Further JPEX Controversy Due to DAO Plan

HKMA Issues Warning Against Crypto Firm MisrepresentationThe Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA), the central bank for the Chinese autonomous territory, has taken a stand against cryptocurrency businesses that falsely present themselves as “banks” and market their products as “deposits,” issuing a public advisory to raise awareness about the issue.Photo by Marcel Eberle on UnsplashBanking ordinance violationsIn a press release published to its website on Friday, the HKMA said that instances had arisen where crypto firms had labeled themselves as “crypto banks,” “crypto asset banks,” and “digital trading banks.” The regulatory authority underscored that such misrepresentations could be in violation of the Banking Ordinance in Hong Kong.In addition to adopting misleading bank-related titles, these crypto firms have been advertising “savings plans” as “low risk” with “high return,” potentially misleading the public into believing that these entities are authorized banks in Hong Kong, where they can securely deposit their funds.The HKMA stressed that only entities such as licensed banks, restricted license banks, and deposit-taking companies, collectively referred to as “authorized institutions” and holding a license granted by the HKMA, are legally permitted to engage in banking or deposit-taking activities in Hong Kong.Furthermore, funds held on crypto exchanges are not covered by Hong Kong’s Deposit Protection Scheme. “Under the Banking Ordinance, only licensed banks, restricted license banks and deposit-taking companies, which have been granted a license by the HKMA can carry out banking or deposit-taking business in Hong Kong,” the HKMA stated.Misuse of banking termsAny entity using the term “bank” in its business name or implying that it offers banking services in Hong Kong is committing an offense, according to the central bank. The same rule applies to any entity engaging in deposit-taking activities in Hong Kong or soliciting the public to make deposits.It’s important to note that crypto firms not officially recognized as banks in Hong Kong are not subject to the oversight of the HKMA.The HKMA advised the public to exercise caution. In cases of uncertainty regarding an entity claiming to be a bank or soliciting deposits in Hong Kong, individuals are encouraged to consult the register of authorized institutions on the HKMA’s website, and if doubts persist, it suggests that they should contact the authority via its Public Enquiry Service hotline.According to section 97 of the Banking Ordinance, only a bank or a central bank can use the term “bank” or its derivatives in its business name in Hong Kong without the written consent of the HKMA.Additionally, sections 11 and 12 of the Banking Ordinance stipulate that only entities possessing a valid banking license or recognized as authorized institutions are permitted to engage in banking or deposit-taking activities in Hong Kong. As per section 92 of the Banking Ordinance, only an authorized institution is authorized to issue advertisements inviting the public to make deposits, with certain exceptions.The HKMA’s advisory serves as a stern reminder to the crypto industry that regulatory compliance and transparency are essential, particularly when using terms associated with traditional banking, to protect the interests of the public.

Philippine Police Warns of Play-To-Earn DangersThe play-to-earn gaming trend has not only captured the enthusiasm of gamers but has also raised concerns among authorities, prompting a closer examination of the risks inherent in cryptocurrency gaming schemes. The Philippine National Police Anti-Cybercrime Group (PNP ACG) has issued a warning about the potential dangers associated with these enticing gaming models, shedding light on some of the hidden complexities and vulnerabilities within this developing ecosystem.Play-to-earn gaming takes on added significance in the Philippines as it was in the southeast Asian country that the first breakthrough play-to-earn game, Axie Infinity, took hold during the pandemic. Axie Infinity is a metaverse game crafted on the Ethereum blockchain, inspired by the world of Pokemon. Under its play-to-earn model, players are required to acquire a minimum of three Axie characters to embark on their gaming journey.Photo by iSawRed on UnsplashHighlighting game costsHowever, the PNP ACG has raised a red flag concerning the financial commitment demanded from players, with an upfront investment potentially reaching $300. This stands in stark contrast to the traditional gaming industry, where user expenditures tend to average around $100.The PNP ACG’s warning echoes the ethos of cautious investment practices in the crypto sphere. While the security of the underlying blockchain technology may be robust, the operational components of the gaming engines and marketplaces require careful scrutiny. By implication, just as investors are advised to thoroughly research ecosystems and founders before engaging in cryptocurrency investments, gamers must exercise the same due diligence before diving into play-to-earn platforms.BCP partnershipAs part of a broader movement towards fostering the adoption of Web3 technologies in the Philippines, the Department of Information and Communications Technology (DICT) has partnered with the Blockchain Council of the Philippines (BCP). This alliance aims to harness the potential of blockchain startups to serve the public good, reflecting a commitment to sustainable growth and innovation within the sector.It is essential to emphasize that the focus on Axie Infinity doesn’t go so far as to label it a scam. Rather, it spotlights the larger concerns surrounding market volatility and accessibility barriers encountered within certain play-to-earn crypto games. The history of Axie Infinity itself underscores the vulnerabilities faced by such platforms, as exemplified by a significant hack that led to the loss of $622 million in user funds.Iterative improvementAs the gaming and crypto industries continue to intertwine, the path ahead involves careful navigation and a shared responsibility among gamers, developers, and authorities to ensure a secure and enriching experience for all stakeholders. In the overall scheme of things, the advent of Axie Infinity, and the play-to-earn model more broadly, has been a positive development when viewed as an iterative step towards the use of blockchain in gaming.Many in the blockchain gaming space have since expressed the view that the play-to-earn model can be improved upon for the benefit of gamers and developers alike. Blockchain-based gaming developers are now concentrating on engaging gameplay rather than trying to lead primarily with an emphasis on earning through playing.

