Cheongju City Targets Cryptocurrency to Recoup Unpaid Taxes

In a global effort to bolster regulatory control over the cryptocurrency sector, Asian nations feature prominently among 17 jurisdictions globally, who have implemented tighter cryptocurrency regulations in 2023. That’s the view expressed by blockchain analytics firm TRM Labs in a report published on Monday.Photo by CARTER SAUNDERS on Unsplash2023 notable for regulatory tighteningThe increased scrutiny comes on the heels of several crypto meltdowns in 2022, including the collapse of major platforms like Terraform Labs, Celsius, BlockFi and FTX, resulting in a market rout that wiped out trillions of dollars in value. The subsequent year witnessed an extraordinary surge in regulatory measures globally, with governments prioritizing consumer protection in the volatile crypto space. TRM Labs' report indicates that the jurisdictions strengthening consumer protection measures accounted for 80% of the 21 studied, representing 70% of global exposure to cryptocurrencies. As the crypto ecosystem grappled with the aftermath of the FTX collapse at the beginning of 2023, regulatory actions surged, shaping a transformative year for the industry. The TRM Labs report emphasizes that nearly half of the jurisdictions tightening crypto regulations in 2023 prioritized increasing consumer protection measures. Additionally, international organizations, including the G20, Financial Action Task Force, Financial Stability Board, International Monetary Fund and the International Organization of Securities Commissions, played a role in shaping global frameworks and policy recommendations for cryptocurrency regulation. While prominent regulatory moves included the European Union's implementation of the Markets in Crypto Assets Regulation (MiCA) in June, Asian countries were particularly active in rolling out regulatory controls and measures relative to digital asset markets.  Stronger measures in SingaporeSingapore, recognized as an early adopter of crypto regulation, took significant steps in November to curb retail speculation in cryptocurrencies. The city-state’s central bank and financial regulator, the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS), brought in these restrictions following a year-long public consultation process, together with a review of cryptocurrency platforms. The country set itself apart from other jurisdictions by becoming one of the first to finalize rules governing stablecoins. That regulatory action included the establishment of a comprehensive framework relative to stablecoin operations. South Korea and Australia increased scrutiny of the cryptocurrency sector, contributing to the global trend of regulatory tightening. Hong Kong licensingHong Kong introduced a new licensing regime for centralized crypto exchanges, aligning with its goal to become a global hub for virtual asset businesses. Following its major initiative in October 2022 to support the virtual asset sector, it has since implemented a mandatory licensing regime for centralized crypto exchanges, allowing them to accept retail investors. Eleven companies, including OKX, one of the largest exchanges by trading volume, have submitted applications for the license in the city. In December, Hong Kong followed Singapore’s lead, by proposing stringent rules for stablecoin issuers, prohibiting unlicensed companies from selling stablecoins to the city's retail investors through regulated channels or actively marketing their tokens within the city. These rules are considered challenging for stablecoin issuers and may potentially deter major stablecoin operators like Tether and USDC from entering the city, according to experts. As Hong Kong solidifies its regulatory stance, it positions itself alongside other major players, contributing to the global evolution of cryptocurrency oversight.

