Circle Partners with Asian Convenience Store Chain to Push USDC Adoption

Singapore Judge Says Crypto Not MoneyIn recent years, legal processes in various jurisdictions worldwide have seen judges comment on whether cryptocurrency is actually money. The latest such determination has been made by Justice Vinodh Coomaraswamy who outlined in a Singapore court that while being a component of financial transactions, cryptocurrencies are not money.The consideration emerged in a recent court hearing at Singapore’s High Court in a case involving the Algorand Foundation and failed Singapore-based hedge fund, Three Arrows Capital (3AC). Justice Coomaraswamy’s comments arose due to a discussion in the midst of the court proceedings involving the Judge and counsel representing the Algorand Foundation.©Pexels/EKATERINA BOLOVTSOVASeashells as moneyIn setting out his rationale for the need for 3AC to be wound up, Daniel Chan, a lawyer for the WongPartnership law firm that was representing the Algorand Foundation in the proceedings, told the judge that despite foreign currencies not being recognized as legal tender in Singapore, or used broadly as a medium of exchange within the city state, those foreign currencies are recognized by Singapore law as money. Using that analogy Chan suggested that by implication, the same scenario should be considered where cryptocurrencies are concerned.The judge provided a counterpoint: “What if you had a [community] in the world that used seashells as its internal medium of exchange? Would the Singapore courts have to recognize that as money.” Chan claimed that the judge had used an extreme example although Coomaraswamy remained steadfast in his view, pointing out that seashells had indeed been used as a form of money in the distant past.Coomaraswamy proceeded to dismiss the Algorand Foundation’s winding up application. He acknowledged that the Foundation did have standing in bringing the application. However, as he determined that cryptocurrency couldn’t be classed as money, on that basis he dismissed the application. In conveying his decision, he stated: “The word indebtedness, in my view, must require a debt which is in fiat currency. Determining whether or not a particular intangible, such as cryptocurrency, is money would require a detailed examination of evidence which is not appropriate in the context of insolvency.”Legal tenderThus far, bitcoin has been recognized as legal tender in two countries — El Salvador and the Central African Republic. In 2020, a French court referred to the leading cryptocurrency as money, agreeing that Bitcoin loans can be recognized as customer loans in the same way as loans denominated in fiat currencies. Earlier that year, an Australian court recognized bitcoin as a legally legitimate form of investment. In the United States, a Federal court recognized bitcoin as “money” or “funds” in a prosecution taken against Silk Road website operator Ross Ulbricht.There have been many similar instances in courts globally where judges have had to grapple with the consideration of whether bitcoin and crypto more generally can be regarded as money. Similar to the difficulty authorities are having in regulating cryptocurrency, it’s an issue that in most cases lacks complete clarity and in which we can expect further discussions on, similar to this most recent consideration in the Singaporean high court.

