of Thailand has intensified its scrutiny of promotional campaigns within the crypto sphere. Photo by Dave Kim on UnsplashBroker agent eventsOn April 29, the Bangkok Post reported that the SEC has raised concerns regarding the potential violation of local regulations through introducing broker agent (IBA) events. These events, the SEC clarified, may breach regulations as IBAs are only permitted to promote digital token services to deter speculation on cryptocurrencies, categorized as high-risk assets. IBAs, acting as local conduits for partner digital asset exchanges, typically earn commissions by onboarding clients within a specific market. Such practices are common for exchanges or brokers that don't directly operate in certain markets. Deputy Secretary-General Anek Yooyuen conveyed the commission's unease over crypto exchanges offering preferential treatment to onboard users. Yooyuen stated: "When operators organise sales promotions by offering rewards to entice people to use the service, this could encourage use of the service without considering the investment risks. This is especially the case for cryptocurrencies.” Warning of consequencesHe cautioned that failure to adhere to these guidelines would result in “punishment according to the law.” While cryptocurrency exchanges are legal in Thailand, they must secure local approval. Notably, last month, Thailand even greenlit asset management firms to launch private funds, offering Bitcoin exchange-traded funds (ETFs) exclusively to institutional and ultra-high-net-worth investors. Nonetheless, the country recently prohibited the sale of cryptocurrency lending products and mandated that exchanges prominently display risk warning messages. International regulatory trendThis move by the Thai SEC mirrors actions taken by regulators in other major crypto markets. For instance, the United Kingdom's Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) issued 450 alerts for illegal crypto ads in 2023 alone. Similarly, Spain’s principal securities market regulator, the National Stock Market Commission, denounced fraudulent crypto asset promotions in November 2023, emphasizing companies’ obligations to adhere to local laws. Thai advertising guidelines mandate businesses and advertisers to substantiate the “facts” presented in their campaigns, failing which could lead to legal repercussions. A recent incident provides a case in point. Hackers hijacked advertisements on Etherscan, redirecting users to phishing sites aimed at draining crypto wallets. Scam Sniffer, a blockchain investigation firm, attributed the widespread phishing campaign to the inadequate oversight by advertisement aggregators. The company made the following statement on the matter: “Etherscan aggregates ads from platforms like Coinzilla and Persona, where insufficient filtering could lead to exposure to phishing attempts.” The wallet drainer scam involves enticing users to counterfeit websites and coercing them to link their crypto wallets, enabling scammers to siphon funds into their own wallets without user authentication or consent. This is not the first time that the authorities in Thailand have homed in on crypto-related advertising. In August 2023, the Southeast Asian country’s Ministry of Digital Economy and Society (MDES) outlined that it had engaged with social media firm Meta, owner of Facebook, informing it that its response to the proliferation of fraudulent platform ads relative to crypto had been inadequate.