WOO Network Repurchases Shares in 3AC Settlement

Ripple Receives In-Principle Approval From Singaporean RegulatorRipple, the blockchain-based payments firm, has obtained in-principle regulatory approval from the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) to offer digital asset payments and token products in Singapore.Photo by Dids on PexelsODL service expansionThe approval, announced on Wednesday, will enable Ripple’s subsidiary, Ripple Markets Asia Pacific, to expand its On-Demand Liquidity (ODL) service. ODL facilitates the seamless transfer of the XRP cryptocurrency across borders without the involvement of traditional banking intermediaries.Ripple had applied for an institutional payment license under Singapore’s Payment Service Act to secure the regulatory green light. In response to the approval, Ripple CEO Brad Garlinghouse praised the MAS for its pragmatic and innovation-driven approach to cryptocurrency-related services.He expressed confidence that Singapore would serve as a prominent gateway for Ripple’s business operations in the Asia Pacific (APAC) region. On Twitter, Garlinghouse wrote: “As a major global financial center, Singapore led the way in taking a pragmatic, innovation-first approach to crypto — we’re incredibly proud @Ripple is one of a handful of firms (<20) to receive in-principle approval for a MAS MPI license for digital payment token services!”Stuart Alderoty, Ripple’s Chief Legal Officer, explained that the regulatory approval from MAS would enhance Ripple’s ability to support forward-thinking customers who are exploring the potential of blockchain and crypto technologies to create a more inclusive and borderless financial system.Growing APAC presenceRipple’s presence in Singapore has already been growing significantly. In 2022, the company doubled its number of employees at its Asia Pacific headquarters, with Singapore becoming a major hub for ODL transactions. The MAS, recognizing the potential of fintech firms in the digital money services sector, published its Purpose Bound Money (PBM) white paper on Wednesday, proposing standards for such firms operating in Singapore.While Ripple has made progress with regulatory compliance in Singapore, it has faced legal challenges in other jurisdictions. Since December 2020, Ripple’s legal team has been dealing with a lawsuit filed by the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), accusing Ripple of conducting an unregistered securities offering with its XRP token.The case is expected to reach a verdict in the coming months. While the speculation is that the case has gone well for Ripple, it remains to be seen to what extent it can get the upper hand in taking on a cornerstone institution of the US establishment like the SEC.Either way, Ripple is moving to develop on a global basis. It has recently pursued further development in the Middle East via a Dubai expansion. In Hong Kong, it is collaborating with local regulators in trialing the use of its technology relative to real-world asset tokenization.The company has also established partnerships with central banks in Montenegro and Thailand, as well as numerous regional banks and financial institutions worldwide.The regulatory approval from MAS marks a significant milestone for Ripple, expanding its customer reach and positioning the company for further growth in the digital asset payment sector. Digital asset innovation is truly global and as many organizations are demonstrating, just as Ripple is in this instance, innovative curtailment in one region will simply manifest itself as greater development in another.

