Further JPEX Controversy Due to DAO Plan

Cango, Inc., a Shanghai-headquartered Bitcoin mining business which is publicly listed on the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE: CANG), provided a mining operations update on Aug. 5, disclosing a significant increase in its crypto production.Photo by Dmytro Demidko on Unsplash45% increase in outputThe update outlined that in June, the firm mined 450 BTC, while holding 3,879.2 BTC, with a deployed hashrate of 32 EH/s. The figures for July show a considerable uptick, with 650.5 BTC having been mined. That Bitcoin was retained, bringing the firm’s overall Bitcoin treasury holding to 4,529.7 BTC, with a deployed hashrate of 50 EH/s. Cango CEO Paul Yu outlined that the firm had added 18 EH/s in hashpower towards the end of June. This additional capacity accounted for the increased output experienced for the month of July, representing a 45% increase month-on-month. Yu stated: “This strong performance not only demonstrates our commitment to execution but also fuels our ambition to accelerate future production.” The Cango CEO added that a new and experienced management team is now in place, and with that, Cango is focusing on working towards transitioning to “a more diversified and resilient portfolio of mining sites and energy infrastructure." Cango isn’t the only company in the Bitcoin mining sector to up its production. Cipher Mining, an American miner with facilities in Texas, also published an update, indicating that it produced 214 BTC in July with a hashrate of around 20.4 EH/s, up 21.43% month-on-month. Cipher outlined that Black Pearl Phase I, the initial 150 MW tranche of its Black Pearl facility, came on stream last month, accounting for the increased output. Unlike Cango, Cipher sold 52 BTC as part of what it described as “its regular treasury management process.” In this respect, Cango bucked a trend in comparison with its industry peers. CryptoQuant reported that miners became significant sellers of Bitcoin in July, depositing 16,000 BTC to exchanges as of July 18.Ranked by BitcoinTreasuries.net in order of Bitcoin held, Cango now holds 18th place among corporations holding BTC.Originally an automotive transaction service platform operating within the Chinese market, Cango announced a new departure last November, with the signing of agreements to buy $400 million in crypto mining equipment from a number of vendors, including Bitmain. With crypto mining a banned activity in China, the company has deployed its mining operations at various locations across North America, South America, the Middle East and East Africa. By January, the company was being referred to as a “Bitcoin mining powerhouse.” At that time, the company’s Communications Director, Juliet Ye, told CoinDesk that the firm’s entry into the Bitcoin mining sector had surprised people, given that “nobody has ever heard of Cango before.” By April, Cango had sold its legacy auto-financing business for $352 million to a firm linked to Bitmain affiliate, Antalpha, allowing it to focus exclusively on mining. The company’s stock has surged 180% over the course of the last 12 months. Ye said that the Chinese firm’s pivot to Bitcoin mining has created a buzz around the company that had been absent previously.

Gyeonggi-do Province Mandates Senior Officials to Report Crypto HoldingsSouth Korea’s most populated province which encircles Seoul has taken a proactive step towards regulating virtual assets by notifying the legislation of an amendment to the code of conduct for public officials. As reported by local news outlet Yonhap News Agency, the Gyeonggi-do province will gather public comments on the amendment until July 25.Photo by Ryoo Geon Uk on UnsplashProvincial levelUnder the revised code of conduct, Gyeonggi-do officials will be prohibited from engaging in property transactions or investments related to virtual assets, using any virtual asset information acquired during the course of their duties. Provincial officials are also forbidden from providing virtual asset information to others to aid their property transactions or investments.Implementation next monthThe amendment compels public officials whose duties involve crypto-related projects, as well as high-ranking officials with an obligation to report their wealth, to declare their virtual assets. Once reviewed by the Ordinance and Rules Review Committee early next month, the amendment will be implemented immediately.National levelA Gyeonggi-do official explained that the decision to preemptively amend the code of conduct regarding virtual assets was made in anticipation of the implementation of the revised Public Service Ethics Act. This act, passed during the National Assembly’s plenary session in May, mandates high-level government officials to report their virtual assets and is set to become effective on December 14.Gyeonggi-do’s crypto surveyGyeonggi-do has been active in taking measures related to crypto assets. In a recent announcement, the province revealed its plan to conduct a survey among residents, aimed at hearing their experiences with unfair virtual asset trading practices. The survey is scheduled to run from August to November and was prompted by a growing number of residents suffering unfair losses from crypto investments amidst an economic slowdown.

