Korea’s KFTC launches blockchain-powered loan service for public servants

Regulatory Approval Sees Crypto.com Expand Services to SpainSingapore-based cryptocurrency exchange service provider Crypto.com has achieved a significant milestone by obtaining a virtual asset service provider registration from Spain’s central bank, the Bank of Spain.The company announced the achievement via a statement published to its website on Friday. This regulatory approval grants Crypto.com the opportunity to offer a wide range of crypto-focused services to customers in Spain, a country that has recently shown a positive approach towards cryptocurrencies.Photo by Pixabay on PexelsCompliance reviewIn order to secure this approval, Crypto.com underwent a thorough review of its compliance with the Anti-Money Laundering Directive and ensured adherence to other financial crime laws. This recent regulatory success in Spain comes shortly after Crypto.com acquired a major payment institution license for digital payment token services from the Monetary Authority of Singapore, further cementing its position as a trusted and compliant player in the crypto industry.Kris Marszalek, the CEO of Crypto.com, hailed the entry into the Spanish crypto market as a testament to the company’s commitment to compliance. He expressed enthusiasm about collaborating with the Bank of Spain and emphasized Crypto.com’s dedication to providing users with a comprehensive, safe, and secure crypto experience.Global licensing accumulationWith the latest regulatory approval, Crypto.com establishes itself as a regulated platform in nearly a dozen countries. In addition to Spain, the company has obtained regulatory nods in prominent jurisdictions such as Singapore, France, the United Kingdom, Dubai, South Korea, Australia, Italy, Greece, and the Cayman Islands.The journey of Crypto.com mirrors the growth trajectory of the crypto industry during the bull market of 2021–2022. Like many other crypto businesses, Crypto.com experienced remarkable expansion, forming strategic partnerships with mainstream entities and gaining regulatory approvals across multiple jurisdictions. One notable achievement was Crypto.com securing the naming rights to the renowned Staples Center in Los Angeles, a multipurpose arena that hosts a wide range of public events, including boxing and basketball competitions.Market challengesHowever, the recent bear market presented challenges for the platform. Decreased demand resulted in business difficulties, leading Crypto.com to make the strategic decision to close its institutional platform in the United States in early June.Earlier this week, the company garnered adverse publicity when it was found that it has been using an internal market maker to trade against its own customers. Despite this setback, Crypto.com remains resolute in its mission to expand its presence and offer crypto services in new markets.The regulatory approval in Spain marks a significant step forward for Crypto.com’s global expansion plans. As the crypto industry continues to evolve, regulatory compliance plays a pivotal role in building trust.The development of digital assets has proven to be imperfect. Crypto.com’s experience appears to mirror that reality. Notwithstanding the market difficulties that the firm has experienced and some occurrences that serve to blemish its record, successfully obtaining regulatory approval in Spain is still a positive step for the company in further establishing itself as a global player in the retail crypto domain.

Korean Financial Authorities to Provide Support for Security Token MarketAmid growing calls for accelerating the growth of the emerging security token (ST) market, the South Korean government is preparing to introduce supportive measures. The security token market is powered by blockchain technology which allows fractional investment in real world assets (RWAs) such as real estate and artwork.Security tokens are digital assets that represent securities generated through a process called security token offering (STO). These tokens, backed by RWAs, can be traded similarly to traditional securities. Investors can use these tokens to obtain shares, voting rights, interest, or profits.Photo by Philip Jang on UnsplashSupport measures for security token IndustryNext month, the Financial Services Commission (FSC) will draw up support measures and policy improvement plans to bolster the nascent security token industry. An FSC representative mentioned that the agency intends to work with the National Assembly to finalize the legislation of security token-related bills by November. Furthermore, the government official said the FSC will actively seek input from industry stakeholders to formulate strategies for enhancing policies designed to promote the growth of the security token market.To align with the national objective titled “The Establishment of Digital Asset Infrastructure and Regulatory Framework,” the FSC revealed regulatory guidelines for security token issuance and distribution in February. These new guidelines are centered around the establishment of institutions responsible for account management and entities engaged in over-the-counter (OTC) trading. Subsequently, in July, lawmaker Yun Chang-hyun, a member of the National Assembly’s National Policy Committee, proposed a bill to amend the Electronic Securities Act and the Capital Markets Act with the aim of ensuring that these Acts are consistent with the new regulatory guidelines.Security token market’s growth potentialWith growing anticipation that the security token market could rival the size of the exchange-traded fund (ETF) stock market, securities firms, banks, and blockchain companies have been eager to carve out a niche for themselves since the start of the year. However, their progress has been hindered by a potentially extended period of higher interest rates in the US and the slow advancement of security token-related legislation. While these organizations tried to explore opportunities through the financial regulatory sandbox, their endeavors proved more or less fruitless. An official from a securities firm voiced concerns over the escalating costs of setting up security token infrastructure, especially with legislative delays.On this matter, the Korea Financial Investment Association (KOFIA) has emphasized the urgent need to pass security token legislation to clear up regulatory ambiguities. They’ve also called for measures to stimulate market growth, such as relaxing regulations related to token issuance and distribution and increasing investment caps.At a seminar hosted by the Korea Capital Market Institute, Ahn Hyuk, Head of the Platform Division at Korea Investment and Securities, highlighted that the rigorous review of security registration applications by the Financial Supervisory Service (FSS) might impede the security token market’s growth. Responding to this, Jang Young-shim, Head of the Corporate Disclosure Department at FSS, said that both the FSC and FSS will carefully listen to industry feedback, addressing a range of topics from regulatory relaxation to investor protection.

