Top

Singapore’s Regulator Imposes 9-Year Ban on 3AC Founders

Policy & Regulation·September 15, 2023, 12:50 AM

Singapore’s central bank and financial regulator, the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS), has handed down a nine-year prohibition order to Kyle Davies and Su Zhu, co-founders of the failed crypto hedge fund Three Arrows Capital (3AC).

Photo by Swapnil Bapat on Unsplash

 

Severe restrictions

The penalty relates to alleged violations of the city-state’s securities laws. The prohibition order came into effect on Wednesday, carrying severe restrictions for Davies and Zhu.

During this nine-year period, Davies and Zhu are prohibited from engaging in any regulated activities in Singapore. They are also barred from managing, serving as directors, or holding substantial shares in any capital market services business within the territory of Singapore.

Loo Siew Yee, the Assistant Managing Director of Policy, Payments, and Financial Crime at MAS, emphasized the seriousness of the violations in a statement released by the central bank on Thursday. Yee stated:

“MAS takes a serious view of Mr. Zhu’s and Mr. Davies’ flagrant disregard of MAS’ regulatory requirements and dereliction of their directors’ duties.” She further asserted that MAS would take action against senior managers who engage in such misconduct.

 

Securities law violations

MAS’s decision to impose these sanctions on the 3AC co-founders was based on its findings of further securities law violations during investigations into 3AC and its founders. The regulatory authority accused Davies and Zhu of failing to inform MAS when 3AC hired a new business representative, providing false information to the regulator, and neglecting to establish an appropriate risk management framework.

3AC’s troubles stemmed from the crypto market crash that occurred last year, triggered by the Terra ecosystem’s collapse. The hedge fund’s leveraged crypto positions exposed it to billions in loan defaults, resulting in significant financial losses. Its lack of risk management had a cascading effect in crypto. Lenders like Celsius and BlockFi had exposure to 3AC, leading to further collapses later in 2022 as a consequence.

3AC’s creditors claim that the firm owes as much as $3.5 billion, and liquidators are now seeking to recover approximately $1.3 billion from Zhu and Davies, who allegedly incurred the debt when the firm was already insolvent.

 

Regulatory reprimands

This action by MAS follows last June’s reprimand of 3AC, which occurred just before the hedge fund filed for bankruptcy amid widely reported insolvency issues. At that time, MAS had criticized 3AC for providing false information, failing to report directorship changes involving Zhu and Davies, and exceeding the legal assets under management threshold.

It’s just the latest reprimand the duo have received from a regulator this year, though. Zhu and Davies have been busy in trying to get another start-up off the ground. Earlier this year, they launched OPNX, a crypto bankruptcy claims trading platform. The venture is based out of Dubai, and the firm reported in April that it had gotten significant VC backing.

Many of those that the company claimed were backing the venture disassociated themselves from those claims. The following month, the Dubai regulator, the Virtual Assets Regulatory Authority (VARA), reprimanded the OPNX founders, having issued an investor alert relative to the firm a few weeks prior to that. VARA's complaint was that the business had been operating without having acquired the appropriate licensing.

More to Read
View All
Policy & Regulation·

Jun 29, 2023

India’s RBI Cites Stablecoin Risks With Call for Global Regulation

India’s RBI Cites Stablecoin Risks With Call for Global RegulationIn its latest Financial Stability Report released on Wednesday, the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) expressed concerns about the potential harm stablecoins could inflict on emerging markets and developing economies (EMDE).Photo by rupixen.com on UnsplashPerennial criticThe RBI has been a consistent critic of cryptocurrencies, but particularly so in the case of stablecoins, from an EMDE perspective. However, the lack of authenticated data and inherent data gaps in the crypto ecosystem hindered a comprehensive assessment of financial stability risks.According to the report, one of the ways stablecoins could pose a threat to an EMDE is through currency substitution. Since the underlying assets of stablecoins are generally denominated in freely convertible foreign currencies, the widespread adoption of stablecoins could lead to currency mismatches on the balance sheets of banks, firms, and households, resulting in an increased risk to the economy.Monetary policy headacheFurthermore, the presence of stablecoins in the economy could create challenges for an EMDE’s central bank in setting domestic interest rates and managing liquidity conditions. The decentralized, borderless, and pseudonymous characteristics of crypto-assets make them potentially attractive instruments for circumventing capital flow management measures.Another concern highlighted by the RBI is that stablecoins could undermine credit risk assessment and interfere with banks’ ability to mobilize money and create credit by offering an alternative to the domestic financial system. Additionally, the report emphasized the difficulty in tracking peer-to-peer transactions, on the basis that they increase the potential for illicit activities.In light of these risks, the RBI reiterated its call for global coordination and regulation. It emphasized the need for a globally coordinated approach to analyze the risks posed to EMDEs compared to advanced economies (AEs). As India holds the G20 presidency, one of its priorities is to establish a framework for the global regulation of unbacked crypto-assets, stablecoins, and decentralized finance (DeFi).Establishing a CBDCWhile the RBI has been cautious about cryptocurrencies, it has shown more enthusiasm for central bank digital currencies (CBDCs). In November, the RBI launched a wholesale digital rupee pilot project. It followed that up in February with a retail digital rupee pilot project. In March, it signed an agreement with the Central Bank of the United Arab Emirates to study a CBDC bridge aimed at facilitating trade and remittances.By calling for global regulation and highlighting the risks associated with stablecoins, the RBI aims to foster a safer and more secure environment for financial transactions while exploring the potential benefits of CBDCs in facilitating trade and remittances.As the discussions around stablecoins and CBDCs continue, we’re likely to see ever greater collaboration between regulators, policymakers, and international organizations with a view towards establishing a comprehensive regulatory framework that addresses the challenges and harnesses the potential of digital assets on a global basis.

