NEOPIN Launches South Korea’s First ETH Liquid Staking Product

Deputy Prime Minister and Minister for Finance Lawrence Wong is slated to unveil the Singapore 2024 Budget Statement on Feb. 16. As Singapore prepares for the unveiling of its 2024 Budget, the city-state’s Web3 community is amplifying its call for crucial government backing. That’s according to a recent report by The Straits Times. The plea from Singaporean firms revolves around two pivotal areas: one, nurturing a proficient talent pool well-versed in blockchain technology; and, in addition to that, having a strength and depth in cybersecurity, so as to fortify defenses against cyber threats.Photo by David Pardo Bernal on UnsplashUrgent need for Web3 talentSome time ago, stakeholders in Singapore set out their stall in terms of the ambition of firmly establishing the city-state as a global hub for Web3 development. It’s off to a good start with many notable crypto and Web3 companies having established themselves in Singapore. However, broadening that industry hub to the fullest extent will involve overcoming the significant hurdles hindering the growth trajectory of Singapore’s Web3 sector. Top of the list is the scarcity of skilled professionals in the blockchain domain. Danny Lim, a core contributor at MarginX, a decentralized exchange, stressed the pressing demand for seasoned developers. Lim underscored the necessity of supporting Web2 developers transitioning into Web3 realms, especially those grappling with job displacement, to solidify Singapore’s status as a nucleus for groundbreaking blockchain ventures. Elaine Zhu, the general manager of the Asian division of blockchain infrastructure firm Parity Technologies, emphasized the critical need for blockchain education, expressing apprehension over the dwindling influx of new developers. In citing a recent report by crypto-focused venture capital firm Electric Capital which quantified developer activity across Web3, Zhu noted that the number of experienced developers in Singapore remains healthy. However, the report found that the number of newly qualified developers dropped by 52 percent last year. Bolstering cyber defensesAdditionally, the industry is clamoring for fortified cyber defenses to shield against the escalating threat landscape targeting digital assets. This focus on security underscores the broader challenge of ensuring the secure proliferation of Web3 technologies and digital currencies within Singapore’s technological ecosystem. A report by Singapore-based blockchain security firm Beosin last year found that exit scams are a growing concern in the crypto-sphere. At the end of last month, the Singapore Police Force, alongside the Cyber Security Agency of Singapore (CSA), issued an advisory in order to raise awareness regarding crypto-centric cyber attacks. Ong Chengyi, representing Chainalysis, hailed Web3 as pivotal for long-term growth and advocated for sustained governmental support to enhance the sector’s capability in mitigating risks using advanced technological solutions. Ong remarked:“We hope to see more public-private collaboration to bolster Singapore’s defences against crypto crime and cyber threats more generally, through the utilization of data and technology.” Angela Ang of TRM Labs echoed that sentiment, emphasizing the imperative for heightened regulatory support to nurture the expansion of digital assets. Ang stated:“To deliver clarity to businesses at scale, whether it’s through licensing decisions or implementation guidance, the Government must invest in both human capital and technology throughout the regulatory process.” 