How will Binance’s criminal case affect its presence in South Korea?Binance, the world’s largest cryptocurrency exchange, has reached a settlement with the U.S. government to pay a fine of more than $4.3 billion after the exchange was accused of anti-money laundering (AML) and sanctions violations. Co-founder and CEO Changpeng Zhao also pleaded guilty to violating the Bank Secrecy Act, which requires financial institutions to submit documentation to prevent them from becoming mediums for criminal funding. Binance will thus be withdrawing completely from the U.S.Photo by Vadim Artyukhin on UnsplashNews of this incident has sparked keen interest within the South Korean crypto industry regarding the impact it could have on Binance’s presence and influence in the country.Murky future for Binance as Zhao resignsBinance allegedly failed to report transactions involving criminal entities such as terrorist groups, ransomware perpetrators and money launderers without implementing a system to prevent such crimes. In particular, organizations like the Izz ad-Din al-Qassam Brigades — the armed wing of the Palestinian militant group Hamas — as well as the Palestinian Islamic Jihad and ISIS were found to have utilized Binance as a channel for their funds. Furthermore, the exchange also facilitated transactions with users in sanctioned territories such as Iran, North Korea and Syria.Zhao has subsequently decided to step down as Binance’s CEO, taking to his X (formerly Twitter) account to state that he believes it is the right move. However, he also emphasized that the U.S. government did not accuse Binance of misappropriating user assets or engaging in market manipulation.Despite this fiasco, some insights have painted Binance’s future in a positive light. JPMorgan, the largest bank in the U.S., stated that the uncertainty surrounding Binance itself would diminish. “For crypto investors, the prospect of settlement would see the elimination of a potential systemic risk emanating from a hypothetical Binance collapse,” the bank said, according to an article published by digital asset news outlet The Block.GOPAX reaffirms partnership with Binance despite concernsGOPAX, a Korean fiat-to-crypto exchange that was acquired by Binance in February, also maintained a rather unexpected positive outlook. The acquisition had been followed by a complicated string of events hindering Binance’s full-fledged expansion in Korea, including delayed approval from the country’s Financial Intelligence Unit (FIU) to become a virtual asset service provider (VASP) and multiple leadership changes as a result.Investors in GOFi — GOPAX’s decentralized finance (DeFi) service — subsequently responded by filing a lawsuit at the end of June, claiming that financial authorities unjustly delayed the approval. They argued that, by approving the request, the FIU would enable Binance to provide the capital that GOPAX had struggled to gather to pay principal and interest payments on GOFi in the wake of last year’s FTX collapse.However, these circumstances did not sway GOPAX’s decision to work with Binance. “We learned of the news about Binance’s fine through articles from foreign media platforms,” GOPAX said. “Regardless, we are still in a business and technical partnership with the exchange.”Prospects for Binance’s landing in KoreaIn contrast to GOPAX’s seemingly positive outlook, the Korean crypto community has voiced mixed opinions about the effect of this development, especially on Binance’s successful entry into the domestic market.If GOPAX’s VASP approval had been delayed due to concerns about Binance’s suitability as its largest shareholder — incited by the legal risks it posed in the U.S. — the possibility of the approval going through may be more plausible as some of these risks have since been alleviated, said Yoon Seung-sik, an analyst at Seoul-based research firm Tiger Research.However, Jang Hye-won, an analyst at crypto data research platform Xangle, pointed out that interpretations may differ depending on the reasons behind FIU’s hesitation in approving the GOPAX acquisition. “If the concerns revolved around legal risks, then the path for Binance’s entry into Korea may seem cleared since those risks have been resolved. But if the concerns are about Binance’s capital inflow into the country, then this incident (Binance’s criminal case) will have no effect,” she explained.On the other end of the spectrum, some experts believe that this incident may have negatively affected the GOPAX acquisition. Hwang Suk-jin, a professor at Dongguk University’s Graduate School of International Affairs & Information Security and a member of the ruling People Power Party’s committee for virtual assets, stated, “Since criminal punishment for Zhao and the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission’s (SEC) lawsuit are still pending, it’s hard to conclude that legal risks have been completely resolved. Binance paying a fine for money laundering may actually reinforce the FIU’s concerns about legal risks, making the GOPAX acquisition decisively unfavorable.”These statements come after a public opinion survey conducted earlier in June by Cratos, a Korean blockchain-based polling app, revealed that a 64.6% majority of respondents favored approving the GOPAX acquisition.