Latest Chinese Crypto Crackdown Sees Influencer Accounts Shut Down

With Thailand just having elected its youngest-ever Prime Minister (PM), speculation has arisen within the crypto sector as to whether the new appointee will be bullish where digital assets are concerned. On Sunday, 37-year-old Paetongtarn Shinawatra was sworn in as the Southeast Asian country’s Prime Minister, having received two-thirds of the votes in a House of Representatives ballot on Friday. On Aug. 18, a pseudonymous crypto commentator, @martypartymusic, told his 109,000 followers on X that Shinawatra’s appointment was positive for crypto. He wrote:”She is a crypto bull. Her father was a crypto bull. IMO: Thailand could be next to adopt crypto as legal tender. Let’s watch it play out."Photo by Evan Krause on UnsplashDigital wallet programShinawatra has committed to continuing a similar approach to policy as followed by her predecessor, Srettha Thavisin. That will include an emphasis on pursuing economic reform and accommodating economic stimulus measures.  One crypto-related measure introduced by her predecessor is the digital wallet handout project. According to Nikkei Asia, the scheme has been burdened with both legal and budgetary challenges. Kasit Piromya, a former Thai Foreign Minister, is understood to have said that Shinawatra would be committing “political suicide” if she continues to drive that project forward.  It’s understood that she has indicated that the government will continue with the project but that it plans to take steps to ensure that the program can proceed in a financially sustainable way. Shinawatra’s Pheu Thai Party had first floated the notion of giving 10,000 baht in digital assets, at the time valued at $300, in April 2023, to Thai citizens above the age of 16. Further moves were made to progress that $14 billion project earlier this year. While insiders have reported that Shinawatra has been non-committal about the digital wallet project, she has been quoted as stating previously that “the digital wallet scheme is a project we intend to use as a major economic stimulus.” As various commentators speculate on her likely course of action, the reality is that these matters will remain unclear until such time as she appoints a cabinet and announces relevant policies. Tanawat Sutunthivorakoon, the CEO of Thai digital asset management platform Bitazza Thailand, expressed the view that this change in leadership will have very little impact on the development of digital asset regulation in the Southeast Asian country. Regulatory developmentThe country has seen a number of crypto-positive developments over recent months. Back in March, the country’s tax authority approved a crypto income tax exemption in an effort to incentivize crypto-based fundraising. The authorities had already made crypto trading VAT-free the previous month. Earlier this month, Thailand’s Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) introduced a digital asset regulatory sandbox in an effort to foster innovation relative to the digital assets sector. The SEC allowed institutional investors in Thailand to access U.S. spot Bitcoin exchange-traded fund (ETF) products. In June, the regulator followed up by approving the country’s first spot Bitcoin ETF.

Korean Crypto Exchange Giants Lead Market Expansion With Increased ListingsSouth Korea’s top three cryptocurrency exchanges Upbit, Bithumb and Coinone have all increased the number of cryptocurrencies they listed for trading this year compared to last year, making them responsible for leading the market’s activity and expansion.Photo by Maxim Hopman on UnsplashDynamic shifts in listing and delisting trendsA recent analysis by local news outlet News1 on the number of cryptocurrencies listed and delisted this year on the country’s major fiat-to-crypto exchanges Upbit, Bithumb, Coinone, Korbit and Gopax — listed in order of market share size — revealed that Upbit and Coinone have increased their number of listings and delistings compared to last year.The remaining three exchanges, on the other hand, showed differing results. Bithumb increased its number of listings by 47 compared to the number listed last year, while delistings decreased by three, and Gopax listed eight fewer tokens and delisted one more token. Meanwhile, Korbit’s listings decreased by 37 tokens, while delistings decreased by only one.Among the five exchanges, Bithumb listed the highest number of new cryptocurrencies this year, with 80 new currencies in total added as of Monday (local time). This represents a more than double increase compared to the 33 currencies added last year. It is also 18 more than Coinone’s 62 new currencies and 50 more than Upbit’s 30.Differing approaches based on situational factorsGopax and Korbit have taken a more conservative approach compared to Upbit, Bithumb, and Coinone, which have been more aggressive in their listing strategies. In particular, as of Oct. 4, Bithumb has also been offering free transaction fees in an effort to regain its market share. This aggressive approach can be interpreted as an effort to weather the recent crypto winter, although it hasn’t been very successful.Conversely, the exchange that delisted the most cryptocurrencies this year was Coinone, with 38 taken down as of Monday, marking a significant increase compared to last year when it delisted 26. This can be accredited to the platform’s efforts to improve its reputation and operating system following an incident earlier this year where two former employees were booked for taking bribes in exchange for listing certain cryptocurrencies. Coinone CEO Cha Myung-hun subsequently issued an apology and pledged to take proper measures to prevent such an event from recurring. Since then, the exchange has been actively looking into carrying out delistings tied to issues like the amount of currency in circulation or market price manipulation.Bithumb and Upbit came in second and third for most delistings this year, with 22 and 18, respectively.However, Korbit showed the least fluctuation in the number of listings and delistings this year — nine and three, respectively — among the five exchanges. This is a sharp contrast owing to its conservative listing policy. Speculation suggests that the platform might adopt a more aggressive stance if market conditions improve in the second half of the year.On the other hand, Gopax listed 10 tokens and delisted eight tokens. The exchange has notoriously been dealing with operational difficulties due to regulatory roadblocks despite optimistic outlooks after its acquisition by Binance, one of the world’s most prominent exchanges. Along with the recent appointment of Cho Young-joong as the new CEO of CityLabs, the company that acquired an 8.55% stake in Gopax, the exchange has been working on resolving regulatory issues and improving the state of operations.