South Korea’s GDAC Suffers $13M hackSouth Korean cryptocurrency exchange, GDAC, has suffered a significant hacking incident that has resulted in the loss of approximately 23% of its custodial digital assets.©Pexels/PixabayThe hack occurred on Sunday when some of the exchange’s hot wallets were breached, and the stolen assets were transferred to an unidentified wallet. GDAC reported the incident on Monday and disclosed that the exchange lost over $13.1 million in Bitcoin, Ether, Wemix, and USDT, with more than $10 million in Wemix.According to blockchain analytics firm Arkham Intelligence, the hacker has since swapped the USDT for ETH, sending 461 ETH to cryptocurrency tumbler, Tornado Cash. The hacker used three separate wallets to take funds from two of the exchange’s hot wallets. Arkham has labeled the wallets as follows:GDAC Hacker 1: 0x244615D99684175d31369332039b2D84ce925EC5GDAC Hacker 2: 0x62B5eb2cb925Ce2898f9327B235b3228e7Cac1C2GDAC Hacker 3: 0x87597bDB421482190e223aCa0A4DEAd75AB0a98DGDAC deposits/withdrawals suspendedGDAC has suspended its withdrawal and deposit services and reported the incident to the Korea Internet and Security Agency and the Financial Intelligence Unit. The exchange has also requested other cryptocurrency exchanges to block incoming transactions from suspicious addresses.In a notice posted on its website, GDAC CEO Seunghwan Han apologized for the suspension of deposits/withdrawals and concern relative to the hack, adding that the firm will be working towards investor protection and safe withdrawal of funds in due course. GDAC also posted the breakdown of the digital asset quantities lost in the hack, with the hacker stealing 60.80 BTC, 350.5 ETH, 10,000 WEMIX and 220,000 USDT.Crypto hacks increasingThis hacking incident comes at a time when cryptocurrency hacks have been on the rise. According to blockchain analytics firm Chainalysis, illicit actors stole $3.8 billion worth of assets last year, the largest one-year loss in crypto’s history. In addition, other crypto platforms have also suffered notable hacks and exploits in the past 15 to 18 months. Axie Infinity’s Ronin bridge, for example, suffered a $625 million hack last year, and decentralized-finance protocol Sushi was exploited for $3.3 million on Sunday.GDAC is not the only South Korean cryptocurrency exchange to suffer a significant hacking incident. In 2018, Coinrail was hacked, resulting in the loss of approximately $40 million worth of assets, and in 2021, Upbit suffered a $50 million hack.In response to these incidents, South Korea has taken steps to tighten regulations around cryptocurrency exchanges. In March 2021, the country’s Financial Services Commission issued a revised regulation that requires cryptocurrency exchanges to maintain stricter anti-money laundering measures and report suspicious transactions.The GDAC hack is a stark reminder of the risks associated with cryptocurrency investing and the importance of implementing robust security measures. Investors and cryptocurrency exchanges should take note of this incident and ensure that they have adequate security measures in place to protect against potential hacks and exploits.

Korean Financial Watchdog: Investor Protection Boosts Crypto MarketLee Bok-hyun, Governor of the South Korean Financial Supervisory Service (FSS), addressed the issue of investor protection measures in the cryptocurrency market during his speech at the fourth Blockchain Leaders’ Club in Seoul. According to a report by local news agency News1, Governor Lee emphasized that these measures would not hinder the market but instead establish a positive cycle by increasing market confidence and driving industry growth.Photo by Joshua Miranda on PexelsCrypto user protectionTo underscore the importance of safeguarding users in the crypto industry, Governor Lee referred to recent incidents such as the collapse of stablecoin Terra and the failures of Silvergate and Silicon Valley Bank. He highlighted how these examples demonstrate the need for protective measures as the influence of the crypto market extends beyond the financial sector and impacts the real economy.Governor Lee further emphasized the FSS’s commitment to maintaining ongoing communication with the crypto industry and adapting the regulatory system to accommodate the changing landscape. He stated that the FSS would assist the industry in establishing its own self-regulatory system, which includes monitoring suspicious transactions and transparent procedures for virtual asset listing. Additionally, the FSS plans to collaborate with industry insiders to prevent misunderstandings when formulating relevant rules and regulations.Governor Lee also touched on the Virtual Asset User Protection Bill, stating that he expects to see the final draft this summer as it is currently undergoing a legislative process in the National Assembly. He highlighted the government’s commitment to improving market order and minimizing investor losses before the law’s implementation. The government is taking a “same risks, same regulation” approach to prevent regulatory arbitrage and establish effective monitoring systems for virtual asset transactions and on-chain data.Unfamiliar but importantMeanwhile, Lee Yong-woo, a member of the opposition Democratic Party of Korea (DPK), echoed the importance of establishing and improving a regulatory framework for the cryptocurrency industry. He drew parallels between the current situation and the dot-com bubble era, emphasizing the significance of not disregarding the potential of the crypto market due to unfamiliarity.Communication channelLawmaker Lee expressed hope that the Blockchain Leaders’ Club would contribute to shaping a stable crypto market by providing opportunities to listen to the opinions of market participants, which can then be reflected in managing and revising laws and regulations.Today’s event, hosted by News1, saw the gathering of lawmakers, government officials, crypto industry leaders, and academics. Among the participants were People Power Party Lawmaker Yun Chang-hyun, the top executives of the five major Korean crypto exchanges (Upbit, Bithumb, Coinone, Korbit, and Gopax), and the CEO of blockchain gaming company Wemade.