Top

Korea’s Crypto Exchange Group Hires Data Security Professor as Advisor

Policy & Regulation·October 24, 2023, 5:54 AM

The Digital Asset eXchange Alliance (DAXA) — a group consisting of the top five South Korean cryptocurrency exchanges: Bithumb, Coinone, Gopax, Korbit, and Upbit — announced on October 24 (local time) that it has appointed an information security professor as one of its advisors.

Photo by Heng Films on Unsplash

 

Investor protection expert

Dr. Hwang Seok-jin, a professor at the Graduate School of International Affairs and Information Security at Dongguk University, is widely recognized for his expertise in investor protection. He has previously held positions with the ruling People Power Party’s Digital Asset Special Committee, the Korean Army, the Korea Coast Guard, and the Korea Association of Anti-Money Laundering.

 

Upcoming regulation rollout

DAXA Vice Chairman Kim Jae-jin said, “The alliance has decided to bring on a new advisor ahead of the upcoming implementation of the Virtual Asset User Protection Act. Given his wealth of experience and expertise, we expect that Professor Hwang will contribute to significantly enhancing the objectivity and practicality of DAXA’s self-regulation.”

The advisory term at DAXA is one year, which means the new advisor’s tenure will extend until October 24, 2024.

More to Read
View All
Policy & Regulation·

Jul 29, 2023

Indian Supreme Court Scolds Government over Crypto Regulation Delay

Indian Supreme Court Scolds Government over Crypto Regulation DelayThe Indian Supreme Court did not mince words recently as it criticized the Union government for its failure to establish clear cryptocurrency regulations in the country.Photo by Studio Art Smile on PexelsLack of crypto clarityThat’s according to a report published by local media outlet, the Hindustan Times, on Friday. It’s understood that the Supreme Court is frustrated with regard to the lack of guidelines surrounding cryptocurrencies. That frustration has arisen as crypto is increasingly coming to the attention of the courts due to it being associated with a rising number of criminal activities.The court directed the government to provide information about any plans to set up a dedicated federal agency to investigate crypto-related crimes. During the proceedings, Justices Surya Kant and Dipankar Datta expressed their disappointment, pointing out the absence of any concrete laws pertaining to cryptocurrencies.Crypto bill failingsThe context for the court’s remarks was the ongoing hearing of petitions related to cryptocurrency fraud cases across different states in India. In light of the gravity of these cases, the court demanded a response from the government regarding its capability to establish an effective mechanism to investigate crypto-related crimes.The struggle for clear and comprehensive crypto regulations in India has been long-standing. As far back as 2018, the government was instructed by the Supreme Court to draft a crypto bill, but progress has been slow. The government has continually promised to provide legislative clarity over the past few years. Despite this, the final draft of the crypto bill has not been produced.Crypto taxesGovernments may drag their feet when it comes to regulatory clarity relative to unfolding innovations but they’re far more responsive when it comes to taxes. The Indian government acted swiftly to impose crypto taxation laws, which took effect in April 2022.During that bull market period, India emerged as one of the leading crypto markets, witnessing the rise of several crypto unicorns and significant trading volumes amounting to billions of dollars. However, the introduction of tax laws had an adverse impact on the thriving crypto industry. Added to that, the lack of regulatory clarity caused many established firms to relocate from India, seeking more favorable environments for their operations.Market potentialDespite the government’s lethargic legislative response and heavy-handed tax policy, there are still reasons for optimism with regard to the development of crypto in India. India’s fintech sector is the third largest in the world, driven more recently by rapid digital adoption, together with efforts to bring about financial inclusion.Last month, Xapo Bank, a Gibraltar-based crypto bank, was sufficiently encouraged by the potential offered in India to enter the Indian market. Earlier this week, the world’s largest asset manager, BlackRock, announced that it was partnering with Jio Financial and re-entering the Indian market after a six-year hiatus.The move could have implications for crypto in India given that BlackRock has changed its tack on crypto, having recently filed an application to launch a bitcoin exchange-traded fund (ETF) in the United States.Notwithstanding these developments, concrete regulatory guidelines will not only protect against criminal activities but also foster a conducive environment for legitimate innovation and growth in the cryptocurrency space.

