Wemade and SK Planet Team Up for Blockchain and Online Platform Collaboration

Tether Critics Point to Previous Chinese Securities BackingUSDT stablecoin issuer Tether (USDT) has long faced persistent scrutiny and criticism due to the lack of transparency surrounding the assets backing their digital currencies. The latest allegations come in the form of a report by Bloomberg on Friday suggesting that the world’s largest stablecoin was once backed by securities issued by Chinese companies.Photo by Manuel Joseph on PexelsNYAG releases documentsThese findings were based on documents made public by the New York Attorney General (NY AG). The documents disclosed that Tether had listed securities issued by China’s state-owned Industrial and Commercial Bank of China, China Construction Bank, and Agricultural Bank of China as part of its reserves backing the USDT stablecoin.Rumors about USDT’s exposure to Chinese securities have circulated for a number of years. In 2021, a Bloomberg research report revealed that Tether’s reserves reportedly included billions of dollars in short-term loans to China-based companies, as well as a significant loan to the collapsed crypto lender Celsius Network.However, in February 2021, Tether reached a settlement with the NY AG’s office over accusations of providing misleading information about its reserves and losses. To address these concerns, Tether handed over documents such as letters, bank accounts, reserve holdings, and wallet addresses through the law firm Steptoe.Attestation reportTether’s latest attestation report for Q1 2023, released on May 10, offered further details about its reserves. According to the report, Tether’s reserves were valued at $81.8 billion at the end of the quarter, a significant increase from the earlier period of $14.8 billion. These reserves consisted of $53 billion in US Treasuries, $1.5 billion in Bitcoin, and $5.3 billion in loans described as “over-collateralized.”The disclosure of Tether’s previous backing by Chinese securities adds another layer of complexity to the stablecoin landscape, raising questions about the risk exposure and potential impact on the stability of these digital assets. Using Chinese commercial paper to back a US dollar stablecoin is a risky endeavor.It raises the same issues as we’ve seen with the plethora of crypto lenders that went bankrupt in 2022. In those cases, they were using customer money to speculate and turn a profit. That’s fine when it works but when it goes wrong, it is customers who suffer. In its defense, Tether has stated that it only held A1 rated banking sector Chinese commercial paper in 2022 in state-owned Chinese companies like Industrial & Commercial Bank of China Ltd., China Construction Bank Corp., and Agricultural Bank of China Ltd. It reduced this exposure to zero later that year.With the cryptocurrency community and regulators seeking greater transparency and accountability, the industry is likely to face increased scrutiny and calls for enhanced regulations to ensure the integrity of stablecoin operations moving forward.As regulators continue to assess and navigate the evolving crypto market, it remains to be seen how the industry will address these concerns and establish clearer guidelines for stablecoin issuers to ensure the trust and confidence of market participants.

Public Confidence in Crypto Wanes in Hong Kong Amid JPEX ScandalThe development of cryptocurrency in Hong Kong has been dented in terms of public sentiment following the JPEX cryptocurrency exchange scandal, according to a recent survey conducted by the Hong Kong University of Science and Technology’s (HKUST) business school.Photo by Alex Plesovskich on UnsplashA two-phase survey methodologyThe survey, the preliminary results of which were disclosed by the business school on Tuesday, aimed to gauge how public attitudes toward virtual assets had been affected by the JPEX scandal, which rocked the crypto community within the Chinese autonomous territory.While the survey is set to conclude on October 20, the preliminary findings have already revealed a noteworthy shift in public perception. Notably, 41% of respondents expressed a preference not to hold virtual assets, marking a 12-percentage-point increase from the earlier study conducted in May.Moreover, only 20% of respondents indicated a desire to hold virtual assets in the future, reflecting a five-percentage-point decrease compared to the previous survey. These findings suggest a growing skepticism among Hong Kong’s populace regarding the cryptocurrency industry.Post-JPEX public sentimentThe initial survey involved 5,700 participants aged 18 and above and was conducted between April 24 and May 23. Phase two of the survey commenced on September 28, approximately 11 days after the allegations against JPEX came to light. The results were compared to a similar survey conducted between April and May to assess the evolving sentiment. Between September 28 and October 5, phase two of the survey had compiled responses from 2,200 individuals.HKUST acknowledged that the second survey occurred in the “aftermath of an alleged financial fraud” involving a cryptocurrency platform but refrained from directly naming JPEX in the report.Professor Allen Huang, Associate Dean of HKUST’s business school, attributed the shift in sentiment to the recent financial scandal, which thrust the cryptocurrency industry into the spotlight. This heightened attention has led to a “more conservative investment appetite” among the public. He emphasized the need for greater educational initiatives to enhance public awareness and understanding of the risks and potential of this emerging field.HKUST’s business school stated that the survey’s primary objective was to assess the attitudes and viewpoints of Hong Kong’s residents regarding virtual asset investments, considering their experiences, intentions, and the regulatory safeguards in place.JPEX falloutThe JPEX scandal, which allegedly involved a $166 million fraud scheme, unfolded over several months before Hong Kong authorities publicly announced their investigation into the exchange. It forced local regulators to reassess the soundness of crypto trading-related regulatory measures applied within the Chinese autonomous territory.That reassessment led to regulators concluding that efforts needed to be intensified to combat unregulated platforms operating within Hong Kong. In response to the JPEX saga, the Hong Kong Police Force and the Securities and Futures Commission (SFC) established a cryptocurrency-focused working group earlier this month to combat illicit activities on cryptocurrency exchanges.The evolving sentiment in Hong Kong reflects the broader challenges and concerns surrounding the cryptocurrency industry. As regulatory scrutiny increases and major incidents like the JPEX scandal come to light, it’s clear that fostering public trust and understanding is a pressing priority for crypto businesses and the broader crypto community.

