Wiziin Earmarks $500K Pre-Seed Funding for Blockchain Investment

Japan’s FSA Proposes Tax Exemption for Unrealized Crypto GainsThe Financial Services Agency (FSA) of Japan has taken the step of putting forward amendments that provide a notable tax exemption for unrealized gains on cryptocurrency holdings.Photo by Erik Eastman on UnsplashFSA proposalThe move is significant in that it spares domestic companies from the standard 30% corporate tax rate typically imposed on digital assets up until now. According to reports in local media, that proposal was detailed in a comprehensive 16-page document outlining various regulatory modifications.The most pivotal change within this document is the exemption of domestic companies from the annual “unrealized gains” tax on cryptocurrencies. Unlike some countries that only tax crypto assets when they are converted into fiat currency, Japan currently enforces an annual tax on these digital assets.2023 tax reform agendaThe proposed amendment has garnered support from the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry, indicating its potential passage. These discussions are part of Japan’s broader tax reform agenda for 2023, suggestive of the Asian nation’s interest in fostering a favorable environment for the blockchain and cryptocurrency industries.It is important to note that this tax exemption applies exclusively to companies that issue their own tokens and does not extend to entities solely involved in investing in other digital currencies. Additionally, individual crypto investors will still be subject to a maximum income tax rate of 55% on earnings exceeding JPY 200,000 ($1,355) related to cryptocurrency, categorized as “miscellaneous income.”The exemption is structured in a way that excludes these digital coins when assessing a company’s asset market value, provided specific conditions are met. Presently, Japanese law mandates that companies holding crypto assets must pay taxes on unrealized gains at the end of each tax period.To qualify for the tax exemption, a company must meet specific criteria outlined by the tax authority. Firstly, the company must be the issuer of the cryptocurrency in question. Additionally, it must retain continuous ownership of the crypto asset after issuance, while the asset itself remains subject to transfer restrictions.Blockchain ambitionsThis development aligns with Japan’s broader ambition to nurture and expand its blockchain and cryptocurrency sectors. Prime Minister Fumio Kishida recently articulated a vision for a “new form of capitalism,” emphasizing the importance of fostering innovation and growth in emerging industries, inclusive of the Web3 sector. As Japan moves forward with these changes, it signals its interest in creating a conducive environment for blockchain and crypto ventures to thrive.Over time Japan has been iteratively building a framework in respect of digital assets. In 2017 the country recognized Bitcoin as a legitimate property in accordance with the Payment Services Act (PSA). That same year, the Tax Agency classified crypto earnings as miscellaneous income. In 2020, crypto assets were included in Japan’s fund settlement law. Around the same time frame, the FSA brought in the requirement for crypto exchanges to register and obtain a license.These amendments also form part of a series of changes that the Japan Blockchain Association (JBA), an industry advocacy group, has been canvassing for. The proposed changes reflect a pragmatic approach to taxation, doing away with a paper profits taxation treatment in favor of a more progressive approach.

