Singaporean VC Pledges Funding for Web3 Accelerator

Bizplay Improves Payment Experiences for Foreign Tourists in South KoreaBizplay, a cost management solutions provider, is gearing up to introduce a mobile payment service for international visitors to South Korea. This innovative service will empower tourists with the convenience of seamless transactions across a nationwide network of 1.75 million merchants who accept ZeroPay, a QR code-driven mobile payment platform.Photo by Federica Bisso on UnsplashBlockchain involvementOn September 7, Bizplay joined HIVEX Network, the cross-border payment system of blockchain tech company TBCASoft. This collaboration opens up opportunities for Japanese and Taiwanese tourists in South Korea to access the same payment services they are accustomed to in their home countries.Native apps and currenciesBy the first half of next year, these tourists will be able to readily identify ZeroPay-accepting merchants in their native apps without having to install a separate app, and they will have the ability to pay in native currencies such as Japanese yen and New Taiwan dollars without the cumbersome process of currency conversion.Once integrated with the HIVEX Network, Bizplay’s services will be available in all member countries of the HIVEX Network. By strengthening its partnerships with global payment companies, Bizplay aims to facilitate easy payments for the 4.5 million Korean users of its BeplePay, another app similar to ZeroPay, when they travel abroad in the latter half of 2024.Kim Hong-ki, CEO of Bizplay, expressed his excitement that international tourists in Korea will soon be able to enjoy a convenient travel experience by easily making payments with their native apps at ZeroPay-accepting shops. He further emphasized the company’s commitment to leveraging its technology and extensive global network to expand its services, with the aim of meeting the diverse needs of consumers.

South Korea’s financial regulator outlined plans on Jan. 28 to transition crypto exchanges from a registration system to a licensing regime to boost capital market appeal, Financial News reported. Financial Services Commission (FSC) Chairman Lee Eok-won stated that the proposed licensing framework—part of the Digital Asset Basic Act—would grant exchanges ongoing authorization while assigning them broader responsibilities.Photo by Tara Winstead님 on PexelsRuling party plans Lunar New Year crypto bill filingThe FSC has recommended capping individual ownership stakes in exchanges at 15–20% to prevent ownership concentration, a view broadly supported by the ruling Democratic Party’s Digital Asset Task Force, according to Edaily. However, party officials noted that internal disagreements remain over whether to include these limits directly in the bill, which they aim to submit before the Lunar New Year holiday next month. Progress on the legislation faces hurdles regarding stablecoins. The Democratic Party has presented a mediation proposal, but the Bank of Korea and the FSC remain at odds. The central bank argues that stablecoin issuance rights should be restricted to consortia where banks hold a majority stake of at least 51%. The regulatory push coincides with a surge in crypto participation. Data from the Financial Supervisory Service (FSS)—cited by People Power Party lawmaker Lee Heon-seung and reported by the Asia Business Daily—shows the number of won-based traders rose about 70% over the past three years. Users on the five major exchanges (Upbit, Bithumb, Coinone, Gopax, and Korbit) reached 9.91 million last year, up from 5.82 million in 2023. Despite the growing user base, trading volumes have been volatile. Volumes surged to 2,411 trillion won ($1.8 trillion) in 2024 from 1,122 trillion won ($801.6 billion) in 2023, before easing to 2,140 trillion won ($1.6 trillion) last year amid a market slowdown. Tax rulings and crime cases test crypto oversightAs regulations tighten, courts are clarifying tax treatments. According to the news outlet Digital Asset, a court recently upheld the National Tax Service’s decision to tax digital assets received through promotional events. The court rejected a claimant’s request for an 80% tax deduction, dismissing the argument that the promotion was a competition determined by participant rankings. The ruling clarified that the giveaways did not meet the legal definition of a competition eligible for such tax benefits under the Income Tax Act. Authorities are also grappling with crypto-related crime. According to another Edaily report, the Gwangju District Prosecutors' Office has launched a probe into five investigators after 320 seized Bitcoin was stolen from a phishing site during a handover of duties in August. Prosecutors have denied internal collusion. Separately, MBC News reported that Seoul police are investigating two teenagers accused of luring a buyer to a face-to-face trade in Gangnam on Jan. 27 and fleeing with 28 million won ($21,000). 

28 crypto service providers register with India’s FIUIn India, 28 entities providing services related to virtual digital assets (VDAs) have successfully registered with the Financial Intelligence Unit (FIU), the body responsible for combating money laundering in the world’s most populous country.Notable names in this list include Neblio Technologies, more commonly known as CoinDCX, Zanmai Labs, the company responsible for the WazirX crypto platform, Bitcipher Labs’ CoinSwitch, Nextgendev Solutions and Awlencan Innovations India’s Zebpay.Photo by Big G Media on UnsplashA need to register as ‘reporting entities’This information comes in response to a question posed in the Lok Sabha (India’s lower house of Parliament), where the government emphasized the significance of these entities complying with the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA). In March, the government had formally designated companies dealing in VDAs, crypto exchanges and related intermediaries as “reporting entities” under the PMLA.According to the notification, crypto exchanges and their intermediaries are obligated to conduct Know Your Customer (KYC) procedures for their clients and platform users. This includes maintaining KYC details, identity documents, account files and business correspondence records with clients.Offshore exchanges required to registerMinister of State for Finance Pankaj Chaudhary mentioned that the registration process for VDA service providers catering to the Indian market is underway. Non-compliance with these regulations may result in appropriate action under the PMLA. It has been clarified that offshore crypto exchanges operating in India are required to adhere to these guidelines. Despite that, none of the 28 entities who have registered so far appear to be offshore companies.Commenting on the development via the X social media platform, Sumit Gupta, Co-Founder of CoinDCX, wrote:”Emphasizing compliance to PMLA is vital for the safety and financial integrity of Indians, as dealing with non-registered platforms exposes citizens to nefarious actors, putting their finances at risk.” . . . “It’s encouraging to witness the Government initiating actions against non-compliant offshore entities.”While steps to provide guidelines for the industry are largely positive, the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) has been vocal in its criticism of cryptocurrencies and calls for potential bans have cast a shadow over the industry in India. The recent collapse of prominent platforms like FTX have not been helpful, only serving to exacerbate concerns relative to India’s crypto ecosystem.The negative sentiment, coupled with an ongoing funding winter, has resulted in the closure of operations for some crypto platforms, including Pillow and WeTrade, this year. Firms like CoinSwitch and Gupta’s CoinDCX have had to reduce headcount in 2023 amid challenging market conditions.Despite these challenges, there are also positive signs. A recent report by blockchain analytics firm Chainalysis found that India has been the frontrunner more recently in terms of crypto adoption in Asia.This latest development provides guidelines where anti-money laundering processes are concerned for crypto firms in India. However, the government needs to follow through with a complete regulatory framework for the industry. The Indian courts recently declined to act on such a petition on the basis that it falls within the remit of the country’s legislature and is outside the purview of the courts.