SK Telecom and Polygon Labs Team Up for Web3 Ecosystem Development

While Russia had previously ruled out adding Bitcoin to its national reserves, the latest soundings from officials within the world’s largest country call for the creation of a crypto fund to hold and manage confiscated cryptocurrencies. According to a report published by Russian state-owned news agency TASS, Evgeny Masharov, a member of the Civic Chamber of the Russian Federation, has put forward a proposal for the formation of a special fund that would hold and manage cryptocurrencies that had been confiscated as the proceeds of crime by the Russian authorities.Photo by Artem Beliaikin on UnsplashMasharov told TASS: "Cryptocurrency confiscated in criminal proceedings should work for the benefit of the state. For these purposes, a special fund can be created, on the balance sheet of which these cryptocurrencies would be located, the capitalization of which will significantly increase over time.” In the future, Masharov proposes that the funds could eventually be used for educational, social and environmental projects. Enabling asset confiscationMasharov supported moves to define digital assets as property within the realm of criminal procedure legislation previously. Since 2021, legislation has been proposed to lay out a properly defined framework to enable the confiscation of such assets in criminal cases. As of last month, Russia’s Supreme Court is currently working towards establishing this. The Civic Chamber official expressed his willingness to discuss his proposal with other stakeholders such as crypto industry representatives and officials from Russia’s Federal Taxation Service. If this proposal was to be implemented, it would match a position taken in the U.S. with regard to a Bitcoin reserve. Earlier this month, U.S. President Donald Trump signed an executive order creating a strategic Bitcoin reserve which will be funded mainly by confiscated Bitcoin. Central bank resistanceRussia’s central bank has been largely opposed to the use of cryptocurrencies within Russia in recent years. Last December, central bank governor Elvira Nabiullina stated that the bank had no plans to invest in cryptocurrencies. Earlier that month, Anton Tkachev, a member of Russia’s State Duma, had put forward a proposal to establish a national Bitcoin reserve. With the onset of sanctions as a consequence of the conflict in Ukraine, the Russian government has softened its position with regard to cryptocurrencies. Digital assets such as Bitcoin are now seen as a mechanism to enable cross-border trade and cross-border payments, circumventing the international banking system. It was reported last year that Russia’s central bank had changed course and with that, it was leading efforts to assist Russian companies to use cryptocurrency for international trade, bypassing Western sanctions. Earlier this month, Reuters reported that Russian oil firms are now using leading cryptocurrencies such as Bitcoin, Ethereum and Tether in oil trade deals with their counterparts in China and India. In another development earlier this month, it emerged that the central bank is now allowing a limited level of crypto investment by investors. Faced with sanctions and current geopolitical realities, it’s understood that Russia had been considering the use of Bitcoin for reserve purposes, but for the time being, it has opted to concentrate on adding gold and the Chinese yuan to its sovereign wealth fund. 

As cryptocurrencies increasingly position themselves as a recognized asset class and potential hedge against fiat inflation, illicit activity tied to digital tokens is becoming more visible. A recent high-profile case in the UK has brought this issue into sharp focus, centering on a fraud scheme originating in China. According to BBC News, the case involves Qian Zhimin, a woman who raised funds from more than 100,000 investors in China by claiming to operate a crypto mining company that also develops health products. Instead, she laundered the proceeds and fled the country. On Nov. 11, Qian was sentenced to 11 years and eight months in prison by a UK court.Photo by Vasilis Chatzopoulos on Unsplash$6B fraud and lavish lifestyle​Qian entered Britain on a forged passport in September 2017 and proceeded to live an extravagant lifestyle, renting a mansion in Hampstead for over £17,000 ($22,700) per month. She was arrested in northern England in April 2024, and it was found that she held roughly 61,000 Bitcoin, valued at roughly £5 billion ($6.6 billion), having converted portions of her holdings to cover her substantial living expenses. ​The sheer scale of her wealth was revealed after police searched her rented residence, discovering the Bitcoin reserves on hard drives and laptops. It marks the largest crypto seizure ever recorded in the UK. During the raid, officers also found four other individuals at the property illegally employed to handle household tasks such as shopping, cleaning, and security. ​Since Qian’s arrival in the UK, the value of her Bitcoin holdings has appreciated more than 20-fold. With the fraudster now sentenced, victims are seeing a glimmer of hope for restitution. A civil case scheduled for early next year will determine the fate of the seized assets. However, while many defrauded Chinese investors are reportedly preparing to file claims, establishing a clear paper trail may prove difficult. Many victims routed funds through local intermediaries rather than transferring them directly to Qian’s firm. ​U.S. Bitcoin forfeiture and Beijing’s allegationsWhile the UK courts grapple with the aftermath of Qian’s fraud, a separate crypto controversy is brewing between the U.S. and China, highlighting Beijing's continued vigilance over the sector despite its 2021 ban on trading and mining. According to Cointelegraph, the state-supported National Computer Virus Emergency Response Center (CVERC) has alleged that American authorities are connected to the disappearance of roughly 127,000 Bitcoin, valued at around $14.5 billion, from the LuBian mining pool. ​These allegations surfaced after the U.S. filed a civil forfeiture claim in October against Chen Zhi, the Cambodia-based founder of the Prince Group, who is believed to have owned the assets prior to the breach. At the time of the filing, the U.S. Treasury Department noted that the funds were already under its control. ​CVERC contends that Washington hasn't explained how it accessed the assets. Citing data from analytics firm Arkham, the Chinese agency suggested the funds had been under U.S. control for over a year. They argued that the prolonged inactivity of the Bitcoin before the formal seizure is inconsistent with the typical behavior of hackers seeking quick profit, implying state-level involvement. Economic chess between Washington and BeijingThis matter of Bitcoin control adds a new layer of complexity to U.S.–China relations, even as a trade truce between the two countries took effect on Nov. 10. In a report by CNBC, Washington cut tariffs on China’s fentanyl-linked imports to 10% and extended a reciprocal rate reduction under that agreement. In exchange, Beijing is said to have eased certain restrictions on rare earth exports. Analysts at Morgan Stanley suggest that China is maintaining its export-control regime, implemented in April, to retain strategic leverage. They caution that recurring negotiations and strategic divergence will remain defining features of the evolving bilateral relationship. 

