CoinEx Reveals Insights Into Recent Platform Hack

In Malaysia local regulator the Securities Commission has ordered global crypto exchange platform Bybit to shut down its operations within Malaysia as part of enforcement actions being taken by the regulator against the company.Photo by Esmonde Yong on UnsplashOperating without registration The Securities Commission published a statement to its website late last week outlining that both Bybit and its CEO Ben Zhou had been reprimanded for carrying out digital asset trading activities in Malaysia without having completed the necessary registration. The regulator also pointed out that both Zhou and his company have been listed on its Investor Alert List since July 2021. The Securities Commission took the opportunity to remind investors that they should only deal with what it termed “Recognized Market Operators” (RMOs), a designation it applies to entities that have completed registration with the regulator. Investors who utilize unregistered platforms are not extended any form of protection under Malaysian securities law, the Securities Commission warned, adding that such platforms could put them at risk of fraud and implicate them in money laundering activity potentially. Enforcement actions Bybit has been directed by the regulator to disable its website and mobile applications that are currently targeting Malaysian investors within 14 business days from Dec. 11.  The regulator also wants the company to curb other forms of promotion aimed at Malaysian investors. With that, it has requested that the company take down its Telegram-based support channel for Malaysian customers. Advertising activity, including social media posts, must also cease in cases where such activity is aimed at Malaysian investors. The Securities Commission acknowledged that thus far, Bybit has been compliant with its latest enforcement requests. Intentions to secure licensing Bybit has responded to these developments on its Bybit Malaysia Telegram channel, stating that the company understands that these actions “may cause some inconvenience” to Malaysian customers. “Once we have secured the appropriate licenses, we look forward to reconnecting with you again in the future,” it added. The enforcement action is likely to be a setback for Bybit given that the firm appeared to be focusing on the Malaysian market of late. In June it emerged that the company was moving to relocate Chinese employees to both Malaysia and Dubai.  This is not the first occasion in which Malaysia’s Securities Commission has taken action against a crypto platform. In 2023 the commission ordered the closure of the Malaysian operations of global exchange Huobi (subsequently rebranded as HTX). The circumstances in that instance were similar in that it acted against the exchange and its CEO for operating illegally within the Malaysian market. Within the Malaysian market, only six trading platforms have been registered. These include Hata Digital, Luno, MX Global, Sinegy, Tokenize Technology and Torum International. Earlier the Securities Commission acted similarly in prohibiting Atomic Wallet from operating within Malaysia given its failure to register its digital asset exchange activities. 

Bitcoin is facing growing uncertainty as it trades near $90,000, down nearly 30% from its October peak of $126,000. While the cryptocurrency remains under pressure, investors are increasingly focused on Tokyo, where a potential change in monetary policy could tighten global liquidity. According to CoinDesk, which cited a report from Nikkei, the Bank of Japan (BOJ) is expected to raise its policy rate by 25 basis points to 0.75%, a move that would push borrowing costs to their highest level in nearly three decades. Historically, a stronger yen has often been associated with weaker Bitcoin performance amid tighter global liquidity.Photo by Kanchanara on UnsplashYen carry trade in focusThe report suggested that higher rates could unwind the yen carry trade, a strategy in which investors borrow cheap yen to fund positions in higher-yielding assets such as stocks and U.S. Treasuries. A similar dynamic played out following the Japanese central bank’s July hike, which precipitated a market-wide selloff that dragged Bitcoin from roughly $65,000 down to $50,000. However, CoinDesk noted that a recurrence of such volatility cannot be assumed. It added that speculative positioning is already skewed toward yen strength, while steadily rising Japanese bond yields suggest monetary policy is adjusting to prevailing market realities. Institutional skepticism toward BitcoinBeyond the macroeconomic landscape, fundamental skepticism remains entrenched among traditional finance heavyweights. John Ameriks, Vanguard’s global head of quantitative equity, said at Bloomberg’s ETFs in Depth conference that the asset behaves more like a speculative digital collectible, comparable to a Labubu toy, than a conventional investment, citing its lack of income generation, compounding, and cash-flow characteristics. Ameriks’ comments follow Vanguard’s move earlier this month to permit trading of select third-party crypto ETFs. He said the decision was based in part on the funds’ ability to establish a track record since their January 2024 launch. While acknowledging that Bitcoin could theoretically offer value during periods of high inflation or political instability, he maintained that its history remains too short to draw conclusions. Bullish case for BitcoinA contrasting view was offered by Katherine Dowling, president of the Bitcoin Standard Treasury Company. Speaking with DL News, Dowling projected that Bitcoin would surge to $150,000 by the end of 2026. She pinned this bullish outlook on favorable U.S. regulatory shifts, increased liquidity from Federal Reserve rate cuts, and sustained institutional adoption via ETFs.The perceived influence of institutional flows was also underscored by a recent weekly survey of 2,000 South Korean investors conducted by CoinNess and Cratos. The data showed that 42.3% of respondents view flows into and out of spot Bitcoin ETFs as the primary price driver. Monetary policies in major economies like the U.S. and Japan ranked second at 26.7%, while 16.3% pointed to shifts in equity markets. Another 11.5% attributed price action to the halving cycle, and 3.4% said they could identify no specific catalyst.

Korean Lawmakers Complete First Rough Draft of Virtual Asset User Protection BillKorean lawmakers have completed the first rough draft of the virtual asset user protection bill at a National Policy Committee meeting held later last month.©Pexels/Matthias ZomerAgreeing on term usage ‘virtual assets’So far, 18 bills have been proposed to regulate cryptocurrencies, and the lawmakers and the Financial Services Commission (FSC) agreed to use the term “virtual assets” to encompass similar terms such as digital assets and crypto assets.Phased enactment of billsThe bills are likely to be reviewed under the title “Virtual Asset User Protection Act.” The bipartisan group agreed to enact the bills in phases, introducing the user protection bill in the first phase and the virtual asset listing and issuance bill in the second phase.Meanwhile, there were mixed opinions on the content of the bills. In particular, there was debate over whether the bills should stipulate that the central bank digital currency (CBDC) is excluded from virtual assets, and whether the bills should include a standard for determining if a virtual asset is a security.Debate over stipulating CBDC’s statusThe stipulation of excluding CBDC from virtual assets was the most divisive topic since it would lead to defining the conditions for other assets such as non-fungible tokens. Moreover, the Act on Reporting and Using Specified Financial Transaction Information, which currently regulates virtual asset service providers (VASPs), does not contain any stipulation on CBDC. Some raised concerns that such discrepancies could later cause confusion. In the end, assembly members decided to discuss the matter again in April after consulting with the Bank of Korea and the Ministry of Government Legislation.Criteria for classifying virtual assets as securitiesRegarding whether to include criteria for classifying virtual assets as securities, the lawmakers and financial regulators took different sides.Lee Yong-woo, a member of the Democratic Party of Korea, underlined that a clear statement of the relationship between the issuer and the recipient of virtual assets in a whitepaper can determine their security status. He added that such provisions should be included in the bills.Park Min-woo, an FSC official, on the other hand, commented on a cautious note that in case virtual assets fall under the category of securities, they may not be applicable to the virtual asset act. He explained that VASPs might deal with both securities and virtual assets, and in such cases, there could be a misunderstanding that VASPs are not subject to the virtual asset act simply because they trade securities.