Binance Explores Stablecoin Issuance on MUFG Progmat Coin Platform

Korea’s prominent crypto exchanges Bithumb and Korbit have recently resumed charging trading fees, local media outlet Edaily reported. However, these changes in fee policies are reinforcing Upbit’s dominant market position while downsizing Bithumb’s and Korbit’s market shares. Meanwhile, the local banks affiliated with crypto exchanges are benefitting from an uptick in fee revenue from the recent bitcoin boom. According to crypto data intelligence platform CoinGecko on Feb. 28, Upbit accounted for 77.4% of the local market share in crypto transactions, followed by Bithumb (20.43%), Coinone (1.73%), Korbit (0.35%) and Gopax (0.09%). Photo by Markus Winkler on UnsplashShifts in market sharesAs of March 2, the market shares of Bithumb and Korbit decreased by 8.59 percentage points and 0.21 percentage points, respectively. Conversely, Upbit’s dominance grew to 86.57%, up by over 9 percentage points. A Korbit official said it’s too early to pass judgment on Korbit’s market performance, as the exchange’s policies on trading fees could change depending on the market sentiment. The person added that CoinGecko tracks only eight types of tokens traded on Korbit and does not cover all the transactions on the exchange.  Bithumb had previously benefited from charging no fees, driving up its market share to as high as over 40% in December. Following the decision to impose a fee of 0.04% on Feb. 6, however, the exchange has been experiencing a drop in transaction volume. Korbit also reinstated trading fees last Thursday, roughly four months after eliminating them on Oct. 10 as a promotional move. However, it's worth mentioning that the newly introduced trading fee is 0.07%, which is lower than the earlier rate of 0.2%. Meanwhile, Gopax currently exempts fees for users who trade BTC, ETH, XRP and USDC.  No local regulations on fees for crypto transactions At the moment, there are no local regulations on fees for crypto transactions, leaving the task of setting such fees to individual trading platforms. It is known that crypto exchanges in other countries, such as the U.S., set their own rates as well.  

Blockchain technology and digital assets feature strongly in a fintech ecosystem report carried out by InvestHK, an agency within Hong Kong’s government responsible for foreign direct investment.Photo by Shubham Dhage on UnsplashGrowing fintech sectorThe recently published report, identified that as of July 2024, there were 175 blockchain application/software firms located in Hong Kong. In the area of cryptocurrency and digital assets, it identified the presence of 111 firms, while there were 122 payment and remittance firms. All in all, the report found that in excess of 1,100 fintech firms had been established in Hong Kong as of mid-2024. It highlights the fact that the sector has seen robust growth in Hong Kong in recent years, while making the point that this has come about in part due to “substantial resources” having been committed by the Hong Kong government to enable such growth within the local fintech sector. The report cites data from a study carried out by DataCube Research, which projects that the fintech market within the Chinese autonomous territory will reach $606 billion by 2032. This forecast incorporates an expectation of an annual growth rate of 28.5% over the course of the next eight years. As well as forecasting further growth for the fintech sector in general in Hong Kong, the InvestHK report also foresees artificial intelligence, blockchain and distributed ledger technology (DLT) and digital assets contributing to that growth. 250% blockchain startup growthThe research identifies that since 2022, there has been a 250% increase in the total number of blockchain-related startups that are located within the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region (SAR). The number of crypto and digital asset firms based in Hong Kong has grown by 30% during the same period.  Finding talentIn formulating this report, InvestHK surveyed 130 local fintech firms. One challenge that was identified through that process is the need for the appropriate talent to be in place in order to secure projected growth rates over the coming years. Hong Kong is having to compete on a global basis for appropriate fintech talent, with almost 60% of the companies surveyed by InvestHK suggesting that this is a major challenge. Taking cryptocurrencies as a key component for future growth, last year’s Bitcoin price surge led to a crypto hiring boom with some of the large global fintech companies actively hiring crypto talent.  Other centers such as Singapore are taking measures to attract that talent. Access to capital was another area of concern, with 44% of respondents indicating it as an area of difficulty. In an interview with English-language newspaper China Daily recently, Brian Ah-Chuen, managing director of ABC Banking Corp., said that InvestHK has been aggressive in its approach to certain initiatives. He said that the agency has been successful in drawing capital and talent from around the world to Hong Kong.

Research Finds Over 90% of Korean Cryptos Prone to Pump-and-Dump SchemesThe Korea Institute of Finance (KIF) has released a report revealing that 91.3% of South Korean-issued cryptocurrencies, known as “kimchi coins,” are prone to pump-and-dump (P&D) schemes. These schemes involve intentionally spreading false information on social media platforms to manipulate token prices. This is done with the intention of selling the tokens at artificially inflated prices.Photo by Maxim Hopman on UnsplashP&D prevalenceThese manipulative practices were frequently observed during the rapid growth of the cryptocurrency market from 2020 to 2022. Previous research papers indicate that P&D schemes commonly occur on multiple crypto exchanges and typically unfold within a time frame of 10 minutes. It has been observed that cryptocurrencies with lower liquidity and smaller market capitalization are particularly vulnerable to becoming prime targets for these schemes.Korean market and global marketThe Korean cryptocurrency market stands out with its significant number of cryptocurrencies listed on a single exchange, including kimchi coins. This distinction becomes evident when comparing it to the global market. In the Korean market, the top 10 global cryptocurrencies, ranked by their market capitalization, account for 59% of the total market share. Meanwhile, in the global market, they represent 84.9%. This contrast indicates that the Korean market has a larger proportion of alternative coins, also known as altcoins, which are more susceptible to pump-and-dump schemes and other manipulative activities.According to a survey conducted by the Financial Services Commission in the second half of 2022, there were a total of 625 listed coins (excluding duplicate listings), with 389 (62.24%) of them being listed on a single exchange. Among these single-exchange listed cryptos, 223 were kimchi coins, which is equivalent to 57%.OHLCV data analysisIn this KIF paper, research analyst Baik Yeon-ju delved into abnormal price patterns within the Korean cryptocurrency market. She analyzed the hourly Open-High-Low-Close-Volume (OHLCV) data of kimchi coins in October 2021. The study revealed that out of a total of 16,560 hourly price and volume observations, approximately 4.7% exhibited characteristics consistent with P&D schemes. Baik noted that 91.3% (21 of the 23) observed kimchi coins witnessed such movements.Legislative effortsMeanwhile, it is encouraging that the South Korean National Assembly passed the Virtual Asset User Protection Bill during its plenary session on June 30. This legislation, set to go effective in July next year, aims to provide protection for customers’ assets in the virtual asset space. The act not only establishes regulations to combat unfair trading practices but also enforces penalties for non-compliance.Call for further measuresHowever, Baik suggested that policies should be further strengthened to enhance investor protection within the crypto market. In order to achieve this, she proposed the implementation of a monitoring system for virtual asset service operators (VASPs) and the allocation of inspection and investigation personnel, as well as technical resources. It is also necessary to address potential conflicts that may arise with the Act on Real Name Financial Transactions and Confidentiality, particularly if the data required from VASPs falls under the classification of financial transaction information and personal information.Furthermore, considering the lack of transparency surrounding many altcoins regarding their projects and exchange listings, Baik suggests that the upcoming second virtual asset bill should tackle this issue by regulating the issuance and disclosure of these cryptocurrencies. Additionally, she highlighted the importance of conducting research based on empirical data to detect abnormal transactions. This approach enables the recognition of existing issues and the acquisition of concrete evidence, which serves as a credible basis for policymakers to enact relevant legislation.