Shapella Upgrade to Have limited Impact on ETH’s Selling PressureThe Shapella upgrade on the Ethereum network scheduled to take place on Wednesday will only have a limited impact on the selling pressure on ETH, according to a report by the research center at Korean cryptocurrency exchange Korbit.©Pexels/JievaniShapella upgradeOne of the key features of the Shapella upgrade is to allow withdrawal of staked ETH. This upgrade follows September’s Merge upgrade that switched the Ethereum network’s consensus algorithm from Proof of Work to Proof of Stake, significantly reducing electricity consumption.Impact on selling pressureTo predict the impact of the Shapella upgrade on the selling pressure on ETH, the analysts at Korbit Research calculated the amount of time it takes for all the ETH staked as of March 22 to be withdrawn. They believe this calculation is relevant because withdrawals of staked ETH could trigger bulk sales, potentially imposing a greater selling pressure on ETH.According to the findings, the daily sell volume for the first three days is expected to be 300,700 ETH, 0.254% of the circulating supply. This volume will gradually decrease to 43,000 ETH for the next six months and to 29,000 ETH for the following six months, each corresponding to 0.035% and 0.024% of the circulating supply, respectively.All in all, bulk selling of ETH is not likely, considering it will take about a year and five months for all the staked ETH to be withdrawn and that the amount of withdrawable ETH will stay relatively low for each period. Furthermore, since this analysis assumes an extreme case, the market will be able to effectively handle the volume over the six month to 18 month period.4 other reasonsIn addition, Korbit Research outlined four other aspects that limit the selling pressure on ETH.Firstly, there is some concern that the selling volume of ETH may increase due to unstaking resulting from the cessation of staking services at American crypto exchange Kraken. However, a decrease in the number of validators on the Ethereum network will raise the base reward. This may prompt those who unstaked ETH to stake them on other platforms, rather than selling them.Second, ETH locked up at liquidity staking protocols such as Lido Finance and Rocket Pool provide liquidity for representations of staked ETH. These platforms allow users to stake fewer than 32 ETH for rewards. According to a February Binance Research report, 57.7% of ETH stakers enjoy liquidity and rewards. Therefore, there may be a limited impetus to divest of staked ETH.Third, since only 41.1% of ETH stakers are seeing profits as of the time of writing the report, the remaining stakers would have to risk losses when withdrawing ETH. This suggests that those not yet seeing profits are more likely to keep ETH staked. Furthermore, Dune Analytics data shows that most of the ETH stakers with gains staked ETH when its price was relatively low, which indicates that they participated in staking in early days. Shivam Sharma, the author of the aforementioned Binance report, states that these ETH stakers are likely “some of the strongest Ethereum believers.”Lastly, despite the Shapella upgrade, ETH withdrawals at different staking pools may not be initiated immediately. This could limit the circulation of withdrawable ETH, which in turn would hinder the selling pressure on ETH.Macroeconomic factorsThe Korbit researchers concluded their paper with a note that the selling pressure on ETH will be more influenced by macroeconomic factors than technical factors. They added that a possible downturn in the overall economy and corrections in risky asset markets might lead investors to sell ETH.