Intella X Partners With Aptos Foundation to Accelerate Growth of Web3 Gaming

The cryptocurrency market has come under renewed pressure as escalating global tariff tensions converge with growing stress in the private credit sector, though a South Korean analyst suggests that prospects for a rebound remain intact. According to Etoday, Yang Hyun-kyung, a researcher at iM Securities, noted that risk assets staged a brief rally after the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that President Donald Trump’s reciprocal tariffs, imposed under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA), were unlawful. However, the relief proved short-lived as tariff fears reignited following the announcement of a 10% levy and a subsequent proposal to increase it to 15%.Photo by Markus Winkler on UnsplashLiquidations surge amid private credit jittersYang observed that market volatility intensified as concerns in the private credit market resurfaced after Blue Owl Capital halted redemptions for its Blue Owl Capital Corporation II (OBDC II) fund and initiated a $1.4 billion asset sale. Yang highlighted that $420 million in liquidations hit the crypto market as Asian trading opened on Feb. 23. This included $386 million in long positions and $34 million in shorts, signaling a swift deleveraging. These pressures are reflected in current price levels. According to CoinMarketCap, Bitcoin, the world’s largest cryptocurrency, is trading just below $65,000, down 1.13% over the past 24 hours. The token remains approximately 49% below the all-time high recorded in October. Bitcoin’s decline has widened valuation losses among digital asset treasury (DAT) firms. Yang estimated that Strategy, which holds 717,131 BTC, is sitting on roughly $7.89 billion in unrealized losses. Yang added that a potential shift toward monetary easing ahead of the U.S. midterm elections, combined with reduced regulatory uncertainty from the crypto market structure bill known as the Clarity Act, could serve as short-term catalysts for a rebound. Binance focuses on regulatory alignment in KoreaDespite the market slump, crypto firms are deepening their presence in South Korea. In an interview with ZDNet Korea, Binance Head of APAC SB Seker stated that the company’s focus is not on increasing its ownership stake, but on establishing a compliant, trusted, and sustainable operation in the country. Binance currently holds a 67.45% stake in Gopax, operated by Streami, after securing regulatory approval to become its largest shareholder. Addressing the issue regarding GoFi—Gopax’s DeFi product designed to generate returns for users—Seker said any repayments of unpaid customer funds must comply with Korean commercial law and satisfy relevant legal and administrative procedures. He added that discussions with regulators are ongoing and the company cannot unilaterally set a repayment schedule. Seker also noted that Binance plans to work closely with authorities to advance its business in areas such as institutional investment and stablecoins. Regulators reiterate exchange ownership capsAs the digital asset sector evolves, South Korea is moving to tighten oversight. MoneyToday reported that financial authorities have notified the heads of the country’s five largest crypto exchanges—Upbit, Bithumb, Korbit, Coinone, and Gopax—of their intention to introduce caps on the ownership stakes of controlling shareholders. The notification is widely viewed as a precursor to the government’s release of the Digital Asset Basic Act, often described as the second phase of the country’s crypto regulatory framework. The Financial Services Commission has maintained that a single largest shareholder’s stake in a crypto exchange should be limited to between 15% and 20%. At the meeting, officials outlined key elements of the forthcoming bill and reaffirmed their intention to enshrine the ownership cap in law. Representatives from the five exchanges and the Digital Asset eXchange Alliance (DAXA), the industry body to which the platforms belong, reportedly raised concerns about the proposal. 

