Wemade and SK Planet Team Up for Blockchain and Online Platform Collaboration

Fraud Defense Sees Terraform Labs Pursue Access to FTX WalletsTerraform Labs, the Singapore-based cryptocurrency firm at the center of a lawsuit filed by the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) in February, is taking steps to bolster its defense against fraud charges.Photo by Anete Lusina on PexelsSubpoena for debtors’ recordsAccording to a motion filed with the FTX bankruptcy court in Delaware on Wednesday, the company is seeking permission from a judge to subpoena data from the bankrupt crypto exchange. The filing shows that Terraform’s legal team is requesting access to information about digital wallets utilized by short sellers between March and May 2022.The company believes that its algorithmic stablecoin’s collapse was not a result of natural market forces but rather a coordinated attack by short sellers, potentially involving Alameda Research, FTX’s sister company.The motion states: “To establish these defenses, TFL needs Debtors’ records about wallets, accounts, and assets used to transact on the FTX International and US exchanges and sales/offers of large volumes of cryptocurrencies developed by TFL, if any, by FTX Trading and West Realm Shires Services Inc. d/b/a FTX US.”Alleged securities fraudThe SEC’s lawsuit, filed on February 16, accuses Terraform Labs and its founder, Do Kwon, of orchestrating a multi-billion dollar crypto asset securities fraud. The regulator alleges that Terraform offered unregistered securities through its algorithmic stablecoin, TerraUSD (UST), and the Terra Luna (LUNA) token. The failure of Terraform in 2022 led to a staggering loss of over $40 billion in the crypto markets.The motion also targets Jump Trading, another entity accused by the SEC of colluding with Terraform to manipulate the price of the UST stablecoin. Jump Trading is facing a separate lawsuit in Illinois in the US, accused of purchasing millions of UST tokens in 2021 as part of an agreement with Terraform to maintain the stablecoin’s peg to $1.“Defendants misrepresented UST’s recovery by claiming that the algorithm was able to restore and maintain the price peg. According to the SEC, UST instead recovered its price peg because Defendants entered an arrangement with a U.S. trading firm, Jump Trading, […] to purchase substantial amounts of UST to support the price,” reads the court filing.Jurisdictional argumentsAside from its pursuit of FTX’s data, Terraform is also seeking to dismiss a class-action lawsuit in California, having already sought to have the SEC lawsuit dismissed. The company argues that since it is based in Singapore, US securities laws referenced in the lawsuit are not applicable to its foreign-developed protocols.Using a similar jurisdictional argument, Do Kwon also tried to conceal documents held in Singapore by the Singaporean company from the SEC, but he failed in that endeavor.Another significant development at Terraform has seen a new CEO appointed to lead the troubled company. According to a report in the Wall Street Journal on Wednesday, Chris Amani, who has been acting as Terraform’s Chief Operating Officer and Chief Financial Officer up until now, has been appointed as CEO.