28 crypto service providers register with India’s FIUIn India, 28 entities providing services related to virtual digital assets (VDAs) have successfully registered with the Financial Intelligence Unit (FIU), the body responsible for combating money laundering in the world’s most populous country.Notable names in this list include Neblio Technologies, more commonly known as CoinDCX, Zanmai Labs, the company responsible for the WazirX crypto platform, Bitcipher Labs’ CoinSwitch, Nextgendev Solutions and Awlencan Innovations India’s Zebpay.Photo by Big G Media on UnsplashA need to register as ‘reporting entities’This information comes in response to a question posed in the Lok Sabha (India’s lower house of Parliament), where the government emphasized the significance of these entities complying with the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA). In March, the government had formally designated companies dealing in VDAs, crypto exchanges and related intermediaries as “reporting entities” under the PMLA.According to the notification, crypto exchanges and their intermediaries are obligated to conduct Know Your Customer (KYC) procedures for their clients and platform users. This includes maintaining KYC details, identity documents, account files and business correspondence records with clients.Offshore exchanges required to registerMinister of State for Finance Pankaj Chaudhary mentioned that the registration process for VDA service providers catering to the Indian market is underway. Non-compliance with these regulations may result in appropriate action under the PMLA. It has been clarified that offshore crypto exchanges operating in India are required to adhere to these guidelines. Despite that, none of the 28 entities who have registered so far appear to be offshore companies.Commenting on the development via the X social media platform, Sumit Gupta, Co-Founder of CoinDCX, wrote:”Emphasizing compliance to PMLA is vital for the safety and financial integrity of Indians, as dealing with non-registered platforms exposes citizens to nefarious actors, putting their finances at risk.” . . . “It’s encouraging to witness the Government initiating actions against non-compliant offshore entities.”While steps to provide guidelines for the industry are largely positive, the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) has been vocal in its criticism of cryptocurrencies and calls for potential bans have cast a shadow over the industry in India. The recent collapse of prominent platforms like FTX have not been helpful, only serving to exacerbate concerns relative to India’s crypto ecosystem.The negative sentiment, coupled with an ongoing funding winter, has resulted in the closure of operations for some crypto platforms, including Pillow and WeTrade, this year. Firms like CoinSwitch and Gupta’s CoinDCX have had to reduce headcount in 2023 amid challenging market conditions.Despite these challenges, there are also positive signs. A recent report by blockchain analytics firm Chainalysis found that India has been the frontrunner more recently in terms of crypto adoption in Asia.This latest development provides guidelines where anti-money laundering processes are concerned for crypto firms in India. However, the government needs to follow through with a complete regulatory framework for the industry. The Indian courts recently declined to act on such a petition on the basis that it falls within the remit of the country’s legislature and is outside the purview of the courts.

Binance Thriving in China Despite Crypto BanWhen China cracked down on cryptocurrency trading in 2021, it seemed like Binance, the world’s largest crypto exchange, would have to leave the country behind. However, nearly two years later, an investigative report carried out by the Wall Street Journal finds that business is thriving for Binance in China.Photo by Hanson Lu on Unsplash$90 billion in monthly tradingThe report, which was published on Wednesday, reveals that users managed to trade a staggering $90 billion worth of cryptocurrency-related assets in China within just one month.Internal data, shared with The Wall Street Journal and corroborated by current and former employees, unveils this underground activity. Remarkably, these transactions propelled China to become Binance’s largest market, accounting for a massive 20% of global trading volume, excluding trades by a subset of major traders.Almost one million active Chinese usersDespite the supposed ban, Binance’s internal discussions highlight the pivotal role China still plays for the exchange. Current and former employees indicate that Binance’s investigations team collaborates closely with Chinese law enforcement. This partnership aims to identify potential criminal activities among the 900,000+ active users in China, underscoring Binance’s efforts to maintain oversight.However, Binance now faces regulatory challenges tied to its secretive global operations. In June, the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) filed a lawsuit against Binance and its Founder, Changpeng Zhao (CZ), alleging illegal operations and misuse of customer funds.Meanwhile, the Justice Department is conducting its own investigation. A report by Semafor on Wednesday suggests that authorities are considering fraud charges but they’re concerned that such an eventuality may lead to a run on the exchange. This regulatory onslaught has seen Binance’s market share among US users plummet, leading to a reduction of over 1,000 jobs out of its 8,000-strong workforce.Circumventing regulationThe clandestine existence of Binance’s footprint in China offers insights into the exchange’s ability to function surreptitiously in unwelcoming environments. To circumvent restrictions, Binance directed Chinese users to visit local websites with domain names before rerouting them to the global exchange. This tactic allowed Binance to keep a foothold in China, even after the government blocked direct access to its website in 2017.China’s central bank, responsible for imposing the crypto ban, remained silent when questioned about these developments. Binance’s official stance is that its website is blocked in China and inaccessible to users there.Holding on to its China-based users is crucial for Binance as it navigates a treacherous regulatory landscape that threatens its future. The company’s history with China is intricate. CZ established the firm in Shanghai in 2017, only for the government to initiate a series of regulatory attacks on crypto exchanges soon after. This led to concerns about money being illicitly moved out of the country, and Zhao eventually relocated Binance’s operations to Japan.Despite this move, Binance retained a significant workforce in China, a decision that raised concerns among its US arm regarding data control. Binance’s Chinese heritage also attracted attention, with Zhao addressing the company’s challenge of being labeled both a “criminal entity” in China and a “Chinese company” in the West.Binance’s relationship with China remains complex. As the exchange navigates these murky waters, its ability to operate under the radar and maintain its foothold in markets like China will undoubtedly play a significant role in determining its future trajectory.