Swing Launches Blockchain-Based Service to Offer Financial Incentives for Scooter Riders

Polymarket activity under scrutiny in Taiwan due to election contractsTaiwanese law enforcement is currently delving into the activities of online influencers and community members promoting Polymarket contracts related to the upcoming presidential election which is due to be held on Jan. 13.Polymarket is a New York-based Ethereum-centric prediction market. The platform runs on the Ethereum layer-2 scaling solution network Polygon. The project invites platform users to bet on the outcomes of a broad spectrum of events, ranging from politics to entertainment.Users deposit USDC stablecoin, choose an event to bet on and purchase “outcome shares” through USDC. The user has the ability to trade those shares anytime before the resolution of the contract.Photo by Ethan Lin on UnsplashPossible election law violationsThe Taiwanese investigation came to light in a report by Taiwan-based crypto publication BlockTempo, which was published last week. The investigation comes as concerns arose about potential violations of Taiwan’s Presidential and Vice Presidential Election and Recall Act, which explicitly prohibits gambling on election outcomes.Multiple influencers and crypto community members have reportedly been subpoenaed for their involvement in Polymarket contracts, allowing users to place bets on the January election. At present, the betting pool for the election holds over $300,000, with a market prediction favoring the Democratic Progressive Party’s Lai Ching-te, also known as William Lai, with a 78% chance of winning.However, the legality of such betting activities is in question under Article 88–1 of Taiwan’s election law. It stipulates that anyone gambling on the outcome of an election or recall in a public place or a place open to the public may face imprisonment, short-term detention or a fine of up to NT$100,000 ($3,196.85).Sherman Lin, an attorney at Taipei-based Lin & Partners, emphasized the seriousness with which law enforcement views gambling activities related to presidential elections in Taiwan. He explained that broad legal interpretations under the Presidential Election and Recall Act have led to investigations and convictions of gambling website operators targeting Taiwanese gamblers. Lin stated:“Law enforcement agencies in Taiwan are vigilant in investigating any gambling activities related to presidential elections.”“Broad legal interpretations have been applied to gambling crimes under the Presidential Election and Recall Act, leading to investigations and convictions of gambling website operators in Taiwan targeting Taiwanese gamblers,” he added.Prohibited in United StatesComparing the situation to the United States, where gambling on election outcomes is illegal in most states, Lin noted that enforcing such regulations often falls under the jurisdiction of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC). Polymarket’s Terms of Use explicitly prohibit usage by U.S. persons.Despite potential legal consequences for gambling activities in Taiwan, including participation, promotion and platform hosting for betting pools like Polymarket, Lin pointed out that enforcing actions against overseas entities poses jurisdictional challenges. Taiwan’s legal reach is primarily limited to domestic actors, creating complexities in addressing decentralized platforms like Polymarket.Lin suggested that law enforcement may focus on online influencers who promoted the Polymarket contract, as seen in previous cases involving the collapse of the unlicensed crypto exchange JPEX in Hong Kong.Moreover, while there are legal precedents for pursuing centralized entities organizing election gambling, Lin highlighted that no established legal precedent in Taiwan currently exists for decentralized platforms organizing election betting.

Blockchain Deposit Insurance Corporation (BDIC), an emerging crypto insurer based in Florida in the United States, with corporate headquarters in Bermuda, has disclosed that it is preparing to launch its cryptocurrency insurance platform.Photo by Kindel Media on PexelsStarting point in AsiaIn a press release published on Feb. 11, BDIC outlined that the launch would take place in Q2 2025, with its crypto insurance underwriting service commencing in key Asian markets to begin with.  The company has chosen Asia as its starting point, where it feels crypto adoption continues to build momentum. With that, it specified Hong Kong, Singapore, Japan, Taiwan and South Korea as target markets.  While the initial launch will take place in Q2, the company foresees having expanded into Southeast Asia by Q4 2025. Broader service coverage will follow across the greater Asia-Pacific (APAC) region by 2026, with particular emphasis on entering the Hong Kong market. Company CEO Jeffrey Glusman cited a growing demand for crypto wallet security across Asia. He underlined the growing crypto adoption rate in the region, suggesting that this will encompass 300 million users by 2028. Insurance essential for mainstream adoption Speaking about the product offering more generally, Glusman said that the crypto sector has reached a critical inflection point. With that, he believes that “institutional-grade insurance solutions are essential for mainstream adoption.” He added: “BDIC introduces a new paradigm in digital asset protection, using advanced risk assessment algorithms and real-time monitoring to safeguard users’ holdings.” Token launch The company is also planning to launch a native token for its platform, “BDIC Coin,” in Q2 2025. The purpose of the token launch will be to power the BDIC Foundation Reserve Fund, a reserve which will be used for the purposes of premium payments and claim settlements. Furthermore, the token will enable holders to participate in governance voting relative to the project. BDIC claims that it has established compliance protocols and a whitelist in order to provide for a robust and equitable tokenomics structure. Glusman believes that the timing of BDIC’s launch couldn’t be better. A recent report by information services company GlobalData corroborates his view. The report, published on the back of a GlobalData survey, outlined that only 10.8% of crypto holders worldwide have insurance in place for their digital assets.  The survey data suggests that 41.9% of non-policy holding respondents would purchase such insurance given the opportunity, while a further 26.2% were open to the idea. Theft or hacking of digital assets was perceived to be the most important risk to cover in a digital asset insurance policy in the case of a quarter of respondents. The number of insurers offering crypto-related insurance remains limited. However, it would appear that there’s a significant growth opportunity for firms like BDIC, based on the survey data. While there might be a growth opportunity, there are also challenges. Nischal Shetty, founder and CEO of WazirX, an Indian crypto exchange platform that suffered a $230 million hack in 2024, described the difficulties encountered by the company in trying to get insurance when interviewed last August. He stated: “We tried to get insurance in the past, but we did not get any provider who would be willing to insure these assets. It's not an easy process.”

