Hong Kong Authorities Unite to Form Crypto-Centric Taskforce

Puzzle Monsters Wins Investment from CRIT Ventures for Web3 Game ExpansionSouth Korean blockchain game developer Puzzle Monsters has secured an investment from CRIT Ventures, a venture capital subsidiary of Com2uS Group, during its recent Pre-A investment round. The amount hasn’t been disclosed.The investment comes as part of CRIT Ventures’ efforts to expand its investment portfolio with promising companies specializing in Web3 content and platforms.“Through CRIT Ventures’ investment, we look forward to honing our game development expertise and securing a faster and more meaningful gateway to the blockchain infrastructure and community,” said Yang Jin-hwan, CEO of Puzzle Monsters.Photo by Precondo CA on UnsplashAbout Puzzle MonstersPuzzle Monsters is known for its away-from-keyboard massively multiplayer online role-playing game (AFK MMORPG) called “Idle Ninja Online,” which began incorporating blockchain technology at the end of 2021 and earning popularity among users.The developer’s mounting success can be accredited to its creative game ideas and a keen understanding of market trends. Its other flagship game, Ninja Survivors Online, is also enjoyed by many users both domestically and overseas.“We want to present better products to the market, both in terms of gameplay and blockchain integration,” CEO Yang emphasized.Boosting the market for Web3 gamingCRIT Ventures’ parent group Com2uS has been focusing on leading the Web3 market with various games and game platforms that are based on the XPLA blockchain mainnet. It has also recently launched the immersive online community space SPAXE in Com2uS’s all-in-one metaverse service Com2Verse. Earlier this year, Com2Verse partnered with Microsoft Korea to apply artificial intelligence technology to the metaverse.Com2uS additionally unveiled plans to onboard Puzzle Monsters’ current and future games onto XPLA, aiming to create maximum synergy.

Strengthened KYC Spurs More Suspicious Transaction Reports from Korean Crypto ExchangesIn South Korea this year, there has been a significant surge in the number of suspicious transaction reports (STRs) related to cryptocurrencies, according to local news agency Yonhap.This increase is primarily attributed to cryptocurrency exchanges fortifying their Know Your Customer (KYC) procedures. This proactive response follows the controversy surrounding lawmaker Kim Nam-kuk’s significant virtual asset holdings, which were unveiled in May. His scandal came to light when a substantial amount of WEMIX tokens, valued in billions of Korean won, were transferred from the Bithumb exchange to the Upbit exchange. Upbit, deeming it a suspicious transaction, promptly reported the matter to the Financial Intelligence Unit (FIU) of the Financial Services Commission (FSC).Photo by ron dyar on UnsplashGrowing number of suspicious transaction reportsAs the scandal continued to gain traction, the political realm reached a consensus to conduct investigations into the cryptocurrency holdings of all lawmakers. Additionally, the National Human Rights Commission of Korea initiated the tracking of all lawmakers’ cryptocurrency holdings last month, a process set to span 90 days.Data received by lawmaker Yoon Young-deok on October 30 from the FIU reveals that the number of STRs originating from virtual asset service providers (VASPs) has reached 11,646 in the first nine months of this year. This figure has already exceeded last year’s total of 10,797 STRs.Under the current Act on Reporting and Using Specified Financial Transaction Information, commonly referred to as the Financial Transaction Reporting Act, VASPs are mandated to report to the FIU if they have reasonable grounds to suspect that a customer’s financial transactions are connected to illicit property, money laundering, or terrorist financing. The Act has been in full effect since October 2021.In 2021, a total of 199 reports were submitted under this Act. The number of reports surged to over 10,000 the following year, and in the current year, it continues to grow at an even faster rate. The FIU reviews and analyzes these STRs in accordance with Article 10 of the Financial Transaction Reporting Act. It forwards the relevant information to law enforcement agencies only when it is deemed necessary for the investigation of a specific criminal case.Enhanced but varied approaches by exchangesCrypto exchanges have bolstered their customer verification requirements, especially for customers deemed to have a high risk of involvement in money laundering, in accordance with the Financial Transaction Reporting Act. This entails the need for additional scrutiny of the source of funds and the purpose behind transactions. Notably, if customer verification appears suspicious, exchanges are mandated to confirm the authenticity of the information using reliable documents.However, it’s important to note that the enforcement decree accompanying this Act grants exchanges the flexibility to verify documents based on their own business guidelines. This autonomy has been provided to assist exchanges in effectively mitigating money laundering risks by taking into account their individual business rights and characteristics.For instance, Upbit, South Korea’s largest cryptocurrency exchange, has implemented a fraud detection system (FDS) powered by artificial intelligence to continuously monitor and identify fraudulent transactions. This initiative has earned Upbit recognition from the FIU as an outstanding organization for reporting suspicious transactions during the first half of this year.On the contrary, Bithumb has devised and applies internal guidelines dedicated to anti-money laundering (AML) measures. The exchange has instituted a streamlined customer verification process for customers who are assessed as having a low likelihood of being engaged in money laundering activities. However, this simplified process is not extended to individuals from countries that have not adopted the recommendations of the Financial Action Task Force (FATF).Korbit monitors information related to customer verification through a dedicated department. It declines transactions for customers who have not undergone sufficient verification and validation procedures.Coinone’s AML department examines customer transactions comprehensively. It maintains ongoing reviews of customer information, business operations, risk assessments, and the source of funds. If any of these aspects are found to be suspicious or inadequate, the AML department proceeds with additional customer verification, including the disclosure of the source of funds.Some raise concerns about the inconsistency in customer verification standards for AML and STRs across different exchanges. When one exchange flags a transaction as suspicious, another might see it as routine. Such discrepancies highlight the need for uniform guidelines. Addressing this, the Digital Asset eXchange Association (DAXA), consisting of Korea’s five leading currency exchanges — Upbit, Bithumb, Coinone, Korbit, and Gopax — has set up an AML division to devise standardized rules for STRs.