Gyeonggi Officials with Cryptocurrencies Clear of Professional Conflicts in Virtual AssetsGyeonggi Province, South Korea’s most populated province surrounding the national capital of Seoul, announced on October 26 (local time) that the duties of all crypto-holding officials ranked 4 or higher in the provincial government are not associated with virtual assets. In Korea, public officials are ranked from nine to one, with one being the highest position.In anticipation of the amended Public Service Ethics Act coming into effect on December 14, the Gyeonggi provincial government introduced a revised employee code of conduct in August. This required officials of rank 4 or higher to report their crypto holdings within 10 days starting from August 21.Photo by Nattu Adnan on UnsplashReported crypto ownershipThe result indicated that out of 228 officials, 23 reported owning virtual assets. Among these, 15 officials held cryptocurrencies valued at less than KRW 1 million ($738), while the remaining 8 had holdings exceeding that amount.To determine any potential involvement with cryptocurrencies in their official duties, the Gyeonggi government examined the roles and responsibilities of these officials within their respective departments. Following this review, the matter was forwarded to the Gyeonggi Public Service Ethics Committee for further scrutiny.Ethics committee reviewOn October 20, the committee convened to assess the relationship between the officials’ duties and their crypto holdings. They unanimously concluded that none of the 23 officials had any ties to crypto in their official roles.The newly revised code of conduct elaborates on the conditions under which a public official’s responsibilities are associated with virtual assets. Specifically, an official’s duties are considered linked to virtual assets if they are involved in formulating or implementing crypto-related policies or laws; conducting related investigations, inquiries, or inspections; engaging in the registration and oversight of cryptocurrency exchanges; or if they are involved in supporting or overseeing the development of crypto technologies.In light of these definitions, officials who engage in any of the above roles are strictly prohibited from capitalizing on any crypto-related information they encounter during their professional duties for personal trading or investment. Furthermore, officials who either currently shoulder or have previously carried out such responsibilities are required to disclose any crypto holdings they acquire.In the future, once the revised Ethics Act is implemented, the Gyeonggi government will remain fully committed to preventing conflicts of interest among public officials. To bolster these efforts, Gyeonggi will introduce additional measures, including a thorough verification process for the accuracy of their cryptocurrency holdings reports.In situations where a public official with cryptocurrency holdings is assigned a position related to virtual assets, Gyeonggi will issue individualized instructions. These directives may entail either the liquidation of their cryptocurrency holdings or their removal from the specific role in question.Meanwhile, Gyeonggi will enhance its endeavors to furnish educational resources pertaining to virtual asset reporting. Moreover, the local government will restrict officials from holding virtual assets if they fall under financial disclosure obligations and are deemed to possess information about or exert influence on virtual assets.

Cryptocurrency exchange Bybit has reinstated access to its mobile app for users in India via Apple’s App Store and Google Play, saying website access has been restored following regulatory steps taken earlier this year. The company said it registered with the Financial Intelligence Unit–India (FIU-IND) in January 2025 and re-enabled trading functions for eligible users on Feb. 25, with full app access announced on Sept. 8.Photo by appshunter.io on UnsplashPenalty and registration paved way for Bybit’s comebackThe return follows an enforcement action at the start of the year. On Jan. 31, FIU-IND imposed a penalty of 92.7 million Indian rupees (approximately $1.05 million) on Bybit for violations under India’s anti-money laundering law and said its website had been blocked under the Information Technology Act until compliance was achieved. The following month Bybit announced it had paid the penalty and completed its FIU registration. Bybit’s latest announcement comes against the backdrop of India’s cautious approach to sector-wide rules. A government document reviewed by Reuters indicates New Delhi is distancing itself from a comprehensive cryptocurrency law, citing the Reserve Bank of India’s view that regulation could confer “legitimacy” and elevate systemic risks, while an outright ban would not stop peer-to-peer or decentralized exchange activity. India does not have a comprehensive crypto law but applies a flat 30% tax on income from transfers of virtual digital assets (VDAs) and a 1% tax deducted at source (TDS) on consideration paid for VDA transfers under section 194S of the Income-tax Act. Platforms bet on India despite tighter oversightIt's worth noting that authorities had moved to bring offshore platforms within local oversight. FIU-IND issued show-cause notices to nine foreign exchanges (Bitfinex, Bittrex, Binance, Bitstamp, Gate.io, Huobi, Kraken, KuCoin and MEXC Global) in December 2023 and sought to block access to non-compliant services. App store removals of several offshore exchange apps occurred in January 2024 following the notices. Binance later registered with FIU-IND as a reporting entity after paying a fine of 188.2 million Indian rupees (about $2.14 million) for earlier violations, imposed in June 2024. KuCoin also registered, with a smaller penalty of $41,000. In March 2025, Coinbase joined the list by gaining clearance from the Indian financial regulator, announcing plans to launch offerings for retail customers in the country later this year, with other products to follow. Their rush to establish a foothold makes sense, as India topped the Chainalysis Global Crypto Adoption Index, underscoring the country’s widespread embrace of digital assets. Bybit’s re-entry follows a major security incident unrelated to India’s rules. In February, the exchange reported a theft of roughly $1.5 billion in Ethereum (ETH), which the U.S. Federal Bureau of Investigation later attributed to North Korean actors known as “TraderTraitor.” Shortly after the incident, Bybit CEO Ben Zhou said the exchange had replenished the gap in the ETH reserves.