Singapore Takes Lead in Regulating Stablecoins

NVT Ratio Signals Overvalued BTCThe network value to transaction (NVT) ratio of Bitcoin, which has been staying at a high level since the beginning of the year, has signaled its overvaluation, according to Yonhap Infomax.However, some argue that this will not necessarily lead to a crypto winter, considering that the nature of Bitcoin as an asset has changed and there is no sign of overheating in other indicators.©Pexels/PixabayPrice and NVT ratio correlationYonhap Infomax found out that the correlation between the NVT ratio and the price of Bitcoin over the past six years is -0.35. A value of 1 represents a completely positive correlation, while a value of -1 represents a completely negative correlation.Extending this period to 2010 makes the correlation close to 0, but during the early years, NVT ratios showed high volatility, shooting up to four digits. Such a high volatility doesn’t suggest much correlation. Until 2021, there was a high correlation of up to -0.44.The NVT ratio is calculated by dividing the market cap by the transacted volume. Conceptually, it is similar to the price-to-earnings ratio for the stock market.In 2017, when the crypto market was bullish, the average Bitcoin NVT ratio was 7.3. This number became 8.7 in 2021 when the market experienced a similar pattern. In retrospect, single-digit NVT ratios usually hint at bullish markets.This year so far, Bitcoin has been relatively overvalued, given that the average NVT ratio is 23.6.BTC price recoveryWhen the crypto market sentiment lost its confidence due to the FTX bankruptcy last year, the price of Bitcoin went down to $15,000. It later recovered to the near $30,000 level. The Bitcoin price once had reached an all-time high in 2021, surpassing $65,000.The years that manifested similar patterns as this year were 2018 and 2019. In those years, the Bitcoin NVT ratio plateaued around 20.Uncertain outlookThe NVT ratio itself could point to a possible crypto winter, but researchers say it’s hard to say.Jang Kyung-pil, a research analyst at crypto data platform Xangle, said that people now consider Bitcoin as a store of value rather than a means of transactions, pointing out that BTC’s market value to realized value (MVRV) ratio has hit the bottom at 0.84 and now reached 1.4. According to Jang, MVRV values under 1 indicate undervaluation and those above 3 indicate overvaluation.Jung Seok-moon, head of the research center at crypto exchange Korbit, said that the current NVT ratio signals BTC overvaluation. He added that the Fed is likely to turn dovish in its monetary policy, which would prompt a strong BTC uptrend.

K-Pop NFT Platform MetaBeat’s Token Listed on UniSwap v3MetaBeat, a non-fungible token (NFT) platform based in Seoul and catering to K-pop fans, announced that its BEAT token is listed on Uniswap v3, one of the most popular decentralized cryptocurrency exchanges.©Pexels/Josh SorensonBEAT/USDC on UniswapBy introducing the BEAT/USDC liquidity pool on Uniswap v3, MetaBeat aims to increase the popularity of its BEAT tokens.MetaBeat ecosystemThe MetaBeat ecosystem enables music fans to contribute to their community with social media activities. Contributions from fans, along with their artists’ performances, are taken into account when determining the FANomance Index, which is then utilized to appropriately reward fans.Fans can support their favorite artists in three distinct ways: Drops, Mingle, and Shout Out.DropsWithin the MetaBeat platform, Drops indicate NFT sales. MetaBeat creates and sells community NFTs backed by music intellectual property (IP), allowing fans to own or stake them for value sharing. The IP value depends on music consumption, such as album sales and streams.MingleMetaBeat users can stake tokens on an open Mingle, backed by music IP, and obtain rewards based on the Mingle’s FANomance Index.Shout OutThe Shout Out program incentivizes fans who upload their artist-related posts on social media and verify their activities on MetaBeat.KuCoinMeanwhile, it is also worth noting that the BEAT token is tradable on a centralized exchange. In November last year, the global centralized exchange KuCoin began supporting the trading pair of BEAT/USDT.

A Chinese creditor of failed crypto exchange FTX has filed an objection on his own behalf and that of 300 others, with a U.S. bankruptcy court against a motion lodged with a view towards excluding payouts to creditors resident in China, Russia and 47 other foreign jurisdictions.Photo by Mariia Shalabaieva on UnsplashPotential distribution forfeitureThe FTX Recovery Trust, an entity formed in January to oversee the FTX bankruptcy estate following the adoption of a plan of reorganization, filed a motion last week seeking the approval of the Delaware Bankruptcy Court in the United States to adhere to new parameters related to the claims of creditors residing in restricted overseas jurisdictions. Besides China and Russia, the list of restricted jurisdictions also includes many within the Asian region, including  Afghanistan, Iran, Iraq, Macau, Myanmar (Burma), Nepal, North Korea, Pakistan, Qatar, Bangladesh and Cambodia. The FTX estate claims that these jurisdictions have regulations and laws restricting cryptocurrency transactions. In such cases, the FTX Recovery Trust claims that it cannot break local laws.  The difficulty for creditors resident in these countries is that if it's deemed illegal to reimburse them, they won’t qualify for the next scheduled distribution from the estate. In that instance, distribution forfeiture will be triggered. Taking to X on July 7, FTXcreditor.com, an entity that has been buying up bankruptcy claims from FTX creditors over the course of the FTX bankruptcy process, highlighted the peril that creditors residing in these restricted countries may face. It stated: “Distribution forfeiture is triggered at every distribution record date. The first record date already passed, if your claim is still tied to a local KYC when the stamp drops, that tranche is potentially gone.” Short timeframe for objectionsMr. Purple, a pseudonymous distressed assets bankruptcy professional who has been advocating for FTX creditors since the collapse of the business in November 2022, concurred with this view in a subsequent post on X. He pointed out that an extremely short timeframe has been given to affected creditors to respond. The motion was filed on July 2 and objections are due by July 15. $500 million in claims are at stake which accounts for 5% of all creditor claims. Of this, 82% of these claims belong to Chinese creditors. In a series of follow-up posts, the bankruptcy professional describes several procedural issues that he believes will result in it being incredibly difficult for affected creditors to have their funds reimbursed.Mr. Purple concludes:”The incentives are designed to be extremely risk averse in finding [a legal opinion] that paying creditors is legal! [The estate’s lawyers will] take the fees and say its not legal.” In his court filing, the Chinese creditor, who is resident in Singapore, stated: “My family holds four KYC-verified accounts with aggregate claims exceeding $15 million USD.” . . . “We have fully complied with every procedural requirement under the Plan. The proposed motion now jeopardizes our right to distribution in an arbitrary and inequitable manner.” On X, he asserted that the FTX Recovery Trust’s motion “constitutes an impermissible and material modification of the Plan.” Aside from legal action, the only other potential solution for creditors residing in restricted countries is to sell their claims. However, claims buyers are pricing in greater risk with lower rates and less favorable terms.