Hong Kong's debut of Bitcoin and Ether exchange-traded funds (ETFs) faced a tough start on their first day of trading, with volumes falling far below the record-breaking figures seen in the United States earlier in January 2024. Tough act to followThe launch of six spot Bitcoin and Ether ETFs, managed by prominent firms including China Asset Management, Harvest Global, Bosera and HashKey, marked a significant milestone for Hong Kong's cryptocurrency market. However, initial trading volumes indicated a notable contrast with the groundbreaking volumes witnessed during the debut of spot Bitcoin ETFs in the United States. On their inaugural day, the total trading volume of the six new crypto ETFs in Hong Kong amounted to 87.58 million Hong Kong dollars ($12 million). This figure, while significant, paled in comparison to the $4.6 billion trading volume recorded for U.S. spot Bitcoin ETFs on their first day, making the U.S. investment funds a tough act to follow. Despite the disparity, industry experts like Justin d'Anethan, head of APAC business development at crypto market maker Keyrock, viewed the Hong Kong ETFs' performance positively within the local market context.Photo by Simon Zhu on UnsplashAbsence of stakingD'Anethan told The Block that while the trading volume in Hong Kong didn't match the U.S. debut, it reflected a noteworthy level of investor interest, particularly considering the market dynamics in Hong Kong, which lacks access to mainland China investors. Bloomberg ETF Analyst Eric Balchunas suggested on X that people expected too much and that in reality, it was a good first day’s trading. In an interview with Bloomberg, China Asset Management CEO Yimei Li stated that the products open the door “for a lot of RMB holders.” They didn’t show up on day one as d’Anethan pointed out, and he further noted that the absence of staking rewards for Hong Kong's spot Ether ETFs was a notable factor affecting investor decisions. Data from the Hong Kong Stock Exchange (HKEX) cited by Cointelegraph illustrated the relatively subdued performance of the newly launched ETFs. Among them, the Bosera HashKey Bitcoin ETF and Ether ETF recorded modest trading volumes, while the China Asset Management (CAM) Bitcoin ETF demonstrated stronger traction, attracting significant trading volume by the closing bell. Prior to trading, CAM's subscription size for its spot Bitcoin and Ether ETFs drew substantial interest, totaling $140 million during the initial offering period. This heightened anticipation was further fueled by the success of HKEX's cryptocurrency futures ETFs, which garnered $529 million in net inflows in the first quarter of 2024. Fee exemptionsIn an effort to stimulate investor participation, local fund managers and brokerages in Hong Kong offered fee exemptions for the new crypto ETFs. Harvest waived its management fee for six months, while Bosera extended a fee waiver period of four months. Despite the optimism surrounding the launch, potential access to the ETFs by mainland Chinese investors remains uncertain, subject to Know Your Customer (KYC) policies. Meanwhile, the Securities and Exchange Commission's (SEC) stance on Ether ETFs in the U.S. complicates the prospects of listing such products in the near future. While Hong Kong's debut of Bitcoin and Ether ETFs faced challenges in matching the fervor witnessed in the U.S., it nevertheless represents a significant step forward for the region's cryptocurrency market, signaling growing interest and participation in digital asset investments.