Vietnam has moved to take a positive approach to crypto assets by passing legislation to legalize them. Last week, the Southeast Asian nation’s National Assembly passed the Digital Technology Industry Law, which takes effect on Jan. 1, 2026, according to a report published in the official online newspaper of the Vietnamese government. Photo by Daniel Bernard on UnsplashCategorizing digital assetsThe law sets out two categories of digital assets, virtual assets and crypto assets. The legislation frames virtual assets as digital assets used for exchange or investments. Meanwhile, crypto assets are to be regarded as digital assets utilized to validate transactions and confirm ownership while relying on the use of encryption technology. Neither category includes securities or digital versions of fiat currencies such as central bank digital currencies (CBDCs) or other financial instruments. The legislation gives the Vietnamese government the authority to define and apply specific regulatory conditions when it comes to items such as anti-money laundering (AML) measures and the inclusion of international cybersecurity standards. It is hoped that the law will pave the way for the development of home-grown technological enterprises within Vietnam, while also promoting a nationwide digital transformation process. Regulatory clarityThe legislation is significant as it clearly sets out the legal status of digital assets in Vietnam after years of uncertainty and regulatory ambiguity. Singapore-based blockchain-focused Business Strategist, Anndy Lian, said that such legal clarity could result in Vietnam becoming a regional hub for the crypto sector.  Anh Tran, who belongs to Superteam Vietnam, a community for Solana builders in Vietnam, said that the development was huge for founders, developers and investors in the crypto space in Vietnam. He stated: “For a country who has always been at the forefront of crypto adoption, [Vietnam] is now a 'green-lighted zone' in principle, but we're still waiting at the red light for operational rules.” He refers to the fact that Vietnamese regulators still have until Jan. 1, 2026, to flesh out the details in terms of defining who can issue, trade, custody or manage crypto, and how AML, cybersecurity and taxation are handled. Vietnamese officials are likely to give strong consideration to AML measures relative to crypto given that the Southeast Asian nation has been on the grey list of the Financial Action Task Force since 2023. Countries who appear on the grey list are under considerably more scrutiny with regard to AML matters. While another community member claimed that anywhere crypto regulation has been implemented, actual usage has declined, Tran maintained that regulation is inevitable and that “crypto doesn’t need to be lawless to be free.” Last October, Vietnam set out its blockchain strategy, aspiring to the goal of achieving regional leadership in the sector by 2030. In March, the country’s Prime Minister, Pham Minh Chinh, requested that a legal framework for cryptocurrencies be established.  According to Chainalysis’ 2024 Global Crypto Adoption Index, Vietnam ranks fifth in the world.

Japan’s Financial Services Agency (FSA), a government agency and financial regulator responsible for overseeing banking, securities and exchange, has ordered both Apple and Google to remove specified unregistered crypto exchange apps from the Japanese versions of their app stores.Photo by Louie Martinez on UnsplashFive exchange apps specifiedIt is understood that the request was made at the beginning of this month, with the regulator specifically calling for the removal of the ability of Japanese consumers to download apps related to Bybit, MEXC Global, LBank Exchange, KuCoin and Bitget. In response to a query from The Block, Bitget Chief Legal Officer (CLO) Hon Ng said that the company is “aware of the issue and sincerely apologize for any inconvenience caused by the temporary removal of the Bitget app from the iOS App Store in Japan." The Bitget CLO went on to state that the company is working with Apple and regulators to resolve the matter. News of the regulator’s request emerged via a report published by Japanese financial media platform Nikkei on Feb. 7.  Apple had removed the apps from its App Store on Feb. 6. Reclassification of digital assets as securitiesA subsequent report by Nikkei on Feb. 10 suggests that the FSA is considering classifying digital assets as financial products akin to securities. The objective of the move is to protect Japanese investors as it would mean increased disclosure requirements from those that offer crypto-related investment products. Last August, FSA Commissioner Hideki Ito told Bloomberg that any decision to approve crypto-linked exchange-traded funds (ETFs) requires “careful consideration.” At the time Ito said that many people believe that digital assets “do not necessarily contribute to the wealth creation of the Japanese people in a stable and long-term manner.” The Japanese have been far more cautious in their approach to virtual assets by comparison with other Asian centers such as Hong Kong, which had approved spot Bitcoin and Ether ETFs some time ago. It appears that Japan’s FSA is wary of the volatility of cryptocurrencies and risks associated with the nascent assets. It’s understood that the FSA will announce crypto policy reforms by June 2025. Legislative amendments would then follow in the following parliamentary session in 2026. The change would mean a lifting of the current prohibition related to crypto ETFs. Another aspect likely to be reformed is taxation as it relates to crypto. It’s thought that a reduction from the existing 55% tax rate on crypto to 20% is on the cards. This is not the first occasion when a regulator has leaned on Apple and Google to cut off access to crypto exchange apps. In January 2024 Apple India blocked access to eight exchanges which had been subject of a show-cause notice from India’s Financial Intelligence Unit (FIU). Following a seven month ban, access to the Binance app was subsequently restored once it had come back into compliance in India. In April 2024 the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) in the Philippines had ordered both Google and Apple to remove the Binance app from their app stores on the basis that it posed a risk to Filipino investors at the time.