Maxst launches extended reality-based metaverse platform

The South Korean National Tax Service (NTS) is reportedly in the process of setting up virtual asset accounts for its district offices. This initiative is aimed at confiscating and liquidating the digital assets of individuals who fail to pay their taxes. This move comes after the creation of similar accounts by public prosecutors' offices, leading to speculation in the crypto industry that virtual asset accounts will soon be allowed for corporate entities as well.Photo by Nataliya Vaitkevich on PexelsDirect confiscation of virtual assetsA report by the local news outlet Etoday today has revealed that each district office of the NTS is working towards establishing a virtual asset account. This development will empower the tax agency to directly sell virtual assets confiscated from tax delinquents. Previously, the NTS would freeze the accounts of overdue taxpayers at Korean cryptocurrency exchanges, compelling them to convert their assets into Korean won. These funds were then confiscated by the NTS. The new initiative is set to streamline the process, enabling the tax authority to directly confiscate virtual assets without the intermediary step of conversion to Korean won. Speaking about this development, an NTS officer said that as each district office director holds the authority to collect taxes from taxpayers with overdue payments, it's necessary for each office to have its own account. Prosecutors’ Offices’ Upbit and Bithumb accountsThe crypto industry views this development as a potential step towards allowing the creation of virtual asset accounts for corporate entities, starting with government agencies. In December, the prosecutors' offices established their entity accounts at major cryptocurrency exchanges Upbit and Bithumb. Since then, the prosecution has utilized these accounts to sell confiscated virtual assets, aiming to recover funds that had not been collected.  An official from a cryptocurrency exchange indicated that the South Korean government is currently focusing on allowing entities that serve the public good to own virtual asset accounts. This approach is seen as the starting point, with expectations that the trend will gain momentum in the future. The official added that it's rare for the government to provide blanket permissions from the outset, suggesting a gradual and cautious approach to the integration of virtual asset accounts.Money laundering concernsMeanwhile, the Financial Intelligence Unit (FIU) of the Financial Services Commission (FSC), along with other financial regulators, has remained silent on the matter of virtual asset accounts for corporate entities. This reticence stems from concerns with the financial authority that the introduction of corporate crypto accounts could potentially lead to money laundering and the creation of slush funds. An official from the National Assembly’s National Policy Committee said that they have not received any comments from the financial authority in response to inquiries about plans to allow such accounts for corporate entities. The current law doesn’t prohibit corporate entities from trading virtual assets. However, under the auspices of the financial authority, banks have refrained from offering real-name accounts to corporate entities. This policy has been a point of contention within the crypto industry. Advocates argue that allowing corporate accounts could mitigate issues of market manipulation and challenge the dominance of Upbit in the Korean cryptocurrency market.  The official from the cryptocurrency exchange pointed out that the financial authority does not have a clear legal basis for prohibiting the creation of corporate crypto accounts. They suggested that the regulator should develop clearer guidelines and enforce these rules for corporate entities. More serious discussions in AprilMore serious discussions about the introduction of corporate crypto accounts are anticipated to take place in April, following the conclusion of the general election. Last month, the main opposition party, the Democratic Party of Korea, made election promises to open the crypto market to institutional investors. Meanwhile, the ruling People Power Party has been quietly deliberating on virtual asset policy. Despite these political movements, earlier reports indicate a disconnect between the political parties' efforts to relax crypto regulations and the financial regulator's stance. Meanwhile, Hwang Seok-jin, a professor at Dongguk University’s Graduate School of International Affairs and Information Security, expects to see a conclusion on the permission of corporate crypto trading by the end of this year. He said that there has been ongoing discussion about the approval of spot Bitcoin exchange-traded funds (ETFs) and that allowing the trading of such funds requires the ownership of virtual assets by institutions. 