Korea’s FSS to Collect Public Comments on Financial Statement Guidelines for Virtual Asset EntitiesThe South Korean Financial Supervisory Service (FSS) has revealed a set of exemplary financial statements aimed at clarifying the disclosure requirements of virtual asset-related entities. These guidelines have been designed to align with the Korean version of International Financial Reporting Standards (K-IFRS), which was established by the Korea Accounting Institute (KAI).It was reported earlier this month that the Financial Services Commission (FSC) brought forward these regulations to tackle accounting uncertainties within the blockchain industry.The main goal of these exemplary guidelines is to help entities provide financial statement readers with essential information regarding virtual assets. This includes details about the reserve amount held by virtual asset issuers and information about the virtual assets held by virtual asset service providers (VASPs).Photo by Kelly Sikkema on UnsplashPresentation sessionsTo ensure effective dissemination and understanding of these guidelines, the FSS, KAI, and the Korean Institute of Certified Public Accountants (KICPA) have planned presentation sessions. These sessions will take place from July 26 to August 11, which will involve visits to VASPs, listed companies, and accounting firms. Valuable feedback and suggestions from these stakeholders are anticipated, as the events encourage open two-way communication and welcome participation from anyone interested.Discussion meetingsTo further refine the ideas put forward during the presentation sessions, two separate discussion meetings with experts are scheduled for September and October. The recommendations gathered from the industry will undergo a careful review by experts and be thoughtfully incorporated into the guidelines.The FSS will finalize the guidelines in cooperation with the FSC, and the Securities and Futures Commission under the FSC will review them and give approval for their implementation. This is expected to take place between October and November.The FSC has stated that these exemplary guidelines are currently in their preliminary stage and open to potential changes during the public comment period. Additionally, companies have the flexibility to make necessary adjustments to these practice guidelines to suit their specific needs and requirements.Issuers, holders, exchangesThe exemplary practice guidelines are specifically targeted at three types of entities: virtual asset issuers, virtual asset holders, and virtual asset trading exchanges.For virtual asset issuers, providing essential information about their virtual assets is a key requirement. This information should encompass their business models, accounting policies, obligations (e.g. whitepapers), and the current status of their projects. Such details should be disclosed in the annotations of their financial statements. Furthermore, revenue generated from the sales of virtual assets must be recognized, and any changes to their obligations should be duly noted. Moreover, disclosure of the reserved amount of issued virtual assets and their intended usage plan is mandatory.Companies holding virtual assets must provide information regarding accounting policies, the total value of assets held, the reasons behind their holdings, and any gains or losses incurred. Additionally, holders are obligated to disclose risks associated with virtual assets and their potential impact.Virtual asset trading platforms, such as exchanges, are mandated to disclose not only their own virtual asset holdings but also those held on behalf of their customers. This disclosure should encompass detailed information about their accounting policies, the total value of assets under their custody, associated risks, and the involvement of third-party custodians. In particular, the platforms must indicate whether they treat customer assets under their custody as assets or liabilities and provide a clear rationale for such classification in the annotations of their financial statements.