news
Web3 & Enterprise·

Jan 23, 2024

Intella X teams up with Galxe to ramp up ecosystem

Blockchain gaming platform Intella X has partnered with Galxe, a Web3 protocol that allows users to own, manage and share their digital credentials, according to an official announcement by Intella X’s operator Neowiz on Tuesday (KST). The two companies vowed to leverage Galxe's community network and expertise to create an Intella X channel on the Galxe platform, revitalizing the Intella X ecosystem.Photo by GuerrillaBuzz on Unsplash"Through this partnership, we look forward to exchanging our knowledge with Galxe and effectively growing the Intella X community, which will help revitalize the Intella X ecosystem and strengthen our global competitiveness," said Jose Ko, CEO of Intella X. Leading the way in Web3 communitiesWith over 14 million on-chain users, Galxe is a pioneer in Web3 community building. Its vast network supports 26 blockchains and various social networking websites, including X, Discord and more. In particular, the protocol also operates a rewards-based Loyalty Points system with over 3,300 partners, including Optimism, Polygon and Arbitrum, which distributes points rewards based on participation in project campaigns. "We will strive to leverage the Galxe community and introduce Web3 technology that serves to expand the Intella X ecosystem. Through our collaboration, we will bring innovations, developers and gamers to the Web3 market,” said Galxe CEO Charles Wayn. Revolutionizing blockchain gamingIntella X, which is built on the Polygon Network, is a Web3 gaming platform that emphasizes contribution and rewards. Services include a decentralized exchange (DEX), NFT marketplace and digital wallet, as well as a service protocol that rewards platform participants. In December last year, the platform also beta-launched a service last month dubbed Space Candy Store, an innovative platform service designed to reward gameplay.

news
Policy & Regulation·

May 23, 2023

South Korea: Crypto Exchange Execs Indicted on Manipulation Charges

South Korea: Crypto Exchange Execs Indicted on Manipulation ChargesA number of executives at Coinone, one of South Korea’s leading cryptocurrency exchanges, have been indicted on charges related to market manipulation.That’s according to a report published by South Korean news outlet, The JoongAng, on Monday. The complaint details no less than forty-six coins that are alleged to have been the subject of manipulation in some form. That represents one in four of the total number of coins that the exchange has enabled for trading on the platform.Photo by Burak The Weekender on PexelsFour executives indictedThe indictment lists four Coinone executives, Mr. Jeon, Mr. Kim, Mr. Ko, and Mr. Hwang. The four have been charged with employing illegal mechanisms to manipulate coin listings, resulting in the four executives profiting to the tune of 2.98 billion Korean Won, which amounts to $2.26 million dollars according to current fx exchange rates.The complaint specifies that these offenses were committed between December 2019 and November 2022. South Korean prosecutors further allege that prior to various projects obtaining a token listing on Coinone, company executives made them sign third-party market-making contracts. That in and of itself is not unusual.One of the key aspects of a new coin listing (and an ongoing listing for that matter), is the need to have sufficient liquidity in place to ensure that the coin can be traded without being susceptible to market manipulation. Low liquidity conditions open the door to bad actors moving the market relative to a particular token.Cross tradingThe indictment is far more specific in calling out illegal cross trading activity. It’s likely that these key Coinone employees would have been expecting such an indictment to land at their doors. Last week, it emerged that LUNA tokens associated with Terraform Labs’ failed Terra USD (TUSD) algorithmic stablecoin project, had been illegally cross traded on three South Korean crypto exchanges: Bithumb, GoPax and Coinone.Cross trading is the practice of trading an asset on an exchange without recording the transaction transparently on the exchange. Strictly speaking, the activity can be legitimate although most exchanges prohibit the practice as it can be used to affect market manipulation.A cross trade could be permitted in a scenario where the price is deemed to be competitive at the time that the trade takes place. While this can more easily be determined in conventional markets as the practice is covered by specific regulation, that’s not the case in most jurisdictions right now where digital asset trading is concerned. By extension, there’s a complete lack of transparency and a lack of reporting.As other market participants don’t have visibility of this type of trading activity, they are unaware as to whether a better price is available on the market or not. In an unregulated state, the practice undermines trust.In the case of Coinone, the executives enabled the practice in order to provide an illusion with regard to trading activity. That meant that trading volumes claimed were inaccurate, misleading ordinary traders and exchange users. Along with trading volume in these coins being artificially boosted, so too were token prices.In the indictment, prosecutors explicitly alleged that cross trading was being employed in an illegal manner:“This price manipulation causes misunderstandings about the trading volume and market price among general members of the exchange, and induces [service users] to participate in the coin transaction and buy the coin.”

news
Loading