Cryptocurrency Losses Surge to $686 Million in Q3The cryptocurrency industry has witnessed a turbulent third quarter, with losses surging to $686 million. This unsettling development marks the worst quarter of the year, contributing to $1.4 billion in total losses year-to-date.Photo by GuerrillaBuzz on UnsplashImmunefi reportThese alarming statistics have been unveiled in a report by Singapore-headquartered blockchain security firm Immunefi. According to the report, the number of crypto hacking incidents skyrocketed by 153% year-over-year in the third quarter, with 76 separate incidents recorded.This stands in stark contrast to the same period in 2022, which saw a mere 30 hacking incidents. Furthermore, the losses resulting from these incidents witnessed a 60% increase, surging from approximately $429 million in Q3 2022 to the current level of $685 million. This marks the highest loss recorded for the year.Devastating hacksOf these incidents, two major hacks targeting Mixin Network and Multichain were particularly devastating, accounting for nearly half of the total losses in the quarter at $326 million. The Mixin Network hack, attributed to North Korean-sponsored hackers known as the Lazarus Group, underscores the involvement of state-backed actors in crypto-related cybercrimes.The Lazarus Group’s fingerprints were also found in major hacks of cryptocurrency exchanges, including CoinEx, Alphapo, and Stake, as well as digital payments firm CoinsPaid. Web3 projects based in Japan have been particularly hard hit by the hacker group’s activities. The group was responsible for losses exceeding $200 million.An overwhelming majority of the total Q3 losses, approximately 97%, were attributed to hacking incidents, while frauds and scams constituted a mere 3%. Decentralized finance (DeFi) protocols bore the brunt of the damage, with nearly $500 million lost, compared to over $185 million stolen from centralized exchanges and services. This highlights the vulnerability of DeFi platforms and the intricacies of smart contract code that underlie many of these applications.Among the targeted blockchains, Ethereum, BNB Chain, and Coinbase-incubated Base blockchain were the most prominent, with Ethereum being hit by 35 out of 82 chain losses. These platforms were singled out due to the substantial funds they held and the high level of activity on their networks.Greater recovery effortsThough the situation may appear bleak, there is a glimmer of hope in the form of recovery efforts. Immunefi reports an 8.9% recovery rate, with $61.2 million of stolen funds successfully reclaimed in six cases. Notably, Mixin Network recently introduced a $20 million “bug bounty” in a bid to incentivize the return of stolen funds, underscoring the cryptocurrency industry’s unwavering determination to combat these challenges.Immunefi itself has played a pivotal role in mitigating crypto-related risks, disbursing over $80 million in bounties and safeguarding more than $25 billion in user funds across various protocols. The company’s recent launch of on-chain vaults represents a significant step toward decentralizing its bug bounty platform, further fortifying security within the crypto ecosystem.