WOO Network Repurchases Shares in 3AC Settlement

Standard Chartered Bank Hong Kong, a licensed bank and subsidiary of British multinational banking group Standard Chartered, has partnered with local companies to launch a Hong Kong dollar-based stablecoin in the Chinese autonomous territory.Photo by Chapman Chow on UnsplashJoint venture formed In a press release published by Animoca Brands, a blockchain-based gaming and Web3 venture capital firm based in Hong Kong, the company outlined details of the partnership between it and Standard Chartered, alongside Hong Kong Telecom (HKT), Hong Kong’s dominant fixed-line, mobile and broadband telecommunications firm. The partnership has been structured as a joint venture between the three companies, with the objective of launching the Hong Kong dollar-backed stablecoin. Local regulator and central bank, the Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA) has been working towards implementing a regulatory framework specifically dedicated to stablecoins.  Legislative framework incoming As of the end of 2024, proposed legislation that would enable such a framework had advanced to Hong Kong’s Legislative Council. Before the bill can be enacted into law, the legislative process requires three readings of the bill accompanied by a series of debates and the scrutiny of lawmakers.  Once the legislation has been signed into law, it will require stablecoin issuers to obtain a license from the HKMA. In the case of this particular joint venture, the promoters plan to apply for a license in due course. Standard Chartered is already deeply embedded in Hong Kong’s financial system, making this latest development all the more significant. Alongside HSBC and Bank of China (Hong Kong), Standard Chartered issues the local currency, the Hong Kong dollar. That activity is carried out under the oversight of the HKMA.  The HKMA launched a sandbox environment relative to stablecoins in order to provoke an exchange of views between the regulator and market participants. The three parties to this latest joint venture have been sandbox participants since July of last year, alongside JINGDONG Coinlink Technology and RD InnoTech. JINGDONG declared its intention to launch a Hong Kong dollar-backed stablecoin last year. RD InnoTech plans to launch the HKDR stablecoin in conjunction with HashKey Exchange. Stablecoins ‘starting to eat the world’Earlier this month, Rene Michau, Standard Chartered’s global head of digital assets, set out the bank’s thoughts on stablecoins in an article published on the company’s website and co-authored by Circle Chief Financial Officer (CFO) Jeremy Fox-Green. Within it, Standard Chartered recognized the potential of stablecoins, suggesting that they are key to unlocking a future where blockchain acts as a new “internet of money.” The article went on to state that it is critical for stablecoin issuers “to maintain deep connections with strong banks and for those banks to be building digital asset capability.” The company recognizes that stablecoins are “starting to eat the world,” referring to a global stablecoin circulation that has already surpassed $100 billion.  Evan Auyang, President of Animoca Brands, pointed out that “we are still in the early stages for mass adoption of stablecoins across retail, enterprises and institutions.” He added that Hong Kong has a bright future as a global Web3 hub. Susanna Hui, Managing Director at HKT, believes that “issuing an HKD-linked stablecoin will enhance payment efficiency, streamline transactions, and provide greater security and transparency through advanced Web3 innovations.”

Netmarble F&C, a subsidiary of South Korean game developer Netmarble, has taken action to lay off employees by notifying all 70 workers under its Metaverse World project to resign, according to industry sources on Friday (KST). Metaverse World, which had begun developing an IP-based metaverse platform, will be abandoned during an upcoming corporate reorganization process. Photo by julien Tromeur on UnsplashA brief journey from ambition to abandonmentMetaverse World was launched by Netmarble in 2022 by acquiring blockchain gaming platform ITAM Games and Web3 wallet developer Bono Technologies. It had been scheduled to hold a closed beta test last year, but no news of the development has resurfaced since then.  However, it was revealed today that the project will be abandoned during the corporate reorganization process. "We have been looking for a sustainable direction to take the project, but business conditions and market changes have pushed us to make the difficult decision to terminate the Metaverse World corporation, which was developing a metaverse platform,” a representative from the company disclosed. Fluctuating trendsThe metaverse first gained traction during the COVID-19 pandemic, when gatherings were limited to online spaces. Since then, the industry and other related technologies like Web3, blockchain and NFTs also garnered significant attention, with various companies snagging investments to fund their projects. However, as the attention of tech and investment firms has shifted to AI, these companies have increasingly found themselves in difficult positions. Last September, Com2Verse, the metaverse arm of content provider Com2uS Holdings', also began streamlining its workforce, organizing voluntary retirement and transition arrangements for its employees.

Polymesh’s APAC Digital Asset Regulation Report Highlights ChallengesThe project team behind Polymesh, an institutional-grade permissioned blockchain built specifically for regulated assets, released a report on digital asset regulation within the Asia Pacific (APAC) region on Tuesday, highlighting several challenges that regulators are attempting to overcome.In a press release, the company outlined that the report covers recent regulatory developments in South Korea, Singapore, Hong Kong, and the broader APAC region.Photo by Jéan Béller on UnsplashProgressive regulatory effortsRegulators within the APAC region are currently striving to introduce legislation for digital assets, while several centers within the region are vying to establish themselves as hubs for digital asset-related business.The report explores the individual efforts of regulators in various APAC nations as they work towards crafting regulatory frameworks tailored to their jurisdictions. Those efforts encompass implementation, investigation, and enforcement of legislation in a borderless industry.Regulators in South Korea, Singapore, and Hong Kong have all embarked on formulating rules for emerging asset categories, albeit using different terminologies such as “digital assets,” “digital payment tokens,” and “virtual assets.” Their focus lies in striking a balance between consumer protection, market integrity, and industry development.Additionally, all three regulators adhere to the principle of “same activity, same regulations, same risks” when it comes to tokenized securities. They argue that regulatory requirements do not significantly differ solely because a security is in tokenized form. Each state has been actively engaged in local and global activities surrounding security tokens, including state involvement in the advancement of security token technology and cross-border transactions.Main findingsThe report’s main findings emphasize that while regulators in the APAC region are making strides in introducing digital asset legislation, the road ahead will not be without challenges.Legislating a cross-border industry poses difficulties that necessitate harmonization to foster a robust and interconnected ecosystem. Digital assets originating in Asia can be traded globally and vice versa. Merely identifying the asset’s place of origin is no longer sufficient.Although the report delves into the efforts of individual regulators, it emphasizes the need for long-term collaboration to establish a unified vision and practical implementation of regulations for this borderless phenomenon.Regulatory challengesThe regulatory challenges faced by South Korea, Singapore, and Hong Kong in driving the growth of digital assets in the APAC region are multifaceted. They include the intricacies of legislating an inherently cross-border industry. In turn, that can lead to the potential violation of legislation from other jurisdictions.The lack of harmonization among different jurisdictions, and variations in regulatory approaches among the three regulators are likely to be problematic. Furthermore, there are push-pull dynamics between the industry and regulators, with even the regulators themselves not always in agreement.However, despite these challenges, all three regulators have initiated the formulation of rules for new asset categories, with a strong emphasis on safeguarding consumer interests, maintaining market integrity, and fostering industry development.