CoinFLEX’s Creditors Sue CEO and OPNX in Legal DisputeCreditors of Seychelles-incorporated crypto platform CoinFLEX have taken legal action against its CEO, Mark Lamb, alleging that his involvement in launching the claims trading platform OPNX violated his fiduciary duties to CoinFLEX.Photo by Sasun Bughdaryan on UnsplashDissatisfied CoinFLEX creditorsAccording to the civil action, which was filed in a Hong Kong court earlier this month, they view OPNX as a competing business to CoinFLEX. The lawsuit also implicates CoinFLEX investor Roger Ver.Lamb joined forces with Su Zhu and Kyle Davies, the founders of the now-defunct Singaporean crypto hedge fund Three Arrows Capital (3AC), to introduce a platform for trading bankruptcy claims, initially named GTX (later rebranded as OPNX). CoinFLEX co-founder Sudhu Arumugam also backed the project, with Leslie Lamb, Mark Lamb’s wife, installed as CEO.Lamb and CoinFLEX defended the project, claiming it would enhance transparency in financial markets and benefit CoinFLEX creditors. However, creditors argue that Lamb’s actions indicate a strategic move to distance himself and his associates from CoinFLEX. With that, they’re seeking to prevent him from representing CoinFLEX in the future.Complaint detailsThe creditors of CoinFLEX assert that OPNX was not authorized by CoinFLEX’s board or creditors and that Mark Lamb independently appropriated CoinFLEX’s intellectual property, technology, customer base, and employees to create the claims exchange.They accuse Lamb of entering into a harmful licensing and purchase agreement with OPNX’s parent companies, Open Technologies Holding LTD and Open Technology Markets LTD. Through their lawsuit, the creditors are aiming to nullify these agreements and place OPNX’s assets and profits into a trust.OPNX’s strugglesOPNX has faced difficulties from the point at which it was launched. While Zhu and Davies were once leading figures in the digital assets space, their reputations have been severely tarnished due to the manner of the 3AC collapse and its profound impact on the broader crypto market.In April the platform confirmed backing from various venture capital (VC) entities only for many of the VCs to turn around and deny any such involvement with the project. Having issued an investor and marketplace alert in relation to the firm in April, a short time later the Virtual Asset Regulatory Authority (VARA) in Dubai issued a formal reprimand to the business' founders.VARA followed up in August, applying a $2.7 million fine. OPNX had entered a bid for troubled Singaporean crypto lender Hodlnaut as part of that business restructuring process. The offer was turned down on the basis that the deal involved OPNX’s native OX token, which was deemed to be far too illiquid. A short time later, the OX unit price plummeted.Zhu was arrested in Singapore last month in connection with non-compliance related to 3AC’s bankruptcy, while Davies’ whereabouts remain undisclosed.CoinFLEX’s creditors also accuse Lamb of reaching a settlement agreement with Roger Ver, known as “Bitcoin Jesus.” Ver was one of CoinFLEX’s initial investors but later became entangled in a dispute over an $84 million debt he allegedly incurred on the platform due to market volatility. The lawsuit seeks to recover any benefits Ver received from the settlement.On X, a user called @CoinFLEXReal suggested that it has uncovered evidence that Lamb, Zhu, and Davies “used creditor assets as their personal piggy bank.”