Five Foreigners Detained in Thai Crypto Scam Crackdown

Circle CEO Sees Role for Yuan-Backed Stablecoins in Hong KongJeremy Allaire, the Co-Founder and CEO of Circle, the USDC stablecoin operator, expressed his acceptance of mainland China’s ban on cryptocurrencies. However, he remains optimistic about the development of Web3 technology in Hong Kong and the city’s monetary authority’s move towards regulating stablecoins.Photo by Mitchell Luo on UnsplashYuan internationalizationAllaire believes that Hong Kong must embrace digital assets to remain relevant in the global financial market. While he acknowledges that China is unlikely to open up its markets to cryptocurrencies, he sees potential for stablecoins to contribute to Beijing’s goal of yuan internationalization.During an interview with the South China Morning Post (SCMP), Allaire highlighted that major financial markets worldwide are embracing digital assets and that the biggest financial institutions are adopting them. He mentioned that there is Chinese government support for stablecoins, but he clarified that it doesn’t imply opening up crypto trading on the mainland. Allaire emphasized that stablecoins could be a more immediate solution to the Chinese government’s aim of internationalizing the yuan compared to the central bank digital currency (CBDC) e-CNY.Allaire cited the example of a stablecoin pegged to the offshore yuan (CNH) as a potential tool to facilitate the RMB’s use in global trade and commerce. He mentioned the existence of CNH Coin, a stablecoin team that also offers HKD Coin, pegged to the Hong Kong dollar.Virtual asset hubHong Kong is positioning itself as a global virtual asset hub by focusing on the regulation of stablecoins. The Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA) has committed to implementing stablecoin regulations by 2024, recognizing the potential impact of such assets on financial markets. Additionally, the Securities and Futures Commission (SFC) is working on complementary regulations for stablecoins following the recent implementation of licensing rules for sellers of other cryptocurrencies.Circle’s USDC, the second-largest US dollar-backed stablecoin by market capitalization after Tether (USDT), is considered a “stored-value instrument” in the United States. Allaire expressed Circle’s encouragement regarding the HKMA’s plans and highlighted the positive motivation to expand their business in Hong Kong.While central banks worldwide have expressed concerns about stablecoins’ impact on financial stability, the HKMA has proposed that the value of reserve assets should match the outstanding stablecoins at all times. The HKMA has also been researching the possibility of a digital Hong Kong dollar and is part of a cross-border trial for the e-CNY using a blockchain known as the mBridge.CBDCs alongside stablecoinsRegarding the future role of stablecoins in a well-regulated environment alongside CBDCs, Allaire believes that CBDCs and private coins are complementary. He sees CBDCs as an upgrade to central banks’ systems and views the private sector’s work on innovation in distributed ledger technology as distinct and valuable.Allaire noted that Circle conducts significant business activity in Asia, particularly in Hong Kong, which is its largest non-US market, employing around 125 individuals.While mainland China maintains its ban on cryptocurrencies, Allaire remains optimistic about Hong Kong’s regulatory stance on stablecoins and believes they could contribute to the internationalization of the yuan. Allaire emphasized the importance of digital assets in the global financial market and expressed Circle’s support for Hong Kong’s initiatives.

Korea’s FSC Opposes Other Agencies’ Involvement in Virtual Asset BillAhead of the National Assembly’s passage of the virtual asset bill, the Korean Financial Services Commission (FSC) has repeatedly opposed the involvement of the Bank of Korea (BOK) and the Financial Supervisory Service (FSS) in regulating cryptocurrencies, according to the Korean newspaper Kukmin Ilbo.©Pexels/LukasFSC’s oppositionIn a document submitted to the National Assembly’s National Policy Committee, the FSC opposed stipulating the BOK’s right to request documents in the virtual asset bill. The agency argued that the bill is indirectly related to the BOK’s monetary and credit policy and that explicitly mentioning monetary and credit policy in the bill could lead to the misinterpretation of virtual assets as possessing the characteristics of currencies.The FSC also objected to stipulating the FSS’s right to inspect crypto enterprises. According to law, the purpose of the FSC is to inspect and supervise financial institutions. Explicitly stating the FSS’s right to inspect crypto enterprises could cause confusion to the public that they are financial entities.However, there are growing concerns about the FSC’s perceived intention to dominate virtual asset jurisdiction.At a small meeting held under the National Policy Committee last month, Lawmaker Yoon Han-hong of the ruling People Power Party expressed the view that the FSC should consider incorporating the BOK and the FSS in the virtual asset bill for crypto regulations. During the meeting, the FSC objected to the inclusion of a stipulation that excludes central bank digital currencies (CBDCs) from the definition of virtual assets. Meanwhile, the BOK agreed to include such a stipulation.Allowing class action suitsAccording to an internal document obtained by Kukmin Ilbo, the FSC also intends to allow class action suits for crypto investors. It seeks to add cryptocurrencies to a bill proposed for class action suits, which also deal with securities. Class action suits provide a means for victims to receive redress in cases where a representative is successful in winning the lawsuit against the offender.The FSC stated that it will follow the majority on the issue of whether the purpose of the virtual asset bill should include the phrase “to contribute to the development of the nation’s economy,” although it left a cautionary note that some might raise objections to this, considering the speculative nature of virtual assets.

Korean Financial Regulator to Inspect Non-Fiat Crypto Trading PlatformThe Financial Intelligence Unit (FIU) under the Korean Financial Services Commission (FSC) plans to launch a comprehensive inspection on crypto trading platform Fobl (previously known as Foblgate) from March 11.©Pexels/김 대정Unlike other major Korean crypto exchanges, such as Upbit or Bithumb, which allow trading between fiat currencies and cryptocurrencies, Fobl only offers trading between cryptocurrencies.Inspection on non-fiat exchangesThe FIU’s inspection of Fobl is a follow-up to the regulator’s inspection of GDAC, another Korean non-fiat crypto exchange. This suggests that the FIU will focus on inspecting non-fiat exchanges in the first half of this year.Many in the cryptocurrency industry have been paying attention to the FIU’s move after its first inspection of GDAC, as it could signal the direction in which the regulator would take. Earlier this year, the FIU announced that it would conduct inspections not only on non-fiat crypto exchanges but also on wallet solutions, custodians, and staking service providers. It is known that the FIU has been reviewing anti-money laundering (AML) systems and asset management statuses of these crypto enterprises.Fobl’s possible addition of fiat tradingThe Korean crypto industry suspects Fobl might transform itself into a fiat crypto exchange, considering the FIU’s notice that it will prioritize examining non-fiat exchanges that are preparing to support fiat trading.Fobl CEO’s take on the marketPrior to this news, Fobl CEO Ahn Hyun-joon said in a recent interview with Etnews that the platform is in talks with multiple banks to acquire real-name bank accounts and is complying with all the regulations required by the authorities. During the interview, he also raised concerns about the uncertainty that faces non-fiat crypto trading platforms, pointing out that 97% of the crypto trading in Korea is being carried out in crypto exchanges that support trading of Korean won.In Korea, the financial regulator requires virtual asset service providers (VASPs) offering trading in Korean won to hold real-name registered accounts at domestic banks as a measure to prevent money laundering.