Korean Securities Firms Unite to Build Shared Security Token InfrastructureShinhan Securities, KB Securities, and NH Investment and Securities are gearing up to sign a memorandum of understanding (MOU) later this month to establish a security token consortium, according to South Korean news outlet MoneyToday.Photo by Louie Nicolo Nimor on UnsplashShared infrastructureThe primary objective of this consortium is to create a shared infrastructure for their security token operations. This initiative marks the first instance where the nation’s major securities firms are getting together to set up a security token consortium. Until now, securities companies have typically sought collaborations with banks, fractional investment firms, or blockchain technology companies, showing reluctance to cooperate with their direct competitors over concerns of potential loss of competitiveness.An expert within the securities industry underscored the paramount importance of securing control over the infrastructure, particularly given that the security token market has not materialized. The expert further stated that once a collaborative network is built among the leading securities firms, it is likely to set the standards for the entire market. Meanwhile, the precise details of the plan have not yet been finalized.Challenges in prior initiativesSince the South Korean Financial Services Commission revealed the security token guidelines in February, the securities sector has been deliberating the creation of a shared network that would be accessible to all industry participants. This kind of system is considered ideal as it facilitates flexible expansion and cost efficiency. However, the discussion came to a halt due to conflicts between the Korea Securities Depository, the Korea Financial Investment Association, and fintech firm Koscom.Meanwhile, installing an independent network is not very feasible, given that it not only incurs significant costs upfront but also has limited potential for expansion. This is why these industry leaders devised an alternative strategy in which they can collectively share the financial burden. In addition, Shinhan, KB, and NH plan to explore joint business models with the aim of maximizing the utility of their security token infrastructure.

South Korean lawmakers are moving to seize control of the nation’s stalled second phase of digital asset legislation, aiming to bypass months of interagency gridlock and introduce a comprehensive regulatory framework by January. The legislative acceleration comes as Seoul races to align with global standards following the implementation of the U.S. GENIUS Act in July, a shift that has intensified pressure on local regulators to formalize oversight of the crypto sector. According to a report from the Maeil Business Newspaper, the ruling Democratic Party of Korea (DPK) plans to introduce the Digital Asset Basic Act as a lawmaker-sponsored bill rather than wait for a government submission. The procedural move is intended to ensure that formal deliberations can begin during the February provisional session. Lawmaker Kang Jun-hyeon, a DPK member of the National Policy Committee, told reporters on Dec. 11 that relying on the government’s timeline would jeopardize passage of the bill in the first half of next year. Kang cited points of disagreement among the parliament, the government, and industry stakeholders. Among the authorities, in particular, a standoff between the Bank of Korea (BOK) and the Financial Services Commission (FSC) over monetary policy and issuance authority has been a key source of delay.Photo by Lauren Seo on UnsplashDraft sets ‘major’ stablecoin requirementsAt the heart of the legislation is a new classification system for stablecoins. The government delivered its draft for the Digital Asset Basic Act to DPK’s Digital Asset Task Force, outlining its intention to classify won-denominated stablecoins exceeding a certain issuance threshold as “major digital payment tokens.” According to Blockmedia, citing sources familiar with the closed-door briefing to the task force, these assets would fall under a rigorous oversight framework developed in consultation with the central bank. Under the draft rules, issuers would be required to maintain 100% reserves, prohibited from making interest payments to holders, and obliged to submit detailed issuance plans to the FSC. Foreign-issued stablecoins would only be permitted to circulate domestically if the issuer establishes a local branch. Although the government ultimately submitted its draft to the DPK, the delivery was delayed by two days, missing the Dec. 10 deadline set by the party. Officials attributed the postponement to unresolved interagency disagreements. The central bank had argued that any issuance should require unanimous approval from all relevant agencies, including itself, but the government agreed to involve the bank only when a token is designated as “major.” The Bank of Korea continues to advocate for a bank-led consortium issuance model, highlighting the coordination challenges that have complicated the bill’s preparation. Supply thresholds emerge as fault lineCritics warn that the proposed regulations could inadvertently tilt the market against domestic innovation. Analysts argue that if the threshold for the "major" designation is set too low, new won-based issuers may face compliance costs that could undermine their business viability before they reach meaningful scale. They added that setting the bar for entrenched dollar-backed issuers such as USDT and USDC is also complex, given that their combined global issuance already exceeds $250 billion. Market participants said concerns about triggering the “major” designation could prompt Korean issuers to cap supply to avoid heightened scrutiny, effectively stifling growth from the outset. Despite these concerns, political will to close the policy vacuum is hardening. The DPK intends to move the legislation forward on its own timetable, incorporating the government’s input but steering the process through parliament. Lawmaker Kang emphasized that while numerous issues remain, the task force aims to narrow the debate to a few essential questions before the bill’s planned introduction in January. Industry representatives have largely welcomed the clearer timeline, viewing the move as a necessary step to reduce uncertainty as the global crypto sector comes under more formal regulatory oversight.