Korean Blockchain Firm Ozys Achieves ISMS Certification for Data Security

Korean Financial Watchdog to Penalize Bankers Involved in Illegal Foreign RemittancesThe Korean Financial Supervisory Service (FSS) recently completed an investigation into illegal foreign remittances of approximately 16 trillion KRW (~$12,137,718,400) that involved numerous bankers.©Unsplash/Paul FiedlerExploiting the kimchi premiumThe investigation, launched by the Korean financial watchdog last June, found that these lawbreakers sent funds to China, Hong Kong, and other overseas destinations through Korean crypto exchanges, trading firms, and bank branches with an aim of making money through arbitrage by taking the advantage of the kimchi premium, a term used to describe that the higher prices of crypto assets in Korean exchanges compared to their foreign counterparts.Bankers neglecting the KYC ruleSome of these bankers participated in the crime by raising the remittance cap and applying favorable exchange rates to trading companies that had no previous transaction records with banks. By law, bankers in Korea are obligated to follow the “know your customer” rule. It was found that 12 domestic banks and one futures firm were involved in this incident.The FSS has decided to impose strict penalties on these financial institutions, considering they were exploited for money laundering purposes. These entities are likely to have some of their services suspended, with the employees involved being fired.Accountability of top bankersOne key point to watch out for is whether the FSS would be able to hold executives accountable. Some say penalizing top bankers is not easy, given that it has to be proven that the employees’ criminal activities were due to a lack of executives’ internal control.The financial regulator recently announced plans to revise the law governing banks’ governance, but it is expected that such a bill would take some time to pass through the National Assembly.Through a revision of the law, the financial authority aims to hold top executives at financial institutions more responsible for serious financial accidents. It looks forward to bestowing top bankers with the obligation of comprehensive internal control management and making them accountable as an overall manager only in case of critical financial accidents. The term “top executives” in the bill will encompass not only bank presidents but also chairpersons of financial holding companies. More specific revision plans are expected to be revealed by the end of this month.

Recent developments in the cryptocurrency market reveal that mainland Chinese citizens will face restrictions in purchasing Bitcoin and Ether exchange-traded funds (ETFs) in Hong Kong. This restriction stems from China's ban on crypto transactions, which has been in effect for several years. Bloomberg data analyst Jack Wang highlighted this issue, indicating that the upcoming launch of spot Bitcoin and Ether ETFs in Hong Kong will not facilitate market access for investors in mainland China.Photo by Traxer on UnsplashSpot Bitcoin and Ether ETFs approved in Hong KongDespite Hong Kong's approval of spot BTC and ETH ETFs, major Chinese asset managers such as China Asset Management, Harvest Global Investments, and Bosera have established these products through their Hong Kong subsidiaries. However, despite their close ties with mainland China, these ETF issuers are unable to offer Bitcoin or Ether exposure to investors within the jurisdiction due to regulatory constraints. Exclusion of mainland Chinese investorsWang emphasized during a Bloomberg webinar that mainland Chinese citizens will not be able to participate in these ETFs, citing a statement from the Chinese State Council issued in September 2021. This statement prohibits financial institutions from engaging in crypto-related transactions, including account creation, fund transfers, and clearing services. As a result, Chinese investors are unlikely to engage with these products in the short term. Impact on regulatory environment and market accessWang expressed skepticism about the potential impact of spot Bitcoin and Ether ETFs in Hong Kong on the regulatory environment in mainland China. He stated that the launch of these ETFs is unlikely to open the crypto market to Chinese investors in the foreseeable future. Thomas Zhu, head of digital assets at China Asset Management, noted that the eligibility of mainland Chinese investors to acquire crypto ETFs in Hong Kong depends on forthcoming regulatory modifications. He highlighted the Mainland-Hong Kong Stock Connect, which allows mainland investors to trade eligible Hong Kong stocks and ETFs since 2014. Comparison with U.S. Bitcoin ETF marketDespite optimism surrounding the launch of spot crypto ETFs in Hong Kong, Bloomberg analyst James Seyffart drew attention to the significant difference in market size between the U.S. and Hong Kong ETF markets. Seyffart pointed out that Bitcoin ETFs in the United States have more assets than all ETFs in Hong Kong combined, emphasizing the vast disparity in market scale and impact. As the launch date for spot Bitcoin and Ether ETFs in Hong Kong approaches, stakeholders continue to monitor regulatory developments and market dynamics closely. 

Bgin Blockchain Limited, a crypto mining equipment manufacturer headquartered in Singapore, filed documentation last Friday with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) with a view towards launching an initial public offering (IPO) in the U.S. The Feb. 21 filing, a Form F-1 registration statement, outlines that the company wishes to go forward with the IPO after the effective date of the filing has been established. Bgin identified itself as an “emerging growth company.”  The registration statement was filed on behalf of Bgin by Hunter Taubman Fischer & Li LLC, in conjunction with the underwriters represented by Robinson & Cole LLP. It proposes to offer the U.S. investing public 59.54 million Class A ordinary shares and 15.69 million Class B shares. As part of its plan, Class A shares would be listed on the Nasdaq stock exchange using “BGIN” as the ticker symbol.Photo by Leslie Lopez Holder on Unsplash$50 million raiseIn a statement published on Renaissance Capital's website, the independent investment bank outlined that Bgin is seeking to raise $50 million in capital through the IPO.  It’s understood that funds raised by way of the IPO will be utilized to ramp up research and development efforts. The bookrunners, responsible for managing the IPO, are Chardan Capital Markets and The Benchmark Company. As yet, no information has been provided with regard to how Bgin will price its share offering. Renaissance described Bgin as a digital asset technology company “with proprietary cryptocurrency mining technologies and a strategic focus on alternative cryptocurrencies.”  The company, founded in 2019, focuses on the design, manufacture and distribution of mining equipment relative to Kaspa (KAS), Alephium (ALPH) and Radiant (RXD) blockchain networks. Bgin supplies 8nm and 12nm ASIC chips dedicated to these alternative blockchain networks, which all depend on the use of a proof-of-work (PoW) consensus mechanism. Additionally, Bgin mines cryptocurrency itself while providing a hosting service for crypto mining, with facilities in the U.S. and Hong Kong. It hosts 4,020 mining rigs for customers, with 3,330 of these located within facilities in Iowa and Nebraska.  Across various subsidiaries Bgin manages 33,862 active mining rigs in the U.S. within its own mining operations. And additional 12,000 non-operational rigs are currently in storage facilities in the U.S. and Hong Kong. Over a 12-month period ending on June 30, 2024, the company recorded revenues of $392 million. In 2023, the firm recorded sales of 68,000 mining rigs. In H1 2024, the company sold over 47,000 mining machines. The filing disclosed that the company’s Hong Kong subsidiary was responsible for considerable crypto mining facilities in mainland China prior to China deeming the activity to be illegal in 2021. Providing full disclosure in the lead-up to its IPO, the firm warned that it continued to operate crypto mining facilities in China for a number of months in violation of that law. It identifies this item as a risk factor as potentially, the firm could be penalized and fined.