Abu Dhabi Puts Forward Legal Framework for Decentralized TechAuthorities in Abu Dhabi, the capital of the United Arab Emirates (UAE) as well as an individual emirate within it, have published a proposed legislative framework for distributed ledger technology.©Pexels/redouan khoulassiThe consultation paper, titled “Proposal for a legislative framework for distributed technology foundations” was published earlier this month by the Abu Dhabi Global Market’s (ADGM) Registration Authority.Promoting investor protectionThe document covers a broad spectrum of aspects relative to digital assets and crypto entities, including corporate governance, insolvency and restructuring considerations, and data protection. The ADGM’s objective with the proposed policy is to advance investor protection, improve market integrity and efficiency, and build towards a comprehensive regulatory framework.Specific proposalsMore specifically, the policy would implicate an enhancement in the protection of whistle-blowers who report misconduct relative to ADGM-regulated companies. Under the proposal, new rules would be introduced to ensure that digital asset platforms operate in a fair and transparent manner. A requirement would be placed on regulated companies to disclose detailed information in relation to beneficial ownership and control structures. Furthermore, the policy seeks to bring about an improved dispute resolution process between the stakeholders involved in ADGM-regulated transactions.Building upon an existing frameworkThe Abu Dhabi regulator’s current legal framework is built upon English common law. It has its own financial services regulator, the Financial Services Regulatory Authority (FSRA) which operates independently and is responsible for supervising and licensing financial institutions and market participants. The FSRA takes a principles-based approach, regulating those market actors attempting to maintain financial stability and integrity, promote market competition and innovation and ensure customer protection.ADGM has sought to act on an international basis by signing agreements with regulatory bodies in the UK, Hong Kong and Singapore, in an effort to enable information sharing and cross-border cooperation.Regulatory activityAt a national level, earlier this year the UAE enacted a digital assets regulatory framework. Earlier this week, the UAE also revealed a federal licensing system for crypto companies. In February, work began on a $2 billion initiative to nurture blockchain and Web3 startups via Hub71, the emirate’s tech ecosystem. The initiative provides startups with access to a broad range of support services as well as potential collaborations with government and investment partners.According to the document, “this Consultation Paper is of interest to any persons operating or planning DLT projects, persons engaging in digital asset-related activities and their legal advisors, as well as DLT participants, associations, and stakeholders.”With that, the ADGM is inviting comments and feedback from members of the public on the proposed changes contained within the consultation paper. To aid public comment, the policy document includes a number of questions that it invites stakeholders to consider as they work towards submitting their feedback.Those interested have until May 12 to take the opportunity to submit their comments and views relative to the Abu Dhabi regulator’s proposed framework.