news
Web3 & Enterprise·

Dec 19, 2023

OKX NFT Marketplace hits the front on trading volume

OKX NFT Marketplace hits the front on trading volumeIn the non-fungible token (NFT) space, OKX’s NFT marketplace has emerged as the leader in daily trading volume, surpassing long-standing frontrunners such as OpenSea, Blur and Magic Eden.According to data from decentralized applications (DApp) tracker DappRadar, on Dec. 18, the OKX NFT Marketplace had recorded a 24-hour trading volume of $50 million. In more recent trading, that has reduced to around $35 million. Nevertheless, it maintains its lead over its main competitors, whose combined 24-hour trading volume stands at approximately $24 million.Photo by Kanchanara on UnsplashOrdinals driving volume uptickThe surge in trading volume can be attributed to OKX’s support for Bitcoin Ordinals NFTs and BRC-20 tokens. Notably, the NFT transaction volume on Bitcoin experienced a substantial increase, reaching $121.8 million between Dec. 10 and Dec. 17.Unlike traditional NFTs, Ordinals do not rely on smart contracts pointing to a digital asset. Described as digital artifacts by developer Casey Rodarmor, they lack smart contract features, making their trading reliant on decentralized exchanges and wallets.The Ordinals protocol has been made possible by the Bitcoin Taproot upgrade, which was implemented in November 2021. The upgrade allows digital files to be inscribed on satoshis, the smallest monetary denomination on the Bitcoin network, each with a unique number or ordinal.Strategic focus on BRC-20The OKX NFT Marketplace’s strategic focus on the BRC-20 token standard has also played a role in its success. Collaborating with UniSat, a developer of Ordinals wallets, OKX created an indexing mechanism for BRC-20 transactions built on ordinal inscriptions, further solidifying its position in the market.The Ordinals protocol has not been without controversy, with some, including Adam Back, CEO of Blockstream, criticizing it as a misuse of Bitcoin transaction blockspace. Despite the controversy, Ordinals have gained momentum, contributing to $367 million in sales volume on the Bitcoin network, surpassing Ethereum and Solana.Ordinals and the BRC-20 standard have generally been a boon for Bitcoin miners, boosting their revenues through increased fees. This incentivizes miners to secure the network. Over 49 million transactions have resulted in over 2,250 BTC in transaction fees. Around 6 p.m. UTC on Monday, bitcoin fees are averaging out at $38.43 per transaction.Beyond Bitcoin Ordinals, the broader NFT space has seen a resurgence, with the collective volume nearing $1 billion in November. During that month, the average value of NFT transactions experienced a notable 114% increase, rising from $126 to $270. This suggests a willingness among users to engage in higher-value trades compared to previous months.Speaking with The Block, Nick Ruck, COO of ContentFi Labs, a community-owned Web3 tool suite, had this to say on the development:“OKX has become the number one NFT marketplace after enabling trading of BTC Ordinals NFTs. Blur and OpenSea have not yet allowed trading of these Bitcoin-based NFTs, so they’ve started to fall behind in terms of volume due to the huge demand of Ordinals.”

news
Policy & Regulation·

May 17, 2023

Chinese Prosecutors Issue Warning on NFTs

Chinese Prosecutors Issue Warning on NFTsIn recent days, China’s top procuratorial agency, the Supreme People’s Procuratorate of China, issued a warning alongside some guidelines on non-fungible tokens (NFTs).The Supreme People’s Procuratorate is the highest office in China charged with the mandate of upholding legal integrity, safeguarding citizens’ rights, and where necessary, conducting criminal investigations. In a statement published on Monday, the agency set out an advisory, together with additional recommendations, pertaining to NFTs.Photo by Markus Winkler on PexelsNFT status in ChinaWhile all and sundry are aware of a multi-year crack-down by the Chinese authorities on crypto in recent times, exemplified by a ban on crypto trading and the operation of crypto mining facilities within the country’s borders, the status of NFTs has been discussed to a much lesser degree.NFTs remain legal within the country. When the crypto trading ban came into play in 2021, much of the local industry connected with that trading activity disappeared. However, in its place, a newly emergent trend came to the fore in the form of NFTs. With cryptocurrencies perceived as being high risk and sanctioned by the authorities, attention turned to NFTs and there has been a surge of adoption of the digital collectibles within China as a consequence.NFT risksThe procuratorial agency highlighted a number of attributes as well as risks in relation to NFTs in the report that it published. The agency finds the issue of ownership of NFTs as a troublesome one. It cites the fact that NFTs can be replicated and distributed at will on this basis as being particularly problematic. The legitimacy of the right source of the work itself is the decisive factor for the healthy and orderly development of digital works NFT transactions,” it states.It appears that the agency, like many in traditional professional circles before them, have a difficulty recognizing the model of asset ownership that NFTs incorporate. That ownership is not defined by civil law or in accordance with centralized systems but by simply the possession of the requisite private key pertaining to a given NFT within a decentralized system.Blockchain, not cryptoThe agency acknowledged that NFTs do present a novel application of blockchain technology. This is not surprising as while there might be an ongoing clampdown on decentralized cryptocurrencies in China, officials at a national level and in numerous instances within regional administrations, are demonstrating a strategy of leveraging blockchain technology for the betterment of the Chinese economy in the future.Public prosecutor Wang Xia-fen, one of the authors of the report, stated: “It’s widely recognized that digital collectibles have the potential to protect intellectual property rights, boost content creation and enrich the digital economy.” Wang encouraged public prosecutors to “find the distinction between real innovation and criminal activities” where NFTs are concerned.The upshot of its report though, is that the procuratorial agency is uncomfortable with the similarity of many of the attributes of NFTs when compared with decentralized cryptocurrencies. It issued a warning on that basis, emphasizing a need for risk assessment to be carried out and further consideration of the legal risks that are implicated.

news
Loading