KuCoin Report Points to Marked Increase in Crypto Investors in Turkey

Busan Blockchain Special Zone Gears Up with Expert-Led Operations CommitteeGovernment officials and various executives from financial enterprises have been appointed as members of the operations committee of the Busan Blockchain Regulation Free Special Zone project, according to local news outlet Etoday on Tuesday. This project is geared towards growing the city as a blockchain hub and nurturing blockchain-related businesses in the special zone that are exempt from regulatory oversight. The operations committee will be responsible for overseeing the designated area, fostering new businesses and facilitating the development of Busan’s blockchain industry.Photo by Maicon Fonseca Zanco on PixabayDiverse lineup of expertsA total of 25 members have been appointed to the committee, including two ex-officio members — Lee Sung-kwon, Deputy Mayor of Busan for Economic Affairs, and Son Sung-eun, Policy Advisor for Financial Startups in Busan. Other members include Kim Sang-min, the leader of Busan’s initiative to establish its own digital asset exchange; Lee Keun-ju, President of the Korea Fintech Industry Association; and Jin Hyeong-gu, Vice President of KakaoPay, along with other relevant personnel and academic experts. Notably, the only representative affiliated with a cryptocurrency exchange is Seo Byung-yoon, Director of Bithumb’s Economic Research Institute.The participation of Jin Hyeong-gu, Vice President of KakaoPay, is also noteworthy given the fact that KakaoPay is under the internet juggernaut Kakao Group along with GroundX and Klaytn Foundation — two entities that served as the main driving force of blockchain projects at Kakao. However, KakaoPay clarified that its involvement in the operations committee is unrelated to any plans for blockchain and virtual asset-related businesses, instead attributing it to Jin’s experience and expertise in anti-money laundering (AML) procedures. Prior to joining KakaoPay, he had been an AML expert at prominent financial institutions like the Financial Services Commission (FSC) and Kookmin Bank.In addition, Kiwoom Securities and Hanwha Asset Management are both members of the Busan Blockchain Industry Association. Kiwoom Securities explained that it was asked to join the committee to serve as a representative of the association.Key milestones and plansThe committee’s first meeting is scheduled for Nov. 9, the first day of this year’s Blockchain Week in Busan (BWB) event, during which it will discuss matters such as the appointment of a chairman and detailed plans for setting the special zone in motion.The promotion committee of the city’s plan for a digital asset exchange, which has been active until now, is also being dissolved as the term for the members serving in the committee has ended. Subsequently, the new operations committee will become a priority.The committee’s detailed blueprint and action plan will be unveiled during BWB. Touting the theme “Target 2026 Blockchain Busan,” the event is set to host local and overseas experts in the field of blockchain and Web3 to jointly discuss the prospects and potential of Busan to become an urban blockchain hub by 2026.

Calls for Regulation of Crypto Investment Management Firms Amidst Growing ConcernsThere have been recent calls in South Korea for crypto investment management companies to be subject to the Financial Investment Services and Capital Markets Act amidst concerns about potential regulatory blind spots negatively impacting crypto investors.Photo by Conny Schneider on UnsplashPushing for regulatory oversightKang Seong-hoo, chairman of the Korea Digital Asset Business Association (KDA) went into detail regarding the issue during a forum held by the association on Thursday to discuss the efficient use of technology and safety management in the era of the digital economy.He emphasized that dealings related to virtual asset management such as deposits, lending, and staking must be regulated by authorities under the Financial Investment Services and Capital Markets Act. This is due to the fact that crypto investment management companies are not within the purview of the Act On Reporting and Using Specified Financial Transaction Information or the Virtual Asset User Protection Act, the latter of which is set to take effect next year.The Act On Reporting and Using Specified Financial Transaction Information defines financial companies as those that provide services for selling, buying, exchanging, transferring, keeping, or managing virtual assets; or act as a broker, intermediary, or agent for these services. However, there is no mention of crypto management companies.Echoes of past crypto platform controversiesThese concerns are driven by the looming possibility of another debacle like the class-action lawsuits against crypto platforms like Haru Invest or Delio arising again as a result of regulatory gray areas. Two months ago, investors had filed a legal complaint after the two lenders unexpectedly suspended customer deposits and withdrawals, claiming that they suffered around KRW 50 billion (approximately $39 million at the time of the incident) in damages as a result.Furthermore, the Financial Intelligence Unit (FIU), a division under the Korean Financial Services Commission (FSC), recently stated in a report that virtual asset deposits, lending, and DeFi services do not fall under the obligations of the Act On Reporting and Using Specified Financial Transaction Information.“Given the context of the ongoing crypto winter since last year, the business model of virtual asset management companies, which is heavily reliant on arbitrage between exchanges, poses a high risk of incidents similar to the Haru Invest and Delio cases,” said Chairman Kang.“In order to ensure virtual asset user protection and market safety, authorities should promptly explore regulatory measures under the Financial Investment Services and Capital Markets Act for virtual asset management such as deposits, lending, staking, and the like.”

