Dubai Tempts AI and Web3 Enterprises With Subsidized Commercial Licenses

Polymesh’s APAC Digital Asset Regulation Report Highlights ChallengesThe project team behind Polymesh, an institutional-grade permissioned blockchain built specifically for regulated assets, released a report on digital asset regulation within the Asia Pacific (APAC) region on Tuesday, highlighting several challenges that regulators are attempting to overcome.In a press release, the company outlined that the report covers recent regulatory developments in South Korea, Singapore, Hong Kong, and the broader APAC region.Photo by Jéan Béller on UnsplashProgressive regulatory effortsRegulators within the APAC region are currently striving to introduce legislation for digital assets, while several centers within the region are vying to establish themselves as hubs for digital asset-related business.The report explores the individual efforts of regulators in various APAC nations as they work towards crafting regulatory frameworks tailored to their jurisdictions. Those efforts encompass implementation, investigation, and enforcement of legislation in a borderless industry.Regulators in South Korea, Singapore, and Hong Kong have all embarked on formulating rules for emerging asset categories, albeit using different terminologies such as “digital assets,” “digital payment tokens,” and “virtual assets.” Their focus lies in striking a balance between consumer protection, market integrity, and industry development.Additionally, all three regulators adhere to the principle of “same activity, same regulations, same risks” when it comes to tokenized securities. They argue that regulatory requirements do not significantly differ solely because a security is in tokenized form. Each state has been actively engaged in local and global activities surrounding security tokens, including state involvement in the advancement of security token technology and cross-border transactions.Main findingsThe report’s main findings emphasize that while regulators in the APAC region are making strides in introducing digital asset legislation, the road ahead will not be without challenges.Legislating a cross-border industry poses difficulties that necessitate harmonization to foster a robust and interconnected ecosystem. Digital assets originating in Asia can be traded globally and vice versa. Merely identifying the asset’s place of origin is no longer sufficient.Although the report delves into the efforts of individual regulators, it emphasizes the need for long-term collaboration to establish a unified vision and practical implementation of regulations for this borderless phenomenon.Regulatory challengesThe regulatory challenges faced by South Korea, Singapore, and Hong Kong in driving the growth of digital assets in the APAC region are multifaceted. They include the intricacies of legislating an inherently cross-border industry. In turn, that can lead to the potential violation of legislation from other jurisdictions.The lack of harmonization among different jurisdictions, and variations in regulatory approaches among the three regulators are likely to be problematic. Furthermore, there are push-pull dynamics between the industry and regulators, with even the regulators themselves not always in agreement.However, despite these challenges, all three regulators have initiated the formulation of rules for new asset categories, with a strong emphasis on safeguarding consumer interests, maintaining market integrity, and fostering industry development.

