Com2uS’ partnership with Thailand’s SHIN-A to boost Web3 gaming presence in Southeast Asia

In a global effort to bolster regulatory control over the cryptocurrency sector, Asian nations feature prominently among 17 jurisdictions globally, who have implemented tighter cryptocurrency regulations in 2023. That’s the view expressed by blockchain analytics firm TRM Labs in a report published on Monday.Photo by CARTER SAUNDERS on Unsplash2023 notable for regulatory tighteningThe increased scrutiny comes on the heels of several crypto meltdowns in 2022, including the collapse of major platforms like Terraform Labs, Celsius, BlockFi and FTX, resulting in a market rout that wiped out trillions of dollars in value. The subsequent year witnessed an extraordinary surge in regulatory measures globally, with governments prioritizing consumer protection in the volatile crypto space. TRM Labs' report indicates that the jurisdictions strengthening consumer protection measures accounted for 80% of the 21 studied, representing 70% of global exposure to cryptocurrencies. As the crypto ecosystem grappled with the aftermath of the FTX collapse at the beginning of 2023, regulatory actions surged, shaping a transformative year for the industry. The TRM Labs report emphasizes that nearly half of the jurisdictions tightening crypto regulations in 2023 prioritized increasing consumer protection measures. Additionally, international organizations, including the G20, Financial Action Task Force, Financial Stability Board, International Monetary Fund and the International Organization of Securities Commissions, played a role in shaping global frameworks and policy recommendations for cryptocurrency regulation. While prominent regulatory moves included the European Union's implementation of the Markets in Crypto Assets Regulation (MiCA) in June, Asian countries were particularly active in rolling out regulatory controls and measures relative to digital asset markets.  Stronger measures in SingaporeSingapore, recognized as an early adopter of crypto regulation, took significant steps in November to curb retail speculation in cryptocurrencies. The city-state’s central bank and financial regulator, the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS), brought in these restrictions following a year-long public consultation process, together with a review of cryptocurrency platforms. The country set itself apart from other jurisdictions by becoming one of the first to finalize rules governing stablecoins. That regulatory action included the establishment of a comprehensive framework relative to stablecoin operations. South Korea and Australia increased scrutiny of the cryptocurrency sector, contributing to the global trend of regulatory tightening. Hong Kong licensingHong Kong introduced a new licensing regime for centralized crypto exchanges, aligning with its goal to become a global hub for virtual asset businesses. Following its major initiative in October 2022 to support the virtual asset sector, it has since implemented a mandatory licensing regime for centralized crypto exchanges, allowing them to accept retail investors. Eleven companies, including OKX, one of the largest exchanges by trading volume, have submitted applications for the license in the city. In December, Hong Kong followed Singapore’s lead, by proposing stringent rules for stablecoin issuers, prohibiting unlicensed companies from selling stablecoins to the city's retail investors through regulated channels or actively marketing their tokens within the city. These rules are considered challenging for stablecoin issuers and may potentially deter major stablecoin operators like Tether and USDC from entering the city, according to experts. As Hong Kong solidifies its regulatory stance, it positions itself alongside other major players, contributing to the global evolution of cryptocurrency oversight.

The Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) is set to gain enhanced powers through the Financial Institutions (Miscellaneous Amendments) Bill 2024 (FIMA Bill), currently under consideration in the country's parliament.Photo by Kenneth Koh on UnsplashProfound impactIf the bill passes, it could have a profound impact on cryptocurrency firms operating in Singapore. One significant aspect of the proposed amendments is the expansion of MAS's authority to issue directives to capital markets services license (CMSL) holders involved in unregulated business activities. This move is particularly aimed at firms offering unregulated products that might pose contagion risks to their regulated operations. The bill cites examples such as bitcoin futures and payment token derivatives traded on overseas exchanges. At the moment, the regulator is actively monitoring the crypto space in Singapore, issuing investor alerts relative to unregulated entities. Last month, MAS added imToken, a non-custodial crypto wallet, to its Investor Alert List. The list serves as a means for the regulator to draw attention to entities that may be actively trading within the city-state while being wrongly perceived by the investing public as licensed or regulated entities. Greater powersIn response to potential risks, MAS had previously issued guidance on risk-mitigating measures for CMSL holders conducting unregulated business with retail investors. The FIMA bill seeks to empower MAS further by enabling it to issue written directions specifying the minimum standards and safeguards for CMSL holders and their representatives engaging in unregulated businesses. Cryptocurrency exchanges, potentially categorized as CMSL holders, along with Major Payment Institution (MPI) licensees, may face increased regulatory scrutiny. MAS has been active in implementing measures to curb speculation in cryptocurrency investments and has updated its regulatory framework for stablecoins. The bill introduces additional provisions empowering MAS to compel individuals to participate in interviews and provide written statements. It grants MAS the authority to enter premises without a warrant and obtain court orders to seize evidence. Furthermore, the bill allows MAS to approve agents appointed by foreign regulators for inspecting Singaporean financial institutions. Precursor to ETF offeringThe potential ramifications of the bill extend beyond local regulatory dynamics. Industry observers suggest a connection between these developments and the recent approval of spot bitcoin exchange-traded funds (ETFs) in the United States. Lasanka Perera, CEO of Independent Reserve Singapore, recently highlighted that the approval of bitcoin ETFs in the U.S. will likely attract major global wealth management firms, intensifying the demand for bitcoin and transforming it into an accessible asset class for traditional institutions. Perera sees relevance in this proposed legislation as it pertains to the potential offering of spot bitcoin ETF products within the Republic of Singapore. While he speculates that it's too early to tell, he said Singapore’s proposed new bill to enhance regulatory authority over financial services, including bitcoin futures, makes provisions for possible spot bitcoin ETFs in the Republic. As Singapore continues to refine its regulatory framework, the proposed amendments reflect a broader trend of regulatory tightening in the global cryptocurrency landscape, emphasizing the importance of compliance and risk management for industry participants. 

Qatar Criticized for Regulatory Inaction Against Crypto CompaniesThe Qatari Central Bank (QCB) has come under fire from the Financial Action Task Force (FATF) for its lack of efforts in enforcing regulations that prohibit virtual asset service providers.In a report released earlier this week, the global watchdog for money laundering and terrorist financing highlighted the need for Qatar to enhance its capabilities in effectively combating evolving forms of criminal activity, including taking action against virtual asset service providers.Photo by Akbar Nemati on PexelsContinuous improvement neededAlthough acknowledging “substantive improvements” applied to its control system, the FATF report emphasized that Qatar must further improve its understanding of more complex forms of money laundering and terrorist financing.While Qatar has shown positive progress in gathering beneficial ownership information through its unified register, which consolidates data on its citizens, the FATF report emphasized the need for stronger controls to ensure the accuracy and currency of the collected information. The report also criticized Qatar’s authorities for underutilizing their sophisticated analysis capabilities in identifying instances of money laundering.Lack of control despite VASP banDespite the Qatar Financial Centre Regulatory Authority’s (QFCRA) announcement in December 2019 that virtual asset service providers (VASPs) are not allowed within or from the Qatar Financial Centre, the country’s regulatory authority has made little progress in penalizing firms that facilitate or provide crypto asset services.Interestingly, while Qatar has banned virtual asset service providers, it has expressed interest in exploring the potential use cases of a central bank digital currency (CBDC). In June 2022, it was reported that the QCB is in the early stages of developing a CBDC.Sheikh Bandar bin Mohammed bin Saoud Al Thani, the governor of Qatar’s central bank, revealed that the QCB is evaluating the advantages and disadvantages of CBDCs and determining the appropriate technology and platform.As the country explores the potential of a CBDC, it must ensure that its regulatory framework aligns with international standards and best practices. By doing so, Qatar can strike a balance between fostering innovation in the digital currency space and safeguarding its financial system from illicit activities.Global coordinationThrough the Paris-based money-laundering watchdog, and calls from the G7, the European Central Bank, and others to regulate on a global basis, the official response to controlling digital assets and VASPs is becoming more globally coordinated. Central bankers and government officials have learned that decentralized finance has the ability to be borderless.FATF has been active in getting more countries on board. Effective from Thursday, Japan now implements FATF’s “travel rule” with respect to digital assets. That action was taken following a FATF finding that Japan wasn’t following best practice relative to anti-money laundering (AML) measures. Pakistan recently banned cryptocurrencies in an effort that appears to have been motivated by wanting to stay off the FATF’s gray list of non-compliant countries.While Pakistan managed to get itself off that list, the United Arab Emirates found itself on the gray list. The UAE’s Central Bank issued guidance on AML relative to virtual asset companies, in an effort to come back into FATF compliance.It remains to be seen how Qatar will respond to the FATF’s critique and whether it will take concrete actions to address the concerns raised. The international community will be closely monitoring Qatar’s efforts to combat financial crimes in the virtual asset sector and to establish a robust regulatory framework for its future CBDC endeavors.