Fraud Defense Sees Terraform Labs Pursue Access to FTX WalletsTerraform Labs, the Singapore-based cryptocurrency firm at the center of a lawsuit filed by the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) in February, is taking steps to bolster its defense against fraud charges.Photo by Anete Lusina on PexelsSubpoena for debtors’ recordsAccording to a motion filed with the FTX bankruptcy court in Delaware on Wednesday, the company is seeking permission from a judge to subpoena data from the bankrupt crypto exchange. The filing shows that Terraform’s legal team is requesting access to information about digital wallets utilized by short sellers between March and May 2022.The company believes that its algorithmic stablecoin’s collapse was not a result of natural market forces but rather a coordinated attack by short sellers, potentially involving Alameda Research, FTX’s sister company.The motion states: “To establish these defenses, TFL needs Debtors’ records about wallets, accounts, and assets used to transact on the FTX International and US exchanges and sales/offers of large volumes of cryptocurrencies developed by TFL, if any, by FTX Trading and West Realm Shires Services Inc. d/b/a FTX US.”Alleged securities fraudThe SEC’s lawsuit, filed on February 16, accuses Terraform Labs and its founder, Do Kwon, of orchestrating a multi-billion dollar crypto asset securities fraud. The regulator alleges that Terraform offered unregistered securities through its algorithmic stablecoin, TerraUSD (UST), and the Terra Luna (LUNA) token. The failure of Terraform in 2022 led to a staggering loss of over $40 billion in the crypto markets.The motion also targets Jump Trading, another entity accused by the SEC of colluding with Terraform to manipulate the price of the UST stablecoin. Jump Trading is facing a separate lawsuit in Illinois in the US, accused of purchasing millions of UST tokens in 2021 as part of an agreement with Terraform to maintain the stablecoin’s peg to $1.“Defendants misrepresented UST’s recovery by claiming that the algorithm was able to restore and maintain the price peg. According to the SEC, UST instead recovered its price peg because Defendants entered an arrangement with a U.S. trading firm, Jump Trading, […] to purchase substantial amounts of UST to support the price,” reads the court filing.Jurisdictional argumentsAside from its pursuit of FTX’s data, Terraform is also seeking to dismiss a class-action lawsuit in California, having already sought to have the SEC lawsuit dismissed. The company argues that since it is based in Singapore, US securities laws referenced in the lawsuit are not applicable to its foreign-developed protocols.Using a similar jurisdictional argument, Do Kwon also tried to conceal documents held in Singapore by the Singaporean company from the SEC, but he failed in that endeavor.Another significant development at Terraform has seen a new CEO appointed to lead the troubled company. According to a report in the Wall Street Journal on Wednesday, Chris Amani, who has been acting as Terraform’s Chief Operating Officer and Chief Financial Officer up until now, has been appointed as CEO.