At the end of last month, social derivatives trading platform ZKX, a protocol that runs on the Ethereum-centric Starknet layer-2 network, shut down blindsiding the project’s stakeholders. That event has led to Singapore-headquartered digital assets firm Amber Group speaking out, calling for cryptocurrency projects to be more accountable and transparent going forward. Not economically viableNews of the project shutdown emerged when ZKX founder Eduard Jubany Tur took to X on July 30 to outline the discontinuation of the protocol. Tur claimed that the project was “unable to find an economically viable path for the protocol.” In a long-form post, the ZKX founder outlined that user engagement had been minimal, resulting in disappointing trading volumes. By extension, Tur claimed that revenues didn’t come anywhere close to covering cloud server expenses. “The market is undervaluing the work done and infrastructure built by appchains and dApps coming from ecosystems like ours,” Tur added. Pseudonymous blockchain sleuth ZachXBT had a different take on the matter, claiming that the shutdown represented a rug pull. Amber Group chimed in on the subject on X on Aug. 3. Amber suggested that it wouldn’t break any contractual non-disclosure obligations it had with regard to ZKX but that aside, the firm took the opportunity to share its perspective more broadly in an effort to promote transparency.Photo by Markus Spiske on PexelsAmber Group criticismAmber Group criticized the ZKX team on the basis of a lack of transparency. It stated: “The last update we received was on July 30, when the project announced the cessation of operations. This decision was made without prior communication, highlighting the importance of transparency in our industry.” Staying with that theme, it claimed that clear communication and transparency are essential for fostering trust and collaboration within the crypto community, and that such principles would guide future projects. Amber Group had acted as a market maker relative to the ZKX project. It borrowed and purchased ZKX tokens in support of the launch of the token and in an effort to support token liquidity post-launch. It had secured two million ZKX tokens from the open market, with its overall holding totaling three million ZKX tokens. Project investor HashKey Capital also took to the X social media platform on the subject. Like Amber Group it too criticized the ZKX project for its lack of accountability and transparency. It described the project’s reluctance to communicate as “disappointing,” while it asserted that Tur’s handling of the situation had been “regrettable.” Ye Su, founding partner at ArkStream Capital, expressed a similar complaint, stating on X that “when ZKX shut down, as investors, we got zero heads-up.” He also singled out Tur, claiming that “Edward took the money from early supporters without any communication, showing no moral standards and losing his right to future entrepreneurship in the industry.”

Hong Kong Broadens Pilot Program for China’s Digital YuanA senior Hong Kong official announced last week that the Chinese autonomous territory plans to expand its pilot program of the e-CNY, China’s digital yuan, to include additional banks and payment platforms.Photo by Chi Lok TSANG on UnsplashDriving cross-border payment efficiencyThe e-CNY project is China’s ambitious endeavor to bring a digital counterpart to its national currency, the yuan, into mass market, everyday use. The primary objectives of this latest initiative are to enhance the efficiency and convenience of cross-border payments and to bolster greater use of the digital yuan on an international basis.Given Hong Kong’s status as a special administrative region of China and bearing in mind that it is a global financial hub, its role in the e-CNY project is likely to be of paramount importance to the Chinese administration.Hong Kong has been actively involved in the e-CNY project for some time. Previously, the local regulator, the Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA), and the People’s Bank of China (PBOC) jointly explored and tested e-CNY’s feasibility and interoperability in cross-border scenarios.Ongoing collaborationOver the years, these two authorities have conducted numerous technical trials to assess the practicality of implementing the e-CNY. The PBOC initiated e-CNY testing in mainland cities in 2019, followed by cross-border trials involving Hong Kong and Macau. Collaboration between Hong Kong and the mainland relative to the digital yuan was initiated in December 2020 when a pilot program was launched.That program enabled Hong Kong residents to utilize e-CNY wallets for purchases at specified merchants in Shenzhen, aligning at the same time with a separate initiative, the objective of which is to achieve closer economic and social integration between Hong Kong, Macau, and nine cities in Guangdong province.Hong Kong and Mainland China had also partnered on technical testing in 2021 aimed at evaluating the technical feasibility, operational efficiency, regulatory implications, and legal considerations of employing the e-CNY for cross-border trade settlement between the two areas. That testing program is likely to be providing valuable insights, which Chinese authorities can use to expand the e-CNY’s scope and use cases relative to cross-border transactions.Completion of initial testing phaseHong Kong recently successfully concluded the first phase of its e-CNY trial, featuring local banks and the Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA). This phase primarily focused on assessing the technical feasibility of employing the e-CNY for cross-border payments between Hong Kong residents and mainland merchants.What Christopher Hui, Secretary for Hong Kong’s Financial Services and the Treasury, was referring to last week at a fintech event, is effectively the second phase of that overall trial program. This upcoming phase will involve a broader array of banks, payment service providers, and use cases, expanding the scope of e-CNY testing.Taking this latest development into account from the point of view of e-CNY development by the Chinese government, it’s patently obvious from the myriad of initiatives that keep coming week after week that the Chinese authorities are determined to drive the e-CNY towards ever greater real-world use.