Laos targets crypto operators’ unpaid feesIn a bid to enhance state revenues, Laos has turned its focus to the cryptocurrency sector, revealing that operators in the country owe a total of $20 million in fees. The announcement, reported on Thursday by Chinese state news agency Xinhua News, references information from the Lao People’s Army News.Photo by Alessio Roversi on UnsplashLoss-making mining activityLaos had previously granted authorization to 15 blockchain companies to engage in crypto mining or operate as exchanges as part of a strategy to diversify government income sources. However, Prime Minister Sonexay Siphandone disclosed that two of these companies showed no progress in their operations, while others lagged behind in meeting their financial obligations to the state.It emerged in August that the national electricity supplier, Electricité du Laos, had decided to suspend the supply of energy to crypto miners amid a perfect storm of challenges. Laos has ample hydro electric resources and is a net exporter of electricity. However, a drought this year has challenged it to honor contracts for supply of electricity to the Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand.To deal with this issue, power supply to Laotian crypto miners was suspended. To compound matters, many mining operators have been struggling financially and were unable to pay their bills.Debt reliefSiphandone mentioned that since the government initially set the tax obligations, the overall value of cryptocurrencies has experienced a 50% decline. Consequently, Laos has decided to alleviate the burden on crypto companies by reducing the outstanding balance by an equivalent 50%.Following this decision, the affected companies have commenced the settlement of their fees, and it is anticipated that all outstanding amounts will be fully resolved by the year’s end, according to the country’s Prime Minister. However, he issued a cautionary note, stating that companies failing to make satisfactory progress would face consequences, including the suspension of their operations, imposition of fines or even the revocation of their licenses.Digital transformationIn May, Laos outlined key aspects of its digital transformation strategy, emphasizing the use of digital technology to generate new fiscal revenue, strengthen foreign exchange reserves, control inflation, and promote sustainable economic growth. The move to reduce crypto companies’ tax burdens amid market volatility underscores Laos’ adaptability to the challenges presented by the dynamic cryptocurrency landscape.As part of its digital transformation strategy, the Laotian government signed a cooperation agreement with Singapore’s MetaBank. Partnering with another overseas entity, the country has also relied upon the expertise of Japanese fintech developer Soramitsu with regard to a central bank digital currency (CBDC). Soramitsu has played a pivotal role in enabling the issuance of Laos’ Digital Lao Kip.Early last year, the landlocked Southeast Asian country authorized trading licenses for two crypto platforms. These included Lao Digital Assets Exchange (LDX), a joint venture between Phongsupthavy Group and AIF Group, and Bitqik, a subsidiary company of Simuong Group.

Chinese Prosecutors Issue Warning on NFTsIn recent days, China’s top procuratorial agency, the Supreme People’s Procuratorate of China, issued a warning alongside some guidelines on non-fungible tokens (NFTs).The Supreme People’s Procuratorate is the highest office in China charged with the mandate of upholding legal integrity, safeguarding citizens’ rights, and where necessary, conducting criminal investigations. In a statement published on Monday, the agency set out an advisory, together with additional recommendations, pertaining to NFTs.Photo by Markus Winkler on PexelsNFT status in ChinaWhile all and sundry are aware of a multi-year crack-down by the Chinese authorities on crypto in recent times, exemplified by a ban on crypto trading and the operation of crypto mining facilities within the country’s borders, the status of NFTs has been discussed to a much lesser degree.NFTs remain legal within the country. When the crypto trading ban came into play in 2021, much of the local industry connected with that trading activity disappeared. However, in its place, a newly emergent trend came to the fore in the form of NFTs. With cryptocurrencies perceived as being high risk and sanctioned by the authorities, attention turned to NFTs and there has been a surge of adoption of the digital collectibles within China as a consequence.NFT risksThe procuratorial agency highlighted a number of attributes as well as risks in relation to NFTs in the report that it published. The agency finds the issue of ownership of NFTs as a troublesome one. It cites the fact that NFTs can be replicated and distributed at will on this basis as being particularly problematic. The legitimacy of the right source of the work itself is the decisive factor for the healthy and orderly development of digital works NFT transactions,” it states.It appears that the agency, like many in traditional professional circles before them, have a difficulty recognizing the model of asset ownership that NFTs incorporate. That ownership is not defined by civil law or in accordance with centralized systems but by simply the possession of the requisite private key pertaining to a given NFT within a decentralized system.Blockchain, not cryptoThe agency acknowledged that NFTs do present a novel application of blockchain technology. This is not surprising as while there might be an ongoing clampdown on decentralized cryptocurrencies in China, officials at a national level and in numerous instances within regional administrations, are demonstrating a strategy of leveraging blockchain technology for the betterment of the Chinese economy in the future.Public prosecutor Wang Xia-fen, one of the authors of the report, stated: “It’s widely recognized that digital collectibles have the potential to protect intellectual property rights, boost content creation and enrich the digital economy.” Wang encouraged public prosecutors to “find the distinction between real innovation and criminal activities” where NFTs are concerned.The upshot of its report though, is that the procuratorial agency is uncomfortable with the similarity of many of the attributes of NFTs when compared with decentralized cryptocurrencies. It issued a warning on that basis, emphasizing a need for risk assessment to be carried out and further consideration of the legal risks that are implicated.