Korea to introduce more effective guidelines for crypto listing and delistingThe South Korean cryptocurrency industry is expected to see standardized guidelines for listing and delisting cryptocurrencies on trading platforms by the first half of next year, according to a report by local news outlet ETnews. This move is a response to the current self-regulatory guidelines among cryptocurrency exchanges, which have been found inadequate in effectively managing the listing and delisting of digital currencies.Photo by Mathew Schwartz on UnsplashA dedicated task forceThe Financial Supervisory Service (FSS) in South Korea has reportedly initiated a task force dedicated to creating standardized rules and regulations for cryptocurrency listing and delisting. This team includes both government officials and experts from the private sector.An official from the FSS noted that the task force is aiming to present the final version of the guidelines to the National Assembly before the implementation of the Virtual Asset User Protection Act in July of next year. Operating under the oversight of the financial regulator, these standardized guidelines are expected to enhance their effectiveness and aid crypto businesses in maintaining self-regulation.Frequent listing and delistingThe decision by the Korean financial authorities to formulate these guidelines was prompted by the frequent listing and delisting of cryptocurrencies on trading platforms, which pose risks and cause confusion for customers. An earlier report from the Financial Services Commission’s Financial Intelligence Unit (FIU) highlighted that the number of tokens listed in the first half of 2023 increased to 169, up from 95 in the first half of 2022, while the number of delisted tokens rose from 78 to 115.The WEMIX controversyThe cycle of listing, delisting, and relisting cryptocurrencies has sparked controversies, with WEMIX serving as a notable example. WEMIX is the native token of blockchain gaming company Wemade’s Wemix blockchain network. In December, WEMIX was collectively delisted by the Digital Asset eXchange Alliance (DAXA), which includes South Korea’s top five crypto exchanges: Upbit, Bithumb, Coinone, Korbit, and Gopax. The reason cited was Wemade’s breach of disclosure rules regarding token distribution.However, in a turn of events, Coinone relisted WEMIX on its platform in February this year. Following this, DAXA established self-regulatory guidelines concerning the relisting of tokens. Despite these guidelines, Gopax also proceeded to relist WEMIX earlier this month. As a result of this move, DAXA criticized Gopax for not complying with the self-regulatory guidelines. Gopax faced a restriction on its voting rights within the alliance for three months, and a cautionary note was issued against them.An industry insider noted that despite the efforts of DAXA, their self-regulation measures for cryptocurrency trading services, including the listing process, have not been particularly effective. However, the upcoming rules are expected to be more impactful as they will be in line with the forthcoming Virtual Asset User Protection Act.

$100M Pyramid Scheme Linked to Prominent Chinese Filecoin ProjectA courtroom showdown currently playing out in the People’s Court of Pingnan County in northeastern Fujian province in China is laying bare an intricate pyramid scheme entwined with one of China’s flagship ventures in the Filecoin ecosystem.The lawsuit thrusts five defendants into the spotlight, alleging their orchestration of an expansive pyramid scheme under the guise of their enterprise, Shenzhen Space-Time Cloud Company. The operation is purported to have siphoned off millions of dollars, leaving in its wake a trail of financial wreckage.Photo by Traxer on UnsplashAggressive project marketingAccording to a local media report published on Monday, the saga began in June 2018 when Lai Mouhang and Lai Moujun established the Space-Time Cloud Company. Subsequently, co-defendants Hu and Liang joined the ranks in the following months. However, it wasn’t until September 2019 that Lai Mouhang escalated the company’s operations, leveraging the ipfs.cn domain to aggressively market and peddle investments linked to distributed storage technology and Filecoin’s intricate economic model.Central to Filecoin’s model is its block reward system, where miners validating new blocks receive Filecoin tokens (FIL) as a reward. In a stunning revelation, the prosecution claims that Lai Mouhang and his accomplices crafted a scheme mirroring this economic structure.Their brainchild, the filpool.io platform, served as a conduit for joint mining, masquerading as a storage server vending operation for FIL mining. This platform, intrinsically linked to Space-Time Cloud Company, allegedly formed the epicenter of the defendants’ fraudulent maneuvers.Almost 60,000 usersThe gravity of the scheme becomes evident when considering the staggering numbers: a reported 57,122 members registered on the filpool.io platform and an additional 143 partners on the bpool.io platform, a sibling project of Space-Time Cloud Company. These platforms collectively amassed a jaw-dropping RMB 607 million ($83 million), alongside RMB 62 million in diverse cryptocurrencies.The modus operandi of the defendants was rooted in enticing participants with rosy prospects of exponential profits. By acquiring a minimum of 8 terabytes of cloud computing power, individuals could attain bronze membership status or higher, unlocking the ability to further recruit participants. Unsurprisingly, the magnitude of returns correlated directly with the size of investments and the recruitment spree — classic hallmarks of a pyramid scheme.The prosecution contends that the defendants exploited these platforms as bait for participants, perpetuating the myth of high returns. This alleged deception led to substantial financial losses for many unsuspecting victims. Furthermore, these actions purportedly sowed discord and upheaval in both economic and social spheres, potentially transgressing criminal law boundaries.As the investigation into this convoluted case unfurls, its implications resonate far beyond China’s territorial confines. The intertwining of cryptocurrency, blockchain, and pyramid schemes punctuates the ever-evolving narrative of financial crime. The case highlights the importance of vigilance and regulatory scrutiny in an innovative industry that has more than its fair share of bad actors.