India’s judiciary turns down plea to formulate a crypto regulatory frameworkThe Indian courts have declined a consideration targeting the establishment of a regulatory framework for cryptocurrency trading, following a plea which had been brought to court by a petitioner.Photo by Naveed Ahmed on UnsplashBeyond the court’s purviewIndia’s Supreme Court, led by Chief Justice Chandrachud, recently confronted a petition urging the establishment of a regulatory framework for cryptocurrency trading. According to a local media report, the bench, which included Justices JD Pardiwala and Manoj Misra, dismissed the plea, emphasizing that the demands presented were legislative and thus beyond the court’s direct action purview. This decision points to the judiciary’s recognition of its constraints in crafting laws, particularly in intricate domains like cryptocurrency.The petitioner, Manu Prashant Wig, a former director at Blue Fox Motion Picture Limited currently in custody due to allegations of cryptocurrency fraud, sought relief through a public interest litigation (PIL) for crypto trading regulations in India.The Economic Offence Wing (EOW) of the Delhi Police accused Wig in 2020 of deceiving investors with promises of high returns from crypto investments, involving 133 reported victims of the scheme. Despite this, during the hearing, the Supreme Court advised Wig to pursue legal remedies through appropriate channels, specifically for bail, underlining its inability to issue directives under Article 32 of the Constitution for legislative matters.Judiciary criticize governmentWhile the judiciary has found that it cannot act itself in putting in place a crypto regulatory framework, the Supreme Court has been critical of the government’s inaction on the matter. In July, India’s highest court criticized the Indian government for its failure to establish clear cryptocurrency regulations.Interestingly, while the government hasn’t acted locally, it has been making efforts to drive regulation at an international level instead. The status of cryptocurrency trading in India remains uncertain, with the country developing a regulatory framework influenced by recommendations from the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and the Financial Stability Board (FSB), potentially leading to legal legislation within the next several months.Prime Minister Modi called on authorities internationally to establish a worldwide regulatory framework. At the recent G20 summit, it appears that member states did reach agreement on such a framework.The Supreme Court’s dismissal of the PIL marks a clear distinction between judicial and legislative responsibilities. As India moves closer to formulating a comprehensive crypto regulatory framework, this decision reinforces the imperative for legislative action to address mounting concerns and interests in the crypto market.Awaiting legislative actionThe outcome of these developments is keenly awaited by investors, legal experts and the crypto community, poised to shape the future landscape of cryptocurrency trading in India. The decision signifies the judiciary’s acknowledgment of its limitations and highlights the necessity for a legislative approach to effectively navigate the intricate landscape of cryptocurrency regulation.In this evolving scenario, the verdict amplifies the importance of a well-defined regulatory framework. As the world’s most populous country grapples with the delicate task of balancing innovation and investor protection, the Supreme Court’s decision places the ball firmly in the legislative court.

Official Says Hong Kong Should Invest in Web3 EconomyAccording to Hong Kong’s financial secretary, Paul Chan, this is the perfect time for Hong Kong to promote the development of Web3, the next-generation version of the World Wide Web that is decentralized and distributed through the use of blockchain and similar technologies.©Pexels/Tara WinsteadLearning from the dot com boomDespite the recent instability of the virtual assets market and the collapse of some digital asset exchanges, Chan has pointed out that the quality of the real economy has improved since the dotcom bubble burst in 2000, and surviving market players have focused on technological innovation, applications and value creation.In remarks made via a blog post published on Sunday, Chan argues that the development of Web3 is going through the same process. He suggested that the next stage of development would be to focus on developing blockchain technology more deeply to find wider application for it, which would improve existing business models, ultimately benefiting users and improving the quality of the real economy.To accelerate the development of Web3, Chan allocated HK$50 million (US$6.4 million) to the Cyberport business park to organize major international conferences and youth workshops in his latest budget released in February.VASP licensingChan also announced that authorities would introduce a licensing regime for virtual asset service providers (VASPs) in June to ensure appropriate supervision and minimize risks in the innovation and development of Web3. Furthermore, the government is looking into regulating stablecoins or cryptocurrencies with their value pegged to another currency or commodity.According to some local experts, Hong Kong should not delay in pushing Web3 development, and the government should work out clear policies to attract overseas investors and Web3 developers to set up offices in Hong Kong.Working towards a Web3 hubFrancis Fong Po-kiu, honorary president of the Hong Kong Information Technology Federation, told the South China Morning Post that the government could help by building up infrastructure such as data and supercomputing centers to help small and medium-sized enterprises to adopt more advanced technology.Although IT sector veteran Joseph Leung Wai-fung agreed that Hong Kong was lagging Singapore in terms of Web3 development, he suggested that the government should step up efforts to attract overseas investors and Web3 developers by working out clear policies to support them in setting up offices in Hong Kong. He also pointed out that Web3 covers key areas such as artificial intelligence, the Internet of Things, blockchain technology, and metaverse augmented reality, and that every international smart city should explore this area.The recent fluctuations in virtual asset markets and the collapse of some online trading platforms have cast doubts on the future of Web3, but Chan believes that competent market players who survive a “burst bubble” can focus on innovation and make significant strides.The government’s efforts to accelerate the development of Web3 through the allocation of HK$50 million to the Cyberport business park, the introduction of a licensing regime for virtual asset service providers, and the regulation of stablecoins, are steps in the right direction. However, more needs to be done to attract overseas investors and Web3 developers to set up offices in Hong Kong and to build up infrastructure such as data and supercomputing centers to help small and medium-sized enterprises to adopt more advanced technology.