Victory Securities granted approval for retail crypto trading in Hong KongHong Kong’s Securities and Futures Commission (SFC) has given the green light to Victory Securities, a well established investment firm headquartered in the Chinese autonomous territory, for retail virtual asset trading.Photo by Carlos Alberto Gómez Iñiguez on UnsplashFirst licensed corporationThe license will allow the investment firm to expand its crypto trading and advisory services to retail investors. The publicly traded company announced its crypto licensing achievement via a press release published to its website on Friday. In that statement, the company expressed the hope that “by connecting traditional finance with virtual assets, customers can configure assets in a flexible and convenient way, and [we] can provide general investors with investment advice on virtual assets and publish relevant research reports.”This approval marks Victory Securities as the first licensed corporation in Hong Kong to offer such services to the retail market, joining the ranks of already approved firms like HashKey Exchange and OSL Digital Securities. It builds upon previous licensing approval that the company received from the SFC to offer a full range of trading and advisory services in respect of virtual assets to institutional clients in November 2022.The move reflects Hong Kong’s commitment to crypto regulation, as earlier this year, the region established a framework enabling the provision of crypto services to retail clients. This development positions Hong Kong as a key player in the Asian crypto market, where firms seem to be receiving more regulatory clarity compared to their counterparts in the United States. The regulatory initiative gains significance in light of the recent JPEX scandal, involving an alleged HK$1.6 billion ($204 million) fraud.Bringing retail into cryptoVictory Securities, currently listed as an applicant on the SFC’s recently published roster of virtual asset trading firms, is navigating this regulatory landscape to bring retail investors into the crypto market. In parallel, HashKey Group, another Hong Kong-based cryptocurrency firm, has launched the city’s first SFC-approved trading app since the JPEX incident. HashKey Exchange’s app, boasting “full mobile trading capabilities,” became operational this month, a notable progression given its prior limitation to professional investors.Through HashKey’s app, local traders can now engage in bitcoin and ether transactions using funds from their Hong Kong or U.S. dollar bank accounts. In addition to pioneering retail crypto trading, HashKey has introduced its crypto over-the-counter (OTC) trading service, HashKey Brokerage, aligning with local securities regulations and the recently implemented cryptocurrency regulatory framework by the SFC.The Hong Kong regulator is also believed to be currently weighing up whether to allow retail investors the ability to access spot crypto exchange-traded funds (ETFs). Despite these advancements, the SFC maintains restrictions on retail traders engaging in stablecoin transactions until new regulatory arrangements are established. This decision follows the SFC’s consultation paper on regulating crypto activities, emphasizing the need to address risks associated with stablecoins and their regulation.The regulator aims to ensure appropriate management of stablecoin reserves to maintain price stability and safeguard investors’ redemption rights, underscoring the potential significant implications for stablecoin stability if these risks are not effectively managed.As Hong Kong solidifies its position in the evolving crypto landscape, Victory Securities’ approval signifies yet another milestone in the region’s journey toward fostering a regulated and inclusive crypto market for retail investors.